/fa/ - Fashion

i vote converse

AF1's (no bait)

>>8968109
Don't fall for this bait.

af1s are too big for the summer

sk8 hi

It's summer here at Aus, is it acceptable to wear white high tops with shorts?

CDG X Converse

Anything else is a meme

>>8968162
yes you faggot

>>8968181
>shitty cheap shoes with a heart logo

jeez calling everything a meme is the worst meme

Whatever this is. Reverse search says Miharayasushiro but not much else.

Are sk8 his juvenile? I'm 20 in college. Thinking of copping a pair in either white or black.

Been seeing a lot of mixed shit on this board and it's frustrating actually

>>8968214

Dude, think for yourself.

MFA and /fa/ says SK8-His are played out. I don't care if they're played out and I got my first pair ever and I love 'em.

I get compliments on them, from girls mostly. It's a stereotype that girls like SK8-His but whatever the fuck, just buy them if you know how you wanna wear them.

Shit.

>>8968211
AF1 rip basically, just an altered sole

>>8968214
I have the whites, looks gorgeous and fits nice. Rough them up in the dirt and looks pretty neato

>>8968211
That has an odd heel like a boot but looks like an AF1 on the top.

Seems like an odd combo to me

>>8968081

>>8968181
>CDG x Converse isnt a meme
my sides

Where I live white converse is what all the 16-18 year old girls wear.

Go with sk8 hi's. They generally look better anyway

>>8968202
post inspo and I'll love you forever

>>8968211
these remind me of hender schemes if they weren't that ugly tan color

w2c?

>>8968236
yeah you are right, fuck /fa/. I just copped a black and white pair in leather. Considering people are still wearing Js into their 30s, I think I can wear these and do whatever I want. Might as well, because once I graduate is probably when I'll stop being able to do this anyways. Thanks anon

>>8968271
Man, I wish I could cop the white ones pictured >>8968299. Leather looks so much nicer than the ones that are out now.

>>8968314

I've posted this before, only one reply.

I have the new jack purcells I copped a year ago in canvas. They are pretty cool, but they are kinda hot because of the eyelet placing, and they feel stiff as fuck.

I kinda wanna cop a pair of the old leather ones before there is absolutely no place left to grab them from to replace them with, but another part of me is saying "stop buying converse, fuccboi"

I'm a huge fan of the style though. What do you think?

>>8968344
you'll have em for later as mint condition grails even if you don't need em now

opinions on these?

>>8968327
I have the leather Sk8 Hi's. They are pretty fuckin dope.

>>8968327
Somebody posted pics of the original leather sk8 his and they look exactly the same as the XTUFF leather sk8 his. The only major difference is that panel that comes from the eyelets & no brown lining & sole.

>>8968455
Pic related is my Sk8 Hi LX leather. These actually have a full leather upper. The XTUFF has a canvas upper. I think the lining is leather, but I don't know because I don't have those.

ty bb <3

>>8968393
would copp, gotta have the right pants with them doe

>>8968477
I have the XTUFFs, theyre leather as well, its coated in something too. They're practically the same.

>>8968572
are you sure
are you really positive

>>8968766
lol

>>8968393
I love them. Really muted colors, earth tones, washed out look I feel like would go best with them.

Anyone know any cream color sneakers?

i cant find the mids in size 9.5 anywhere online

should i just get AF1 lows?

>>8969039
Ye af1 lows are sick as long as they fit almost perfectly to make them look as small as possible and prevent ugly cracks. I have mids that are almost a size too big and i feel shitty wearing those and wish that i bought lows.

Unif 101s

Most sites that have these put them in the women's section, but no one can really tell, right?

>>8968119
>>8968214
>>8968271
>>8968327
How do they fit compared Nike or other shoes you own?

>>8969054
good to know, thanks anon

they dont look too big on me, i normally wear a 9 but tried some on in the black colorway at footlocker (didnt have any whites so i have to get em online) and they were pretty tight on me. the 9.5s feel much better and look just right. i'll cop em tomorrow

>>8969065
They look like clown boots

>>8968344

get the left in leather

I'd recommend these but I don't know what they're called

>>8969273
>white sneaker general
>posts black sneakers

anon pls

>>8968393
autistic as fuck

what are your feelings on national standards

Should I cop white CRT300s?

