WATCHES: POST EM HERE YOU DEAR FRIENDS

[Anonymous No.10057607]

Automatic chronometer officially certified edition

[Anonymous No.10057614]

[Anonymous No.10057641]

reposting my collection

rundown:
>Hamilton Khaki is my favourite, awesome watch, pretty much my daily wear
>Tissot PRC200 was my first watch, I like it a lot, a solid starting watch imo; to nitpick it's slightly too chunky for the leather strap, also the leather strap isn't that great
>the other Tissot is my dad's, he got it as a gift but he doesn't wear watches so he gave it to me; good enough, it's my dressy watch although I definitely wish he got a Visodate instead
>Seiko 5 was my first mechanical watch, very cheap so I ordered it to see what's up; it's too small and too kiddy looking tbh, also I might have a faulty movement because, although it keeps ok time, it only keeps like 8 hours reserve
>Orient Makos are my summery wear, I first got the blue one but the bracelet got broken so I got the black one to get another bracelet and I figured I'd also have another watch, good deal since they're cheap... but now the blue one is scratched up (no sapphire crystal) and the black one broke down. They actually look very nice and are fine beaters but don't expect them to last.

currently looking for a new diver I guess

[Anonymous No.10057663]

Guess I'll do mine too. Also have a SARB035 coming in the mail today or tomorrow.

>>10057641
I really really like both of my divers, I can highly recommend either one.

[Anonymous No.10057686]

Massdrop poll for Bulova Accutron II watches :
dro.ps/v/WlA6cmp

[Anonymous No.10057693]

>>10057663
I don't like Seiko divers. The other diver looks nice but it also looks big, I can't get a diver bigger than 40mm for my puny wrists ;_;

[Anonymous No.10057740]

copped for $0 at a garage sale, threw in a new battery and new pins and i haven't had any problems with it. decent enough and i kinda like the

[Anonymous No.10057794]

recently got this

[Anonymous No.10057802]

cop or not?

[Anonymous No.10057948]

Are the metal straps on these type of watches adjustable? I'm a manlet with pretty skinny wrists and like when a watch fits closely. Not sure if I should just opt for a watch with a leather strap.

[Anonymous No.10057959]

>>10057948
I know Armani watches are shit, but this looks really nice
W2c something similar?

[Anonymous No.10057968]

>>10057948
most of them have removable links on either side, but I'm not sure about armani

[Anonymous No.10057975]

>>10057948
No get the metal band! You can go to a shop to get links taken out so it fits
>>10057959
Raymond Weil has something similar

[Anonymous No.10058035]

>>10057948
Unless Armani's watches are completely retarded you can even do it yourself with a tool you can buy from ebay for a couple of bucks.

[Anonymous No.10058098]

Here is my Breitling Navi, A23322. Really want a stainless steel bracelet but $1200 is a joke.

[Anonymous No.10058338]

>>10058098
I can't stand Breitlings personally. They're just too busy and in-your-face for me, just a shitload of numbers thrown on there.

That said, if you enjoy it, well, that's all that matters.

[Anonymous No.10058385]

>>10058098
you are literally wearing a fedora on your wrist

what do you do with all that information tbh?

and with you're pudgy hands you're probably fat as fuck. the extra fat on your wrist literally forms a muffin top out of your watch band

fat fuck with bad taste GTFO

[Anonymous No.10058411]

>>10058385
>the extra fat on your wrist literally forms a muffin top out of your watch band

That's a bone, mate. What's wrong with your wrists that you don't have that?

[Anonymous No.10058454]

I want a watch with a moon phase and a leather strap around $100-300, any good suggestions?

[Anonymous No.10058487]

>>10058098
fuck these guys
>>10058338
>>10058385

I don't like other Breitlings but the Navitimer is awesome, looks nicer on the leather strap too imo, solid choice

[Anonymous No.10058502]

>>10058454
I don't think you'll find many in that price range. I recall that Tissot makes a quartz one, PR50 moonphase which might be afordable, pic related

[Anonymous No.10058522]

>>10058502
I think this is your best bet but beware that the case is only 36mm which is really small by today's standards

[Anonymous No.10059819]

>mfw watch is out for delivery

[Anonymous No.10060614]

http://www.theverge.com/2015/6/29/8860737/casio-watches-smartwatch-features-photos-exhibition?wt_zmc=sm.int.zonaudev.facebook.ref.zeitde.redpost.link.sf

check out those old casios tho

[Anonymous No.10060885]

>>10058522
>36mm which is really small by today's standards
This annoys me a bit. I have thin wrists and I think large cases look absurd on me, is there much of a range of options for the challenged?

