/fa/ - Fashion

1st for if you're a dumb fuck then post your watch

Only watch I have other than a cheap analogue Casio. Looking to pick up a silver one soon.

What am I doing.

literally feel sorry for you watch autists
this is insane how much money you spend on something so worthless

>>9971938
Hur durr stop liking what I don't like

>>9971938
>insane
>money
>worthless
you sound really triggered from all these fancy watches lmao

>>9971915
>That tudor diamond hand

Soiled it, soiled everything good about the watch

>>9972602
Nah man, it's good.

>>9972148
>>9972153

Where the fuck can I get cloisonne watches as nice as Ulysse Nardin's without having to shell out $20,000-$30,000+

>>9973957

You can get a Celadon for under $10k.

>>9971938
JUST

>>9971938
agreed. No one can even tell what they look like when you''re wearing them.

>>9971938
>watches are worthless
>on a board that encourages the purchase of $1000 sneakers.

I got this watch as a gift by a family member but a few weeks later i noticed the second hand stopped moving
Does anyone know the name of the watch and/or how to fix it?

>>9974427
at least people can tell the difference between sneaker designs and you can wear them to get some kind of utility. watches provide no utility in the age of the smart phone, they are just decoration. the band has more tangible presence than the watch itself
the level of autistic nerdery inherent in the watch collecting hobby is obvious to everyone but "WIS"'s

People laugh when they see it

>>9974717
Here's your guaranteed reply.

All collectors seem stupid to people who aren't part of that hobby, collecting anything is stupid anyway. I don't understand why people pay shitloads of money to buy coins that are worth a couple of cents, but I don't go to numismatist forums to shit on their hobby because it's not my damn problem. What the hell utility does a thousand dollar pair of sneakers offer that some torn up $10 shoes don't?

and also
>call themselves watch idiot savants
>aren't aware of their autistic nerdery

It's hard trying to find a new watch that isn't xbox huge.

>>9973957

you could have a custom dial made for you by a Jewelery-maker, and than transplant that dial into a nice case with an automatic movement.

You could probably get it for just a few thousand if you did that. Maybe try looking around on Etsy or contact your local college's art department.

>>9974697
Have you tried...I dunno...Winding the watch?

>>9975402
Uhhhh how?
If i pull out the the lil handle one tick it changes the date and 2 ticks changes the min hand

>>9976163
Dont pull it out, just turn it clockwise about 10-20 times, if that doesn't work then you're fucked. If it does keep winding until you feel a firm resistance.

I've got thin wrists, looking for a small clock as big ones look absolutely ridiculous on my wrist. Right now I'm wearing a Casio F91W, I'm thinking of maybe buying a Seiko instead.

Any pointers or other suggestions? Also does anyone have that poorfag watch list by any chance?

>>9974771
Have the same without numerals, good cop m8 100% with you on the watches size.

>>9976181
Well fuck its not working...

>>9974771
>Gee Bill, 30 Germany?

>>9974697
change the battery

>>9971575
the best watch

>>9971575
Which to cop??

>>9976515
Or this ??

It's tacky and I love it, fight me

>>9974721
based

>>9976515
>>9976518

Top.

The ''Edifice'' font ruins it.

>>9976523
I need a watch and that is on top of my list. I wear mostly all black and it seems to go well with my fit.

>>9976539
So Edifice is 10 =bar water proof and ORIENT is 5 bar and I won't go diving with it but could there be any quality difference due to water proof raiting ??

>>9971938
Honestly, spending a lot of money on a watch makes more sense than spending a ton on seasonal fashion statements seeing as the watch will last you and your children for generations is you buy correctly and the clothes won't even last you a year if you buy them like /fa/ does.

classic sheffield. Rate?

>>9974771
w2c?

>>9976661
>>9976662
weird we posted ten seconds apart wtf.

I'm wondering about these DW watches apparently they have a shitty time keeping mechanic but who really gives a fuck about that?

I want my watch to look nice not be 100% accurate all the time. As long as its not more than 5 minutes out IDC

>>9976674
Oh wow just noticed. Nice watch by the way.
Haven't heard about it, might look into it but yeah doesn't really matter if it's a couple of minutes. Not like i'm gonna use it in some organized military attack.

>>9976668

If you're in America I know Watchbuys sells them. If not then check the Junghans site for retailers in your country. Also it's like a $1,000 watch.

