[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 1.42 MB, 3264x2448, Sk8His.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8311324 No.8311324 [Reply] [Original]

Old one died.

I'll start: ZX Flux or Flyknit Frees?

>> No.8311434

>>8311324
fluxes in black

>> No.8311511

Alternatives to CPs that arent National Standards?

>> No.8311541

>>8311511

Svennson, Haerfest, Hydrogen-1, Wings + Horns, Acne, Buttero.

>> No.8311543

>>8311434
this

>> No.8312237

>>8311541
do you (or anyone else) have any experience with the wings + horns low-top whites? they look pretty nice in the pics and they're $304 atm

>> No.8312369

I suppose this is a good place to ask this question. I've been looking for a good walking sneaker for everyday use. Any recommendations? I'm looking for something not too bright or busy, but still feminine.

>> No.8312379
File: 98 KB, 1920x1920, poormanscps.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8312379

Are zaras sneakers any good?

>> No.8312389

>>8312379
Well, I like the look of it.
I wonder how durable they are though

>> No.8312400

>>8312389
>>8312379
i can't say that that sole looks very good at all
it'll probably crease and "pinch up" and start to come off just with regular wear

>> No.8312473

>>8312379
dat filename

>> No.8312511

Maybe, but they are pretty cheap. Worth it for the money?

>> No.8312523

>>8312379
they're like £40 or something just buy them.

>> No.8312596
File: 205 KB, 847x304, 41133M050008_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8312596

cop or not?

>> No.8312615

What's the quality on Adidas originals like?

>> No.8312635
File: 40 KB, 600x600, the roaming soldier .png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8312635

>>8312596
cock

>> No.8312650

cop or not

>> No.8312654
File: 223 KB, 1481x1481, 26_paluzzi_97_6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8312654

>>8312650
forgot pic

>> No.8312710

>>8312379
I have a pair that are similar, they look pretty good - I got the wrong size/the toe box is awful so it creased to shit
this being said the sole hasn't worn down with loads of use

Pros: cheap af and decent sillhouette
Cons: squeaky on floor, creases to hell, sole pinches, doesn't fit me (but I have wide feet)

dnc, buy some nike city courts if you want a durable sneaker for cheap :P

>> No.8313048
File: 68 KB, 1024x681, newbalance.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313048

cop or not, need NB recs

>> No.8313092

>>8312379

I don't understand the hype for this style, to me CPs and the like just look like a feminized stan smith...

the look is so feminine/unisex its awful

>> No.8313118

what you guys think of vans?

I've tried them a couple times in the past but it seems like they always get destroyed after 5 or so months of daily wear (sole wears through, stitching/padding comes out).

Some people however swear by their quality. Think it might just be my weight? 170lbs.

>> No.8313122
File: 213 KB, 640x640, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313122

>>8313048
I like these, but 997 and 577s are both getting reissued this year and both look better imo.

I already own NB1300s, but these are so sexy that I will probably cop.

>> No.8313197

>>8313092
I would buy stan smiths if his face wasn't so fucking ugly

>> No.8313217
File: 188 KB, 1500x1006, 1400686982735.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313217

whats the best black sneakers?

>> No.8313223

sk8 his or af1s?

>> No.8313224

>>8312237

Solid. They're more padded and not as slim as CPs, though they'll wear similarly in almost any outfit. It's just a slightly more detailed, less "clean" look.

>> No.8313225

>>8311324
Are you the retard that is buying running shoes for rain and snow?

>> No.8313293

>>8313223

sk8 his, af1s are meme shoes and look shit

>>8313225

Nope

>>8311434
>>8311543

Guess it's unanimous then

>>8312650

Not

>>8313118

They wear out fast if you skate, or if you get the cheap entry-level ones. I've had my sk8-his for almost a year without skating and without blowouts in the sides, personally. And no, it's not the weight unless we're talking mastodon territory

>> No.8313320

>>8313293
he was like should i get flyknits or zx fluxes for a beater shoe for rain and heavy snow

>> No.8313334

>>8313320

lmao... that's some next level retardation shit

I'm just looking 2 cop some summer beaters lel

>> No.8313336

>>8313293
>af1s are meme shoes and look shit

meh fair enough, i reckon they look decent when they're beat though

sk8 his it is

>> No.8313679

>>8313197

>TFW I bought the Stan Smiths mainly because of his face and green patch.
>TFW people ask me whos face is that sometimes
>TFW it has opened the door for me to get laid.