[Anonymous No.10061291]

>>10057794
looks good, what kind of orient is that?

[Anonymous No.10061472]

>>10060885
I have small wrists myself and I can rock a 40 mm watch (which is one of the most common sizes) just fine. 42 is a bit too much though, which eliminates a lot of options, but what can you do.

[Anonymous No.10061519]

>>10060885
Bauhaus style watches.

[Anonymous No.10062030]

>>10059819
>tfw it's here

[Anonymous No.10062067]

just got this, what do y'all think?

[Anonymous No.10062126]

>>10062030
Nice, personally I would have spent an extra $50 for the cocktail time, but that's a damn nice looking watch.

>>10062067
I think that could look pretty good depending on the rest of your outfit.

[Anonymous No.10062149]

Here's mine.

[Anonymous No.10062161]

>>10062126
Cocktail time is too big and flashy for me and too dressy since I already have a dress watch I like better, I wanted something a bit more casual. The other one I was really considering was the SARX015 which has a lot of things I really like, but the hands and the crownguards kind of turned me off.

[Anonymous No.10062181]

>>10062161
How big is cocktail time? I was thinking about it heavily as my next purchase, but I'm turned off by big watches.

[Anonymous No.10062210]

>>10062181
40mm. Not huge in absolute terms, but for a dressy watch with almost no bezel and a big domed crystal and a dial which really draws attention to itself I think it would be too much.

[Anonymous No.10062245]

>>10062210
Yeah, I just found a YouTube review. Looks thick as fuck, but the guy is also an idiot and the angles are kinda weird.

Anyone got one willing to post some pics or give me your thoughts?

[Anonymous No.10062247]

I wish I could afford a Rolex Explorer, it's probably my favourite ever watch. It just looks so clean and is the perfect balance between formal and casual. You could wear it with a suit or wear it at the weekends with jeans.

Are there any cheap alternatives until I become super rich or win the lottery or rob a bank?

[Anonymous No.10062254]

I just wish my wrists weren't so damn fat, maybe then I could fit more watches on.

[Anonymous No.10062284]

>>10062067
What watch is this? Love the green and black.

[Anonymous No.10062311]

>>10062245
It is pretty thick yes. When I wear double-cuff shirts it only fits under if I wear some of my looser cufflinks.

It's very nice, especially in the summer, the dial changes constantly.

The crown feels kind of 'back-to-front' to me, as in to advance the date and wind the watch you go the opposite way to what you (or at least, I) would expect. When I got it I actually thought the quickset date was broken, spent about 10 minutes googling before I thought to try the other way,

[Anonymous No.10062322]

>>10062284
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008PIK5JA/?tag=famooutf-20

[Anonymous No.10062343]

>>10062247
Do you want an old one like your picture? Then yeah, you'll need like $10k.

Newer 36mm versions can be had for like $3500 with box and papers. Probably one of the cheaper Rolex models if you don't mind the redesign.

[Anonymous No.10062360]

>>10062322
>http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008PIK5JA/?tag=famooutf-20

Thanks man. Such a sexy watch.

[Anonymous No.10062382]

>>10057663
This looks beautiful to me.

[Anonymous No.10062385]

>>10062360
>>10062067

So just how reliable are Seiko Watches?
This will be my first watch, but after looking at watches for a week this is the first one to stand out to me.

[Anonymous No.10062452]

>>10062343
What's changed with the design? I thought the new ones are 39mm?

[Anonymous No.10062457]

>>10062385
They are considered the standard when it comes to automatic movements on a budget imo

look at the seiko 5

[Anonymous No.10062568]

>>10062385
that's a kinetic watch, which means you charge its internal battery by swinging the watch back and forth. (fap-powered) it also jingles a tiny bit when you do this, and also during any quick sudden movement of your arm. if this bothers you don't buy it.

other than that the watch is very reliable. tells time perfectly, looks pretty cool (although a bit cheesy with the wrong outfit), not very expensive at all

[Anonymous No.10062607]

>>10062452
New ones are 39, yes.