>>9976772
Bit too much for me then. Only got about £450

>>9976792
the one posted is the handwind version of the junghans max bill which is 34mm and something like 510€ on premiumwatches
The automatic is 38mm and more expensive

>>9971915
>What am I doing.
Buying fakes

>>9976661
>>9976662
Daily reminder that Daniel Wellington is shit.

>>9976906
anyone want to post a version of this pic that isn't tiny?

>>9976906
>>9976914
Hmm would be interested too, i posted one of those watches.

thinking about looking for a watch with a compass and ideally altimeter and perhaps thermometer/timer. figure it'd be handy for off-trail hiking

I really don't care for the oversized plastic nerd-looking sensor watches I generally find. I understand the more data the trickier it is to present it with any elegance but I'd imagine just a compass watch shouldn't be too tricky. smaller faces and classic designs are my preference here

cheaper the better, probably looking at under $100US if possible

thanks

>>9976957

You aren't going to find an ABC (altimeter barometer compass) watch for under $100.

>>9976914
>>9976936
It basically just says that the mechanism is cheap japanese shit. But who really gives a fuck? They look nice.

Are we here to discuss which watches operate the best or which watches look the best?

>>9976855
Rolex obviously lying on the box.

>>9977065
Oh so it's the same thing the guy that posted the other DW said. Yeah it's no biggie this is /fa/

Anyone know anything like this that isn't over £5k

>>9977885
My two watches

>>9972602

> diamond

It's snowflake you fucking drongo.

>>9974697
Did you try turning it off and on?

>>9971575

ugh that's so fucking nice....but it's a patek, I don't even want to know the price

>>9977841
I feel like shinola might make something like that? but maybe a little more rounded.

>>9978668
How do i do that?

>>9977841

Stowa makes something kind of similar. It's still kind of pricey though at about $1,800USD. They also make one with a black dial.

Can smartwatches ever be /fa/?

>>9976633
>things autists actually believe
I bet people said that about cufflinks and hunting rifles a long time ago too

>>9979040
>he's serious

>>9977902
My nigga

>>9971938
Your frustration, I dig it.
>richfag here
>richfag gere
>richard gere

>>9979189
buy me this>>9977841
pls

>>9971575
watches are overrated and overpriced... cant even wear one in summer, fucking wrist is always sweaty and i dont even sweat that much

>>9979304
Faggot.

>>9979036
No.

>>9976523
Is there a mens model with gold case, bracelet but black face? I don't mean the screen but the whole area inside the "frames"?

>>9971575
Watch costing 4k to 6k dollars.
What do you recommend?

>>9979435
Rolex Submariner

>>9979435

For that kind of money you have quite a few nice options and even more if you're willing to go used. I'm just going to list off a handful of watches that personally interest me in that price range. Rolex Explorer 1 is a great watch and very versatile, can be used for dress/business or casual. Grand Seiko Hi-Beat for a pure dress watch. Maybe an Omega Seamaster or Tudor Pelagos for a diver. Speedmaster Mark 2 for a chronograph option.

>>9979515
>>9979527
Been thinking about a Rolex but the people ( and country) I am around would probally look at me differently in a bad way, so mabey something more discreet.

I have no problem getting a used one.

The Omega Seamaster looks good, I will look into that.

Thanks a lot.

>>9979572
Where do you live?

>>9979610
Sweden

>>9979623

>Sweden

They would get mad at him for not giving his money to immigrants

>>9979664
Its true, cant say that I am very fond of Swedes but theres always an exception.

>>9979664
It's because of the law of jante.

Tag Heuer Link chronograph automatic calibre 16.
~$4500

>>9979430
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B005FEY47Q/ref=s9_im_co_g241_i2?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=typ-top-left-1&pf_rd_r=V71BQFYJ4Y9GCSDG1NBR&pf_rd_t=3201&pf_rd_p=517831827&pf_rd_i=typ01

>>9974721
Autist with a calculator watch, why would they laugh?

>>9979925
That's Denmark.

>>9980506
It's all of Scandinavia.

>2015
>not using a pocket watch

Which one? Same price, equal design, the brand and swissness takes me towards the Hamilton.

>>9980949
Always go swiss. (Or german if necessary ) But I'd definitely say the Hamilton.

Parents got me this for graduation. It's no Nomos but I love it

>>9979304
Clearly they're underrated since everyone is shitting on them so much

I just got this bad bitch

>>9974717
>watches provide no utility in the age of the smart phone,
Touched

>>9981280
lol Tag Heuer is the Tommy Hilfiger of the watch world. AKA it's crap and all marketing.

