/fa/ - Fashion

there is no "fa's verdict" on a best pair under $100 because there aren't any

>>9692378
>buying >$100 boots

>>9692406
>not knowing how to properly signify inequalities
it would be buying <$100 boots since 100 would be the greater value
the more u kno :^)

>$100
that cant even buy you the sole

The h&m ones arent so bad if you just want the look. Don't listen to the other teenagers on here desperate to flaunt daddy's money.

http://www.hm.com/us/product/14635?article=14635-B#article=14635-A

>under $100
LOL

>>9692378

how long did it take you to save 100 dollars? a month? why not wait 4 months and get a decent pair? Do you need them tomorrow?

>>9692406
>>9692410
I understand that /fa/ loves to brand whore, but there is literally nothing signifying difference between any of the brands of chelseas i've seen

>>9692406
> >$100
>greater than $100

>>9692432
Okay, well if I had a budget of say, $500, what would be the best pair?

Give up

>>9692434
Chelsea boots are better constructed when it's one piece. As in, under the elastic, there is no seam. There literally is a difference between brands. If you don't believe that, why be interested in fashion? Why not just buy your clothes at target or walmart?

>>9692434
>>9692424
I made the mistake of buying $180 boots. Don't do it. The sole will be made of particle board and will eat away in less than 160 hours of wear. pls stop shit posting, thanks

Chelsea boots are amongst the gayest most feminine things a man can wear

>>9692436
used slp

>>9692453
Anyone buying $100 boots is obviously not looking for a lifetime investment you fucking idiot. That price point is perfect for trying out a style before investing more into it, chances are OP won't even like chelsea boots as they're pretty hard to pull off.

Dropping serious money on something you might not even like is retarded.

>>9692477
>they're pretty hard to pull off.
kek
no they're not
you just have to be skinny and not dress like shit

>>9692436

RM Williams.

Especially now the AUD is weak.

>>9692477
>lifetime investment
4 weeks of 40 hours of walking. Some people actually have jobs, school, etc.

>>9692453
>particleboard
You mean leather sole? Every boot or dress shoe that uses leather shoe will need resoling if you wear them a lot within a year.

>>9692481
Right and not everyone is skinny or has the wardrobe for it .

>>9692453
I bet you wore them in the rain or other wet conditions like a twat

>>9692496
And those people will not buy chelseas.

>>9692492
No, it's literally particle board. I know what a decent boot's sole looks like and how long it should last
>>9692497
No; I live in a desert

>>9692496
it's a very basic boot style, you don't need an eating disorder or a pair of slp jeans to wear them
l o l

>>9692453
thats a leather sole though? and thats how they look when worn retard

>>9692502
no, AllSaints uses paint instead of actual leather

>>9692378
get a cheap hooker, it'll make you happier than $100 boots

>>9692436

Crockett and Jones. saw a nice ass pair on ebay.

Thinking about copping tomorrow for $54.

>>9692640
bad

>>9692467
SLP is wack now

>>9692640
>>9692644

for my pusher man outfit.

>>9692621
what if im asex

https://www.ssense.com/en-us/men/product/comme-des-garcons-homme-plus/black-leather-guarachero-boots/579203

These are good for $500

If you've never worn Chelseas before and are about to start experimenting with the style, don't listen to people telling you to cop a 600 dollar pair of boots that you may not even like.

Albeit you may have money to blow. I'm a bit of a jew when it comes to money, even if I have shit tons of it I don't want to spend a lot if I'm uncertain.

Cop a 90 dollar pair or something from a fast fashion outlet, make sure they don't look - too - tacky since it could influence your perception of the style, and then rock them with how they're meant to be worn.

Dress with a slim/skinny silhouette and solid, dark and neutral colors. Nothing too loud to start off with.

I'm sure you'll like it, if you're happy after a couple months, drop money on an actual nice pair.

>>9692661
This goes well with my Aeropostal brand clothes.

>>9692665
this is weird to me, mostly because of my aversion to fast fashion clothing, but why not try on a nice pair? that should really tell you all you need to know.

>>9692687
this
>>9692665
You make it seem as if people can't possibly find chelsea boots at stores to see if their wardrobe can fit with the boot.

>>9692687
Will it's true that it would be nice to cop a 600+ dollar pair to start out with, and experience that incredible feeling of designer quality, imagine if the OP ends up hating the style and is stuck with a pair of boots that are worth more than a minimum wage paycheck.

Like I said, if s/he has the money to spend and doesn't care, by all means, go for some Saint Laurent Paris, but if they don't want the former to happen, it's okay to cop a fast fashion outlet's knockoffs.

>>9692699
>>9692687
Oh, well yes you can always do that too. Wear a fit and try them on a store.

I was assuming OP was interested in actually buying them for trial, though. In which case, I advice not entering in with a designer pair to start off with.

>>9692700
> stuck with a pair of boots
>implying it's impossible to resell SLP ____
It's okay to cop fast fashion if you cant fucking afford anything else.

>>9692706
Of course you can always resell those designer boots. I doubt you'll get all your money back though.

Like I said, I don't like wasting money, and I doubt OP does either. Just my two cents speaking from experience.

>>9692709
If you can afford designer boots you can afford to take a loss.

>>9692711
I can agree with this.