Explorer I had a redesign to the dial awhile ago, maybe in the 80s or 90s (white markers and numbers surrounded by metal like in the pic)

[Anonymous No.10062610]

Question /fa/.
My friend has a Citizen watch which keeps time using satellites. Is this feature unique to Citizen watches/worth it?

[Anonymous No.10062630]

>>10062161
I was going to get the SARX015 but the sale fell through, ended up getting the SARX017 instead (same design but with a leather strap and a red-tipped seconds hand).

I might buy a metal bracelet at some point, but I'm happy with it as it is.

[Anonymous No.10062633]

>>10062311
>pretty thick
Is the thickness off putting? It just doesn't seem like it matches the face size.

>dial changes
Yeah, I've heard the dial is great, everyone that has it loves it.

>crown
No problem there, kinda weird, but wouldn't bother me.

Any chance you got time to take some pics?


>>10062385
Seiko is pretty damn reliable. I've never had any trouble with any of mine. I have 2 5s that I wear as beaters and they've gone through hell and still work fine.

>>10062610
>worth it
No def not worth it. Citizen is a solid watch maker and not just a crap brand, so there's that. But a feature like that is purely for the talking points or if you personally just think it's cool.

[Anonymous No.10062644]

>>10062610
>Is this feature unique to Citizen watches
No, there are a number of Casio that do that. Just look for Wave Ceptor or on G-Shock models it's listed as Multiband. I'm sure there are other companies that make similar watches also.

>worth it
It's kind of a neat extra feature to have on a watch but not at all necessary.

[Anonymous No.10063904]

>thread is on page 10 again
Post your watches.

[Anonymous No.10064238]

Just got the orient esteem last week, but i want a more casual band than the leather one it came with. Any suggestions?

[Anonymous No.10064288]

>>10062568
I really like the idea of it charging through movement as I am someone who likes to keep active.
How loud is the noise?

[Anonymous No.10064365]

>>10064238

I think you're stuck with leather bro but there are plenty of different styles out there. I think it'd look like shit on a nato or perlon and you'll never find and aftermarket metal bracelet that'll match up.

[Anonymous No.10064395]

Fossil shit aside, I love this shit for my beater watch during work. Thinking about copping a weekender for day to day shit around town. Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.10064398]

Fossil shit, but I kinda like my beater watch. Thinking about grabbing a weekender for day to day shit. Not too into watches yet, maybe when I've got more cash. Thoughts on the weekender?

[Anonymous No.10064568]

Bump

[Anonymous No.10064662]

/fa/ this is extremely important. Having an argument with my mate. Are Citizen watches Swiss made?

[Anonymous No.10064674]

Tissot PR-100.
I'm not that into watches to be honest, but this does the job and is pretty versatile. I like it a lot

[Anonymous No.10064690]

>>10064662

No, they are fucking Japanese.

[Anonymous No.10064714]

>>10064662
It's pretty simple really:
Does it say "Swiss Made" on the dials?
No? Then they're not fucking swiss made, jesus fuck.

[Anonymous No.10064729]

>>10064714
>>10064690
That is what I am saying! But he won't accept it. He claims they are the third biggest manufacturer of swiss watches in the world. He clearly got bullshit to by a salesman.

It all started because I have ordered a Seiko watch and he was ranting saying how only Swiss watches are good but he owns a citizen.

[Anonymous No.10064739]

>>10064729
Holy fuck, how old are you?
Fucking 12? I thought 4chan was 18+.

[Anonymous No.10064752]

>>10064739
21. Although I am not sure how me arguing a correct point makes me 12.

[Anonymous No.10064766]

Lighting is utter shit in my room so I aint gonna bother with a pic, but got one of these a couple months back, no ragrets

[Anonymous No.10064775]

>>10064752
If you can't fucking settle and discussion by simply going to wiki and see that Citizen is Japanese, you're not fucking >12 years old.

[Anonymous No.10064780]

>>10064752
Dude, fact checking on the Internet does not mean you can cite 4chan.org as a source

[Anonymous No.10064784]

G-guys... I got this 2000 dollar watch as a gift
What do you guys think?

[Anonymous No.10064807]

>>10064775
>>10064780

I have fact checked.
Went on this site: http://www.watches-of-switzerland.co.uk/brands..

Googled ' Largest Swiss watch manufacturers'.

Went on Citizen's Wikipedia page.

However he is stubborn and has owned watches and followed watches longer than me. I have literally got into them within the last week.