>>9981297
Kill yourself

>>9981297
That's a dumb thing to say. Confirmed for knowing little about watches.

>>9981298
>>9981306
Tag Heuer is sold in the same stores that carry Oris, Seiko, Tissot, and other subpar watch makers. Heuer used to be an amazing company, but when they were forced to merge with Tag it all went to shit.

>tfw I want to save up for a ceramic no-date.

>>9981320
Tag Heuer relies on releasing rehashed non inhouse versions of the legendary pieces Heuer introduced, e.g. the Monaco and Carrera.

>>9981320
So is Omega. It doesn't matter what store in which they are sold. Tag Heuer watches are among the most long lived and precise watches of its price range, I don't know what you think is wrong with them? It's pure quality.

>>9981336
They're nice, but the old version is a better shape, i.e. less square. Although the new bracelet has solid links.

>>9981340
They've moved away from in house movements, only producing them on small showcase models. LVMH basically turned the brand in to something like Ralph lauren or Tommy hilfiger where they still do runway designs but you know that their main business is selling 5 buck polo shirts that become 50 buck polo shirts when you put their logo on them. Also Omega is not sold in crap mall boutiques, I've seen Tag Heuer in absolutely trash stores. It does matter where things are sold. Why do you think high end designers don't allow Macy's or JC Penny to carry their stuff. Even Barney's New York in Beverly Hills can't stock Rick Owens Mainline. Tag Heuer is faux money mall core garbage, which is a damn shame because Heuer made some of the greatest vintage watches of all time.

>>9981363
The laughable state of Tag Heuer resale value and ease is enough to show how shit the watches are now.

>>9981340
If the only thing you wanted was longevity and precision get a seiko. It'll give you both those things in spades. The issue is that Tag pretends to be a luxury watch and markets itself well so that people who know little about watches will drop 4 figures on a watch that is worth much less.

>>9981363
You're wrong, Omega is sold in crappy mall boutiques too, literally everywhere in the world. I bought mine in one.

>>9981382
What's wrong with its ETA movement then? I mean, if you have an educated opinion on why it should cost much less, then I want to hear it.

>>9981382
>>9981397
>If the only thing you wanted was longevity and precision
Or if it's not the movment you think is the issue, then explain what is.

>>9981389
Are you sure they were authorized dealers, because where I live all the AD's that carry Omega have high standards. However I have issues with Omega as well. They are relying heavily on the legacy of the Speedmaster and releasing a staggering amount of new models that have no business be called a Speedmaster. This is coming from an Omega owner. Pic related the final nail in the Speedmaster's good reputation.

>>9981350
Still not sure if I prefer the bigger lugs or not. The price difference between steel and ceramic in the used market isn't too big from what I've seen.

>>9981407
Yes, of course I'm sure of that.

Which watches do you not have issues with then?

>>9980577
>"what time is it anon?"
"U-uh, hang on a s-second I gotta get my watch out, hehe"
*a full minute of awkward fumbling ensues*
"Oh, uh, it's half past n-nine"

No thanks.

>>9981397
There's nothing wrong with ETA. It's like the toyota of movements. The problem is when a watch maker pretends to be in the luxury market, but uses an ETA. It's like if Ferrari used a prebuilt Toyota engine. Tag Heuer in it's current state has no horological value, which in my opinion is a huge factor in buying a watch. Otherwise you're just dropping thousands of dollars on a piece of jewelry rather than a piece of functional art. ETA belongs in seikos and hamiltons, not Omega's or Tag's. Would you really buy a supercar knowing they didn't build the engine and the engine isn't exceptional?

>>9981422
Jaeger, Patek, Lange, Vacheron, and FP Journe are without flaws in my opinion. There are others I still like but you can't have your blinders up they still fuck up sometimes, e.g. Audemars, Omega, Rolex, and Brietling.

>>9981436
Of course, don't forget that their ETA movements (both omega and tag heuer) is modified to suit their specs in terms of performance and finishing. Even IWC does the same if I'm not mistaken.

>>9981445
>Jaeger, Patek, Lange, Vacheron, and FP Journe are without flaws in my opinion
But there are in a whole other price range too.

>>9981403
To sum it up simply, Tag Heuer is a shell of its former self. It uses the legacy of the company it bought to prop itself up, but won't even put a inhouse movement in any of them. It's tarnishing a once great watchmaker and going for a total cash grab. Anyone who was a fan of Heuer didn't and still doesn't like the merger. They even promised to feature a new inhouse movement for the Anniversary Carrera the one that didn't have Tag (they know collectors don't want TAG to be associated), but at the last minute changed their mind and released another ETA based Carrera.

