/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.10367246]

what is the most /fa/ camera to carry everyday?

DSLRs need not apply they all look autistic

[Anonymous No.10367323]

35mm or gtfo

[Anonymous No.10367340]

m3

[Anonymous No.10367353]

I want a cheap camera, gimme recs.

[Anonymous No.10367391]

LX100 if you want lecia lens and style but not the price

[Earmuff Maniac !!g+HshWCPoGp No.10367435]

The one that's the tool you want to use to make pictures, /fucking thread.

>>10367340
GOAT camera, too bad it's film.

>>10367353
How cheap are we talking, to do what with?

[Anonymous No.10367444]

>>10367246
so you just wanna camera as a fashion accessory? that's also autistic as fuck, poseur hipster scum

>>10367323
>35mm
literally every camera

[Anonymous No.10367460]

>>10367246
Your phone if you just want something basic. Anything else is going to look touristy, tryhard, and/or "autistic."

At least with a DSLR, it might look like you're working at something.

[Anonymous No.10367480]

>>10367246
>most /fa/ camera to carry everyday
>camera displayed as fashion accessory
fucking die asshole

[Anonymous No.10367486]

>>10367435
>GOAT camera, too bad it's film.
If you've got $8k lying around, the M-P is Leica's attempt at a digital M3.

>>10367246
If you want something pocketable, the Rollei 35 is a decent option.

[Anonymous No.10367498]

lol I just bought this film camera and I have to admit it's very ugly

[Anonymous No.10367505]

>>10367498
although my last camera was beautiful

[Anonymous No.10367575]

>>10367246
Leica D-Lux 6 is pretty effay

Takes amazing pictures too.

[Anonymous No.10367580]

Is there a way to start getting into film photography without looking like a try hard/hipster from 2008?

[Anonymous No.10367594]

>>10367246
Sigma dp1/2/3 Merrill
Ricoh gr

[Anonymous No.10367601]

>>10367580
Yeah, by not caring what you look like, faggot.

You obviously don't care about doing good work, and just want to use the hobby as social capital; absolutely disgusting.

[Anonymous No.10367604]

>>10367601
I'm posting on /fa/ so obviously I care about what I look like

to rephrase: What's the most effay way to start shooting film photography

[Anonymous No.10367611]

people, plis

[Anonymous No.10367614]

>>10367604
>I'm posting on /fa/ so obviously I care about what I look like

yeah, with regards to clothing and accessories, neither of which covers a hobby, especially an inherently artistic one. don't be shallow, find a camera you like and click away.

[Anonymous No.10367619]

>For actual use?

Probably something like a d750 with a fast prime.

>For maximum pretentious /fa/?

Leica M6 with a noctilux

>For max fun as a compliment to your phone (which probably has a good enough camera for your snapshits already)?

Some kind of TLR. Seriously. Everyone loves a TLR and image quality and medium format is great.

[Anonymous No.10367679]

Is there a cheap cameras infograph out there?

[Anonymous No.10367710]

>>10367679
i have this old one from /tv/, it's old and geared to shooting video. also, its probably shit

go to >>>/p/

[Anonymous No.10367741]

xf1 or a something, I can't afford shit so I'm picking up used rx100 for dem sony video and image quality.

[Anonymous No.10367776]

I have this. Fits in a pocket but will slightly fuck up your silhouette.

Using film makes me focus more on composing unique shots. With a digital camera it's tempting to take 5 of the same shot. I'm taking way less pictures a week, maybe only a single roll, but the results are more thoughtful.

[Anonymous No.10369174]

the poorfag's leica is pretty effay

[Anonymous No.10369194]

>>10367710
thanks

[Anonymous No.10369215]

>>10367246
I'm looking for a good Polaroid for my grill
but don't know shit about cameras and what she would want for her birthday.
pls recommend a decent polaroid that isn't incredibly expensive.

[Anonymous No.10369228]

>>10369215
All polaroids are inherently terrible and only brainless hipsters use them. Fire your girlfriend.

[Anonymous No.10369230]

>>10367435
>How cheap are we talking?
Cheaper than a smartphone
>to do what with?
Take pictures.