[Anonymous No.10064863]

>>10064807
So your friend is 12?
Your friends are often a reflection of yourself.

[Anonymous No.10064894]

>>10064863
Well he is younger. Just turned 18 the other day.

[Anonymous No.10065044]

>>10064288
not very. other sounds will drown it out, but it's noticeable in silence.

[Anonymous No.10065323]

>>10064784

Whoever bought that fucked up. You could have gotten similar style watches that use the same movement from Hamilton or Tissot who are respected watch making companies with real history for $500 or less. That's one of the reasons you don't fucking buy watches from fashion brands.

[Anonymous No.10065727]

Are Tag Heuers effay?

[Anonymous No.10065736]

>>10057802

nicer design from victorinox, but I really dislike sub-brands of anything. go swiss army or go elsewhere.

[Anonymous No.10065745]

>>10064674
I miss mine so bad. Wore it with a stainless steel bracelet though. With leather it just looks too European eclectic.

[Anonymous No.10065753]

Laco understands my skinny manlet wrists.

[Anonymous No.10065886]

I was given one of these by an old friend and father figure, he'd had it for decades. They're not especially /fa/ but mine has sentimental value and, call me old fashioned, I think a watch should be more than just an accessory

[Anonymous No.10065921]

>>10065886
>call me old fashioned, I think a watch should be more than just an accessory
That's anything but old fashioned. Way back they were only used for practical matters.
I'm pretty sure sentimental shit like yours is pretty modern - and you're of course entitled to your opinion, but in my opinion the aesthetics of a watch supercedes whether it has sentimental value or not.

[Anonymous No.10066102]

Cop or not?

[Anonymous No.10066145]

>>10057607
copped this lovely mechanical jules jurgensen yesterday

[Anonymous No.10066168]

>>10066145
Wrong Jürgensen.

[Anonymous No.10066248]

>>10066168
... this is a great watch. Tell me why he's the wrong jurgensen?

[Anonymous No.10066262]

>>10066248
Out of the classic Jürgensen watches sprung 2 watch makers: Urban Jürgensen and Jules Jürgensen

Jules are the ones that sold out and is now forgotten and shit
Urban is the ones that are still great watches with great complications

[Anonymous No.10066309]

>>10066262
both siblings were fantastic watchmakers, though. Sure, I agree, jules sold out and his company fizzled but his watches are still very good. Also urban jurgensen and sonner watches are ridiculously expensive, aren't they?

[Anonymous No.10066328]

>>10066309
Yes, Jules WAS good.
But they stopped making good watches back in 1957, and I bet you that the watch acquired by >>10066145 is not that old. Or rather, I know it's not. 1. It doesn't have the Royal Crown that the watches are originally known for (being a supplier for the Queen/King of Denmark) and 2. It doesn't say "Swiss Made" (as it was from 1936).

After '57 they became shit, and not actual Jürgensen watches. That's the difference between Urban and Jules - Urban still makes sick watches, and yes they are expensive as hell.

Urban > Jules, therefore
>wrong Jürgensen

[Anonymous No.10066357]

>>10066328
here
>>10066309
>>10066248
I'm not saying this to shit all over your watch, it's just that it's not really valuable, and I don't think you should go around telling people so. I still like it for having a very interesting history, though.

[Anonymous No.10066383]

>>10065921
Plus the mechanics of good mechanical watches is really interesting. Watches cover a lot of ground. Style, practicality, astounding engineering, and sometimes sentiment.

assuming you don't buy shit kek

[Anonymous No.10066416]

>>10066357
yes I'm aware it's not super valuable. It's my first watch. I'm actually glad you went so in depth, I know a ton more about the watch now. The history is very interesting indeed

[Anonymous No.10066731]

>>10064288
Mine is virtually silent. Unless you find yourself airlocked in a soundproofed room you're not going to hear it.

[Anonymous No.10066856]

It's fake, paid $30 for it.

I'm happy with it

[Anonymous No.10067025]

>>10066102
no... especially not some 2nd rate james bond rip watch

[Anonymous No.10067035]

>>10066856
>two second hands in the crono

well done

[Anonymous No.10067055]

do you guys like either of these? trying to decide

[Anonymous No.10067064]

>>10067055
left is more readable, plus if those are yellow accents on the hands it's pretty chill.