>>9981445

How can you shit on Tag but not Breitling? They charge over $3k for ETA 2824-2 watches.

I'm looking for a good watch, possibly seiko, that's around 200-300 that I can wear casually and for work (with business casual clothes)

>>9981463
Modifying an ETA rather than making a new movement is just lazy and is used to widen their margin. From a business standpoint its fine and if all you want is to show a logo on your wrist then by all means, but enthusiasts will always want an inhouse movement not a modified ETA. When someone buys a Ferrari they like knowing that the engineering team did their damnedest to create something great, the same goes for watches.

Granted that the flawless brands I listed are indeed expensive it furthers my point that what justifies price is having a untarnished horological history. Also Jaeger can be found at reasonable prices if you know where to look. I'm strongly considering swapping a few of my watches for a Ultra Thin.

>>9981474
But Carrera uses calibre 16 right? What is wrong with that? It's literally a top-tier movement.

>>9981485

Check out the Seiko SARB033 and SARB035. They are a little over your budget but well worth it.

>>9981483
If you read the post you can see that I said I like them, but I still hate a lot of things about them. I only like the Navitimer the rest is mostly garbage catered towards new money and rappers.

>>9981499
There is like 30 different models called "carrera". Not every one used the calibre 16 most use modified ETA's. They release only a small amount of watches that us inhouse and use ETA on the rest that make up a bulk of there sales. LVMH basically turned the brand in to something like Ralph lauren or Tommy hilfiger where they still do runway designs (inhouse) but you know that their main business is selling 5 buck polo shirts (ETA) that become 50 buck polo shirts when you put their logo on them.

>>9981519
not every individual Tag is necessarily crap at least objectively, but the company is.

>>9981519
So you're saying you approve of calibre 16?

>>9981526
I don't know a lot about it, but if it's inhouse and well made with good precision I won't knock it. The main gripe still remains with the company itself. I personally put a lot of thought before I buy any watch, and why would you put money in a nice watch from a shitty company when you can take your money elsewhere and get something else.

>>9981544
Buy a Tag if you don't care about it's stolen history, mediocre build quality (from reviews of watch blogs), and poor managment (delay of inhouse movements + the announcements of a SMART WATCH).

>>9981544
I don't know whether it's in house, is it? Read this, I need confirmation of someone who knows more than me about watches.

http://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php?title=TAG_Heuer_Calibre_16

>>9981553
It isn't its a valjoux so its another modified movement.

>>9981562
Carrera 16 uses a standard ETA Valjoux 7750 according to watchuseek

>>9981568
Which means it's not in house?

And also, more importantly, is it good or no?

>>9981575
Objectively speaking only on precision and power reserve probably, but I'd never wear it. It has no horological value. There's always gonna be a better option for the same price. Get a Speedmaster Professional instead it has a great inhouse movement that has stood the test of time, and if you got the money you could go for a cal. 321.

>"The ETA 7750 movement, also known as the TAG Heuer Calibre 16, is perhaps the most successful automatic chronograph movement ever produced. While it has become fashionable to regard the 7750 as a generic, “common” movement, the calibre is easily able to meet COSC Chronometre standards (in top spec) and can be found in a range of high-end watch brands, including IWC, Tudor, Panerai, Hublot and, of course, TAG Heuer."

It doesn't sound like "shit" as you guys put it.

>>9981585
I heave the seamaster.

My darkness!...

Never been such fan of watches but bought this yesterday. Should arrive soon, watcha think?

>>9981599
ayy limão

here's what I'm wearing

this is what I want: http://www.dutyfreeislandshop.com/orient-ser24005w0-er24005w-bambino-dome-crystal-japan-automatic-gents-brown-leather-elegant-watch

>>9981850
you have awful taste

>>9981852
ok

>>9979036
The Apple Watch looks nice.

>>9981852

Hey now Bambinos are nice watches for their price point.

>>9981866
yeah I can't really afford to spend $200 or more on a watch. I only make 44k/yr and my expenses are high

>>9981866
>>9981877
it's a fossil

and spending $200 on a watch is nothing. i spend that much on a weekend dinner out

>>9981889
>tfw thats minimum wage in my country

>>9981901
sup brazilian brother

sites to get good quality leather watch straps for under $50 that do international shipping(preferably free). most sites that i googled seems to be sketchy as fuck.

>>9981889
Spending large amounts of money on jewellery doesn't make you tough, square up

thoughts?

