/fa/ - Fashion

They both look like shit.
If I saw you wearing those in public I would laugh at you and think you were pathetic.

tech runner. other looks like a piece of shit dipped in chocolate

>>9794818
Based on aesthetics only I personally prefer the adidas.

>>9794818
Tech runner hands down, way easier to pull off

both good if girl. tech runner if you're a guy

>>9794818
Both are terrible choices. I hope you choose to purchase a better pair than either of these

black patent looks bad on those futures. Regular leather futures or white patent leather is fine. Personally though i like the tech runner.

>>9794818
the tech runners

patent leather just looks bad to me

>>9794875
this guy gets it

They have both their qualities, but Tech Runner are way more versatile and easier to pull off.

>>9794818

Techrunners are more versatile overall, but people will probably think you have a physical disability or a balance problem or something with the way the thick sole is jutting off the back.

Futures, on the other hand, have a more interesting design, in my opinion, but are definitely less versatile. Also, in general, you should avoid the patent leather.

These are pretty different so it just depends on what you want to get out of them. If you want a "daily driver" I'd say the tech runner is the "safer" choice because it's more subdued in design and more versatile overall. If you want a statement shoe that you'll wear less often, get the futures in something other than patent leather. though, honestly, depending on your personal style, the futures could be both if you choose the right color and materials.

Booth are good if you're a child

>>9794818
don't buy the vagina sneakers

>>9794818
Rick Owens or MMM vags in another colourway or material.

>>9794818
neither, these are fucking hideous. youll thank me in a year.

Definitely the Futures.

get the techrunners, unless you can get the futures in non-patent leather black then do that

>>9794833
>>9794886
>>9796219
>>9795684

BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP BEEP

>>9794818
the future silhouette is nice but get a pair with a matt colour. they look stupid and make squeaking noises in the patent finish.

>>9794818
>not picking the best rickdidas of them all..

>>9794818
techrunners go with more things, futures look better if you make them work

>>9795679
Pretty much this.

i'll take this oppourtinity to ask,
for running/tech
rick springblades, y-3 kohnas or y-3, qasas?
inb4 go with reg adidas or rosches
for casuals:
rick geos, ramones, mmm gats, mmm future straps, or dbss high tops?

tech runner, patent futures look dumb

>>9796449
qasas, and dont fucking run in any of those shoes. for casual i personally would pick either of the mmms

>>9794818
honestly I'd go with the most recent iteration of the rick adidas line. sooo good looking in person

>>9796449
if these are your ONLY options
then for

>running/tech
id get the kohna's because ive never seen anyone with them, and theyre not as popular as quasa's have become,
and if you really want them later you can EASILY cop a rep of them on the cheap

>for casual wear
DO NOT i repeat DO NOT get fuckin geos or ramones ppl will think youre a fuckin clown and im not joking, the toebox on them is absolutely facked! and theyve been waaaay overplayed in the fashion world

id highly suggest getting MMM GATS or future straps ONLY IF they're patent leather white or black and not the shiny plastic looking ones

although with future's you're GONNA get noticed, so if that's what you want walking around then by all means get em, with the GATS you can wear them with almost anything and most ppl wont really notice you, and theyre very understated shoes

so it essentially all comes down to do you want to be noticed? or not?

i myself love wearing shoes or color's ppl dont see everyday,
and i always get compliments when i wear my bright fuchsia solar red air maxes, esp when i drop by the footlocker thats close to my house, so it's kinda cool when ppl are always checking them out and giving me compliments and asking where i got em

>>9796449
you will look cool running in those shoes but it will wreck your legs and make you feel like an idiot for considering it afterwards

>>9796598
>taking advice from a guy who thinks his airmaxes are good cause he gets complimented by plebs

>>9796375
kek

>>9796375
perfect

>>9796598
>patent leather white or black and not the shiny plastic looking ones

uh do you even know what Patent Leather is?

>>9796449
For the tech shoe get the ricks or the Qasa's. The Kohna is really flimsy and bad in person.

Don't consider any of these. Leave this thread and reconsider your views on fashion

>>9796598
All the on feet pictures I've seen from the Margielas look terrible; bulbous and gaudy.

>>9794818
get the ricks mate

>>9796598
in response to this dude, i agree about geos for the most part unless you get the all blacks and pull them off well
ramones are fine as long as you can take a joke - if you like them get them.
altho tbh if you are posting in a thread like this then personal confidence and autonomy probably isnt your game

>>9797634
>>9796598

honestly geos are only outplayed on the internet, if im lucky i see a pair like once a month

>>9797651
this is true as well but again its all about personal taste - i like them when i first saw them, now i'm sick of them, so yeah definitely go for it if you like them they werent hyped for no reason