>> No.8313736
File: 145 KB, 1024x683, shit taste.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313736

why do i want these so much

>> No.8313741
File: 133 KB, 1024x683, shit taste 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313741

>>8313736
idk why i like all these gaudy shoes

i want these too

>> No.8313751

>>8313736
cos they're dope

>> No.8313752
File: 169 KB, 1024x683, shit taste 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313752

>>8313751
are they better in blue

>> No.8313758
File: 202 KB, 1024x683, shit taste 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8313758

>>8313751
also come in this weird grey which is ok

>> No.8313774

>>8313752
Yeah these are the best

>> No.8313792

when did /fa/ jump off the af1 train?

>> No.8313798

>>8313792
that was a joke always, like SS on fit

>> No.8314123
File: 134 KB, 570x400, adidas-stan-smith-prime-knit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8314123

what do you guys think?
gonna be available soon

>> No.8314132

>>8314123
i've bought stans for years

i love stans

these fucking suck

>> No.8314135

>>8314123
dope, i will certainly cop

>> No.8314246
File: 14 KB, 340x340, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8314246

alternative to stans? cop or not

>> No.8314257
File: 49 KB, 640x613, New-Balance-515-Grey-Blue-Black_UwVTD_640_613_pad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8314257

>> No.8314622

>>8314246
no just no

>> No.8314637

>>8312650
I recall seeing sneakers very similar to these but nicer, I wish I could remember what they were called

>> No.8316754
File: 254 KB, 1280x960, 1387640785232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8316754

What're the first two white shoes to the left?

>> No.8316772

>>8316754
idk 1st but 2nd are bball cps or something

>> No.8316786
File: 676 KB, 850x570, Schermafbeelding 2014-06-04 om 23.33.16.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8316786

>>8316754
Look around for Maison Martin Margiela high top trainers. Possibly suede, possibly painted. Kinda hard to see - and they don't really have a name.

>> No.8316803

>>8316754
idk about the first ones but i'm pretty sure the 2nd ones are cp bball highs

>> No.8316961

bros, tell me which NB to cop, im itching to cop

>> No.8316975

>>8313048
Concepts x NB 998 are the best new balances IMO

>> No.8316986

>>8313798
Ss?

>> No.8316991

>>8316961
See
>>8316961

>> No.8316997

>>8311324

af1 lows or mids

>> No.8317004

>>8314123
I'm seriously thinking about copping these. I just can't decide on a summer shoe and these kind of grab me

>> No.8317012

>>8313122
>997
>getting reissued this year

in gray? i'd love a link

>> No.8317853

>>8316991
wut

>> No.8317860

w2c GATs in Europe?

>> No.8317864

>>8313122

link to 997 reissue please,

this is the best news I have heard in weeks

>> No.8317926
File: 47 KB, 568x418, ml574ibl_nb_14_i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8317926

Island pack

cop or not

>> No.8318205

>>8316754
>>8316786
they're MMM painted mid GATS

>> No.8318650

>>8317926

pls respond

>> No.8318677

>>8317926
cop

>> No.8318684

>>8317926

>574
i'd get a made in usa or made in england variety

colourway is too much for me, but if you like it, don't let me stop you.

>> No.8320317
File: 14 KB, 356x356, a384c2d5-6c47-492e-8bc4-ee01f5c0f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320317

cop or not? leather sk8 hi's
I don't skate

>> No.8320347

>>8320317
get all whites instead

>> No.8320364

>>8320347
where? I can't find them anywhere. vans site only has slim version

>> No.8320372

>>8320347
any opinions between all white canvas or leather?

>> No.8320375

>>8320317
Get them all white or black with the white stripe. If you go black, blacken the white stitching with paint marker

>> No.8320380

>>8320364
>>8320372
white leather sk8 hi's are hard to come by. They had some for Spring 2014 but they were sold exclusively at their store in NY and sold out.

>> No.8320392

>>8320317
Are the SK8-Hi Zip CA's made of leather or canvas/suede

>> No.8320402

>>8320392
leather. goto vans website and check out their california collection

I would get them if they didn't have that stupid zipper on the back :( looks tacky and ruins the minimalistic look

>> No.8320409

>>8320380
ahhh lame. idk why they'd do that, they would be so popular and generate a lot of sales

>> No.8320423
File: 40 KB, 480x480, SK8-Hi-Zip-CA-VN-0XH9DQQ-3_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320423

>>8320402
They didn't have a picture of it on the website but I see it now. Doesn't look that bad imo. Might cop, I'll think about it. the fact that it's leather is nice.