Simple, cheap, but nice.

>>9983060
It's not nice.

>>9983046
Would be nice if I didn't hate the hour hand, and anchor on second hand.

>>9983046
>$600
Fuck that. You can buy a Seiko Sumo that has the better 6R15 movement for under $500.

Put this strap on. I like it.

>>9983096
Who cares about some movement, it's all about how it looks in the end.

>>9983455

This here epitomizes the difference between /g/ and /fa/.

>>9983046
>Vostok Europe 4chan

1. Hublot Big Bang Steel 44mm.
2. (Front) My most expensive watch; Hublot Big Bang - Black Magic 48mm.
3. Hublot Classic Fusion - Tour Auto - Limited Edition 44mm.
4. Some cheap shitty KA:OZ watch.

>>9984008
1. timestamp
2. How did you come to own not one, not two, but THREE watches of the shittiest brand in existence?
3. why

>>9983390
Looks pretty good, anon.

>>9984014
But, Hublot isn't shitty.
It's very good quality, but they're unfortunately ugly as hell.

>>9984014
I love Hublot basically.

Top 5 watch brands: GO

>>9981350
>>9981411
I'm having a hard time deciding between the new and old no-date subs.

Looking at the measurements the new one doesn't seem that much bigger, but in person it really looks swollen or something.

It's obviously a lot easier to get a hold of the new one, at least where I am.

If you had the choice, would you take:
No-date with minimal dial text (no cosc) (14060)
No-date with full COSC text (14060M)
Or
No-date with COSC and that fucking ROLEXROLEXROLEX chapter ring thing that's on all the new ones.

The last one's that strange hybrid in-betweener model; last of the line I think.

>>9984048
The problem with Hublot, as well a number of other manufacturers, is that they build the air of luxury, prestige, and innovation in their products and price them in accordance of that perception while not actually being prestigious or innovative, with the exclusion of some of their very high end (6 figures+) pieces.

>>9984127
Basically, Hublot has a bad reputation amongst watch enthusiasts because they use relatively inexpensive ETA movements, do a little in house finishing, and then sell the watch at a very high price. For the same price range, you can find an in house movement in a sports watch. Essentially, you wind up paying a lot of money for a luxury case.

>>9979623
Spend that money on some Arabic lessons if you don't already know it already.

>>9984132
>Basically, Hublot has a bad reputation amongst watch enthusiasts
I dunno what the bad rep from watch guys is, but I've only ever seen them on the wrists of the following:
Fat, smelly arabs with receding hairlines
Russians
Little south east asian men that look like they have clocks strapped on their wrists.

Okay their wealthy enough to buy this shit but it just looks so ridiculous.
It looks trashy, and the I think the brand suffers from the fact that the above three kinds of people pretty much advertize the brand.

>>9984184

>>9984184
Now you've also seen a fit well-smelling Danish guy with a Hublot, here on 4chan, too.

Have a nice day.

>>9981363
>>9981365
I found a Tag Heuer Aquaracer in a store, which I like. It's a quartz one, though, about 1000£, since I'm getting a discount. Is that a bad idea?

>>9984205
Hvem stemmer vi på, på torsdag?

>>9984254
Liberal Alliance. Hvad med dig selv?

>>9984256
Tænkte det samme.
Well.. Dem eller Konservative.

>>9984262
Jeg er helt enig.

Anyone got any experience with a Mondaine no1 light.

Thinking about it

Thoughts on Skagen watches? Looking for something under $150, clean and minimalistic

>>9984008
>hublot

I'm looking for a good looking tritium dialed watch. Is it possible?

>>9984105
>1. Patek Philippe
>2. Vacheron Constantin
>3. A. Lange & Söhne
>4. Rolex
>5. Omega

>>9984256
>>9984254
Enhedslisten master-race reportere ind.

>>9984334
>>9984254
Hvilke ure?

Det er mig med Hublot'erne i denne tråd

>>9984008
>>9984054

Which do you prefer /fa/?
This which I dont think quite looks as good, but the quality is much higher...

>>9984350
...or this?

My first adult watch, $900 roughly. Is Raymond Weil fa approved?

>>9984350
>>9984355
or even this?

Citizen master quarts race reporting

>>9984344
Har et vintage Omega, et klovne ansigt, et Komandirskie og et Seiko 5.
Har dog også lige bestilt Maison Celadon Imperial II, den med påfugle guilloché.

Billedet er mit Omega.