[Anonymous No.10067066]

>>10067055
I love the left

[Anonymous No.10067199]

Rocking the Spanish flag on this 4th of July weekend

[Anonymous No.10067219]

>>10067199
I like my Spanish heritage and all but that shit is just gaudy.

Maybe I should wear my red white and blue tomorrow, though.

[Anonymous No.10067221]

>>10067219
Or maybe what I should say is it looks... Gaudí

[Anonymous No.10067262]

>>10067221
I'm gallego but even I know that Gaudí would have had a catalán separatist flag on his wrist.

[Anonymous No.10067425]

>>10062210
>manlet incharge of tastes in watches
Enjoy your girly watches you mong

[Anonymous No.10067551]

>tfw my watch sold out right when I was about to cop it

post some good poorfag watches that I can consider while I wait for restock, looking to fill all 6 slots in my case when right now I only have one

[Anonymous No.10067615]

Is this to small for my wrist?

[Anonymous No.10067639]

>>10067615
No

[Anonymous No.10067656]

>>10067615
God no. Anyway, better for a watch to be too small than too big:: >>10058098

[Anonymous No.10067667]

>>10067551
>>10064238
http://orientwatchusa.com/collections/mens-watches/classic
fuck, these are all so nice
can't pick between a steel/white bambino 1/3 or steel/white class

[Anonymous No.10067677]

Are Seikos good quality watches?

[Anonymous No.10067688]

>>10067677
Yes

[Anonymous No.10067691]

>>10067667
White face, silver bezel, roman Rosegold dial and hands looks good

[Anonymous No.10067692]

Just now getting into watches. I have two but both are casual. Would a citizen watch be a good first formal watch?

[Anonymous No.10067699]

>>10067692
Yes.

[Anonymous No.10067700]

>>10067688
You sure? The prices are pretty cheap

[Anonymous No.10067721]

>>10067700
Not sure if troll but seiko as a watch is commonly considered good. Also there are mid tier more expensive seiko watches

[Anonymous No.10067724]

>>10067721
Nah not a troll just a watch newbie. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.10067727]

>>10067551

[Anonymous No.10067730]

>>10067724
Check this guide if you're a newbie. You can try these before buying 6k worth watch
>>10067727

[Anonymous No.10068501]

>>10058098
Best of the thread

>>10057663
>>10057607
>>10057614
What the fuck is with this place and vintage Seamasters? They really aren't worth the money.

[Anonymous No.10068571]

>>10068501
>What the fuck is with this place and vintage Seamasters? They really aren't worth the money.

they have the Omega name and you can get them for like $600 on ebay.

plebs thinking they're luxe

[Anonymous No.10068863]

>>10068501
The same reason you bought that ugly abomination on the left.
>Brand Whore

No, i'm not a huge rolex fan, but there are several, better looking dive watches than this.
I'd rather get the seamaster 300, has other color options that look lovely.

[Anonymous No.10068864]

>>10068863
Forgot the pic.

[Anonymous No.10068882]

Simple

[Anonymous No.10068990]

>>10068863
Two items of the same brand makes me a brand whore? How fucking retarded are you?

[Clarkey No.10068993]

>>10068864
man that's gorgeous

[Clarkey No.10069010]

>>10068882
oh damn, that too

[Anonymous No.10069024]

>>10068990
>How fucking retarded are you
>Thinks that brand whore is only someone who buys in large numbers

No, ya cunt, you are a brandwhore, because you bought that stupid looking design, for a price that is just silly. There are a lot better looking designs out there, but you got this, because of that brand name.

[Anonymous No.10069119]

Pam on purple camo leather Nato.
Have a good day guys

[Anonymous No.10069120]

[Anonymous No.10069126]

>>10069024
How the fuck do you know why I bought it? How do you know how much I paid for it? Think before you post such shite.

[Anonymous No.10069138]

just got this. pretty happy.

[Anonymous No.10069183]

>>10057948
Go to a shop and have them remove a few links. But you should highly consider suicide.

[Anonymous No.10069187]

>>10069138
Nice, Swiss made?

[Anonymous No.10069206]

Looking to buy my first watch.
I want something this is sub $100 or so and is a silver tone with a black face.
Any recommendations?

[Anonymous No.10069207]

>>10068501
Good thing it's a Constellation and not a Seamaster :^)

>>10069126
Then why do you post your shite? How do you know how I got that Constellation or why I bought it (I didn't)? Also I think you picked an ass ugly Seamaster and reduced speedys aren't worth the money either.