>>8968202
shorts and hightops make you look like a fag from the WAYWTs

>>8969729
Those look really good, no idea about the quality though.

>>8969729
National Standards are some of my favourite shoes out there, they're gorgeous, reasonably priced and presumably high quality.

They get slept on so much here.

Any suggestions for white/off-white canvas sneakers? I really like how "basic" the Shoes Like Pottery sneakers are, but the toe box looks super clunky in real life.

>>8969744
w2c?

>>8968998
Shoes like pottery come to mind.

I have been looking at white sk8 his for months now

i think im just gonna bite the bullet and cop

god damn they look nice

>>8968081
bought myself a pair of vans hosoi sneakers (the one on the pic). worn out in 4 months. worst pair of sneakers i had, (the quality of materials is ass) eventhough they looked cool

>>8970025
>buying skate shoes
>not skating with them
>complaining they weren't good
dumb ass nigga

>>8968081
>>8968299
>>8968477
>>8968766
>>8970025
>vans

>>8970029
did you even read what i wrote? The leather was poor quality and i got a hole on the inside in a week or so. And i didnt say i WASNT skating either, dumbo.

>>8970035
What do you mean by that?

>>8970035
>menes buzzwords :DDDD

>>8970025
vans quality is garbage from my experience. soles fall off in months.

>>8968766
not him but I have the white ones

They are coated in something weird but its leather

Not canvas for sure.

Should I ?

>>8968393
paladiums are gross

So I've been looking into Greats Brand and Mosson Bricke from urban outfitters. Can anyone say anything about the quality?

>>8969772
can I have more on this please? I have been eyeing these for awhile and being a pretty broke person, this 160 bucks needs to go into something I know I wont regret.

>>8968393
would buy, but cant get those ones in australia

Good choice? Bad choice?

You decide.

>>8970380
eh? eh?

>>8968081
Why are those white Van Sk8 hi's so impossible to find?

whats the feel on keds? i got a pair for 2$ and really digging them p sure theyre womens but thats never stopped me before

>>8970392
hm? these are a few options for me

also shoes like pottery but I need more details on what they look like being worn and over time

I really like the sk8 hi California collection because of that sick zipper on the back but I wish they had a black colorway, or at least a black stripe on these, that would be a grail for me

>>8970510
Yeah the navy stripe and red/white lining ruin it for me.

>>8970510
a friend of mine has these
i just googled and seems like these are also available in black/white

>>8970516
I don't know. That navy stripe is nicer than black but the the red is killing me too

>>8970570
The depressing thing is its impossible yo find shoes at size 12. Nobody here at /fa/ has feet bigger than the common girl so BST is a bust, and sz 12 and up look like clown shoes that ruin the aesthetics.

>>8970535
I'm pretty sure those are womens. They don't run above size 10 mens.

>>8969729
what site do you use to cop these though? haha
not on ssense, end, mr porter etc.

>>8970224
not green?

these ones

>>8969759
they make ripoffs
/fa/ prefers og

>>8970971
Those are so gorgeous but they're sold out in almost every size. The blue/black ones are still in stock though.

I want to order a pair of stan smiths online but I'm afraid I'll fuck up the sizing. I'm a size ten in the shitty payless shoes I have now, what should I do?

>>8969693
If I new what they were called I could find a white pair. I personally wouldn't mind a dark blue or all black pair or though.

Green or blue stan smiths? Whats more effay?

>>8970971
Which model are these? Do sk8 hi's run true to size?

>>8971583
/fa/ will say green but it looks like a baby got diarrhea on your shoes

navy is far more versatile and lowkey

gant sneakers? thoughts? I'm torn between these and the national standards..

Thoughts on this, /fa/?