>> No.8320444
File: 60 KB, 840x840, diemme_white_nappa_leather_marostica_low_sneakers_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320444

>>8311511
Not a perfect alternative, but white Diemme marostica lows are on sale at ssense right now for 215 in sizes 41 43 and 44

worth mentioning, I thought

>> No.8320454
File: 151 KB, 1280x960, render.nikeid.com.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320454

Which one? I'm leaning more towards the orange

oh, and what's the sizing like for these?

>> No.8320475

>>8320454
What model is that? I like the ones on the left. I've been looking for white sneakers with a red logo

>> No.8320487
File: 86 KB, 736x1104, 1387052604457.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320487

>>8320475
hitop blazers

>> No.8320507
File: 147 KB, 1225x476, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320507

>>8320454
where are you finding these? on the nike website all I can find is the mids which u can customize

>> No.8320510

>>8320454
>>8320487
I ripped the swoosh off my blazers last night, looks way better all white imo

>> No.8320511
File: 91 KB, 687x464, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320511

>>8320487
Dayum, w2c? Did you make them on NikeiD?

>> No.8320526

>>8320511
pic ain't mine, I really want that shade of red. I'm hoping the NikeiD red is p much the same

>> No.8320537
File: 145 KB, 1024x682, Killshot2-4-1024x682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320537

Only because I can't find any gats.

Thoughts?

I loathe the branding though...

>> No.8320539

>>8320537
looks fine but if you could get the logo in white it'd be better

>> No.8320543

How the fuck are AF1s ugly?

>> No.8320561

>>8320543
they're chunky and played out, I don't really think they ever look good in any fit, there are just so many better options.

>> No.8320563

>>8314246
these are too autistic to even be ironic, try some airwalk?

>> No.8320565

>>8320561
You still didn't explain how they're ugly. What's ugly about them? What better options are there for white mids at that price? I don't think there is

>> No.8320567

>>8320537
whats the specific name of these

>> No.8320578
File: 103 KB, 500x500, 1393009259480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320578

>>8320561

>implying

>> No.8320590

>>8320561
>chunky
how is this bad. they're not thin so they won't disintegrate in a week
>played out
how when everyone hates them? they're very unpopular here

>> No.8320597
File: 966 KB, 1200x900, ao.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320597

fuk wit me

>> No.8320604

>>8320597
Pls b kidding.

>> No.8320615

>>8320604
sry u can only afford $50 sneakers

>> No.8320616

>>8320615
When you buy shit, the price is irrelevant.

>> No.8320623
File: 344 KB, 1500x1500, 1390349506001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320623

Qasas are ugly.
Stan Smith is abomination.

>> No.8320626

>>8320616
lmao i bet u like stan shits

>> No.8320630

>>8320597
you must be lost...
this is a fashion board.
>>>/a/
>>>/vg/
and
>>>/r9k/
might be more your speed

>> No.8320637
File: 284 KB, 1600x1067, a9e9a6af.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320637

>>8320597
oh

>> No.8320642

>>8320630
ya i must be lost bc everyone here wears the same shit like a bunch of macfags
this board doesnt know fashion it just follows trends. /fa/ is in the creative category for a reason but no one here is

>> No.8320643
File: 279 KB, 660x440, obama-laugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320643

>>8320597
gr8 b8 m8

>> No.8320649

>>8320642
theres a difference between being creative and being 12 years old

>> No.8320662

>>8320590
They're played out in the general public, not on this board. Geo's are played out on this board, but I personally have never seen someone with geo's in person. I see at least 3 or 4 people with white AF1 lows daily.
>>8320565
I don't mind the hi's, but this board specifically recommends low whites, and they're just too wide to have such a low profile, they look like a boring white blob on feet. If you think they look good you can get them, I personally would get something like stan smiths instead for around the same price.

>> No.8320663

>>8320649
there's a difference between this comment and an intelligent rebuttal

when was the last time you actually bought something without asking /fa/ first lmao

>> No.8320673
File: 734 KB, 1191x1681, kppss13.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320673

>>8320597
>>8320637
o

>> No.8320684

>>8320663
post fits
put your money where your mouth is m8

>> No.8320699

>>8320662
who said anything about lows. everyone knows lows look boring and stupid. get the mids you fool

>> No.8320707

>>8320662
>I see at least 3 or 4 people with white AF1 lows daily.
3 or 4 people means its played out? wtf? how many people do you see with mids? probably none

>> No.8320710

>>8314123

These aren't even listed on the official adidas website. How do people find out about special editions?