>>9984334
Ej, det er fandme en joke.
Enhedslisten er jo skrald.
Og bor du ikke i Sverige?

>>9984399
Det er jo fint og afslappet.

>>9984395
yuck

>>9984414
Ja, det er sgu fint nok.
Tjener sgu't så mange penge.
Hva' laver du, eftersom du kan eje 3xHublot?

>>9984105

Patek Philippe
Ulysse Nardin
Arnold & Son
Seiko
Rolex

>>9984446
Ejer 2 firmaer og så har en masse aktier jeg har arvet. Derefter arbejder jeg en helvedes masse hver måned for at kunne leve det liv jeg nu gor.

>>9984457
>Derefter arbejder jeg en helvedes masse hver måned for at kunne leve det liv jeg nu gor.
Betvivler ikke at du arbejder meget, men hvad arbejder du med?

>>9984464
Jeg er både portræt/bryllups-fotograf og så har jeg et par Facebook-sider hvor andre firmaer reklamerer på, en af dem har over 700000 personer der synes godt om den.

Der er selvfolgelig også andre småting jeg gor at jeg får et par ekstra skillinger på lommen, men det skal ikke nævnes.

>>9972148
What am I looking at here? Is is custom made?

I apologize for the weird hand.

>>9984439
Get complimented on watch all the time.
Give no fucks

>>9984508
You should apologise for the ugly watch.

>>9984495
No, it's just cheap chink watches.

>>9984553
Doesn't make the watch nice nor good looking.
It looks like shit in my opinion, but to each his own.

>>9984553
by plens ofc

>>9984563
Said the person with a G-Shock to the Hublot Big Bang - Black Magic owner...

>>9984583
I don't own a G-Shock, unfortunately, they're very well made watches for their price and can endure more than most.
You shouldn't frown upon G-Shock, they're ugly as fuck, but very capable.

And I don't like your ugly Hublot, even if it costed half a kingdom.

>>9984508
nice rep
goes well with your easyjet flight

>>9984355
You either buy the 4$ fake one or get a Timex Weekender.
This watch is the pure definition of dogshit.
http://pt.aliexpress.com/item/fashion-quartz-dw-men-Daniel-Wellington-watches-women-36mm-40mm-Military-nylon-strap-luxury-brand-rose/32349366434.html

>>9984395
>hey anon what time is it
>wish i knew

>>9984726
So I assume you prefer the other two?

>>9984741
No. They look even more dogshit.

>>9984350

I like my Mondaine a lot. It fits with anything and people compliment me on it all the time. Even richfags.

>>9984771
You have this model?

>>9984744
Gud 1 m8

>>9984803
>Gud 1 m8
I'm not joking though, i'd rather go with 'denzel washington' than mondaine, so if you really don't want to consider something better just buy the DW

Every one of these threads, every post makes me kek.
clueless tasteless

fa's taste in watches is pretty much hipster. too obvious, tasteless mostly, part clueless
and i don't know shit about how watches work or their movements, just the esthetics

>>9984355
Literally nothing but brand hype

>>9984508
Nice fake

>>9984008
>48mm

Absolutely disgusting

>>9984105
Vacheron
ALS
FPJ
JLC
Seiko (fite me)

If I could have 2 more on there, I'd put Patek and AP. They're obviously excellent manufacturies, but there aren't very many designs of theirs that I really like.

R8?

>>9984008
Literally all of those are fake

>>9984184
Don't forget nignogs

>In harrods, having Langes I will never be able to afford put on my wrist when I came in to check out a Jaeger.
>Two blacker than the ace of spades bix nood african fuckers roll in
>Straight to the hublot section putting their mitts on the glass.

>tfw all these brands catering to non-whites so much
>go to Patek exhibition at Saatchi gallery.
>as many chink and sandnigger language catalogues as european language ones.

>>9984871
How do you know?

>>9984861
I've never been a fan of these. Looks like a Vestal watch.

>>9984882
Been a watch enthusiast for 5 years and frequent many watch forums, including replica forums

>>9984861
Comfiest bracelet in existence, even for manlet nowrists like me.

Definitely would cop, possibly a 15450, or a 15300 in a few years. If only they did a 450 in a blue dial.

>>9984931
Yeah this bracelet is like silk m8 but the 15400 comes in blue too. Is it too big for you or something?

>>9984105
PP
VC
JLC
ALS
FPJ

>>9984955
Yes. I have fairly small wrists and I wear a lot of vintage so I'm used to small watches. Biggest I have is a 42mm speedmaster pro (real original, right?) and the 400 wears pretty huge compared to that.