>>8971583

navy, definitely

if you want to go hxc mode though, you custom miadidas the back of the heel and logo to be black

>cop one of these, free shipping, free returns (but am a manlet (5'6), idk if mids would look good on me)

or

>cop lows from footlocker, 97$ shipped, not sure about return policy but website says "Returns for On-line orders must take place within 90 days from the original shipment date in order to receive a credit back in the original form of payment." (so probably free, but never bought from footlocker before)

>>8971684
cute

>>8971822
fellow manlet here, I copped mids and they still look fine, but i also like their shape way more than lows as i find lows to look like an obese leather lowtop

>>8969772
supergas are similar to that and less clunky

>>8970091
>>8970042
what are you guys doing to your shoes that they're falling apart in like three months? ive had a pair ive worn for about six months and they're barely starting to wear a hole in the upper on the inside. the only thin is the sole separates in a few places towards the front.

>>8972483
probably live in cities and actually walk unlike your lazy american ass that drives everywhere

I live in a small town and its about 7-8 miles to the grocery store and it's not like I'm going to carry my fucking groceries home, am I? Also, it's not like I have many places to walk regardless but I usually was around the neighborhood a couple times daily which is just a few miles.

nice stereotypes, though

>>8972527
>>8972503

>>8972479
that's good to know, i think i'll try out the mids then, and if i dont really care for them i can return them free from amazon, and i disagree about the lows i think they still look really nice but i see what you mean. what would you recommend for some slimmer, sleeker lowtop white shoes? i was thinking these NBs but i cant find em anywhere

>>8973094
>i was thinking these NBs but i cant find em anywhere

iktfb

;_;

turn up

>>8973248
TO THE MOON

>>8973227

http://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-Aug-NB-New-Balance-Mens-Lifestyle-Sneakers-Running-Shoes-CTR300VW-/231309192459?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&var=&hash=item35db1a2d0b

faggots

>>8974075
>>8973094
anyone know how these beautiful motherfuckers fit?
size 12 us in docs

>>8970380
I have them, the glue is shit and the leather dos not stick to the rubber sidewall

fave

>>8974628

>>8972482
lel my ex girlfriend wears those

>>8973254
the mids look so much better

>>8968081
>all white leather converses highs
>leather converses
>leather
what.

>>8968477
Copping black leather sk8 vans as soon as my paycheck gets here.

>>8974696
i got similar looking sneakers two days ago. Are they really for females?

>>8974950
They're unisex, retard.

>>8970224
warning. pic related is the shitty version, just for you to know.

I have been loving these.

>>8975001
i have been waiting to cop a pair of these

>>8975001
>inb4 some retard asks w2c

usually stick to air force memes, tempted by these

I'll be wearing these through Aus summer

Lightweight, comfotable, australian

They look a bit slimmer IRL, i am realy liking them

>>8974927
converse come in leather u fuckin inbred

>>8975048
Holy fuck you can get high top volleys??
Are you going to put a sealant on these or anything? I know white shoes look good when they get dirtied but the canvas on these soaks up way too much dirt and it gets too much

>>8975048
did you mean australian as a pro or con? i'm confused

>>8975007

w2c fuckface

>>8975125
Yeah they are pretty new, just look up volley high leap plaid they are only $50.

Mine are arent too dirty but they have like one or two stains which look shit so im going to clean them, havent considered sealant, how do you think that would look? i feel like it might ruin they overall effect of dont give a fuck volleys. but i dont know much about sealant so idk.

>>8975137
pro, considering i am in Australia and its a bit more unique than just having converse or vans

I got these recently. Feiyue Origine 1920.

>>8975169
help me out guys

>>8976806
>>8976806

>>8975001

thinking of copping a pair, how do they fit?

>>8969273
they're by adidos
>>8969729
fake CPs
>>8971643
>trying to be lowkey
>>8971684
if you're a preteen girl
>>8974977
this
>>8975169
lol what the fuck? in China only very poor school children wear those (for example kids that live in the country side, they play soccer with a plastic ball and school has no air conditioning) because they don't have money to buy adidas or nike shoes. they are literally shit, the worst atheletic shoes money can buy

>>8970954
They're usually on menlook
http://www.menlook.com/us/sneakers/edition-3-white-leather-sneakers-national-standard-90740.html?cm_mmc=AWIN-_-104504-_-Deeplink-_-Generic&ectrans=1&clickref=29968517&awc=5687_1413743553_536519045a61418780ff4e75c9800c1f

Does anyone know of any white leather shoes that are quite wide?

