[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 2.21 MB, 1270x793, tattoos.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14781121 No.14781121 [Reply] [Original]

We actually had an in depth and interesting thread regarding the wearing of tattoos in relation to fashion and the psychology behind them. Old thread has the bump limit reached.

Continuation of thread for those interested.

Previous thread:

>>14769878

>> No.14781128

>>14781121
>in depth and interesting thread
No, you just screeched a lot.

>> No.14781140

>>14781128
Stop creating drama and being a troll, stick to the subject matter.

Fashion can have a relation to mental illness and it's very interesting.

For instance, a Schizoid personality type (not a Schizophrenic) can display traits of spending a lot of time alone, avoiding social situations and wearing eccentric items of fashion such as mismatched clothing. It could sum up some of the people here.

Outliers of society in IQ often have some form of mental instability but this also can make them a genius and be very creative which is how some fashion designers could be and are and why some of them are very awkward in person.

>> No.14781199

Basically was just an anon being a /fa/scist cause he was cucked by a BPD girl before.

vs.

A naive anon unwillingly feeding the trolls.

>> No.14781206

>>14781199
Low IQ and metal instability right here. You are literally saying any talk of genetics and DNA is now fascist and a taboo subject,. You ant the removal and destruction of science. What on earth was "fascist" about my posts?

Next time you need a blood transfusion and they ask for your blood type, call them a fascist and see how well it goes.

>> No.14781224

>>14781206

"Im a big brain anon, I use big words, therefore im big IQ and youre low IQ"

>> No.14781233

>>14781206
Youre the kind of person to take figurative speech literally, right?

>> No.14781240

>>14781224
Not a refute.

>>14781233
No, that was spoken in the literal sense; that poster, possibly, you really does believe once is a fascist at the very mention of science.

You have to question who even conditioned you to that point of thinking that any science, genes, genetics and so on are somehow fascist inventions. It's very crazy indeed.

Perhaps the more crazy part is that lots of Jews are doctors and believe in the very science you believe to be fascist in origin.

>> No.14781245

>>14781206
Jesus, I'll bet you love the sound of your own voice huh? You really had to make another one of these? There wasnt much of a "discussion" really had, more you telling anyone that disagreed with you they were low IQ, reiterating the same points over and over, and squabbling about proving proof through studies or what have you. We get it man, you know how to put together sentences in a way that makes you sound smart. Can you stop stroking your own cock about it already? I don't even necessarily disagree with your points but, fuck me, you're so pretentious it hurts.

>> No.14781267

>>14781245
No it was people such as yourself moaning who couldn't face a truth because it was somehow negative or impacted you.

A question was asked in relation to tattoos and I proved the data and evidence.

If you have/had a counter argument to this then I would listen to you but when you don't and just post some gibberish nonsense then how else am I to look upon you other than someone with low IQ?

I appreciate that you agree with the points raised, I am not attempting to be pretentious, it's just frustrating to me and even saddening that when a question is asked and an answer is provided if it is not positive people just throw out slurs.

We can't live in a world that is always positive because that is simply not reality and these people are going to struggle though life thinking it is reality. I believe in the truth, be that good or bad. Truth does not distinguish between the two.

>> No.14781306

>>14781140
Dunning-kruger effect, you possess severe retardation

>> No.14781343

>>14781306
That is you because you think you sound like an intellectual by knowing that word. Just like every other teenage online knows it You are not special. My IQ is 144 and while I am not a genius, I at least understand basic science which you fail to do so.

>> No.14781404

>>14781343

You forgot to say "Bazinga"

>> No.14781434

>>14781121
WARNING COLOURATION

>> No.14781443

People who have issues with tattoos also have issues with body agency.

>> No.14781462

>>14781306
Unfortunately the dunning kruger effect applies heavily to testing and not very heavily to pretty much everything else in life.
>>14781343
For somebody with 144 IQ your syntax is terrible and you lack basic understading of English rules.
If I may ask, why do you think it's necessary to say
>You are not special
Also I'd just like to point out
>Outliers of society in IQ often have some form of mental instability
You're an outlier by your own admittance so I'm interested as to why you say "mental instability" and not "mental illness"

>> No.14781585
File: 127 KB, 526x960, 75ED824A-2860-49BC-9E49-0306772DE51F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14781585

>>14781121
I figured it out bro’s. People will identify in anything. Pic related decided to identify their ego into tattoo. It’s a sub personality (assaglioli) same way some people identify in feelings, objects, function (like work), their house, their role as a victim. They hold onto these identifications b/ it validates some embedded fear they have about the world. Identifying in your tattoos seems kind of like depersonalization, they don’t believe they’re pretty so they try and ignore it by taking self expression too far.

>> No.14781610

why are people so concerned with other peoples bodies?

>> No.14781627

>>14781121
Like it or not, small and easily hidden tattoos are the epitome of beta males and neurotic sluts. The only respectable tattoos are massive, and impossible to hide, with the god tier of tattoos being facial tattoos. A man with a facial tattoo is destined for greatness or destruction, this is a fact. He stands out, and cannot hide. By giving up his relative anonymity among crowds and peers, he sends the message that he is unafraid of accepting judgement, and Is confident enough to stand out. If you're afraid of marking yourself in a place where you cannot hide, you are a coward.

>> No.14781670
File: 765 KB, 1800x1292, IQ_of_144.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14781670

Woman with BPD are not human.

They are hell, and ony reproduction machines who should stay in kitchen, instead of manipulating poor caps like me.

My IQ is as big as my dick. 144! You cant handle that, I cant handle that, no one can handle that 144 milimeters.

Also metric system sucks, this is america. Leftys can go suck the clinton.

Tatooed utter creatures are high on Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis, caused by inhalation of their snowflake dust and very low on Pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism, my IQ is big, I SWEAR!!

Fedoras and neck-beards are the ultimate trends, and tattoos are nasty and Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious unless theyre swastikas or orange-face.

If you need me i'll be in /trash/ posting rainbow pony clop porn.

>> No.14781737

Thread reminder: anthropology is a joke field and the "professor" cannot get published.

>> No.14781746
File: 212 KB, 1800x1578, 1486963888863.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14781746

>>14781627
>>14781585
shut up samefag

>> No.14781768

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIyt5pEcE_g

>> No.14781844

>>14781443
Do you understand the difference between reasoning to why people do something and issues with their actions? You only have an A to B thought process, a black and white. Nothing in between. Low IQ.

>>14781462
You are grasping and being pedantic. I am writing my messages as simple as possible to help people understand and the fact that you don't understand that really says something.

>If I may ask

You may not.

>You're an outlier by your own admittance

No I am not, I would say at least 150 or so IQ to be genius and have some mental instability to pair that with to really be at the top level of genius.

>interested as to why you say "mental instability" and not "mental illness"

Really I use the terms interchangeably as one seems to hurt the sensitive people less than the other. People do not want to hear illness.

>>14781610
Another person who did not even understand the threads. Low IQ.

>>14781627
Mental illness detected.

>confident enough to stand out.

People who are crazy and smear themselves with shit while walking down the street are "confident" to do that and can not hide but it's a sign of mental illness much like tattoos and attention seeking for having painfully low self esteem and confidence so more forms of mental instability.

Nor would a psychopath suffer anxiety from such things and attention.

>>14781670
Starts bringing up nazi imagery and Donald Trump? For what reasons? Left wing extremist who can't enter a debate without turning to politics. Textbook "useful idiot" of socialism. Very low IQ.

>>14781737
An ad hom does not refute any points raised here. Why did you think it would? Inability to form coherent arguments to refute a point and resorts to simply attacking the person because they have no counter arguments. Low IQ.

>>14781768
Gravity isn't a fact either, if you don't know where I am going with this you might want to take a psych test. You are unstable.

>> No.14781863

My tattoos aren't bad, but I got them when I was very impressionable and thought it would make me cool. I wish I had none now, and there's no guarantee that expensive laser removal would effectively remove them. Thankfully, they are easily hidden and non-offensive.

>> No.14781871

>>14781863
Thanks for being honest. See that is different and I can understand that. Very different from a 35 year old woman getting a big rose across her neck.

>> No.14781898

>>14781121
Even in the modern world tattoos still will still arent good for your first impression image. I have a lot of tattoos but they are easily covered by wearing long sleeve shirts and slacks. When I started working with the corporate team I always wore clothes that made me appear as a clean cut professional young man. On a casual off the clock encounter I wore shorts and a tshirt and a lot of my peers told me to my face I look like a derelict. So keep that in mind if you ever want to be taken seriously in the professional world

>> No.14781911

>>14781898
Yeah because tattoos indicate bad life choices and mental instability and normal people can sense that. Imagine you are 70 and have had a robbery in your home. You call the police and a 25 year old girl turns up with tattoos all across her face. people know right away she has mental issues.

