[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 464 KB, 780x508, tvvyvl[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702873 No.8702873[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How are Converse All-Star for a basic, casual-wear, poorfag shoe?

>> No.8702887
File: 129 KB, 1622x1622, 5039400339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702887

>>8702873
Obvious superior model.

>> No.8702893

they are the incarnation of a basic, casual-wear shoe. They aren't exactly cheap though, at least not in germany.

>> No.8702894
File: 335 KB, 784x584, wemkcj[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702894

>>8702873
Or white ones, especially with blue jeans.

>> No.8702904
File: 192 KB, 1024x683, converse-chuck-taylor-1970-low-white-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702904

>>8702894
Ask me why the Converse CT70 model is better.

>> No.8702905

>>8702904
Why?

>> No.8702909
File: 29 KB, 550x825, 550x825.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702909

They have an all white ox chuck still I bet.
Try copping the ones without the white and black shit all over it.
Pic related tho, what I just copped.
I don't know why Converse doesn't make good colorways. It always takes another designer to make it good.

>> No.8702914

Monos, special editions, and collabs = good
Everything else = fukken gross.

>> No.8702915
File: 60 KB, 1000x759, this.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702915

>> No.8702921

>>8702909
Wait sorry I got ones in black not navy looked the same in the thumbnail.
Only 30 bucks and they look excellent.

>> No.8702922

>>8702904
>>8702909
>>8702914
Unfortunately, it'd have to be under about £60 from http://www.littlewoods.com/shoes/pumps-plimsolls/e/b/103396.end?sort=price,1

Yeah, I'm so much of a poorfag I have to use a buy now, pay later thing. ;_;

>> No.8702924
File: 1.26 MB, 778x1037, L2dr1zp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702924

>>8702905
Higher Quality / Tougher canvas material, Thicker sole, more cushioning within the shoe itself, slightly larger toebox, slightly yellowed sole. Overall a comfier, better shoe.

>> No.8702931

>>8702924
The first string 70s or just the new 70s they have in production?
I kinda wanted to cop a pair in black since I've discovered that the black and white pair go with pretty much any color, but I wasn't quite sure. (Also I have like 5 pairs of fucking converse jesus)

>> No.8702934

>>8702922
Cop something in grey then.
I don't think the chucks in grey look THAT bad
But you might also see if there are grey vans with a white lower sole.

>> No.8702941

>>8702931
As far as I can tell there isn't that much difference between the first string and the ones in production rn.

>> No.8702950

>>8702941
Oh cool. I might cop a pair down the line. Honestly my converse are pretty comfortable to me after they break in a bit so a little more cushion sounds like heaven to me.

>> No.8702952
File: 31 KB, 600x405, All Star High Tops.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702952

>>8702894
Seconded. Although personally, I like white high tops more. They both look great new, but I think the high tops age nicer.

>> No.8702961

>>8702915
i've had these for 2 years or so. they're nice, but the thin sole really pisses me off. after a good few hours, your feet killllll.

are the standard white pair any different?

>> No.8702970
File: 32 KB, 600x400, img_0315_0[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702970

only ones i actually like besides the extortionate margielas

>> No.8704838

Copped the CT 70.

Fucked them up on the same day when I got too drunk and vomited all over them.

>> No.8704977
File: 27 KB, 600x450, converse-comme-des-garcons-play-sneakers-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8704977

Just copped these, love the look and quality is pretty good same as the 70s converse. If didn't get these would have copped white monos.

>> No.8704991

I hate converse, but if you're going to wear them at all, at least wear the monochromes.

>> No.8705276

>>8702873

literally one of the most pleb-tier things

that I still wear. and everyone still wears. and their mother. and grandmother

inoffensive as fuck. get them in a simple color and you would have a hard time fucking these up

>> No.8706363
File: 74 KB, 960x720, bfgdger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8706363

don't be a pleb and get the monos
they're my favorite beaters

>> No.8706393
File: 21 KB, 400x250, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8706393

>>8702873
Waching trainspotting right now. Ewan is rocking his classic all white chucks in it and his fits are nice as fuck, copping some inspo from this movie right now. You can make nice fits with these.

>> No.8706408

>>8702924
>Tougher canvas material, Thicker sole, more cushioning
gross, no thanks.

>> No.8706419

>>8706408
nice bait. Why wouldn't you want that though? It's like a dial up to broadband level increase in quality.

>> No.8706428

Are PF Flyers any good or are they mfa tier?

They don't sell them in stores where I live, but I like their blocky look in pictures

>> No.8706431

>>8706428
they look disgusting and bulky, don't try to be a special snowflake and just get converse

>> No.8706433

>>8706419
nigga if i want stiff, inflexible shoes then i'll just get boots.

only thing keeping me out of those super-thin running shoes is that they smell horrendous after getting caught in the rain a couple times.

>> No.8706448

>>8706433
>wearing converse in the rain
Are you a pleb?

>> No.8706455

>>8704977

this, cop the CDG ones. Cream > white


also it's only $100 and girls love it and people that know what it is will like you more, i guarantee it ;]

>> No.8706465

>>8706448
bruh the weather ain't going to coordinate with your outfit 100% of the time

>> No.8706495 [DELETED] 

>>8706455
comme des fuck down

they're just shoes m8 :P

>> No.8706502

>>8706465
>not choosing outfits based by seasonality

This is basic stuff, anon.

>> No.8706511

>>8706502
>weather perfectly abides by seasonal expectations 100% of the time

if fucking only.

>> No.8706555

>>8706455
not the high tops at least. i saw some faggot with them recently and it looks god awful ugly.

>> No.8706609

>>8706511
>it is winter
>wear shoes that won't get ruined in the rain just in case
>bring a jacket because it might be chilly later tonight
>dress in removable layers if the clouds clear

fuck did you even listen to your mother

>> No.8707308

>>8706555
I think the hip-tops look way better than the lows tbh.

>> No.8707873

There's literally nothing wrong with regular chucks.