>tfw you will never be able to be a panerigatoni.

>>9984990
No the omega is cool, I used to have a chrono from them.

But yes the 15400 is 41mm so it's actually smaller than your omega but it wears much larger since it's thin and the bracelet is thick. Why do you like the blue dial so much? Just curious since I chose black because it's pretty versatile

>>9985030
Yeah, I know it's smaller. I blame the integrated lugs.

I don't know really, I just like blue dials, I guess. When I was younger I got a blue crosshair dial Raketa from the 80s and since then I've just liked them. My semi-realistic grail is probably an FPJ chronometre bleu like lawyerfriend has.

>>9984861
9/10
only tasteful royal oak

>>9981501
Not the guy who asked but thanks for that. Now I can't decide which one. Any recs on color?

>>9984861
Is that real

>>9985126
White is a classic look and the white sarb looks a lot like the kawaii grand seikos, black is a bit more casual. They're both very nice looking. I don't own either yet but I've really been meaning to buy the white one myself.

>>9971575

>>9985861
Not your picture, nice try though

>>9985861
why doesn't it have rolexrolexrolexrolex on the inner bezel

Just got this. I like the style and it wasn't too much. About 430$. Thoughts?

>>9985989
It's very shiny

>>9985989

Tissot is a pretty good brand and the 2824-2 movement is a dependable workhorse. Personally though I think the black dial version looks nicer.

What fucking watch do I buy. I wear basic fits, mainly apc jeans, reigning champ/norse hoodie or sweater, black hightops.

I'm stuck between a bunch of watches. Seiko diver, parnis diver are nice but I want something pretty understated. I really like this parnis milgauss, but it's pretty fucking shiny in a lot of pics and I think it'll stand out too much? Any other silver bracelet watches that aren't as shiny?

>>9986065
Parnis are Chinese rolex knockoffs
The seiko will last longer and be of better quality

>>9986033
I feel that the white can go with anything I wear.

>>9986068
Yeah they're more pricey though. I like the milgauss a lot but it's too shiny/dressy for my everyday fits I guess.

Diver is ok for that casual of a fit described? It's not too shiny, black dial, I like the dotted bezel more than any other diver watch.

>>9986092
The watch that the parnis is a knockoff of is actually pretty casual. Most rolex sport watches are very versatile

>>9986096
Yeah I wish I could just try them all on my wrist instead of scouring ebay. I just wear a casio terrorist and have been trying to find a casual everyday watch that isnt garbage for months.
I'm terribly indecisive, but I guess I've narrowed my choice down to those 2.

If the milgauss wasn't super shiny I'd cop that, there aren't any solutions or something I can soak it in to make it less shiny?

I think the diver might stand out too much, its bulkier looking than the parnis from pictures. I don't want the bezel catching on the cuff of my sweater or whatever. Im probably just retarded though, theyre both prety inexpensive I should just pull the trigger on one.

>>9986105
Seikos are very good watches, I recommend it over the parnis. However you could sand the parnis but then it would lose it's distinctive shine/aspects

>>9986105
Don't buy that cheap Chinese trash. The SKX007 is a great watch, I highly recommend it. Make sure you get a super oyster bracelet too though because it makes the watch look and feel a million times better than that piece of shit bracelet it comes on. If you're really so concerned about dressing it down you can always just put it on a nato strap too when you don't want to use the bracelet.

>>9986120
>>9986115
OK I don't know why I'm so drawn to the milgauss knockoff but I'm going to go with the advice and get the Seiko instead.

It will be more versatile; I'll get it with the black rubber strap, buy a super oyster bracelet (it indeed does look a lot nicer) later, as well as a decent NATO. That way I can dress up/down and it isn't super shiny.

Do I need some tools to switch out bands?

>>9986065
B A G E L S P O R T S
M I L G A U S S

>>9986143
Just a springbar tool, it should be like $5 at most.

Can't wait to get this one in.

Really want to get this watch, are leather straps okay with divers?

What's a watch you would envision a spy wearing?

I was thinking either

>Black Rolex Submariner No Date
>Some calculator watch like a Casio CA53-W

But I would love some suggestions pls

>>9984344
Har et Vintage Omega Seamaster 30 fra 1962
>>9984402
Jo, går på en urmager skole i Sverige.

>>9984008
>>9984054
Oh my god cool it on the fade slider

>>9986405
I'll go with the calculator watch, the Casio EDB610D-8C is something that would feel at home in a mid 2000's bad spy movie.