[Anonymous No.10069228]

Recently acquired.

[Anonymous No.10069239]

>>10069228
>Citizen

What are you an OAP?

[Anonymous No.10069584]

>>10057802
Don't know if your still here but Victorinox makes some damn good watches, cop.

[Anonymous No.10069590]

>>10069206
bagel memegaus

[Anonymous No.10069681]

>>10068882

Hey buddy if you see this can you tell me more of what you think about the watch. Likes/dislikes/etc and about the brand in general. I'm really interested in the Teutonia III models but there are no dealers anywhere near me so I'd be going in blind.

[Anonymous No.10069686]

>>10069590
Seconded.

Looks nice, unless you really look at the second hand movement or something like how the band fits on the lugs. 100% worth the price though.

[Anonymous No.10069899]

>>10069207
I'm sort of confused.
When is it worth buying a watch over a $10 Swatch for you?
Just since you're saying Seamaster and reduced Speedmasters arent "worth the money".
What does "worth the money" mean to you? It's pretty subjective. If he really likes the watches and he feels they are worth the money - they are worth the money to him.

Are you just saying that YOU don't feel like they are worth the money? Or are you stating an invalid "objective" opinion?

[Anonymous No.10069938]

>>10069681
Cant tell you a lot. I like the way it looks, works solidly and is built in a simple way. Very much how I like my watches. Could last a bit longer without wearing it though. Feels nice, movement looks cool

[Anonymous No.10069959]

Got this today.

[Anonymous No.10070156]

>>10069206
http://www.amazon.com/Invicta-8926OB-Stainless-Automatic-Bracelet/dp/B000JQFX1G/ref=sr_1_47?s=apparel&ie=UTF8&qid=1436044292&sr=1-47&refinements=p_89%3AInvicta

[Anonymous No.10070829]

>>10070156
I second this. I have one & love it

[Anonymous No.10071064]

>>10061291

its a brazilian only model...
thats pic i took is artsy
heres a pic from my phone

[Anonymous No.10071184]

>>10057607
>>10057607
Contributan with the Deepsea

[Anonymous No.10071227]

>>10068863
>>10068864
lugs are disproportionately long on this model
even if you have a fat wrist, it looks weird

omega fugged

[Anonymous No.10071367]

>>10058098
Fuck the haters, the "business" of Breitling is what makes it Breitling. Looks good man, I'm jelly.

[Anonymous No.10072283]

>>10069207
Are you asking me why I posted a picture of some of my watches on a watch thread? I'm guessing English isn't your first language.

[Anonymous No.10073106]

Is this a real Rolex?

The only markings I see are F714983 underneath the 6 o'clock and CL5 72200 on the band.

Some guy is trying to sell it for £1,500. Seems cheap...

[Anonymous No.10073113]

>>10073106
>brolex.jpg

[Anonymous No.10073127]

haven't been able to take this off my wrist since I got it

[Anonymous No.10073139]

haven't been able to take this off my wrist since I got it

[Anonymous No.10073143]

>>10073106
Looks fake. Cyclops all fucked up.

[Anonymous No.10073152]

haven't been able to take this off my wrist since I got it

[Anonymous No.10073449]

>>10073127
>>10073139
>>10073152
lmao, you can't exif for shit

[Anonymous No.10073520]

Rodina okay for skelly wrist of 6.5?

[Anonymous No.10073534]

>>10057607

Brathwait here

[Anonymous No.10073569]

Why are Timex's so loud brehs? I just want a nice cheap classic looking watch like the easyreader that doesn't go TICK TICK TICK

[Anonymous No.10073602]

>>10073143
What do you mean?

[Anonymous No.10073633]

>>10073569
LOUD TICK ENSURES WATCH NEVER FORGET TIME
SOFT BABY TICKS FOR SOFT BABY WATCHES

[Anonymous No.10074103]

>>10069138
i like it, and usually i think that fashion watches are shit (they are and it is, but at least the design looks good)

[Anonymous No.10074113]

>>10073602
lmgtfy
https://www.google.com/search?q=watch+cyclops&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

[Anonymous No.10074292]

I'm facing a decision between these two watches. Both very budget but I wouldn't ask a chinese carpet forum for opinions on 1,000+ watches now.