You might be OK though as at least you seem to understand that.

>> No.14782033

>>14781844
Inability to be a published and contributing author in futile "science". Turbo low IQ

>> No.14782042

i would never get a tat for the simple reason you can never get rid of it

>> No.14782068

>>14782042
laser removal has come a long way dude

>> No.14782129
File: 427 KB, 436x668, lilnigga.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14782129

Just admit you are wrong and give this whole thing up. Tattoos have nothing to do with mental illness. If it does, then you being an incel on this site has something to do with mental illness you fag.

>> No.14782155

anon needs to get laid

>> No.14782157

>>14782155
*op

>> No.14782171

>>14781844
>I am writing my messages as simple as possible to help people understand
The problem with "simple as possible" is that it's a cop-out.
Your syntax is out of wack. Simplicity shouldn't equate to poor writing.
>I would say at least 150
It's 160 to be considered genius.
>One seems to hurt the sensitive people less than the othe
It's interesting to me that you've picked up on this too.
What do you think the root cause for that pathology is?

>> No.14782303

Idk man I'm pretty mentally stable and I am covered in tattoos

>> No.14782306

>>14782303
>pretty mentally stable
>browses 4chan

uuuuh ...

>> No.14782318

>>14782306
4chan's just social media now
relax

>> No.14782339

>>14782033
I find it fascinating and enjoy teaching. You're probably a burger flipper at best and I don't scold you for that but because you have no direction or enjoy what you're doing.

Maybe you should google Professor of Anthropology salary and see how futile it is.

>>14782042
That's because you are mentally stable. Those that are not don't think in a stable way.

>>14782129
Greta homophobia there. You are a troll with zero counter arguments. Take your meds and meet a girl you angry incel.

>>14782157
Married with 2 children but thank you for your concern. Low IQ.

>>14782171
What you are talking about has very little to do with overall IQ and you are just creating some pedantic strawman now. Address my arguments and refute them.

>It's 160 to be considered genius

Which is something you just googled as that's the standard answer. Hence I said "I would say" meaning in my opinion anything over 150 goes into the realms of genius but it's not as simple as that as other factors have to be at play.

I think I am waiting for a counter argument or you could have a normal functioning brain and address what the data says and come to the logical conclusion that yes, on average those with tattoos have a higher mental instability rate than those who don't have tattoos.

>> No.14782347

>>14782303
Here is a real shocker for you. Most mentally unstable people are not aware that they are mentally unstable. I've explained countless times I am not talking about totally crazy but small gene mutations. It's not a guarantee you have mental instability but there is a higher chance of it.

>> No.14782363

>>14782339
>Address my arguments and refute them.
What?
You made no arguments.
We covered every key point in our few messages.
>waiting for a counter argument or you could have a normal functioning brain
You've become pointless to engage with.
Keep your temper in check.

>> No.14782364

>>14782339
>Maybe you should google Professor of Anthropology salary and see how futile it is.
Hahaha, keep telling yourself that. Imagine believing you're not just a glorified stand-in for a textbook students can't be bothered to read.

>> No.14782393

>>14782363
You can't even follow a basic thread. Not 1 of the studies has been refuted or the data. Low IQ.

>>14782364
If someone learned to avoid a mentally unstable person with facial tattoos by learning in these threads then I made a real difference and that's all I really care about.

>> No.14782403

>>14782393
I clicked because I had some fun in the last thread, flicked to the bottom, saw you sspwerging out and thought I'd give winding you up a go.
>>14782393
If you think avoiding people with tattoos is making a "real difference" I think you need help.
>hoo hert ewe

>> No.14782411

>>14782393
>by learning in these threads
If you think anyone in these threads is actually listening to you, then you're proving your low IQ.

>> No.14782414

>>14782403
Yeah because of boredom. You resorted to trolling. Get a hobby, read a book!

>If you think avoiding people with tattoos is making a "real difference"

Some guy could avoid dating a girl with full facial tattoos who could seriously mess his life up or even worse end up with him dead. The likely hood is she has mental instability and that could be a dangerous personality disorder.

Yes, that is really making a difference.

>> No.14782421

>>14782411
They are. Just because they are not vocal about it and reply does not mean they are and that thought process is in the realms of low IQ. The majority of people here don't have a face full of tattoos and are mentally stable.

Their main issue is that they are young and have been conditioned that any negative speak towards someone is judgement and therefore bad and wrong.

It's the whole facts over feelings argument and as a scientist, I do not partake in that, only truth and reality.

>> No.14782439

>>14782414
Better response than I expected I'll be honest.
I've been reading The Gold Bug recently. Just curious how do you find Lovecrafts writing in comparison to Poe?
I can assume you've read both?
>Some guy
Why do you gender specifics? Statistically a fully tattooed male will kill tenfold a fully tattooed female.
I don't even need to provide stats, you know that's the truth.
What's your daughters name by the way?

>> No.14782465

>>14782439
>I can assume you've read both

I haven't, not really my area.

I am more about Political ponerology, Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us, The Sociopath Next Door, I Hate You - Don't Leave Me: Understanding the Borderline Personality.

>Why do you gender specifics? Statistically a fully tattooed male will kill tenfold a fully tattooed female

Because I am sure the majority of posters here are male. Most of those male killings wont be slow manipulation and deceit like a borderline girl though. Some of those guys will also kill for the borderline girl after she has manipulated them heavily.

Plus borderlines are much more likely to be females.

>What's your daughters name by the way?

Irrelevant.

>> No.14782480

>>14782465
>I haven't, not really my area.
I'm surprised you admitted to that. Not reading the classics is considered a huge problem in most intellectual circles but I get the feeling you don't really need to read them.
>Slow manipulation and deceit like a borderline girl though
Ex wife or highschool sweetheart?

>> No.14782500

>>14781121
I'd like to read what others anons say about the topic of all-over tattooed bodies going mainstream, but it's impossible with the schizo boomer blogger speaking to himself every two posts

>> No.14782501
File: 8 KB, 211x239, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14782501

>that girl with tattoos all over her face is just as likely to be mentally stable as anyone else

This is what happens when you take "Don't judge" to be all ten of your commandments: you lose all powers of observation and discernment and walk around blind and retarded.

>> No.14782504
File: 7 KB, 172x225, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14782504

>>14782500
Fuck off I'm speaking to him >:(

>> No.14782506

>>14782500
What do you mean by "going mainstream?" Do you believe that normal people see it as normal now?

>> No.14782514

>>14782480
If people need to pretend to read books they believe intelligent people are supposed to just to brag and feel a part of the group then I'd say they probably have mental instability. In those circles I would just say what I love I have for the Marquis de Sade and his writings. Which I in a way do because he was completely mad.

>Ex wife or highschool sweetheart?

Neither. I met my wife in 2005 while still in study. I have friends in Psychiatry which is why I have had a lot of contact with borderlines, with their approval of course. I've also met men in therapy because of dating a borderline.

It's just another subject that I find fascinating and shocking how these people to us are seen as human and how they function (somewhat) in society as human but they are like animals in which their instinct just overrides everything and with a borderline it's their emotions. It boils down to what makes us human or even if someone was in a brain dead state would they still be human? I truly believe the borderline does not have the normal mental functioning abilities to truly be defined as human.

What's even worse still is that some people here think it would be "cute" to date one.

>> No.14782526

>>14782514
Jesus christ, I've had my fun but you're actually much more sick than I initally guessed.
Sorry man I gotta cut the fun here, It's been great talking to you and all but I'm seriously worrired that I'll say the wrong thing and you'll crack and hurt somebody and I'll be indirectly responsible.
Goodluck next life man, and thanks for your time, you've been extremely helpful.

>> No.14782530

>>14782500
Sure talk about that. It would never go mainstream though because everyone would have to be mentally unstable which they are not so by that alone it is an impossibility for it to go mainstream.

>>14782501
Absolutely. Same with people who have their arms and legs all cut up with self harm and then you are told you can't judge them by looking at them.

I am sure some person with "pussy nigga" wrote across their forehead and a giant unicorns penis across their neck is totally mentally stable.

How people actually believe that is just pretty crazy in itself. We shouldn't even need studies but when we do, they still fail to listen to the studies and what has been learned.

>> No.14782533

>>14782526
I have no criminal record. You just don't understand about mental illness and how serious it can be. Borderline is the least week known among the normal population and people always think it;s just some little disorder when they are people that are on the very edge (borderline) of being insane.

>> No.14782538

>>14782533
mhmm
goodluck with that man

>> No.14782546

>>14782533
I'm sorry /fa/
I fucked up and now it wont go away.
Can I report myself?

>> No.14782555

Op is a faggot

>> No.14782556
File: 154 KB, 640x564, stable.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14782556

No mental instability here...

