[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 294 KB, 640x782, 189097F6-5420-4AC5-A48A-A4A289C7C0E3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13222681 No.13222681 [Reply] [Original]

Okay, seriously, fuck H&M for trying to steal profit off of other artists hard work.

>> No.13222702

I'll cede grafitti artists their right to their artwork if they accept the death penalty for shitting down every metropolis on the planet with their hack scribbles

>> No.13222708
File: 5 KB, 277x182, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13222708

Nah bra, I love H&M

>> No.13222715

>>13222708
This. I fucking love it.

>> No.13223395

>>13222681
Ud hope that with all that stolen art they'd turn out anything not shit but here we are

>> No.13223403

>>13222681
>for trying to steal profit off of other artists hard work.
Implying that's why you dislike them. Fucking contrarian namefag.

>> No.13223407

>>13222681
I don't see why shitting on somebody else's property should give you the right to that shit forever.

>> No.13224411

They constantly steal shit from Yung Leans brand SadBoysGear, Hope they stop this shit it's so scummy

>> No.13224423

>>13222681
How are people defending this shit lol, it's a huge company that makes shit quality clothes for lames, and they shamelessly steal designs all the time

>> No.13224784

I'm not one of those anti graffiti types but if you're gonna just doodle over a bunch of buildings that aren't yours without anyone's permission then you're pretty delusional if you think that you should have copyright to it.

How is this even a legal issue that hm us fighting over

>> No.13224786

>>13222681
>artists
>vandalism

>> No.13224794

I'm all for IP right, but I'm also for private property rights. Graffiti is technically vandalism, which is illegal, so should the street artists really have a right to that work?

>> No.13224797

>>13224411
>Yung Lean
Literally who

>> No.13224807

>>13222681
well, unfortunately, they're probably going to win
people need to get their shit nice and legal or it will be taken away.

>> No.13224832

>>13224797
how are you so uncultured?

>> No.13224852

>>13222681
>do ILLEGAL artwork in PUBLIC streets
>still want the LEGAL rights to it
Genius. Pure genius.

fuck outta here

>> No.13224861

>>13222681
You need to register intellectual property, so therefore vandals do not hold active copyright.

You can't go around tagging shit, then invoice the owner of the property for the original work you did without authorization or verbal contract

>> No.13224911

>>13222681
i can understand having slave labor but stealing 'art' to put on shitty t-shirts? that's where i draw the line

>> No.13225060 [DELETED] 
File: 211 KB, 640x636, 4A679FB4-78BD-4C2F-AA20-998623D130D8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13225060

Even though mostly everyone here supported them in the lawsuit, they changed their minds and cancelled it

>> No.13225079

>>13224832
knowing unimportant people does not make you cultured, you tremendous underage faggot

>> No.13225083

>>13224861
>You need to register intellectual property
It is literally the opposite of how it works under most legal systems

Please do not give your opinion on things you know nothing about

>>13224911
This desu

>> No.13225088

>>13224423
because the topic is still illegal graffiti made on other people's property. i'd much rather that fast fashion started stealing from that than damaging the real fashion houses by latching off them you virgin

>> No.13225104

>>13222681
>artists' hard work
Tell these "artists" to stop fucking up engineers' and construction workers' hard work

>> No.13225145
File: 9 KB, 645x773, 1514144968933.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13225145

>intellectual property is real and important

>> No.13225246

Well if it does pass I bet their stores are going to get defaced to shit. Lose, lose situation for them really.

>> No.13226292

>>13225079
Go back under the rock you were residing in.

>> No.13226293

>>13224411
Proof?

>> No.13226304

graff writer here

how does it feel knowing im wearing a six figure outfit as i post this and call u all fucking nerds

>> No.13226310

>>13226304
Pretty good knowing that i'm not retarded enough to spend six figures on an outfit.

>> No.13226322

>>13226310
ur posting on a fashion imageboard while wearing broke boy rags so obviously ur retarded in some literal chromosome deficient sense

>> No.13226362

>>13226304
whatchu write

>> No.13226403

>>13222681
Who are the racist white male Trump supporting boomers running this absolutely shit company?

>> No.13226411

>>13224784
This

>> No.13226442

>>13226322
All the money in the world won't improve your shit taste anon. Lol at your life.

>> No.13226444

>>13222681
>butthurt graffiti niggers upset that their "art" is photographed and replicated on some tees are crying about their unsanctioned "art" being seen by more people
I hope any graffiti nigger who comes out to put their name on the suit gets their ass sent home after a night with Tyrone. Fucking idiots.

>> No.13226475

>>13226444
did you see the "art" that they ripped off? literally a bunch of squiggly lines kek

>> No.13226527

>>13222681
nigga you're drawing on public property.

>> No.13226623

>>13225104
painters != engineers

>> No.13226628

Okay, when I first read it, I was on the graffiti artists side. Then I learned that h&m werent reprinting graffiti on their clothers, rather they (outsourced company) used Revok's (imo one of the greatest) artwork in a backdrop of an h&m ad.

I love graffiti, love Revoks art, but side with h&m on this. They just used his backdrop as an edgy background. Happens all the time. Its not even a good Revok piece.

>> No.13226641
File: 206 KB, 680x414, daniel-tagno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13226641

revok chiefed his 'inventions' off daniel tagno anyway (credit to utah & ether for bringing this to light)

he certainly aint a writer anymore either, his name got too hot so moved onto galleries and street art - so i think any writers backing revok need to really remember why they are doing graff because really it doesn't matter

>> No.13226669

>>13222681
that's scummy but I don't care. I just wanna buy cheap clothes that cover my ass whenever I need any. seriously.

