[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 1.15 MB, 865x2978, 1436346726748.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12393849 No.12393849 [Reply] [Original]

Low-waist vs. high-waist jeans, which do you find comfier?
I feel like low-waist ones are more comfortable to walk and stand in, because they don't pull down your tucked-in t-shirts, but are less comfy to sit because they kinda cause some pressure around your stomach.

>> No.12393857

>>12393849
High waisted are more comfy

>> No.12393861

>>12393849

>tucking in t-shirts into jeans

faggot

>> No.12393872

>>12393849
You mean high-waist, right?

>>12393861
faggot

>> No.12393893
File: 146 KB, 800x1292, 505-C-Slim-Fit-Jeans-Elvis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12393893

I prefer high waisted. They look better on tall people than low waisted.

>> No.12393894

>>12393849
>You mean high-waist, right?

Yeah. Fuck, I was thinking about one thing but wrote another

>> No.12393911

there is no reason for low waisted to exist. prove me wrong

>> No.12393931

>>12393911
this entire board turned from wearing low waisted jeans to regular waist under three fucking months
it's literally just a trend to wear regular waisted jeans right now, likewise it was trendy to wear low waisted for the longest time
anyone repeating what you just said is a clueless fuccboi faggot, prove me wrong

>> No.12393944

>>12393849
none, regular waist where it's at, low waist is pure shyte, high waist will make you look like an autist, however it looks good on girls

>> No.12393949

Is there such thing as high- or mid-waist skinny jeans? They all seem to be low-waist.

>> No.12393972

>>12393949
Definitely, but idk if there are for guys.

>> No.12393975

>>12393949
>>12393972
there are of course

just take a look at H&M for instance, you'll find regular waist skinnies

my fav fit from H&M is slim regular tapered

>> No.12393977

>>12393849
straight jeans are so liberating. Feels good to give up fuccboi clothes

>> No.12394056

I just want mid-rise black pants, still don't know w2c

>> No.12394191

>>12393931
>this entire board
speak for yourself faggot
i've been wearing high waist for the last 10 years after realizing i didn't have to wear low

>> No.12394219

>>12393975
>H&M
ISHYGDDT

>> No.12394232

>>12394191
people have been repeating the
>lmao fuck low waist amirite
for few months now
cool to hear you are such unique fashion forward individual though

>> No.12394233

>>12393931
>just a trend
>regular waist
>regular
you've just proved your point invalid

only like one person in our waywts wears them anyway, there's still resistance to it amongst "fashionable" /fa/

>> No.12394237

>>12393975
complete lie
>>12393949
women's jeans will give you exactly what you're looking for

>> No.12394246

>>12393893
It's more of a torso thing than a height thing, imo. High-waisted pamts are best for long torsos while low-waisted are best for short torsos.

>> No.12394247

>>12394233
>you've just proved your point invalid
you do realize that low rise was the norm for ages right?

>> No.12394255
File: 181 KB, 1275x1280, 1461006478903.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12394255

>>12394247
only for about 10-15 years. compare that to regular/high waist, which was the norm for a little over a century. it's a blip on the radar.

>> No.12394258

>>12393944
"Regular waist" is high waist.

>> No.12394259
File: 1.14 MB, 2304x3456, hmprod (11).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12394259

>>12394237
>complete lie
?
it can be that there's no such item in your country, but i own pic related H&M skinny with regular waist

we are talking about regular waist, not high waist

the same in black: http://www2.hm.com/hu_hu/productpage.0417921001.html#Fekete

there are like 10 different regular waist skinnies at the moment on their site

>> No.12394265

>>12394255
>10-15 years
that's what I'm saying

>> No.12394268

>>12394258
it's not or what do you call the high wasted womens jeans then?

regular waist is regular waist, it's neither high, nor low

>> No.12394269

>>12394259
Those are basically low rise, look at them. Just because they're not literally sagging off his asscrack doesn't mean they're not low.

>> No.12394273

>>12394269
hence they called regular waist, but then again i was talking about regular waist, not high waist, you can't seem to comprehend the difference, it appears

>> No.12394275

>>12394268
It's considered "high" now because the trend is and has been towards low rise. a decade or two ago those would have been considered normal rise. When it comes to us, most so-called high waisted men's clothing is labeled as regular by the companies, or "sits at natural waist".

>> No.12394344

>>12394232
low rise cuck detected
end your pathetic existence now faggot

>> No.12394351

>>12394344
yeah, what kinda waist you choose for your pants is black and white binary choice and people wearing waist different from yours should be your mortal enemies

>> No.12396087
File: 536 KB, 785x1197, 1462075602060.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12396087

>> No.12396110

How would you call it "regular waist" when it has mostly been confined to rodeo jeans for the last 20 years?

>> No.12396120

>>12396110
basically any more historically established brand will sell these "regular fit" jeans, not sure where you're getting this rodeo stuff. i see older people wearing them all the time. and i live nowhere near the southern US.

>> No.12396230

>>12393849
Low-rise,

because I'm not an autistic fucking 16 year old jumping on the 90's trend. I WANT TO BE COOL REEEEEEEEEE

>> No.12396606

>>12396230
hol up hol up

are you implying that normal rise pants were somehow exclusive to the 90s

>> No.12396610

>>12396606
hol up hol up

are you implying you are so retarded you don't understand that the regular rise being trendy shit right now is because 90s is cool

>> No.12396613

>>12396610
it doesn't have to be related to a "90s trend" or whatever else may be happening at the moment, they're just pants after all

the nineties were actually cool though so i don't see the problem. better than the 00s anyway, which brought the low rise into trend.

>> No.12396617

>>12396087
Yo this is fucking legendary

>> No.12397083

>>12393893
Those aren't even mid rise, lol

>> No.12397278

>>12396087
w2c?
also what do i tell my barber to give me if i want what the /fa/g on the left is rocking?