>>8973094
The ones on their website are only $75
http://www.newbalance.com/pd/new-balance-crt300/CRT300-HC.html?dwvar_CRT300-HC_color=Light%20Grey_with_White#color=Light Grey_with_White&width=D

>>8975001
did you get them from menlook?

>>8977154
anyone know anything about the customs?

>>8973227
See
>>8977178
It's kinda hard to help people when they can't even check the actual new balance website.

>>8977181
>Any import duties and taxes for deliveries outside the EU are charged once the parcel has reached the destination country and these charges must be paid by the recipient of the parcel. Unfortunately, we have no control over these charges as customs policies vary from country to country. If you have any questions related to customs charges you are advised to contact your local customs office.
That's straight from their website

>>8968393
just got a tight pair of baggys in navy. so cash

>>8968299
i have these niggers too but what do i waer them with/?
post inspo pls

>>8968081
>white sneakers
never. not even fucking once.
LOL@ all these faggots ITT looking like Seinfeld

y/n?

I kinda wanna cop a pair of these but I'm not sure...

>>8977257
na

>>8977199
>>8977178
no you dummies, the ones on the NB site are gray and white, not white and white

>>8977109
I didn't buy them to be athletic in. I like how they look.

which should i cop?

>>8977425
i wish i could have these dilemmas

>>8977425
lel i've been saving up since before you were born for some white sneakers, im sure i'm no more well off than you are as far as money is concerned. just save up m8

>>8977456
meant to reply to >>8977432

>>8977456
>im sure i'm no more well off than you are
lol

>>8977474
not op, but if you can't save up ~$300, you should seriously reevaluate your life. either that, or you're still in high school

>>8977508
i'm in college with a part time job. I can by CPs right now if I wanted but I'm terrible at justifying purchases

>>8977508
>>8977533
Lol I earn 1k+ pw and I can barely justify spending $200 on shoes.

tbh if you're spending more than 10% of you're weekly income on shoes you're doing something wrong with your life.

>>8977541
yeah I don't make that much at all.

But i have no responsibilities.

>>8977541
lol that maybe makes sense if you spend 10% of you weekly income on shoes once a week, otherwise that's the dumbest thing i've ever heard.

>>8977412
poser fuck boy no fashion

>>8977595
Shoes are a metaphor for fashion/luxuries you mongoloid.

>>8977109
Wait, there's a shitty and good version of Stan Smiths? Where to cop the good kind?

>>8977607
lol you're trying to speak in metaphors on a fashion board? great job spreading your wisdom m8 you've influenced a lot of lives today

I didn't get to post these yet right?
http://www.saturdaysnyc.com/item/mike-suede

>>8977621
smh, 2fuccboi2sad

>>8977611

the good kind has a suede color tab on the back and has thinner leather and a thinner profile

it's more expensive though and is only sold in Europe. will probably run you around 130 if you're in the states - definitely worth it though, the shitty american version looks absolutely disgusting

>>8968393
Discount warriors

>>8977607
omg who?

>>8977651
I thought all of them had suede color tabs though. At least the pair at the footlocker that I tried them on had suede tabs

>>8977629
I like those. What season are they from?

>>8977199
I'm not in USA, they won't ship to my country; my country's NB site doesn't have them available.

>>8974075
>only manlet sizes remaining

thansk anyway

>>8978259
The one's i'm wearing are from their Summer 2014 season so they're discontinued (sorry) but normally they cycle their designs every now and then so i'd keep an eye on their store.

>>8977223
Was meant to reply to
>>8977185

cop?

>>8969054
>cracks
my af-1 have cracks, how do i fix?

>>8974927
do some research before you act smart please.

>>8978491
oh my god...

>>8977265
These would be so nice if they weren't ruined by the stupid double rim thing around the bottom and the ugly toe box.

sadly it's a dnc, anon

>>8970392
shit yes son
i have the black and white version and they age so fucking well its like a wine for dick sake

>>8975167
post fit fuccboi

please

>>8978705
Imo both are better than the basic Jack Purcell

>>8970971
W2C????

>>8970224
Go green.
As in cop the shoe and pick green.

>>8968766
they're fucking leather you faggot, jesus.