>> No.8320721

>>8320561
>there are just so many better options.
and i guarantee all of those better options are just going to be copies of the AF1. AF1s are the original. They just change the design a little and jack up the price.

>> No.8320745

>>8320597
>jeremy scott wings
>not gorillas

>> No.8320856

>>8320597
winged shoes dont make u fly

>> No.8320949

>>8314246

these can be pretty cool, its a shame the toebox is so ugly tho

>> No.8320955
File: 177 KB, 1216x1298, 1 (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8320955

>>8311324

can anyone ID these high tops from the Hotline Miami trailer? This whole fit is pretty dope.

>> No.8320982

>>8320662
Fuck exactly, that's why I rip my skin off because having skin is so overplayed and mainstream, nobody else is rocking the no-skin look. I only wear stuff that can be guaranteed no other human being has ever worn otherwise it's overplayed and mainstream.

>> No.8321038

>>8320537
Don't get it, but only because I already bought them.

>> No.8321047

>>8320567

nike supremes i think

>> No.8321093
File: 22 KB, 400x534, kva.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8321093

How do these fit? Should I go down a size? I sized down with CP's and they were too tight in the toebox, and then I went true to size and they were too long. I'd be comfortable sizing down if I knew that the shoes were wide enough.

>> No.8321179

w2c killshots in uk

>> No.8321184
File: 2.44 MB, 2448x3264, 2014-05-31 17.41.56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8321184

can anyone id these

>> No.8321201

>>8321184
adidas

>> No.8321214

>>8321201
thx m2^3, the anon that posted them didnt know what they were either. must be adidas

>> No.8321215
File: 29 KB, 600x405, Classic_Converse_All_Star_Velcro_Black_Low_Top_Canvas_Shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8321215

>> No.8321219
File: 64 KB, 750x500, Adidas-Originals-High-Cupie-2-Leder-Mens-Shoes-white-459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8321219

>>8321215
Or this?

>> No.8321221

>>8321219

>> No.8321231

>>8312650
not

>> No.8321237

>>8321184
looks like a filthy room to me

>> No.8321258

>>8321215

awful

>>8321219

okay, could be better

you should actually get AF1 Highs

>> No.8321264

whats the difference between af1 his and mids?

also every place only has mids to cop, w2c his?

>> No.8321265
File: 6 KB, 300x300, national-standard-sneakers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8321265

Are National Standard Edition 1's worth $250?

>> No.8321269

Are white AF1 lows memetier, momtier, or actually wearable summer white sneaks?

>> No.8321289

>>8321215
>>8321219
just get the raf velcros

>> No.8321295

>>8321265
Imo my ed 3s were worth their 185 Eur, if the leather on the ed 1 is the same and the workmanship is about the same, then it might well be worth 250 usd.

>> No.8321319

>>8313122
>>8313048
>>8314257
>>8317926
why do people find those New Balance shoes so nice? i just dont get it

>> No.8321322

>>8321319

It's the kind of masculine, but cutesy, vaguely retro thing, from what I've seen. Guys like the idea that it's got a certain old school vibe, but they're a little chunky and aren't sporty in the typical way like some Nikes or Adidas would be.

>> No.8321346

>>8321269
They look cool, feel nice and make you taller. The only people mentally masturbating about that stuff are /fa/nerds that never leave their basements anyway.

>> No.8321358

AF1s white still look cool mid or low. People that want to be special snowflakes with muh clothes are trying to make up for how ugly they are.

>> No.8321366

>>8321269

Wear them if you can pull them off, I always say

Around here they're def meme-tier, irl nobody gives a shit

>> No.8321435

anywhere i can find used white sk8 his? want them in size 44.

>> No.8321442

Anybody know of any outlet stores that stock Nike mayflies? I'd like to try them on before dropping a ridiculous amount of money on them, but I'm having a difficult time even finding them online.

>> No.8321468

>>8320537
Trawl styleforum for gats. They look so much better.

>> No.8321551

>>8321319

In the same way that boots based on vintage work boot designs are considered stylish
Sneakers based on vintage athletic shoe designs are also considered stylish

>> No.8321602

>>8321442
I was lucky. Copped mine for 120 Eur off ebay from some private auction. Was kinda surprised that they weren't made from actual suede but some synthetic stuff.