>> No.14782562

>>14782556
This particular guy got tattooes in order to become (somewhat) famous rapper, and it worked. It's literally part of his job at this point.

>> No.14782582

>>14782562
If that was so he wouldn't have been arrested for drugs, guns and so on. If he wasn't a rapper he would be a criminal because he has mental health problems.

Oh and finally, sane people wouldn't do that just to become a rapper. He hasn't made that much money either.

>> No.14782595

>>14782421
>Their main issue is that they are young and have been conditioned that any negative speak towards someone is judgement and therefore bad and wrong.

People will always be bitchy and judgemental - it'll never go away. Just nowadays, with the internet and the like, its internalised. Kids are "conditioned" to just not get caught

>> No.14782612

>>14782595
Yeah true you can't change human nature as much as you try and force it.

It's like this girl

https://www.instagram.com/millykeepsgoing/

Has tattoos, bright colored hair, teaches her 4 year old child men have periods and takes photos of him posing next to her partners penis.

People will say I can't judge her and say she might be mentally unstable, she is likely to be just as stable as everyone else. I can judge her though from that and it does turn out that she does have mental health issues, self harm and BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER.

>> No.14782625

>>14781121
oh god has this guy actually been going at this since thursday?

>> No.14782635

>>14782612
No one cares about your ad hoc justifications pulled from your ass

It seriously stinks, stfu

>> No.14782639

>>14782635
Refute me or pipe down like a good child when adults are conversing.

>> No.14782645

>>14782635
We're TOTALLY not going to let this nerd sit at our table.

>> No.14782648

>>14782639
actually I hope you keep doing this enough that moralfags are too embarrassed to shit up tattoo threads with stupid arguing in the future

>> No.14782707

>>14781199
Chicks with a lot of tatoos are crazy but fun, just like pitbulls, they will chew your face off and give you a hard time if you are not experienced
If you are a little bitch or want to start a family/normal, meaningful relationship, get a golden retriever type bitch you gay pussy

>> No.14782710

>>14781610
Relax, its /fa/, people with tattoos and or beards trigger them alot somehow

>> No.14782712

>>14782582
>Oh and finally, sane people wouldn't do that just to become a rapper
This is how entertainment goes, sanity has nothing to do with it. Standing out isn't a choice, but a requirement. Good deal of tattoo and bodmod pioneers were circus performers, who did it not because they didn't feel comfortable in their skin, btu because full-body tattoos brough the crowd and made money.

>> No.14782742

>>14782639
Please for the love of god just stop responding to this turbo faggot. I don't care what your opinion is on the matter, I would rather hear it from anyone else but him. I'm sure his wife is bound to drink a bleach martini any day now, bless her infinite patience.

>> No.14782746

>>14781206
Recent MRIs have found multiple deformities of my brain which should, by all accounts, have left me severely cognitively impaired (learning disabilities, hydrocephalus, etc.) alongside a complete lack of formal education throughout my entire childhood.
My IQ was ~124 at the time of testing a few years ago.

>ur the real retardo

>> No.14782781 [DELETED] 

>>14782742
>i would rather hear things from people not versed or involved in the studies and an authority on the matter

You'd rather listen to uneducated people? If you are sick do you go to the swimming pool in stead of the hospital?

Not even low IQ this time, just idiotic. Some poor village out there is missing its idiot. We better give them an call and let them know we found you.

>>14782746
What is even your point? It just proves IQ is largely genetic just like mutated genes are that cause people to get tattoos.

You are basically saying circumstance and environment have nothing to do with it but genetics do.

>> No.14782785

>>14782742
>i would rather hear things from people not versed or involved in the studies and an authority on the matter

You'd rather listen to uneducated people? If you are sick do you go to the swimming pool instead of the hospital?

Not even low IQ this time, just idiotic. Some poor village out there is missing its idiot. We better give them a call and let them know we found you.

>>14782746
What is even your point? It just proves IQ is largely genetic just like mutated genes are that cause people to get tattoos.

You are basically saying circumstance and environment have nothing to do with it but genetics do. Exactly.

>> No.14782786

>>14782746
>take it from me, a literal retard
lol

>> No.14782797

>>14782746
You can't be that smart because you don't appear to understand what mental illness and/or personality disorders are. Someone with a brain injury is not mentally ill. Someone with brain cancer is not mentally ill. Nor is a learning disability a mental illness.

Your IQ is 24, not 124.

>> No.14782800

>>14782639
“Refute me” = uhhhhduuuu read the studies

I can do the same thing, watch:

Uhhhhh dude read assagliolis theory on sub personalities uhhhhhduuuuuuddddeeeee

>> No.14782805

>>14782800
make an argument, dude. all you're doing is having a tantrum.

>> No.14782813

>>14782800
It's Assagioli and it's not the same field, nor is that a refute to current studies on research.

It's also factual on all studies about people with tattoos having a higher than average level of mental instability, it's not theory; the only theory is the gene mutation linked to the industrial revolution and welfare state.

You have low IQ.

>> No.14782826

hilarious to see these plebbit/fa/gs getting this triggered when the academic anon is presenting academic research on the congruent relation beetween mental illness and tattooing.

That one anon who starts all sentences with "imagine" also is pure comedy.

Or the classic go back to /pol/
>dont like an opinion
>must be from pol
being this fucking dense

>> No.14782833

>>14782805
I already tried arguing w this guy, he always resorts to “read the studies” when he feels cornered
>>14782813
The claim that people tattoos show higher mental instability than people without isn’t very controversial. You just keep saying shit about BPD and borderline and nazi trannies afterward as a bizarre spectacle of theory crafting

You don’t have any way of explaining your results other than this vague sensibility toward mental illness. I offered psychological theory which is abundantly relevant to what you’re talking about. Calling it a category error is narcissism

>> No.14782835

>>14782826
maybe people hate /pol/ not even because of its most socially condemned and fringe views but because the "/pol/ mindset" is to want to debate with others to get to the truth or closer to the truth?
on /fa/ in particular you see lots of high school girl attempts to shut debate down rather than making arguments, not just in this tattoo thread but even when someone is just refusing to accept they have shit taste.

>> No.14782840

>>14782785
You're an "authority"? Which is why you're spending your time arguing about this on a Mongolian basket weaving forum? Kek
Get real man. You're just an opinionated asshole with a big mouth. Go back to grading papers or not satisfying you wife's sexual needs, whatever it is you do. And yeah, it would be refreshing to hear someone else's point of view on it. We've heard yours already, and everyone thinks you're ever so smart. Youre a big brainy boy and everyone else is just low IQ, so why don't you fuck off somewhere else if it's all so below you?

>> No.14782844

>>14782833
Well please re-state your arguments and hold him to them for the sake of my enjoyment of your debate.

>> No.14782879

>>14782339
It seems as if you are the angry one taking on all these anons and fuming about your "big brain." I doubt you could reproduce let alone marry. You're a fuckin know-it-all cringe lord lmao.

>> No.14782900

>>14782844
I’m going to emphasize the undefined learning process as I’m not an old bastard convinced of themselves. But your claim about tattoos is not altogether very interesting, your background beliefs are not convincing but rather kind of sickening, and they seemed to have been knocked apart in the other thread.

Whether or not you decide to talk past what people say is a matter of not enough critical thinking. It is certainly for the sake of emotional and economic security that you should remain where you are epistemically. I wish you the most tremendous luck and good fortune in your future pursuits.

>> No.14782949

>>14782900
You didn't make any arguments in this post, bro. These are condemnations and not even good criticisms because they're non-specific things someone can't really respond to properly, right?
That gives me the impression you can't actually beat him and just want to maintain the feeling that you have.
People that have genuine confidence in their view tend to say specific things that can be falsified or responded to so you give off an impression of weakness here even though you may well be correct and him wrong.

>> No.14782961

>>14782949
No ones beaten anything. I meant what I said

And anything can be falsified if you can claim any observation at all that would discredit your theory otherwise. The testability addendum only counts when their is a measure of commensurability such as one scientific theory entailing another

>> No.14782970

>>14782961
I don't even know what your argument actually is. Maybe you stated it very clearly in the other thread or somewhere in this one but you're not doing a good job of persuading me, some cunt in the audience.
And you keep making posts with no arguments while I ask for them so that is persuading me to side with him.

>> No.14782971

>>14782582
all rappers deal with guns and drugs, no matter how popular they are. that's part of the whole rap scene. What the fuck are you on about? Lol

>> No.14782990

Also it’s not very often that I get to lash out against my nit picking professors that take points off for figurative language and I just could wait for end of semester evaluations to lambast one guy for turning the classroom into an adversarial system and the other for pretty much grading viewpoints that agree with his own and for making a class that has nothing to do with theology totally theology-laden for about 30-40% of our course content. He broke me from my prison of idealism however and I am grateful for that.

