/fa/ - Fashion

ugly as fuck, also diesel is a brand you don't want to be associated with

>>9368178
it looks pretty cheap

i use pic related, waterproof and simple, also pretty comfy, I've used it for day hikes etc. too

>>9368178
where's that backpack infographic at

OP here I find it hard to get a backpack that is yet fashionable and not very expensive.

Didn't see anything in the infrographic I like really.

>>9368334
>>9368338
you beauty

>>9368503

Here's a link to an online store I know

http://www.luisaviaroma.com/index.aspx?#CatalogSrv.ashx|Season=actual&Gender=men&SubLine=bags&DesignerId=&CategoryId=82&ItemSeasonId=&ItemCollectionId=&ItemId=0&ColorId=&FromSearch=false&PriceRange=&Discount=&SizeTypeId=&SizeId=&Available=false&NewArrivals=false&ListaId=&paletteColors=&filterDes=

As you can see though they are waay to expensive nobody can afford that stuff.

>>9368503

Here's a link to an online store I know

http://www.luisaviaroma.com/index.aspx?#CatalogSrv.ashx|Season=actual&Gender=men&SubLine=bags&DesignerId=&CategoryId=82&ItemSeasonId=&ItemCollectionId=&ItemId=0&ColorId=&FromSearch=false&PriceRange=&Discount=&SizeTypeId=&SizeId=&Available=false&NewArrivals=false&ListaId=&paletteColors=&filterDes=

>>9368522
any time, bro

>>9368522
any time, bro

>>9368334
Why are there bags costing 200 or 300+
Is the quality really that phenomenal?

Which one should I cop? Is it worth the price?

>>9368967
It's probably the material and brand, meaning that unless you find them visual pleasing or comfy they are not worth your wallet.

>>9368338
Got the north face one, it's comfy and useful as fuck, in college when I was lugging around all my books the back of it was always straight.

>>9368581
wtf? bruce willis with hair?

>>9370479
2nd one and see if it's returnable or find a copy in a store, their like clothes, they look very different in dynamic lighting.

You don't want to be stuck with a shit bag mate.

>>9368334

Are any of those backpacks with the strap functional?(dont know style name sorry)

They look a little soft and flimsy, are the more expensive ones sturdy as fuck?

>>9368178

>>9370479
would not cop either

No love for Muji?
Just ordered a black polyester. I wanted the cotton version but they've been sold out, but that might be for the best since I spend everyday in a greenhouse and such

Recent cop. Pelican s100.

I never over fill it so it doesn't look this fat.

>>9370479
whatever you do do not get the little america, that thing is so played out

Hi, I'm looking for something I'd use at college, I feel like a backpck is kinda childish. Do you know anything more "adult" I could buy? Or can you convince me that I won't look 12 with a back pack?

>>9372836

To me wearing a backback is like 90% posture and gait.

Walk hunchbacked all clumsily with the flat of your foot banging off the ground with two straps over your shoulder you will look autistic

Be graceful and you should be alright

saving for this beauty

Isar is the only answer, I bought it thinking it simply had a nice silhouette but the materials are way better than those of any other bag I've had before. Would cop again

>>9372743
They're so bad. I saw both the cotton and plastic ones at the Muji store downtown. Both of them are paper thin. I feel like they would rip even if I just put 1 textbook inside.

>>9370479
Neither.

How is this one? Costs about 200$. Should I cop?

I've been pretty content with my Raf x Eastpak bag, but this new Cote bag is seriously tempting me.

>>9372836
don't be an autist, man. everyone wears a backpack.

>>9374009
you can get a back for 20 that looks exactly like that. it doesnt even look good its a generic bag what are you doing

>>9374154
no one who's over the age of 25 or has any kind of "professional" life wears a backpack

>>9375180
It's more duffle bags at that point. Which are /fa/ but not in college.

>>9370479
White/cream will get dirty really easily bruh