[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 202 KB, 480x270, tumblr_static_tumblr_static_7si04ax2qdooc8gcw0wk8cg0k_640[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13169106 No.13169106 [Reply] [Original]

I've been lifting for 1.5 years, Started as a 75kg fatfuck (174cm manlet) and got myself to 60kg auschwitz survivor mode in 8 months. Bulked for 5 months, but fucked up and got fat again, so I've been spending the last 5 months cutting again, and I'm around 62 again, would say I'm around 15% bodyfat or so; not fat, but not extremely lean, abs are not visible for instance.

So what would be better?
>cut until 10%bf/abs showing then lean bulk
or
>start 2-month-each bulk/cut cycles despite not being as lean as I could be

>> No.13169162

>>13169106
>no_mention_of_fashion_whatsoever.jpg

>> No.13169186
File: 1.04 MB, 400x225, rick rolled.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13169186

>>13169106
>/fit/izens misslicking on /fa/
never gets old

>> No.13169288

>>13169106
Youre on fa anon

That said, from a fit perspective even 70 kg of muscle would be good. Its not About the BMI anon its about the body fat percentage

Goodluck

>> No.13169318

>>13169106
cut then lean bulk. otherwise youll just get fat again

>> No.13169336

>>13169106
>174cm
>60kg
>Auschwitz

Nigga I'm 180cm 59kg

>> No.13169348

>>13169336
Course you are. Post a pic of your emaciated body please

>> No.13169357

>>13169336
178cm / 53 kg here

>> No.13169445
File: 42 KB, 706x521, 26804375_1055766371229158_466159903862646332_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13169445

>>13169357
Jesus christ

>> No.13169632

>>13169106
Have you tried not being American?

>> No.13169976

>cm
>kg
>months
>%
kys eurofag