The first is £100 ($155) with a quartz movement and day count. The brand name has less design and has thinner hands.

The second is £140 ($220) everything seems a bit bigger inside the face which uses a Automatic movement.

TL;DR: Which one?

[Anonymous No.10074327]

>>10074292

I've got that exact version of the Bambino and it's a very nice watch for the price. Also personally I'll go mechanical over quartz pretty much every time.

[Anonymous No.10074408]

They all show a different date

[Anonymous No.10074457]

>>10073106
@fakewatchbusta

but otrr, looks fake

[Anonymous No.10074518]

>>10069590
Where the hell do I buy this? Google is of no help

[Anonymous No.10074523]

Ya or nay for 2531.80?

If nay, can you recommend a blue diver on comfy bracelet?

[Anonymous No.10074538]

I'm thinking of getting the Komono watched attached and switching the band to something leather. What do you guys think of it? It's also only 110

[Anonymous No.10074549]

Ya or nay for 2531.80?

If nay, can you recommend a blue diver on comfy bracelet?

[Anonymous No.10074594]

>>10074292
>$220
lmao, what
http://www.longislandwatch.com/Orient_ER24005W_Dress_Watch_p/er24005w.htm

[Anonymous No.10074615]

>>10074292
The quartz should keep much better time then the mechanical and when it dies you can replace the battery for a few dollars. The mechanical will likely cost more to service when it dies and will probably be a bitch to find someone to service it. Quartz will likely be a thinner watch too. It's also a pain to keep a auto wound IMO.

I like that the mechanical of those two only has date not day/date. The date is also bigger and easier to read. I like the sweep movement over the ticking too.

[Anonymous No.10074624]

>>10074549
No, Seamaster 300s are like the ugliest watch Omega makes this side of the Ploprof

>If nay, can you recommend a blue diver on comfy bracelet?
Pic related

[Anonymous No.10074712]

>>10074594
>lmao, what
>Sale Price
what how is anything what how?

[Anonymous No.10074721]

>>10074624
I can't buy one of those though.

[Anonymous No.10074731]

>>10074712
>what how is anything what how?
what the fuck are you even saying?
that's the bambino v1 for $130 shipped
if price is part of your consideration, it should be what you'll actually be paying, not msrp

[Anon No.10074798]

W2c cool vintage watches?

[Anonymous No.10074883]

>>10067667
roman bambino is best bambino

[Anonymous No.10074909]

>>10074798
Ebay. I haven't really found any other good sites unless you want to register for watch forums like watchuseek and buy from their sales sections. There's also chrono24 which seems legit enough I guess but I've never heard of anyone buying anything from there.

[Anonymous No.10074911]

Fuck I wish I could afford a good watch

[Anonymous No.10074918]

>>10074911
$55. Good watches come in all price ranges.

[Anonymous No.10074935]

>>10074918
What do I have to google to find that model? Seiko _______?

[Anonymous No.10074952]

>>10074935
SNK807. It also comes in black, green, and tan with SNK80x model numbers, but blue is the true gentleman's preference.

Also check out http://www.watchsleuth.com/seiko5finder/ because there's literally hundreds of similar Seiko 5 models. That's just probably the most popular one and one of the cheapest.

[Anonymous No.10074960]

>>10074935
look after memewatch 2k15 blue edition on google
that and the bagelsports memegauss

[Anonymous No.10075023]

>>10074960
Memegauss is poorly made chink shit. It may have cool Rolex homage styling that you like and it may be a fun watch to own, but I would never call it an actually good watch. At least the Seiko meme5s are made by a respectable company with some pedigree and the watches are very well finished considering how cheap they are.

Look at the textured applied logos and the nice looking hands with an even coat of lume on them and the nice even dial printing and the date window which is cut and beveled into the dial instead of being a rough punched hole. Bagels look like they're made out of scrap metal by comparison in close up photos.

[Anon No.10076131]

>>10074909
How do you know thats legit though? If the model is old I probably cant legit check it

[Anonymous No.10076137]

>>10057607
some cheap dresswatches I wear

[Anon No.10076139]

>>10069959
Wow what watch is this?

[Anonymous No.10076153]

>>10076137
Also a Submariner with a nick in the bezel and a missing pearl. Rolex wants 300 for the fix...

[Anonymous No.10076173]

>>10074883
Got this one last week

[Anonymous No.10076275]

>>10076153
but its fake. why would rolex fix a fake watch?