>> No.14782989

>>14782971
I think what they're saying is like... Would you respect someone that spends literally their whole pay check on lottery tickets?
Probably not. You might think they're fucked in the head if they keep doing that instead of buying food and paying the rent, right?
Well that person can say to you:
>here's a guy that one the lottery and now he's rich so i'm not crazy nor stupid for spending all my money for tickets.
There's lots of rich celebrities that are fucking nuts, it's only good fortune that separates them from being homeless people and their fortune isn't proof of them being sane.

>> No.14782993

>>14782970
I don’t need an argument to knock down another

>> No.14782999

>>14782990
It sounds like you have some pretty classic narcissistic fantasies. I have those too because I believe I am high in trait narcissism.

>> No.14783007

>>14782993
How do you define knocking down another? You can't physically lay into him here so wouldn't knocking him down be either persuading him to see that he is wrong or persuading the audience to see that his wrong?
If you're just pleasing yourself then what are you really doing...
You're publicly masturbating on No Nut November.

>> No.14783038

>>14783007
When you refute another persons assumptions/arguments as self-referentially incoherent is the classic philosophical answer
>>14782999
Yeah with what the other anon said I definitely do this in the vague belief that I might be helping something by spreading or educating about science and stuff to make myself feel better. If it makes y’all feel better I’m really into femdom

>> No.14783131

>>14781121
Fashion in general, and tattoos in particular don't exist in a vacuum. Suits used to be everyday clothes 100 years ago, now they're a work uniform. Same applies to tattoos, they're not nearly as life-changing as some might think. It all depends on how the society will accept you.
Your argument would fly 50 years ago, and it still holds some water now, but the trend is steadily moving from "you need to be -this_ crazy to get your face tattoed" to just having it as another accessory, along with earrings and jewelry. People used to get tattoos to prove a point, now they just do it because they can.
>>14782506
>Do you believe that normal people see it as normal now?
They always did. I've spoken to hundreds of people during my lifetime, overwhelming majority of people with no tattooes didn't mind them on others and actually would love to get one, if not to it being 1) painful, 2) expe
nsive), 3)limiting your work opportunities. All these three factors are steadily becoming more user-friendly now.

>> No.14783200

im going to have full tattoos one day. but im more into the japanese yakuza suit style where i could cover them all with a dress shirt and some slacks. it gives me options to be as conservative as any situation might require. because in any situations there are right ways and wrong ways to present oneself. its simply the way of the world

>> No.14783674

>>14783200
It's easy enough to do. What our "clever" friend doesn't realise that day to day absolutely nobody sees my work, and would never in a million years guess I was absolutely covered.
It's quite enjoyable, I hope to one day see a tirade of attacks against something a person dislikes (dressed up as something academic) in person without them having any notion that I'm one of those very things.

>> No.14783678

>>14782612
But you're taking a small minority of people (ie Instagrammers) as justification for your claims. They're will also be plenty of heavily tattooed people who are intelligent and can have an educated discourse. Also, investigating further, the periods thing describes trans "men", which, if they do have their original organs, still will have periods. I dunno. She has issues but she also teaching her son general acceptance of different people. Might be a weird way to go about it but its better than claiming its OK to judge people solely on looks.

Where do you stand on racism, then? Surely it's justifiable to avoid and discriminate against black Americans based on statistics?

>> No.14783684

>>14782339
>Married with 2 children
Unironically: OKAY BOOMER
Now fuck off from this website full of late teens and go make a better life for your children instead of posting here about other women, pathethic

>> No.14783686

>>14783131
The person I was responding to there said all-over so what I was asking was
>do you believe that normal people see tattoos on someone's face as normal now?

>>14783038
So if I just say
>u r incoherent
I fucking win? Thanks very much, will use this to devastating effect in the future.

>> No.14783689

>>14782500
I dont see it as going mainstream, just the stigma is going away in the west
My hands are pretty tattooed up, and a couple of boomers told me that they wanted something like this, but that the times were different when they weere young etc
Actual old people (70+) think im a criminal tho

>> No.14783691

>>14782500
>>14783689
As a follow up, I think tattoos got gentrified

>> No.14783853

>>14782970
>I don't even know what your argument actually is.

Haha because he does not have one. You see how I post in an easy to understand way because I am not stupid enough to assume everyone would understand deep scientific ways and I back up what I say with studies and only ask for people to give some counter argument as to why the studies might be incorrect.

That person just uses big words because he thinks it will highlight him as intelligent when it does the absolute opposite and shows how hard he is trying to mask his low IQ.

Scientific people don't talk to the general population using fancy words so people think they are sooo smart, that's what edgy teens do with low-self esteem who want to fake being clever.

The outcome is nobody understands what he is even posting because in reality, neither does he. It's just a complete forced mess of pseudo intellectualism.

>>14782971
The fact Will Smith exists proves your argument false. Next question.

>>14782989
Yeah there are no doubt countless amounts of people who covered themselves in tattoos to play up the whole rap thing and will never see nay kid of success. I would say that's a little mentally unstable that you would do mall that just on the tiny percentage you get famous.

The rapper in question "stitches" has a long history of being basically a fuck up and bad choices, even if some of his past is fake he overcompensates for low self esteem, another hallmark of mental instability.

Who would said... hey look at that guy, his full body has tattoos, he has been busted for carrying guns, he is a drug user.. that's totally fine though because it's just the image of rap. he's just as normal as the rest of us.

Should I slice my body up and burn myself and then claim I am just a deeply tortured artist?

>>14782990
Another non-argument. Obviously mad at his own teachers so projecting his hate on to others that he dare not upon them. Coward.

>> No.14783864

>>14783131
While I agree it is easier to get tattoos today and more mainstream culture and an accessory, that still doe snot change the fact that in studies of people with tattoos and those without, the ones with tattoos rate higher for mental instability.

Why is that?

I can only come to the conclusion then that those that get tattoos, despite how mainstream they might be are still on average more mental unstable than those that have none.

Also, it's a real possibility that tattoos became mainstream culturenow because of the mutated genes that had been passed on. In the 50's tattoos existed but never became mainstream because of less mutated genes and less mental instability.

The rise of tattoos being mainstream connects to the rise in mental instability in certain groups which happen to be the groups highest in tattoo usage.

Why are depression and mental illness rates rising and rising? The same way tattoo usage has. Why do immigrants born in the West who grew up in the same circumstances have much less use of tattoos? If the theory is correct, it's because they have less mutated genes.

I hope this was clear, and it;s good someone can ask a real question and have a real opinion. All of the above though, I am yet to see 1 single refute.

>>14783200
If you want to get Japanese gang signs that are frowned upon in that culture and are some white guy from the West and you think that's a good idea, how are you not proving the point you are a little mentally unstable?

>>14783674
>absolutely nobody sees my work, and would never in a million years guess I was absolutely covered.

Typical mentally ill argument. I can't see visually someone is a serial killer or a psychopath but that doe snot change the fact that they are. "It's not mental illness if they don't know about it." - Guy who dresses as a WW2 soldier to buy some bread at the store and has a 20 inch horse dildo.

Go away.

>> No.14783874

>>14783678
>But you're taking a small minority of people (ie Instagrammers) as justification for your claims.

You mean people that have untold millions and millions of youth followers? That's some small minority...

>They're will also be plenty of heavily tattooed people who are intelligent and can have an educated discourse.

This thread has not shown that. The people with tattoos here have been the most mentally unstable.

> Also, investigating further, the periods thing describes trans "men", which, if they do have their original organs, still will have periods.

So you basically agree with her!! YOU ARE MENTALLY UNSTABLE.

men do not have periods ffs. A woman dressed as a man and calling herself a man when she has a period has a period as a biological female whatever she chooses to call herself.

Even if you wish to embrace yourself in this insanity, it's not for a 4 year old to be taught. Most children get taught the basics at 10 or 11. You think it;s fine to teach a 4 year old about trans male periods? Child abuse, the kid is going to have some many mental issues not formed by genetics but by childhood abuse.

>Where do you stand on racism, then? Surely it's justifiable to avoid and discriminate against black Americans based on statistics?

No it's not OK to discriminate say if a black guy comes into your store and you want to ban him. If you are walking home at 11pm alone and 5 black youths are heading your way it's fine to avoid them because that'as how humans work, they have learned behavior based on facts. There is a high chance they will attack you and that's not racism, it's the fault of the blacks themselves for having such shockingly bad crime statistics.

If you think 5 Chinese youths are just as likely to attack you then you don't live in reality. You are putting your left wing ideology before truth in, the same way how girls travel to the Middle East because "we are all human etc." and end up dead.

>> No.14783881

>>14781898
Why on earth wouldn't you keep them covered in a professional environment? Unless you have jobstoppers then you can have a fucking bodysuit and no one need know. It's literally not a concern, because if you're not a retard then you already know the above.