>>8968477
where2cop

>>8975001
where2cop

>>8970392
W2C

>>8979373
https://www.jcrew.com/mens_category/shoes/sneakers/PRDOVR~85231/85231.jsp?color_name=white

>>8970392
is there any way to remove that blue nike swish?
would look so much better w/o

just dyed my shoes with tea. what do you guys think?

>>8979700
the colour is nice but they look shitty otherwise

>>8979690
seam ripper

>>8979709
because they're vans?

>>8979700
meh
whole point of these is being monochrome

>>8979714
Because they are falling apart.

>>8979722
i wanted off white shoes, I think they look better

What do you guys think of these? Thinking about copping in white or black.

>>8969273
adaidas dragons

>>8979827
>>8969273
>adaidas

oops

but yeah dragons are sick I used to have the colorway in that picture

>>8979739
They look pretty dope, but stuff like that often doesn't look anything like what it looks like on UO.

CPs would be the platonic ideal of "white sneakers" if only they didn't have the gold stamp.

>>8975041
tbh one of the worst af1 rehashes ive ever seen
smh givenchy

I copped the fake CPs from Primark and they're surprisingly good. The design is literally the exact same as the CPs apart from the tiny detail on the heel and the numbers obviously. For €17 they're definitely good for poorfags like myself.

>>8979873
Real relative cost is ~100 euros given that CPs will probably last 5 times as long. Or ~200 if you account for the cost of having to visit a primark.

>>8979885

I've had them for 6 months now and wear them maybe 2-3 times a week and I've only had to clean them once a month.

>>8979700
Vans are disgusting, but these are especially disgusting.

I really like these
I have white canvas sk8 his though so I can't justify copping them for myself
Maybe if I can find them on some mad sale

>>8979938
these are so clean. damn

>tfw you realize you can order real GATs from online surplus retailers for way cheaper than those Margiela knockoffs

Well now I have $250 to spend on an escort or something.

>>8980025
what's the qulity like on real gats

>>8980039

i'm assuming decent since they're german, leather, and made with the intention of being used hard daily

>>8979873
link?

Might cop some white sk8 his, which2c?

http://www.barneys.com/Vans-SK8-Hi-LX-Sneakers/503693263,default,pd.html?gclid=CMuNi9Od1cACFVVsfgodE6MAuQ

or

http://www.vans.com/shop/xtuff-sk8-hi-reissue-true-white-bran

Or is there another white sk8 hi I should get?

>>8970961
>>8974977
>>8979291
But I really don't like the green ones

>>8980025
>online surplus retailers
where are these?

>>8980670
>http://www.barneys.com/Vans-SK8-Hi-LX-Sneakers/503693263,default,pd.html?gclid=CMuNi9Od1cACFVVsfgodE6MAuQ
these but it looks like they're sold out

>>8981415
yeah these are like impossible to find now

Can't find these anywhere
>>8981017

>>8981849
up your a hole

>>8979739

The thin soles make them look like women's shoes honestly.

C/N? xtuff reissue

Also considering these: http://www.vans.com/shop/leather-sk8-hi-slim-zip-rue-white-snow-leopard

these look cleaner but i do like the black stripe on white

>>8979938
Where to cop in mens sizing?

>>8968081
thoughts?
girl here btw

>>8983186
imo you'd still rather try and avoid that kinda obnoxious branding.

I'm kinda liking these Our Legacy sneakers, basically vans in better quality on cup soles.

Surprised no one said CPs yet, theyre not even that much u can get a pair kinda cheap on tresbien if youre in the US plus the 10% sign up discount, its a good af deal

Just checked right now and total comes out to 288$ downside is they only have sizes 45 n 46 left lol i mean at least u can cop in a different colorway?? Clownboiz dont sleep if thats your size!!

is size 46 yuropoor a size 12 in us?
i tried google but im getting some conflicting results

>>8980093

As far as I know Primark don't sell stuff online. I copped them in-store at Primark Alexanderplatz in Berlin.

Here's a picture I just took. Excuse me for them being slightly dirty, weather's been really shitty here.

>>8983204
how to get 10% discount?

>>8983186
If you aren't ugly, you can wear pretty much anything you want. Except over-branded shit.