>>9985861
>Shitty GM era jaguar
>poor taste in rolexes
>thinking you're impressing anyone with your "stunting"
>lel

>>9971938
We get it kid, you spend your days sitting at the computer angry that other people like things.

Come back when time is important to you.

my Omega but it's off the strap

and here is the accutron movement

>>9986440
>not being able to tell that it's an obvious fake meme post

>>9971575

>>9984803

Yes, this model. I think.

>>9984815
>>9984821

What do you think of mine, I'm curious.

>>9983390

>>9983390
>>9986590
I like it, it's not too much and it's not unnoticed or not needed. I'd wear a dark blue t-shirt with it; something like this http://www.asos.com/asos/asos-t-shirt-with-contrast-neck/prod/pgeproduct.aspx?iid=5259934&clr=Blue&SearchQuery=blue+t+shirt&pgesize=36&pge=0&totalstyles=1015&gridsize=3&gridrow=3&gridcolumn=1

>>9986620

Thanks. And thank you for the advice, I suppose. I really don't come here for advice as most of the acne riddled kids here couldn't have style/class/whatever if it was for sale, but yea.

Also, this one.

>>9981429
Pocket watches are silly, but your insecurity is even sillier.
>I am so insecure that i can't let people wait for 30 seconds

Good god, you spineless faggot.

>>9984377

>Helvetica
>Swiss
>Made

Fucking why

>>9986487
>thinking it's a fake meme post
>thinking people don't actually do this
>thinking people aren't flexing with fake watches in shitty Audis and GM jags right this second

Poor anon, I've always felt badly for the mentally challenged

>>9986845
>orange+black
>NATO strap

Never thought I'd fall in love with a wristwatch.

Is it a custom or did you buy it like that.

>>9988046
Its because it's not his picture you fucking newfag

>>9986315
>Really want to get this watch, are leather straps okay with divers?
Yeah only if you're not a diver

>>9971575
Cosmograph Daytona Ref. 116520

>>9988057

No, ordered the straps.

Not a watch I own but I would like to. De Bethune DB16 Tourbillon Regulator.

>>9990075
what's that round blue thing?

>>9990085
moon phase, baby.

Shittiest, most useless complication a watch can have

>>9990092
so it shows the moon phases and that's it? lel

is it considered an exclusive thing on watches tho?

the first time i saw this watch i was a bit skeptical but i must say i think it's really fine now

>>9990085
It displays what phase the moon is in, set by a 29.5 day scale.
This one's a different style, in platinum.

>>9990109
Well, it's surely a beautiful watch. How much does this darling cost?

Basic daily beater

>>9990097
Not really exclusive at all, lots of watches have them, but it's more about the craftsmanship and artistry of the timepiece than anything, especially with watches that run upwards of $10,000.

>>9990114
Honestly it's expensive as fuck and I would only ever be able to buy it after years of saving and then it would become a family heirloom. The sites I've seen it on mention De Bethune running about $40,000, with that one being "toward the top of their range".

>>9990123
>$40,000
Welp. That is autistic as fuck to spend unless you're filthy rich tbh.

>>9990132
I agree 100% but it is a beautiful watch and if I'm old and not doing too much, and I somehow have the money for it, I would definitely buy it.

>>9990114
>>9990123
>>9990132
You are so cute.
That watch has a pricetag of over half a million dollars.

>>9990140
I'd do it

>>9990140
Half a million dollars, that's my condo.

>>9989947
Thinking of something similar. How do you like it? Is it kind of keeping the time?

looking for a cheap mechanical watch, cba to buy off ebay and found this site, what you think of it? For £30 I am not really bothered http://www.thelibertyexperiment.co.uk/store/p18/Men%27s_Skeleton_Automatic_Mechanical_Watch_.html

>>9990941

The fact that it's so cheap and there is no information about a maker or what movement it uses leads me to believe it's cheap Chinese garbage. If you want cheap buy a Vostok Komandirskie or step up to an Amphibia or Seiko 5. None of those are amazing but they're solid and dependable watches.

>>9990971

hmmm fair enough cheers, is it not just a cheap chinese automatic mechanical movement tho?

>>9990092
Nah, you can use a moonphase to track your sloot's menstrual cycle.

>>9990941
>screws actually nicely aligned

Wow, even this chinkshit is better than Hublot.

>>9977902
Good Taste.

my lowtier watch arrived today. Like the design

My lowtier watch arrived today. I like the design :]

who /casio f-91w/ here?