>> No.14783884

>>14783689
>I dont see it as going mainstream, just the stigma is going away in the west

That really depends on where you are. The rise of Islam in the West means the stigma will grow and you are likely to be attacked in future. Which is justice really that people with tattoos are usually the whole open borders type who welcome this and ultimately it will lead to them being stigmatized for it.

I am very conservative, probably evident from my posts and I have lots of discussions with Muslims, while I feel Muslims are victims if Islam and it's not a good ideology, most of our other views go along fine and then definitely feel how I do regarding tattoos.

Religious people are ultra conservative and against tattoos yet Western white people with tattoos think only older people over 70 have an issue. It's a totally lack of education and reality again. Hence mental instability.

>> No.14783893

>>14783864
I'd rate you pretty low on agreeableness. Must be a low IQ thing. Aren't Anthropologists supposed to have some level of cultural understanding?

>> No.14783895

>>14783874
>So you basically agree with her!! YOU ARE MENTALLY UNSTABLE.
Putting words into my mouth isnt an argument. I havent said I agree with them or her at all.

>No it's not OK to discriminate say if a black guy comes into your store and you want to ban him.
Why? Hes more likely to commit a crime so why shouldn't I ban him or deny him chances of employment?

>it's the fault of the blacks themselves for having such shockingly bad crime statistics.
So you're still advocating racism. Wonder how your "employers" would feel about your racism..

>> No.14783900

>>14781267
you are insufferable bro

>> No.14783913

>>14783893
No, I am not going to have "cultural understanding" of putting a 20 inch horse penis inside your anus. Stop pushing your Marxist Cultural relativism upon me, some cultures are better than others and your culture of having sex with animals should be destroyed.

It's not even as though you keep that to your private life, yiu force it upon others and proudly display it for all to see. You care little if everyone in your personal life knows you have sex with a 20 inch rubber horse penis. Not mentally ill at all...

>>14783895
You made that argument why it was OK for her to do that. You never said it was shocking what she was doing. You justified it by saying it's OK to teach 4 year olds that men have perioids to stop them judging others. Seriously, What.

>Why? Hes more likely to commit a crime so why shouldn't I ban him or deny him chances of employment?

Because he hasn't done so, and most crimes will be late at night by gangs of blacks so in that case it's perfectly natural for the survival of the species to avoid them. People who ignore all of this data and real world evidence to out themselves in danger have low IQ and mental instability.

If I told you ice was cold and all the facts and evidence said so, would you say no that's "ice-discrimination" or something, putting your ideology (which only feeble minded people are drawn into) before reality. That's what your type are like.

>So you're still advocating racism. Wonder how your "employers" would feel about your racism..

Goes straight to the race card as expected, goes straight to threats. You are a clone. A zombie. A typical online Marxist activist. My whole work consists of racial studies and genetics. The fact that wasn't evident further highlights you as an idiot with very low IQ.

You are trying to tell some 80 year old white man it's fine to walk around a Detroit neighborhood at 11pm or else he is racist. You disgust me.

>> No.14783956

>>14783913
Why are you trying so hard to prove how smart you are? We've already established that if you had anything important to say you wouldn't be saying it to a faceless mass of hentai hoarding cumbrains. Calling other people low IQ doesn't make you sound any smarter. Actually, you've said it so much that it doesn't have any meaning at all. It just shows that for some reason you're desperate for people to think you're intelligent and you're willing to pull out all the stops, use your entire vocabulary, and be as hostile as possible to make that happen. If we're actually talking about mental disorders you strike me as someone who very likely has some form of megalomania, and who likely suffers from some sort of delusions- I'm guessing they probably range from those of grandeur when you're on a high like you are now, to paranoid delusions thinking that everyone is mocking you. Your long drawn out soliloquies reek with so much entitlement that it makes it hard to feel sorry for you, however. You have nothing to prove to us, man. Don't be ashamed to reach out to your loved ones if you need help. As insufferable as you are I'm sure there are probably plenty of people who care for you and want you to seek treatment, I'll bet it would bring you closer together and you'd feel better about it as well.

>> No.14783958

>>14783913
If you're quite finished fixating on anal beastiality and me, I was talking about your lack of understanding of tattoos.

>> No.14783963

>>14783956
Ok retard

>> No.14783967

>>14783956
I'm not, I am talking in a very simple way and listed the proof in very simple ways. The fact you think I am not just highlights your low IQ.

>>14783958
>I was talking about your lack of understanding of tattoos.

Mental insatiability and the data shows that. Prove it wrong.

It does not help that the guy with the most tattoos here is also the one with the highest mental instability and engages in dangerous practices now does it?

You are hardly a shining example of someone with tattoos.

>> No.14783970

>>14783963
It's okay to feel upset and to deny these things at first, thats a pretty typical reaction, but once you accept it and admit it to yourself you don't have to be angry anymore. You can let go. Good luck.

>> No.14783972

>>14783970
All your posts are just nonsensical filler. You have zero arguments or refutes. You are a robot.

>> No.14783977

>>14783972
That's just your god complex talking. I suggest you do some self reflection and try to come to peace with this. It can't have been the first time you've heard it as I'm sure youve felt this level of self importance your whole life.

>> No.14783980

>>14783977
>continues with nonsensical filler and projection

Very low IQ.

>> No.14783997

>>14783980
I'm sorry to say that none of what I've written is nonsensical. I know that you know that, anon. As you've said in other posts- "I've written it in very simple words." Just because you don't want to agree doesn't make it less true and all of your behavior and manner of speaking puts it quite obviously on display. I'm genuinely concerned for you if this is how you go about things in your day to day life. Be honest, you don't really have a wife, do you? I'd wager you don't have many close people at all,but it's only because you put them away from you with your actions. I hope you come to understand that you don't need everyone to think you're smart in order to have value. Just the same as saying everyone around you is low IQ doesn't make you as smart as you wish to be. Seek help my friend.

>> No.14784013

>>14783997
>continues the exact same pattern of posting and expecting a different reply

You are mentally unstable. Low IQ plus mental instability makes you a dangerous and easily manipulated individual. I suggest that you seek some help.

>> No.14784027

>>14784013
I know that it's tempting to pull an uno reverse card and point the finger when you feel you've been called out, but it only further proves my point. The suggestion that I am mentally unstable is also interesting to me because I've shown no behaviors that would suggest it, ultimately devaluing your definition of "mental instability". It seems that you say words just to hear them in your voice, which is another trait common of those who suffer from the disorder that I'm increasingly convinced that you have. Of course I am not a doctor. You might want to do some research on this and have a talk with your loved ones. Speculating about my IQ won't change any of this. You can't run from yourself, and aren't you tired of running?

>> No.14784050

>>14783913
>My whole work consists of racial studies and genetics.
If your "work" held anything of substance, you'd be published. Last time I checked, you're not. You're self-published. You're entire work rests on the same level as momcore erotica.

You're a deluded mongoloid. Continuing coping. Continue regurgitating the work of more the accomplished. Terminally low IQ.

>> No.14784057

>>14784050
Lmao fuckin wrecked

>> No.14784087

>>14784027
Attempting to sound even more so intellectual by talking about some card game. Oh dear me. You are not on the borderline of insanity no, but you have a low tone of mental instability. Some many people do but they can't understand that or accept it. We know there is a terribly high rate of mental illness in society but everyone thinks they are mentally stable.

At not one point have you offered any counter argument to the studies pout forward, at this point I am not only thinking you have mental instability but criminally low IQ.

>>14784050
So works only counts if someone agrees to publish it? So if someone produced one page of mixed up words and a publisher said they would publish it, it now has merit?

Can someone only be considered a journalist if they have a job within the media?

Is a musician only valid if they get a record contract?

You are borderline retarded on the UQ scale. You need another persons validation no matter who they are to think something has worth and value. Most authors were poor in their time and great works only famous after the authors death of non-published works. My validation of worth isn't by a publisher, it's by the people who purchase and read my books and overall it is very positive.

My work is also taboo and at the same time due to the increasing rate of mental instability and low IQ people in society with short attention spans, my scientific work only appears to a tiny percent of educated people. Then again, those are the ones that really count.

>>14784057
Only bullies have to join in the group because they can't stand on their own. You have no backbone and are looking for an internet stranger for validate and to stand with them because you know you can't fight your own battles. Pretty pathetic and it explains your posts.

>> No.14784125

>>14784087
There's those delusions of grandeur I was talking about. Nobody is trying to sound intellectual here but you my friend. Im merely concerned for your well-being as you further prove me correct in my earlier assumptions. I'm not here trying to argue with you, and so you won't find me trying to refute your points. I'm telling you that I think you need serious mental help from a professional. Get off of this website, it's not a healthy place to be for people who aren't sound of mind.