>> No.8321619

>>8321319

These, I have no clue. I've seen some nice ones, but maybe 4 on this whole board qualify. The rest are shit people wear with lightwash jeans for normcore fits.

>> No.8321633

>>8320597
Are you a nigger by any chance?

>> No.8321652

>>8320510
can you post a pic of them without swoosh

>> No.8321696

>>8320487

hnnng this photo is amazing

Do you think the leathers will look like this if I cop on nikeiD?

>> No.8321734

>>8320567
it's in the filename

Nike x Jcrew Killshot 2

>> No.8321835

>>8320510
How easy was it to do? Really liking the profile of them blazers

>> No.8321841

Alternatives to SILENT high tops?

>> No.8321844

>>8321841
buttero
diemme

what exactly are you looking for? plain nice high tops that aren't too flashy?

>> No.8321910

>>8321844
More or less. The slanted bit at the top is nice touch for me, but not that essential

>> No.8321975

>>8314257

soooo ugly

>> No.8322415

>sneaker general dying
>tons of useless random sneaker threads

stay pleb /fa/

>> No.8322495

>>8322415
wt's the new trend stafon

>> No.8322668

>>8311324
Is it just me or is /fa/ frozen?

>> No.8322679

>>8322668
>>>/co/

>> No.8322696

>>8320982
>>8320721
butthurt they fell for the AF1 troll, they look like shit don't deny it fuccbois

>> No.8322699

>>8322679
>Frozen general
Thanks for the answer.

>> No.8322798

Are Nike Blazers better in all white or all black? And how to make the back logo as minimalistic as possible? I was considering using :: just for shits and giggles

>> No.8322812

>>8322798
all white
I have ':^)' on my custom ones
enjoyin every laff

>> No.8322818

>>8322812
Thanks. I'll probably go with something like ..... or x or :: or whatever lol

>> No.8322986

only aspies mentally masturbate about shoes being memes or not

>> No.8323168

>>8311324
just remember NOAA, anon

Nike
Over
Adidas
Always

>> No.8323169

>>8320444
those eyelets are heinous

>> No.8323172

>>8320955
>white tee
>black jeans
>sneakers
>DOOOOOOPE
You are the 99% of /fa/ users.

>> No.8323180

>checking out nike blazers on their site
>customise
>flash player required

what in the fuck

>> No.8323201

>>8320423
you could tippex/paint pen the blue and brown, and be sure to remove that horrible red thing, could look p good

>> No.8323207

>>8322696
It's not a troll

>> No.8323375

What's the poorfag's AF-1's?

>> No.8323958

>>8323375
the whole point of af1s is that they are the best you'll get for the money.
If you pay less they'll fall apart fast, save up instead.

>> No.8324720

bump

>> No.8324729
File: 5 KB, 164x138, creative-recreation-men-s-cesario-x-sneaker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8324729

should I cop these?

or are they too autistic?

>> No.8324743

>>8324729
p plz respond

>> No.8324774

>>8324743
wait for something else

>> No.8324797
File: 94 KB, 1000x1000, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8324797

>>8317012
>>8317864
http://www.endclothing.co.uk/brands/new-balance-pre-orders/new-balance-m997pr-made-in-the-usa.html

OG Colorway, search sneakersites for other colorway info.

>> No.8324813

>>8321093
Try to try on in a shop, I'm a 45 European and a 43 in Multi-laces so be careful

>> No.8324892

>>8324729
Not too fond of red.

>> No.8324924

>>8314246
If you want to look like a 35 year old arab, sure.

>> No.8325018

W2C real German Army Trainers for less than $50 USD new?

>> No.8325436

Need off-white low top shoe/sneaker recommendations. I don't think I want Jack Purcells. Shoes Like Pottery and Anachronorm, but I want to check out other options first.

>> No.8325443

>>8325436
*I really like shoes like pottery and anachronorm

>> No.8325565

>>8311324
Is there a specific way to tie laces like that or is it as obvious as it looks? Googling hasn't helped me

>> No.8325582

>>8323375
af1s

>> No.8325584

>>8312379

>Is Zara any good?

No.

>> No.8325593

>>8325584
they have some good trousers bro

>> No.8325618

>>8325565
Just need extra long laces

>> No.8326398

what fucking socks should i wear with vans while wearing shorts????

>> No.8326456

>>8326398
black vans? black or no show lol

>> No.8326501

>>8326456
like mid calve nike socks? sorry I'm /fit/ not /fa/

>> No.8326525
File: 30 KB, 500x500, D67656_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8326525

Is it worth it to get the stan smiths with the red highlight instead of the green since the reds are the only ones in my size left online? also how do you guys feel about the lemon shoes?