>>8983371
>plus the 10% sign up discount
>plus the 10% sign up discount
>plus the 10% sign up discount
>sign up discount
>sign up
>discount

Retard.

>>8983445
to their facebook mailing list

>>8983186
>>8983191
imo that particular branding would look cute on a girl

Fellow wide feet sufferers, w2c decent sneakers that actually fit us?

GATs for 40,50e, AF1's for 35e or pic related for 25e?

>>8974075
>from Hong Kong
if i buy these, will it take a year/ shoes are fake af?

>>8982335
Hard as fuck to find in big sizes unfortunately, I found 41 eu size ones which I could probably wear but I usually wear 42

>>8983743
anything but pic related
gats are more versatile though 40-50 seems expensive for gats

is there anywhere to cop the all leather sk8 his or should i settle for the xtuffs?

Winter is coming will white sneakers be still effay ?

>>8984831
Nope your're SOL
but these came out this month, although they're off-white. you may get a chance to cop them still if they haven't sold out in your size

>>8984978
I've never seen any pictures of white sneakers in snow but I can imagine it looking good.

just get either a pair of chucks or cps and be done with it

how does /fa/ keep their white sneakers white? Or do you age/dirty them?

consider copping all white air max 90
why haven't they been mentioned yet?

>>8985356

because those aren't readily available

>>8985367
nike id?
dont need the usa flag

>>8985356
bc they are as unstylish as that hideous backpack

do i need to wear a white top or at least a lighter color to balance if i want to wear white shoes? i tried wearing white sk8 his with black jeans and a blackwatch flannel, but it just looked off

>>8985404
No, you dont

What's the general view on River Islands? SL/01 rip-offs, only $60

those converse for sure. sk8 his suck and make you look poor

what do u guys think of my chucks?? theyre really old

hey /fa/ thoughts on these? i know these aren´t white but i like the cream color they have and the zip in the back

>>8977602
Lol ok

>>8975169
what sox r those

Considering copping these. Thoughts?
pic related

>>8986605
They'd be awesome without the zipper

Considering copping these. Thoughts?

>>8977425
get top left. I have them, they're great and less played out than achilles

>>8979700
nice!

got a pair of these badboys a couple of years ago. Silly question though hopefully someone can help me out.
I find the tongues always slip down the side of the shoe. Not sure if its something to do with the way I walk or what. Has anyone else had this issue? Not sure what to do about it.

>>8987162
forgot pic

please help /fa/, should i get these from a friend? he said i can have them for 200... i know for a fact he bought them when they came out for 130 cop or not?

>>8987208
then he's a dick for trying to make $70 off you.

>>8987208
buy twilight white reeboks instead
or customize some white reeboks

>>8987208
there h&m quality type shoes with a MMM name branded on them literally not worth it bro, especially for 200. i will say though they are hard to find/purchase

>>8970510
I really, really like the navy stripe. Has sort of the same colorway of the Nike x APC Blazers.

>>8979700
I like em.

>>8979739
I bought the low top version as a pair of beater shoes and they look great but tbh the are complete shit quality. dnc

>>8986410
why hasn't anybody noticed this picture yet? these are awesome. first converse i would actually buy. w2c

>>8987208

nononono

>>8985097
w2c these?

>>8988487
>>8985097
secondin this. w2c?

I'll buy some white sneakers soon. Any advice ?

>>8989605
sure

>>8989605
ok

>>8989609
>>8989737
thanks based anons

af1 mids or sk8 his for a skinny manlet?

>>8990197
Sk8 his will make you look a little less try hard

>>8970394
>>8971188

ordered a pair last nigh (UK)
http://www.asos.com/vans/vans-sk8-hi-trainers/prod/pgeproduct.aspx?iid=4021658&clr=White&SearchQuery=vans&pgesize=30&pge=1&totalstyles=30&gridsize=3&gridrow=2&gridcolumn=3

>>8974977
>>8977859
>>8977651
Where are you supposed to get the premium ones in the US? Was thinking of copping a pair

>>8968081
to me sk8 hi looks a thousand times cooler

>>8973248
tell them

Anyone know where I can cop a pair these in a smaller size?

http://www.grailed.com/listings/29813-nike-2000-fortnight