>> No.14784136

>>14784125
I relax here while doing research. Hope to educate a few while whilst I am at it. Go find a hobby, kid. Maybe talk to a girl.

>> No.14784156

>>14783864
>In the 50's tattoos existed but never became mainstream because of less mutated genes and less mental instability.
>The rise of tattoos being mainstream connects to the rise in mental instability in certain groups which happen to be the groups highest in tattoo usage.
>Why are depression and mental illness rates rising and rising? The same way tattoo usage has
It's just an observation that X and Y happen to rise in numbers along with each other. You still fail to draw a conclusion that they're directly related to each other. It's like saying that owning an Iphone X is a mental illness, because in the 50s there were zero Iphones X and much less mentally unstable people.

> Why do immigrants born in the West who grew up in the same circumstances have much less use of tattoos?
Because they're raised in a culture that stygmatizes tattoos, and they don't escape that culture once they emigrate from their country of origin, as they tend to move around in groups and stick together at all times. Also their mental state is a very questionable matter, with the amount of shit they keep getting involved.
Riddle me this. The countries with the highest suicide rates, the most notable ones being Russia and South Korea, are known for being unacceptive of tattoos. Are we supposed to assume that not having facial tatoos makes you more prone to kill yourself? Because this is the sort of point you're trying to make all along.

>> No.14784237
File: 118 KB, 1280x720, 1551071009512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14784237

>>14784027
>The suggestion that I am mentally unstable is also interesting to me because I've shown no behaviors that would suggest it
There's a living 4chan legend called ACK, and you act and speak EXACTLY like him, down to this post >>14782993 being a word-to-word quote of him. And just like him, you prove that a person can be somewhat smart, skilled at discussion, yet comically pathetic at the same time. This is exactly why this discussion keeps going for two threads and shows no signs of stopping.

>> No.14784240

>>14784136
Minimizing the words of others, acting or speaking in a way that seeks to put people beneath you while pompously trying to raise yourself up. You realize that all of your behaviors align directly with what I have been telling you, yes?

>> No.14784275

>>14784087
>My work is also taboo
Yeah, I thought you'd whip out how you're a maverick and that no one gets you. Guess what, you're not.

>My validation of worth isn't by a publisher, it's by the people who purchase and read my books and overall it is very positive.
Yeah, your fedora echo chamber on YT surely are an audience to bank your claim on.

>relax here while doing research
Why bother? It's evident none of your work has anything of value.

Disgustingly low and embarrassing IQ.

>> No.14784282

>>14784136
>whilst doing research
what are you researching?

>> No.14784310

>>14784282
You know this cocky fuck is a dark academia fag. He's researching the effect of tucking in your sweater on the girls in his class that he is teaching/sexually extorting for higher grades.

>> No.14784313

>>14784156
>It's just an observation that X and Y happen to rise in numbers along with each other.

No it's not an observation because if we follow that theory, mental illness would have risen in all the population but it's higher in those that have tattoos.

You would then have to conclude following your logic that people with tattoos have a higher rate of mental instability than those without is simply a coincidence.

If I said people wearing caps has risen alongside mental illness and came to the conclusion wearing caps means mental illness, that would be wrong and I believe that is what you mean by mental illness and tattoo use rising. I would then test cap wearers and non-cap wearers and I assume I would find there is no difference in mental illness rates.

If there was and cap users had a higher mental illness rate, I would ask the question as to why that could be? If I then found out the cap wearers were actually people who lived in the area of some nuclear leak, then that was the cause of why they have a higher rate of mental illness.

Now with tattoos wearers, they do rate higher than those without. Also the biggest group are those who would have had their genes affected by great change such as the industrial revolution and welfare state.

I hope you understand my caps/nuclear power peal and tattoos wearers/welfare state analogy.

>It's like saying that owning an Iphone X is a mental illness, because in the 50s there were zero Iphones

Totally nonsensical argument I am afraid as tattoos existed in both time periods while those phones did not.

>> No.14784316

>>14784313
And the rest...

>Because they're raised in a culture that stygmatizes tattoos, and they don't escape that culture once they emigrate from their country of origin

Let me explain it another way. At far left protests which immigrants do not stigmatize, in fact those protesters welcome immigrants, you will still see the people being 99% white there because those whites have mutated genes as they get involved in extreme ideologies only the mentally unstable would while the immigrants do not as they have healthy genes.

You'll see this all the time at open border protests which should be filled with immigrants because it benefits them but they are still 99% white because even immigrants with healthy genes understand open borders would effective them negatively.

>Riddle me this. The countries with the highest suicide rates

Totally different environments. I have always made it clear I am talking about the West. If tattoos in those cultures were normalized and a lot of people have them, you can bet that those with tattoos would have a higher suicide rate overall.

Even those with tattoos in those cultures, if you had the data of mental illness and compared it per capita I can also bet the tattoos users would rate higher on mental instability.

>Are we supposed to assume that not having facial tatoos makes you more prone to kill yourself?

This is skewed logic and in no way related to the studies I have presented.

That's like saying if they don't eat bananas in a country and have a high suicide rate, is not eating banana's making you more prone to kill yourself. It's a bit absurd and 100% different to what we have been dating. Sorry you don't understand that.

For your argument to make sense, people with tattoos would have to have a higher non-suicide rate.

Just like how people in the West without tattoos have a lower mental instability rate and I guarantee a lower suicide rate.

>> No.14784317

>balding in late 20's

Really thinking about tattooing my head after I shave my hair off. Should i?

>> No.14784335

>>14784240
I am above the ignorant, mentally unstable and those with a low IQ.

>>14784275
People do get me though. I would recommend an IQ of around over 110. It's evident you fall below that.

You have totally ignored all the facts and evidence, have no counter argument and just resort to attacking me personally. Seems like you have nothing going for you but to spew anger and hatred online over scientific studies. That makes me believe you are mentally unstable.

If someone presented some scientific study when someone asked a question would you start raging at them and attacking them? You sound mental and projecting inner anger and bitterness of your own life situation which obviously is not very successful.

>>14784282
Many subjects and topics! You should see my works, there are many such subjects. People always ask questions, like the original thread here with why people get tattoos.

Those are intelligent people who ask why. Dull people don't nor ever question things. Perfect low IQ sheep.

>>14784310
It's a bloody fine clothing style, if I may say so my good man.

>> No.14784342

>>14784317
That wouldn't actually be mental instability, you'd be seeking a solution to a problem, so actually using a logical brain. I wouldn't do it though, get a hair system if you are that concerned. There is a guy on youtube called "stick on hair" who will show you how to apply one to yourself at a very low cost.

>> No.14784376

>>14784335
>would you start raging at them and attacking them? You sound mental and projecting inner anger and bitterness of your own life situation which obviously is not very successful.
Imagine spending two threads calling posters mentally ill and stupid and then getting butthurt when someone else hurts their feels.

>You should see my works, there are many such subjects.
>Please see my work.
>PLEASE.

>> No.14784406

>>14784376
If someone said, look at all this evidence and studies we have about people in the prison system. It shows they have a higher rate of mental illness than the general population.

Would you agree with their research or if you didn't explain why it was wrong?

Or would you just attack them over and over, fail to agree with them and fail to make any other argument. If you did that, you would be mentally unstable. There have been a lot of mentally unstable people here.

It boils down to people having tattoos here and they see it as a personal attack and because they are so sensitive to critique and have painfully low self-esteem, they can't face reality and go on the attack.

All that does it further prove that tattoo users do suffer from those issues and it has been displayed here and those issues are linked to mental instability.

The only other people here arguing who don't have tattoos are the useful idiots on the extreme left who believe in the mantra that the world can be all about holding hands, don't judge people, never say anything to hurt peoples feelings or that's hate and those type are equally as mentally unstable.

Those types are likely to be young and the posters here are young so it all adds up.

It will be rare to find someone 30 plus here with zero tattoos and an above average IQ and that is my main audience as that audience has always been the audience of science, logic and reason. Those are the people that run the world.

Some acne ridden teenager here with "be brave" tattooed across their wrist is really insignificant as a whole and that will remain so throughout their lives. You are privileged I am even talking to someone like you, some teenager in his room venting online. Nobody else of my status and standing would. Respect that.

>> No.14784414

>>14784313
>mental illness would have risen in all the population
It did, it's a known fact.
>but it's higher in those that have tattoos
>Now with tattoos wearers, they do rate higher than those without
Survivorship bias. People with excessive tattoos are a rather small group that is easier to sample than the rest of population. They also happen to populate areas with better mental healthcare. At least you specified that you're talking only about the West, otherwise good luck comparing the % of mentally ill untattooed Chinese to the mentally ill hypebeasts, which most definitely wouldn't turn in your favor anyway. You heavily rely on statistic in your argument, but statistics isn't your friend.
>I am afraid as tattoos existed in both time periods while those phones did not
Okay, let's replace Iphoneswith suits. Less people wear suits now than in the 50s, and the mental illness % has increased. Can we conclude from it that wearing suit and tie is benefitial to your mental state?