>> No.8326671
File: 54 KB, 600x600, DINAMIK-II-158156_C450-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8326671

cupernaut?

>> No.8326673

>>8326525
go for the lemons

>> No.8326998

>>8326671
nope

>> No.8327165
File: 115 KB, 640x1136, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8327165

Swoosh+laces in black or grey? Thoughts?

>> No.8327183
File: 63 KB, 600x600, resize.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8327183

Stan Smiths or these Muji Leather Sneakers? I just need a clean pair of white sneaks. The Mujis are cheaper by the way by about $30.a

>> No.8327330
File: 74 KB, 800x531, reebok-gl-6000-v45338_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8327330

neither is popular in Melbourne but im feeling the f.a potential. asics v.s reebok?

>> No.8327352

>>8327330
Sydfag here ,I thought melb was hipster central, how are those not popular there?

>> No.8327641

>>8327165
blak attak

>> No.8327687

>>8327183
>non-stitched sole
>the cheapest pleather
>cap toe
>goofy eyelets
just get stans or save up for your precious CPs

>> No.8327705

>>8327330
If you wear these in Perth you're 16 and hang out at train stations all day. No offence if you're a teen, then they're fine.

>> No.8327711

>>8326525
That print would look nice on girls underwear. But go ahead, wear it around.

>> No.8327715

>>8324729
Big red clown shoes, not even a black dude could pull these off, yuck.

>> No.8327733

>>8325018
>>8325018
>>8325018
>>8325018
bump

>> No.8327802

>>8327687
If it says leather on the material then doesn't that mean it's real leather even if it's just cheap real leather?

>> No.8327810

W2C cheap Air Max 90s that ships in Europe?

Chav as fuck but I don't care.

>> No.8328429

>>8327165
w2c all black

>> No.8328605

>>8328429
Custom made bruh

>> No.8328629
File: 159 KB, 1100x1100, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8328629

Copper Knot?

>> No.8328660

Difference between regular roshes, premium and nm?

>> No.8328676

>>8328660
Dunno about premium but regular roshes have a mesh upper while nm roshes have sort of a suede upper and a different sole with groves that allow it to flex properly (hence, natural motion).

>> No.8329006

>>8327183
>implying you aspies aren't getting these just to not get AF1 cuz muh meme

>> No.8329248

>>8329006
I don't like the AF1 lows. The mids are okay but I'm looking for a versatile low-top white sneak.

>> No.8329312
File: 81 KB, 1366x768, newbalance.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8329312

Can I get an ID on these shoes?

>> No.8329425 [DELETED] 
File: 3.77 MB, 1656x3019, 1398542114861-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8329425

w2c shoes

>> No.8329430

>>8329425
fuck of portman shittrip

>> No.8329478

>>8329430
I am not the person you are thinking of

>> No.8329490

>>8329425
>unshaven
gross

>> No.8329511
File: 657 KB, 3264x1274, c622557f-7fda-4fe7-9d6c-586cf6ffd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8329511

My very basic kicks for summer. Tried the mayflys sockets today, didn't like the feeling of my feet sticking sweatily to the insole.

Should I cop something like sandals or just stick with socks all summer? Highest temp here would be about 33 deg C / 92 F.

>> No.8329536

>>8329425
that fucking bike im cryinf

>> No.8329579

>>8329425
disgusting PUBIC HAIR

>> No.8329930
File: 72 KB, 1024x612, sketchersjpg-30030202da331ab8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8329930

>> No.8330045

>>8329930
do it do it

>> No.8330056

>>8329312
NB 992

>> No.8330165

>>8317860
ebay germany

>>8321319
you're like me 2-3yrs ago.
they grow on you.

>>8321633
niggers wear jordan you fucktard

>>8320710
follow sneakers blog and sneakers speciality stores.

>> No.8330306

>>8329511
w2c 3rd? they must be pretty dear to you since you put trees in em

>> No.8332195
File: 381 KB, 607x401, kutjekak.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332195

Does someone know what these are?

>> No.8332200

>>8332195
Filing Pieces.

>> No.8332346

>>8332200
thanks!

>> No.8332387
File: 156 KB, 970x597, Reebok-Blacktop-1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332387

The 90s are in full swing now. Cop or Not?