>> No.13226740

>>13222681
>Oh no my precious urban murals are controlled by the evil fascist corporations

If you want to boycott something come back when you actually have something meaningful to talk about.

>> No.13227318

>>13226304
It feels like I’m not a hypebeast

>> No.13227331

>>13222681
>Implying the average uneducated normie who shops at H&M gives a shit
The profit will keep coming in because most people don't care.

>> No.13227512
File: 73 KB, 710x781, 1521058314348.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13227512

>>13222681
>guy graffitis your wall without asking
>you decide to put the art on t shirts
>dude comes back to sue you for stealing his work
>you in turn file charges for vandalism

>> No.13227576
File: 1.09 MB, 1242x1219, 0A28F4AC-9BBA-4EAB-A818-E10F418DCE96.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13227576

>>13224786
>vandals dont like being stolen from

>> No.13227608

>>13226304
Post fit fag

>> No.13227690

>>13227512
it's like it belongs on an ancap meme

>> No.13227716
File: 104 KB, 850x644, Most-Expensive-Swords-in-the-World6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13227716

>>13227690
I mean, if you stab me with a fancy-ass sword, passed down your family for generations, and leave it in me(and it is actually yours, not stolen) it's not like you can really ask for it back.

>> No.13227718
File: 83 KB, 500x375, tattoo-neck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13227718

>>13227716
Or hell, to go with the quality of most graffiti "art" if you draw crudely made dicks on my face while I'm sleeping, you can't sue me for selling shirts with pictures of my dicked-up face on them.

>> No.13227772

>>13222681
street artist here

what this actually was about wasnt taking someone elses art and selling it or using it on the products
it was about them doing a photoshoot where street art was in the background on a wall

im fine with this. the point of street art is its public. its in a public space. thats not just the nature of street art but the entire point

there's lots of other different problems with h&m. this isnt one of them.

>> No.13227869

>>13222681
The people who enjoy street art can't afford H&M anyways

>> No.13227965

>>13222681
>street "art"
Kill yourself if you think you need permission from nigger vandals to post their ugly monikers on some sweaters.

>> No.13228016

>illegally tag a wall
>some agency for a clothing company takes a picture with part of it in the background
>find out it's h&m
>"GIVE ME MONEy STEALERS OF CULTURE LE REAL ARTIST URGG!!!"

jesus christ, why do some street artist think they're that important, it's not like h&m took his design and printed on tshirts

>> No.13228033

>>13226641
Thanks for this.

>> No.13228342
File: 248 KB, 993x768, 1514666710512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13228342

>>13227869
>can't afford H&M
The people who can't afford H&M probably don't have streets to be on anyway. And if there are streets there, they're most certainly designated for shitting.

>> No.13228489

>>13227772
>street artist here
nobody cares

>> No.13228655

>>13222681

yo fuck this graffiti "artist" he is fucking corny. and if you did your painting in public, then its in the public domain. can't believe hm backed down.

>> No.13228675

>>13225145
fuck off china

>> No.13228700

revok is a sellout hack anyway who cares


also public announcement to anyone who is antigraff itt buy a noose

this is a fashion imageboard not a sqaure imageboard

>> No.13228726

>>13228700
graff lol graffiti is so fucking corny. it's 2018 it's used to market chips to kids. fuck off.

>> No.13228730

>>13227772
This.
>im fine with this. the point of street art is its public.
Street artists worrying about how to monetize their public art is the original problem here.

>> No.13228737

>>13222681
>artists' rights
>illegal artwork
i wish leftists didn't exist

>> No.13228739

>>13228737

>artists' rights
>applying to vandals

absolute state of the left

kek

>> No.13228740

>>13224911
>>13225083
>slave labor
>paid a wage
these must be the dumbest slave owners in the history of mankind
or you're just a retarded faggot

>> No.13228741
File: 13 KB, 400x400, 1521237121653.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13228741

>>13225145
>the ch*nese are real and important

>> No.13228742

>>13226304
i care only enough to make this post while lying in bed watching anime
i hope that shows you how insignificant you are

>> No.13228746

>>13226628
>Okay, when I first read it, I was on the criminals' side.
thanks for indicating your stupidity in the very first sentence

>> No.13228750

>>13228700
>literal reddit spacing
I wish you were dead

>> No.13229638

>>13226293
replace the €
https://www.google€nl/amp/s/hypebeast.com/2018/3/sadboys-hm-love-roses%3famp=1

>> No.13229760

why are graffiti fags so insufferable
>dude muh art man

>> No.13229811
File: 52 KB, 640x556, 1496007800294.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13229811

>>13226628
>they (outsourced company) used Revok's (imo one of the greatest) artwork in a backdrop of an h&m ad.

wait

did they recreate the graffiti in a studio or did they shoot on location/use real photo of the artwork's location as a backdrop?

because the first one at least kind of has a vague argument but if you (illegally) display your artwork in a public place then you can't expect to get a kickback anytime someone shoots or photographs that place

it would be like the artistic version of patent trolling "my artwork is visible in the background of your film: pay me for the licence or i'll see you in court"

>> No.13229974

>>13228750
oooh why r u so heated cuh

fyi ""reddit spacing"" orignated from here in 2010 not reddit u newfaggot turd

think ur next cop should be clorox lmfao