>> No.14784423

>>14784406
You're sick man. You need help.

>> No.14784446

>>14784414
>Survivorship bias. People with excessive tattoos are a rather small group that is easier to sample than the rest of population.

What? The studies take samples of people in the same culture, environment, welfare bracket and so on. They have 50 people without tattoos and 50 without, not just excessive tattoos. Then they find over and over the group with tattoos on average has a higher mental instability rate.

Explain this.

>They also happen to populate areas with better mental healthcare.

Provide the research and data for this. You can't state opinions or something you just made up which I feel you have. What I am speaking of has all that data and research. Furthermore, tattoos are mainly on the poor and working classes who absolutely do not have better mental healthcare.

>otherwise good luck comparing the % of mentally ill untattooed Chinese to the mentally ill hypebeasts

You are comparing different races with different pasts. I have made it clear my argument is about white people in the West who had their genes affected by the industrial revolution and the welfare state. The Chinese people argument is null and void as this does not apply.

You keep throwing out more variables into a somewhat simple argument that was made first. Nobody is explaining why it is but adding things non-related to the events in the West I mentioned as the cause of mental illness.

The Chinese might have had other events to cause gene mutations that led to mental instability. You are over complicating things because you have no counter argument to the original one.

>Okay, let's replace Iphoneswith suits. Less people wear suits now than in the 50s and the mental illness % has increased

NO because if that was the case people with tattoos and non tattooed would have the same rate of mental illness so clearly the difference is TATTOOS AND NOT SUITS.

Some of you are, I'm going to say it, fucking dense.

>> No.14784455

>>14784423
Insignificant teenager. If you had anything about you, you would start to learn yourself and pay interest in science and better yourself instead of trolling and watching porn online. Make your parents proud.

>> No.14784456

>>14784316
>At far left protests which immigrants do not stigmatize, in fact those protesters welcome immigrants, you will still see the people being 99% white
Why would migrants be there? There's essentially two groups:
1) the ones who successfully entered the country. They got what they wanted and don't care about open borders anymore.
2) the ones who didn't. They physically can't access open border rally, because they're not in this country yet.
>Totally different environments. I have always made it clear I am talking about the West
What we have on the table is that the culture which normalized tattoos is doing better than the ones that didn't. People with BPD are still more mentally sound than the people who kill themselves. Where did those healthy genes go?
>you can bet that those with tattoos would have a higher suicide rate overall
In fact it Russia it would be the opposite, because the violently tattooed people mostly populate richer regions, and most of suicide rates affect the rest of the country. Neither it would be in Korea, as the most toll falls upon the elders, who's very unlikely to be inspired by Lil Pump's image.
>That's like saying if they don't eat bananas in a country and have a high suicide rate, is not eating banana's making you more prone to kill yourself
That's like saying if they get face tats in a country and have a high mental illness rate, is getting face tattoo making you more prone to have mental illness. Oh wait. This is what you've been saying all along.

>> No.14784458

>>14784406
People in prison don't represent the general population.

>> No.14784479

>>14784456
>1) the ones who successfully entered the country. They got what they wanted and don't care about open borders anymore.

So why do natives who already live in the country? What population in the past wanted open borders for their nations? Who would let absolutely anyone into the nation and think that a good thing? Those mentally ill, that's who.

Immigrants have more of a reason to, to let more of their group in and everyone wants to be with their own group which is why they stay within their own groups.

But their healthy genes understand open borders would let everyone in and their way of life would go down or be destroyed.

>What we have on the table is that the culture which normalized tattoos is doing better than the ones that didn't.

It's doing better because of the outlier genius people that white cultures created, It has nothing to do with tattoos and that is now in decline now anyway as is Western culture which you could say coincides with the normalization of degenerate practices such as tattoos.

Which is really a consequence of mental instability and low IQ created by the industrial revolution and welfare state.

>People with BPD are still more mentally sound than the people who kill themselves

That's not true whatsoever. BPD is worse than bipolar and bouts of depression. Lots of BPD people do kill themselves.

>In fact it Russia
>Korea

etc. etc. These are not related to what we are talking about. Do you have autism? You can't keep attention to the topic we are talking about.

>That's like saying if they get face tats in a country and have a high mental illness rate

Seriously, WHAT. You are either autistic or low IQ. Your arguments are a complete mess and in your mind they probably sound well structured and intelligent. Classic sign of low IQ.

I have never said tattoos make you more prone to mental illness, tattoos are a symptom of mental illness. Why is this so hard. You are out of your depth. Please stop.

>> No.14784483
File: 240 KB, 1141x623, Measuring performance on the Healthcare Access and Quality Index for 195 countries.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14784483

>>14784446
>They have 50 people without tattoos and 50 without
50 people? Really?This is a laughably small sample. Any random strawpoll on 4chan has more participants. You can't possibly base any serious conclusions on it, if that's an actual amount and not some placeholder number you typed, you just destroyed your own argument for good.

>Provide the research and data for this
Start from pic related, sure you can google the rest yourself
>What I am speaking of has all that data and research
Which you're not readily providing whatsoever.

>You keep throwing out more variables into a somewhat simple argument that was made first
Because this is the argument i'm making, duh. You keep saying that West is affected by genetic mutations. I say that 1) there's no data to prove that even if it is the case, the West is affected any more than the rest of the planet, 2) there's readily visible political and social factors that burden one's mental state much deeper.

>> No.14784485

>>14784458
>the point i was making
>over your head

So if someone said that to you, you'd refute their argument with that as opposed to attacking them as a person.

Thanks for proving my point.
Painfully low IQ.

>> No.14784490

>>14784483
>50 people? Really?This is a laughably small sample.

Ignored. You are a borderline retard. That was an example to explain things in a simplified way how the studies work. There are numerous. You haven't even taken a look. Why are you debating me on studies you haven't even looked at? Absolutely retarded beyond belief. You are arguing for the sake of boredom and trolling. Good day, get a life (or hobby) too stupid for me.

>> No.14784495
File: 16 KB, 450x540, EJMgukGXkAMnzMN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14784495

>>14784485
People with tattoos are almost the general population. What will your point be then.

>> No.14784504

>>14784458
they're literally a subset of the general population
>a violent subset
agreed

>> No.14784511

>>14784483
THE STUDIES ARE WITH PEOPLE IN THE SAME SOCIAL, ECONOMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS, THEY ARE IDENTICAL AND YET PEOPLE WITH TATTOOS RATE HIGHER ON MENTAL INSTABILITY

It's like you think you are so smart we haven't thought of basic things. I must be talking to one of the most stupid people on the internet. Scientific testing takes into account all of these things as basic measure.

Watch the video. There is nothing more I can really say.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt0sa5u6ZIE

>> No.14784512

>>14784490
>if that's an actual amount and not some placeholder number you typed
>calls me a retard without finishing reading my post
This is why people don't take you seriously no matter how large your IQ is. Your ego is way too big for your own good and will be your downfall eventually.
>There are numerous. You haven't even taken a look
>What I am speaking of has all that data and research
>Which you're not readily providing whatsoever.
Too bad you gave up on reading, indeed.

>> No.14784518

>>14784511
You're the odd one out here, not people with tattoos. Do you realise that.

>> No.14784530

>>14784490
You're fucking pathetic. Completely fucked in the head. You're not better than anyone and you're not smart. GET HELP.

>> No.14784531

>>14784512
Because right away you proved you didn't even read any of the studies or understand them. Why should I read your posts when you clearly did not read mine?

The links are on the info here of the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt0sa5u6ZIE

>>14784518
A sane person in an asylum is the odd one out but they are still the sane one. You are the type of person who acts like an idiot among idiots just so you fit in when the end result will be everyone being an idiot rather than at least having 1 intelligent person.

Low IQ.

>> No.14784534

>>14784511
>THE STUDIES ARE WITH PEOPLE IN THE SAME SOCIAL, ECONOMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS, THEY ARE IDENTICAL AND YET PEOPLE WITH TATTOOS RATE HIGHER ON MENTAL INSTABILITY
Why are you screaming about something i didn't even doubt in my post?
>There is nothing more I can really say
You can post those studies. But it's apparently too difficult for a smart guy like you.

>> No.14784539

>>14784530
Low impulse control and prone to rages even online. Mental instability and low IQ right here.

>> No.14784542

>>14784531
>Because right away you proved you didn't even read any of the studies or understand them
Because you never posted them before. NOW that you did, i'll get back to you when i'm done with them.