>> No.8332389

>>8320597
Nice bro

>> No.8332434
File: 95 KB, 640x640, c2f811bc3fcf11e3904b22000a1f8c1d_8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332434

cop?

>> No.8332449
File: 1.71 MB, 2448x3264, yea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332449

>>8320597

I fuk wit you

>> No.8332490

>>8313741
that's not shit taste, these's are dope af

>> No.8332501
File: 1.38 MB, 7516x1000, $(KGrHqRHJBgE-Qyj9ZQ!BPnI2r882Q~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332501

Help me

>> No.8332508

>>8332501
all shit, m8

>> No.8332522

>>8329511
what are the beige ones?

>> No.8332533

>>8332501
get the primeknit stansmith.

>> No.8332540

>>8332508
why you hate poorfags dude? :(

>> No.8332571

>>8329511
Whats the third pair?

>> No.8332720

>>8330306
>>8332571
Just national standards


>>8332522
Nike mayflys

>> No.8332804

Went out yesterday, kind of drunk, wearing my new Achilles in Black/White. Wake up today to see that there are cuts in the leather. I believe it came from shards of glass on the floor... What do?

>> No.8332828
File: 156 KB, 422x750, nikes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332828

Can I get an ID on these?

>> No.8332851
File: 53 KB, 900x599, lookingood.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332851

god i want them so much

>> No.8332866

>>8332501
>>>8329425
What model is 5?

>> No.8332873

>>8332434
y

>> No.8332920
File: 167 KB, 1200x1600, RU14F2894LPO999_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332920

>>8313217

>> No.8332931

>>8332866
Adidas MC low leather and suede
help me anon :(

>> No.8332940

>>8332851
if you have $600 you can get a pair

>> No.8332992
File: 16 KB, 370x310, palladium velcros.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8332992

Anyone have the velcro palladiums? What do you think of them?

>> No.8333011

>>8332992

Don't really like the idea. I mean, good poor man's Raf, but the sporty closure and the rugged sole don't really meld together to my eye.

>> No.8333034

>>8327165
link?

>> No.8333048
File: 61 KB, 1280x749, tumblr_mnvnqaOdkl1r92k5yo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333048

cop or not? anyone got more inspi pics

>> No.8333088

>>8320487
>>8320511
>>8320507

Blazers are just a low quality adidas ripp off.

>> No.8333104

>>8321269
>wearing big chunky shoes for summer.

>> No.8333106
File: 15 KB, 370x415, jp cork.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333106

thoughts on these?

looking for all round summer shoe

>> No.8333119

>>8320642
Propose some blogs.

>> No.8333146
File: 10 KB, 370x415, sz_058144_a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333146

>>8333106

...or these?

pls welp :-/

>> No.8333155
File: 2.64 MB, 3264x2448, photo (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333155

which should i ditch?

>> No.8333163

>>8333146
these are p good

>> No.8333181

>>8333163
what are they? Some conversr right but theyre all white

>> No.8333183

>>8313217
>>8332828
Air max thea

>> No.8333188

>>8333155
If your 11 I'll buy the white ones

>> No.8333189 [DELETED] 

>>8333181

chuck taylor monocrome

>> No.8333193
File: 651 KB, 2190x765, NB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333193

left or right?

>> No.8333194 [DELETED] 

>>8333146

whoops..

it's All Star Ox Monochrome

>> No.8333212

>>8311324

i am askin this 2

>> No.8333219

>>8333181

whoops

it's all star ox monochrome

>> No.8333224

does anyone find mmm gats uncomfortable? i got mine a size up because of an idiot seller didnt put the right size and they actually make my feet hurt when i wear them.

can i wear them laceless? i find them difficult to put them on

>> No.8333237

>>8333193
left, right looks like something my dad would wear with his Software company T-shirts and sweatpants

>> No.8333250
File: 19 KB, 500x500, M20324_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333250

whats the appeal of stan smiths?

>> No.8333251

>>8333237
ok thanks. OR maybe should I get Stan Smiths ?

>> No.8333256

>>8333250

I like them for their history and the fact that they work like white lows but the green makes them pop more.

>> No.8333276

>>8333250
their cleanliness

>> No.8333386
File: 90 KB, 800x587, almostgats.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333386

Are these an accptable alternative to GATS?

>> No.8333390

>>8333250
hype blinding people to the toe and cheap leather
same peeps talking about buying quality, avoiding fast fashion lol

>> No.8333391

>>8316754
I.D on the bottom right ones?

I'd kill a man for those,

>> No.8333396

>>8320317
>>8320423
Looks pretty nice.