[Anonymous No.10076412]

Prepaid this beauty today, can't wait to get it.

[Anonymous No.10076610]

>>10076275
As the producer deems it legit I am kind of curious what makes you think that?

[Anonymous No.10076787]

>>10076610
the date magnifier is placed wrong and the connection between the bracelet and the lugs aren't that flush. maybe it was a bad day at the rolex factory, but im pretty sure that's fake

[Anonymous No.10076847]

>>10076412
Congrats, man. It's a beaut.

[Anonymous No.10076866]

>>10076412
Nice. Have a Ludwig myself it's a nice look.

[Anonymous No.10076925]

>>10076787
No idea mate, it´s from a coworker that is pretty loaded so I would trust his words on that. It´s 12 Years old though.

[Anonymous No.10077056]

/fa/,

I own a Rodina and I can't decide what strap to use. I'm not feeling the steel mesh, I was thinking NATO, but it feels like I could've as well bought a Daniel Wellington instead then (albeit that's quartz). Is the sensible choice to stick with leather?

[Anonymous No.10077067]

HMT franken "military"

[Anonymous No.10077236]

>>10077067
strap is probably worth more than the watch

[Anonymous No.10077479]

>>10077056
I like NATO despiste the muh DW looks (DW is a new company anyway while NATOs have a fucking history), but if you can put it on leather then yeah why not?
Also, might consider ZULU

[Anonymous No.10077492]

>>10077056
It depends on where you'll use it I think. Leather is the obvious choice for dressier context, while NATO for summers and shit.

[Anonymous No.10077498]

>>10077492
planet of the apes

[Anonymous No.10077509]

>>10077492
another pic

>>10077498
tru

[Anonymous No.10077513]

>>10077509
>>10077492
>Dressing up a shitty chink watch
toppest of keks

[Anonymous No.10077545]

>>10077513
>Upset about people talking about fashion/opinions on the fashion board

watches.reddit.com

[Anonymous No.10077552]

>>10077545
>Upset someone points out he's a poor dogfucker living in a 3rd world country

>>>/out/

[Anonymous No.10077561]

>>10077056
>>10077492
>>10077509
Does anybody else have consistency issues with their Rodina? I know its a $100 knockoff, but it's a generic movement that I would expect to have decent timekeeping. My Rodina gets about 5-10 minutes fast every day or 2, and it's getting obnoxious. Not sure if I got a lemon? Is it worth taking to a watchman to get it checked out?

[Anonymous No.10077588]

>watch thread
>no speedmaster pro

[Anonymous No.10077597]

>>10074624
If you honestly think that looks better than an SMP you're fucking insane.

[Anonymous No.10077598]

>>10077588
My problem with the Speedmaster is that if you want the actual moon watch it's a shitty for a normal use (manual wind, no sapphire crystal). And if you buy the "modern" version you don't have a moon watch.

[Anonymous No.10077610]

>>10077598
winding really is a non-issue once you're used to it.
As for the glas; polywatch; and a replacement doesn't cost you a fortune.

[Anonymous No.10077618]

>>10077610
I'm a watch faggot but not even I am faggy enough to hand wind my watches in 2015

[Anonymous No.10077628]

>>10077618
Patek & Lange both use manual winds you pleb

[Anonymous No.10077681]

>>10077628
>implying

[Anonymous No.10078034]

>>10077618
>>10077681
>I don't like the finest things watches have to offer
So, you're a faggot, but not a watch faggot.

[Anonymous No.10078249]

>>10078034
both Patek and Lange make plenty of automatics

manual winds are literally only for old guys and fedora wearing watch afficionatos these days

[Anonymous No.10078316]

Rate

[Anonymous No.10078333]

>>10078316

I don't know what the hell I'm looking at. Please come back later with a clear photo(s) taken from a real camera.

[Anonymous No.10078353]

>>10078333
Ulysse Nardin Astrolabium Galileo Galilei

[Anonymous No.10078367]

>>10078353
>>10078316
the watch isn't bad but you're a massive faggot

[Anonymous No.10078368]

>>10078316
I hope you get in a car accident holding the wheel like that.

[Anonymous No.10078707]

>>10078249
or if you're someone who wants to have a speedy pro

[Anonymous No.10079375]

>>10066856
>buying a fake of a watch that costs $200