>> No.14784544

>>14784534
For the third time. Just watch the video to make it easier and the links are in the description of the studies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt0sa5u6ZIE

>> No.14784547
File: 654 KB, 1080x1920, 1470276967829.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14784547

>> No.14784549

>>14784406
>some teenager in his room venting online.
Lol good assumption

>Nobody else of my status and standing would. Respect that.
Lmao what standing? You have literally done nothing in your laughable field of significance. You cannot even get a single book published by a respectable house. Youre an absolute failure and should be laughed at for it.

>> No.14784555

>>14783884
>thinking europe is an entire country and that islam stands a chance outside of ghettos of 4M+ european cities

You are a deranged american (unironic) boomer from the bible belt, probably a mormon or some other fundamentalist insane person that cant stand what other people are doing with their bodies so you waste hours of your days making these threads to feel better about your mediocrity and "sticking to the old ways"
I am not religious, my upbringing was never the conservative type and I was never around conservative people and do not intend to, and I cannot understand your fascinations with people that do not adhere to your worldview of a lifestyle
Why are americans always either insane trannies or insane whatever you are
But I admit I regret falling for your bait my dear sir

>> No.14784567

>>14784511
>>14784531
>>14784544
>The Mutant Says in His Heart, “There Is No God”: the Rejection of Collective Religiosity Centred Around the Worship of Moral Gods Is Associated with High Mutational Load' (Dutton, Madison, & Dunkel, 2017) set out to show that religious views outside the mainstream – disbelief in a god as well as belief in paranormal phenomena – result from genetic mutations that have allegedly occurred due to relaxation of natural selection for belief in a moral god that has occurred in these degenerate times we live in. The authors claim that atheism and paranormal belief are “deviations” associated with indicators of mutation load, including poor health, autism, fluctuating asymmetry, and left-handedness. However, this theorising is poorly thought out and largely unsupported by evidence
>one of the books in his video description is of a guy he publicly denounced a liar and assumed that all of his research work must be considered suspect.
Yep, we're off to a good start with this source of yours.

>> No.14784671

Hey guys, you know what we need?

Another one of these threads.

>> No.14784958

>>14784671
What you actually hate is novel threads. There's a range of worse posts than this one but you are habituated to them so you don't post this there.

>> No.14784984

>>14784958
If you think this entire thread was anything but a dumpster fire you're fucking dumb.

>> No.14784992

>>14784547

>powerlifter
>zero muscle

>> No.14784998

>>14784984
Oh, I never said that.

>> No.14785003

>>14784992
The story of this... Individual.. is particularly sad. He was Pauly Unstoppable in the beginning, before his body dysmorphia totally destroyed him and turned him into this thing. I remember reading a post he made about his new vagina getting infected and pussing, lamenting about how nobody wanted to fuck it and other things that make me gag to think about. I also remember a lot of other posts begging for money, etc. He used to be a really well known body piercer in the body mod community, but since I've been trying to distance myself from those people and deleted my social media I've lost track of them. I don't regret that.

>> No.14785007

>>14784998
I actually really would be interested to hear what people say if it wasn't the same dude on his soapbox the whole time, and people infighting about it. Tattooing has been my profession for ten years and in recent years I've started to feel introspective about the reasons behind it, and feel a sense of regret for some of the aesthetic decisions I've made.

>> No.14785013

>>14784958
It's a novel thread here because it's nothing to do with fashion you chode.

>> No.14785169

>>14783864
i dont want japanese gang signs but if you look at any member they can fully cover their tattoos with a simple dress shirt and pants to blend in. im not fooling myself into thinking i deserve and part of japanese culture on my body. but the full body concept with the ability to go incognito appeals to me. you obviously have a low reading comprehension if you missed that in my first post. never did i mention getting any of their signs or symbols

>> No.14785182
File: 743 KB, 2624x2624, 1573341653432.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14785182

>>14781121
"Fucking low IQ scum"

>> No.14785185

>>14783674
this guy seems to have a few instabilities himself if he thinks being mad at peoples forms of expression on their bodies constitutes a superiority. probably has not even left his basement since skip the dishes became a thing and he could cash his welfare online

>> No.14785204

>>14785169
Jesus. Even if you wanted them, who FUCKING cares? It might be a little bit silly, and not make much sense, but its not and indication that you're mentally unstable. This guy's a fucking douche.

Full body suits that can be covered by business clothing is actually extremely popular. It gives people the liberating freedom of self expression beneath a polished and forgettable exterior.

>> No.14785218
File: 247 KB, 693x601, 1570259354018.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14785218

>f + IQ
>55 results

>> No.14785259

>>14785007
Well if you want my two cents, let's see... I definitely used to be able to find some tattoos attractively interesting on women. I probably still can but my experience tells me inked up people are either unpleasant or uninteresting.
One of the biggest things that disgusts me about tattooed people is how they're wearing something that used to be associated with tough guys but they so often seem to be sensitive as fuck.
eg. They fume all night, at a party, because someone just hinted that they didn't like their tattoos.
I also don't like how people very often seem to think they are artistic because a dude drew something on them, like it's their own work.
And the people in /fa/ threads about tattoos do nothing to challenge my pre-conceived notions.

>> No.14785752

Tattoos are outward manifestations of demons inhabiting the body.

>> No.14786236

I agree, OP. I hang around in scenes in which almost everyone has a tattoos. The handful of heavily tattooed girls have slept with 100 guys, have a kid or 4, self harmed... the list goes on. I would never date a girl with a tattoo on her head. What really makes me dislike these people though is how they always define themselves as "tats and piercings" as though it is some unique personality thing. I see it on tinder too. They always use tattoos to define who they are and if tattoos are your prosperity then you must be a bit of shitty person. When I have been confident after a few drinks I have asked what the self expression thing means as they always repeat that. I never get an answer and they appear upset. One has a huge neck rose that she picked out of the tattoo stores window. What is that expressing? Just my 2 cents.

>> No.14786857

>>14783853
>Will Smith
He was an industry plant to appeal to the suburban demographic. Hip-Hop in the 80s was mostly bboys or "hardcore" gangsta shit.
Will Smith was a way to move the genre into family friendly territory so even your white dad would be bumping "BIENVENIDOS A MIAMI"

>> No.14787848

>>14786857
>gets proven wrong
>oh he's just an industry plant
>it doesn't count

Oh please. Make a claim and prove it or offer supporting evidence. Most rappers are set up by the industry to make money and looking the part is what they have to do. Will doesn't fall without that and your claim it is to market to older Dads is just ridiculous as no music is ever really aimed at that demographic of people.

Those type typically do not purchase music, go to concerts, wear the merchandise and so on.

You got proven wrong, made up an answer about being an industry plant with zero supporting evidence and then tried to back it up by making absurd claims that show no knowledge of how the music industry works.

>Hip-Hop in the 80s was mostly bboys or "hardcore" gangsta shit.

Most early hip-hop was much less tamer, it wasn't "fuck hoes, fuck niggas, cocaine, kill you,..." such as artists like Grandmaster Flash. So your whole reply is just total uneducated gobbledygook.

You're clearly just another teenager who doesn't even know they are talking about. Low IQ.

>> No.14787906

>>14787848
Maybe you guys can at least agree that no one likes his son and anything his son does qualifies as being a plant.

>> No.14787936

>>14787906
His son is a little bitch. I feel sorry for Will, genuinely comes across as a nice guy and he has a little brat of a son. Luckily his kid is a manlet.

>> No.14787943

>>14782562
that's retarded though

>> No.14788193

>>14787943
Because he's mentally unstable.

>> No.14788317

>>14787936
Hear the rumour that Will molests him? I can believe there's some weird stuff in that family:
*son being like half-tranny is obviously a red-flag
*but also they named the son after the mother and the daughter after the father, so what are the odds of doing that and then the son just randomly becomes queer?
*will and jada are strongly rumoured to have orgies at their house so even if they didn't bad touch the kids those kids could have been exposed to some sights or some visiting perverts that touched them.

>> No.14788331

>>14788317
Wouldn't surprise me, in the Hollywood circle the straight non-kiddie fiddling one is the odd one out.

>> No.14788335

Do you have any irl friends OP?

>> No.14788340

>>14787848
low iq

>> No.14788347

>>14788335
No. I have little need for friends in this world, all that is necessary to my life is to believe in God, and condemn those that are beneath me.

>> No.14788352

>>14788335
>do I have any friends?

Don't kid yourself. I have so many friends, none of them have any tattoos, and none of them have BPD. Being raised in a conservative way, I have a strong connection to my church.

>I don't have any connection to the welfare state.

I don't know why you would infer that I don't have any friends.

this video might help you to understand what's wrong with assuming that, there are good links on the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

Since you've already ignored so many social cues, you are autistic (maybe asburgers) or at least low IQ. Please stop.

>> No.14788584

>>14788352
>Church

The ultimate low IQ move. Only unstable people need that in their lives.