Don't expect top of the line leather, though.

Do you have a link?

>> No.8333421
File: 20 KB, 480x360, almostgats2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333421

>>8333386
what about these opnes?

>> No.8333449

>>8333386
yeah
>>8333421
nah

>> No.8333480
File: 220 KB, 620x382, adidas-zx-flux.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333480

What does /fa/ think of copping the ZX Flux in something other than black? Thinking of copping the navy ones instead of just black and hope that adidas would re-release the all black ones. If I really had cash to burn I might even cop the yellow ones too.

>> No.8333485

>>8333480
fluxes look so lame irl IMO

>> No.8333492

>>8333391
Kva something

>> No.8333499

>>8333391
Kriss Van Assche Multi Lace Hi Tops.

>> No.8333502

>>8333386
imo no
gats have gum sole

>> No.8333503
File: 64 KB, 500x600, f01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333503

is this any good or is it shit?

>> No.8333511

>>8333485
I think they look okay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDUIuzIwwTU

>> No.8333513

>>8333480
imo the plastic thing by the heel looks tacky unless paired with black

>> No.8333529

>>8333503
fucking horrible.

>> No.8333531

>>8333503
hahahhaha

>> No.8333539
File: 436 KB, 1278x1920, Rickdidas and memphis..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8333539

Best all-black sneaker for under £100?

>> No.8333562

>>8333513
The TPU heel cage of the navy ones is also navy. There's also a pair of grey ones with same color stripes and heel cage.

>> No.8333793

anybody know of a good alternative to the all black zx flux? looking for something similar

>> No.8333949

>>8333193
none. get the 577,580, 670, 998,1300 or 1500 instead.

>> No.8334022

>>8333539
What kind of thing are you looking for,
what do you want them to do?
Do they need to be able to take a beating?
Do they need to have a slim silhouette?
Do they need to be water resistant?

>> No.8334122

>>8334022
not him but
beating, no
slim silhouette, yes
water resistant, no
minimalist preferred just cause that generally goes hand-in-hand with a slim silhouette

>> No.8334179
File: 34 KB, 410x410, 128-0023-010_detalhe1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334179

What does poeple on /fa/ think about these ?

Most of the things i love from /fa/ are impossible for me to get, given i'm from a 3rd world country

>> No.8334182

>>8334022
I found some, it's cool.

>> No.8334214

>>8334122
If same price range probably second hand cp's, vans, Some nike could all be good
but really stop being lazy and have a look

>> No.8334238
File: 1.10 MB, 720x1280, Screenshot_2014-06-09-01-19-07.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334238

I'm new to this shit

>> No.8334241

>>8334238
They're all pretty solid pieces, not the worst.

>> No.8334243

>>8333499
>>8333391

>Kriss Van Assche Multi Lace Hi Tops.

6-6-$600 holy fuarkkkk

>> No.8334274

>>8327165
Custom designs, just fuck around with the NikeiD thing

>> No.8334288

>>8333224

my gats can really rub up on my lil toe and im wearing half a size up, gonna try laceless tommorow but yeah struggle on fuccboi

>> No.8334293

>>8333251

right, 574 bad silhouette imo

>> No.8334317

>>8334241

ty anon, just looking to build up my basics

definitely in the market for something lighter/more hi top

>> No.8334395

>>8334238
what New Balances are those?

>> No.8334456

>>8327330
Reebok's are common as fuck in Melbourne, hyping up more and more lately, get them.

>> No.8334973
File: 25 KB, 500x333, LL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334973

gonna cop these tomorrow
cant fucking wait

>> No.8334977
File: 46 KB, 720x460, Kev-Pirags-Nike-Air-Max-90-Hyperfuse-Independence-Day.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334977

>>8334973

>> No.8334980
File: 29 KB, 400x266, Air-Max-90-Hyperfuse-136---1-8121-73692.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334980

>>8334977
and eventually want to get these

>> No.8334989
File: 142 KB, 650x504, 538282-040-r1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334989

>>8334980

>> No.8334993
File: 58 KB, 650x476, nike-blazer-vintage-voltage-cherry-55.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8334993

>>8334989

>> No.8335162

>>8334973
>tfw got this for retail
I mean the real one not the id obv.

I like the jacquard pack. maybe you should look into them.

>> No.8335363

>>8334989
I have these, swapped out the laces for black ones. I kind regret buying these instead of the rosh run ins

>> No.8335971

>>8332434
w2c?