[Anonymous No.10369231]

obvious answer
XA
or XA2

[Anonymous No.10369239]

>>10369228
Why? They seem fun.

[Anonymous No.10369279]

>>10367391
Its not a real leica lens
Panasonic just license the name and build it to a mildly higher spec than their normal lenses so as to not embarrass leica

[Anonymous No.10369290]

>>10367575
Again, not a real leica
It's a rebadged panasonic lumix.

[Anonymous No.10369529]

The Zeiss Ikon is like a more /fa/ Leica. Same M-Mount and a bigger, better viewfinder too.

[Anonymous No.10369542]

>LEICALEICALEICA
Speed Graphic yo
Turns heads and takes better quality pictures too
Of course, you do have to be a decent photographer to pull it off. You ARE a decent photographer and not just a gearfag, right?

[Anonymous No.10369897]

>>10369239
Back in the days before digital, you used a Polaroid camera when you needed a picture immediately. The tradeoffs were poor quality (mostly due to limitations of instant film), high cost per shot (at least 5x the cost of regular negative film), and poor archival stability.

Then digital cameras came out and gave instant results with high quality and no film cost. Polaroid went bankrupt nearly immediately and the film and cameras disappeared from the market for a while until hipsters picked up on it and Fuji started exporting instant film for to the US.

tl;dr sure, if by "fun" you mean takes really shitty pictures on really expensive film that will turn yellow and fade in five years.

[Anonymous No.10369902]

>>10369228
>>10369239
>>10369897
It's for nudes friends

[Anonymous No.10369934]

>>10369897
You covered the downsides of Polaroid well, but at the risk of being dismissed as a hipster let's look at what's appealing about it.

It's not digital and instantly shared across the world. The moment and memory are private. Not taken so all your friends see where you are an how much fun you're having, but for yourself.

Now you can ask why not just use a standard film camera if you want to record a private moment.

And the reason is the same one you mentioned, the same one that made Polaroid popular in the first place. Immediacy. And also, they're fun.

And whether the film yellows or not isn't really a concern. Having the physical photograph, holding it in your hand, adds a depth and dimension to the image that's far more valuable than perfect pixel fidelity.

>>10369174
Have the x100s as my only camera. Like it a lot. Keep contemplating getting the conversion lenses, but then I remember why I bought it and sold my dslr: I just want simiplicity.

[Anonymous No.10369936]

>>10369902
Digital camera

[Anonymous No.10369941]

>>10369936
no revenge porn with polaroids.

[Anonymous No.10369968]

>>10369934
>derp derp derp romanticism of shitty archaic technology
I'm guessing you never used Polaroid when was the only option. Nobody liked it for anything other than instant results. It was crap. That's why the company folded as soon as digital cameras became affordable.

Also, you know you don't have to share digital photos with anybody, right?

Then again, if you want to spend your money on stupid bullshit, who am I to stop you. Our economy runs on idiots buying dumb crap.

[Anonymous No.10370005]

Your phone you shit stain

[Anonymous No.10370054]

>>10369968
making a lot of assumptions m9.

used polaroids as a kid.

don't use them now. but i understand why others might enjoy the novelty.

not on social media. rarely share photos with anyone.

anyway, we're on /fa/. choosing aesthetic over pure utilitarianism is as valid a philosophy as anything else.

[Anonymous No.10370160]

>>10369968
>poloroid
>only option
>ever

[Anonymous No.10370391]

>>10367353
fuji x20 or x30
~$400-500, 12mp 18-112mm focal length range, manual focusing ring, takes decent pictures. looks like a cool rangefinder but you don't have to pay for the cost of film and developing :)

[Anonymous No.10370505]

Sony - Cyber-shot DSC-RX100M4 20.1-Megapixel Digital Camera - Black but its 900$ but very worth it

[Anonymous No.10370607]

Canon EOS-M Mirrorless

[Anonymous No.10370751]

>>10370391
i would suggest the x100t over these two from experience, a couple hundo more but you can probably find one used for around 6-8 hundred, and the quality is infinitely better. x20 and 30 are great for the money tho no doubt

[Anonymous No.10371015]

Your grandpa's Yashica Electro35 obviously