/fa/ - Fashion

>>8223345
what are the best white face watches you guys recommend?

This is my watch. Pls r8.

help me into watches

name some top tier brands you guys would recommend, I'm looking for a good watch, I'll take it from there.

>>8223411
that question sounds really stupid, and it's probably why i cant answer it.

what has caught your interest?

>>8223424
for starters, dont get anything seiko, casio, or gshock. nothing that screams tacticool

>>8223416
asking again, how is this? Ive been lookin at it how big is the face??

>>8223472
>dont get anything seiko
objectively incorrect.

even their malaysian made Seiko 5 line is a decent entry level mechanical.

>>8223472
so what are some brands you would recommend. seems like it doesn't matter so much

got this in december for around $300, using it as the everyday beater

yay or nay

>>8223416
i think it's really nice. i personally wear 40mm watches, and i'm slim. however, i dont care much for bulova. no reason in particular.

>>8223583
i cant just give you a brand. people who want to come off as know-it-alls will start dropping names. unlike most of these people here, i'm not autistic. what exactly are you looking for in a watch? color? size?

>>8223606
white

any size

Just drop some random names man, I'm completely uneducated in the world of watches, I don't want to just buy something random and it turns out to be shit.

what i'll want to be getting in the near future

and before the shitposting i have yet to see a decent alternative

>>8223614
well i just got this. you like stuff like that? i can start dumping chronographs. i dont really fuck with mechanicals and le divers

>>8223614
>any size

naw bruh.
you need to size appropriately for your wrist.

too small and the watch looks feminine.
too large and you look cartoonish or like you stole your father's watch, especially if the lugs hang over.

>>8223629
I do like that. What are the benefits of mechanical though?

>>8223345
hnnng, that strap

>>8223640
i meant to say quartz and mechanical, not chronograph and mechanical. i just happen to like chronographs more.

no benefits of having mechanical. people like them here because they function on movement i.e. they are powered by movement of the parts. quartz run on battery. so people like them because of the engineering or whatever

they tend to be more expensive. and uglier imo

i want to get pic related, but in black

>>8223563
Here's a pic.

>>8223691
for me the big benefit of mechanical is it's much quieter.
quartz watches always have a really loud tick, and cheap quartz watches aren't even aligned properly.

also i hate having to change batteries in things, no matter how infrequently.

anyone got the link to the watch finder site?

>>8223696
that watch looks a bit small. maybe it's just me. or you may have a huge wrist. i dont care for bulova. it's like someone buying a benz, big fucking deal. it's nice, but i wouldnt ask about it or anything

Commence dump of shit I want desperately

1/16

utterly unattainable, unless I win the lottery.

2/16

Halios Tropik B was made by some dude in Vancouver. It was a oneoff production and goes for around 900$ pre owned. The bezel is bronze

3/16

>>8223786
a wrist shot

4/16

actually attainable luxury

5/16

old timey chronos are probably my favourite watches. this one has alike a 32mm case though

>>8223800
heres a family of benruses

7/16

good watches for around $2000

expecting a very large payout soon, and i want a /fa/ watch

Kemmner is a dude on ebay and he makes custom watches


8/16

ill probably pick this one up when i get my tax return.

9/16

>>8223795
you're dumping a lot of ugly shit, m9

the most tacticool watch in the world. if i had to buy one watch and wear it for the rest of my life itd probably be this one. eco drives are dope

10/16

>>8223818
im actually really into fliegers but theyre so cliche.

11/16

12/16

sinns are skyrocketing in price, alas

>>8223843
old timey chronographs 8=>

14/16

some more tacticool

15/16

and a diver.

16/16

are there any nice watches for no more than 200 dollarzz? my dad is in murrica until august and told me he could get me one there

any recomendable brand or model?

>>8223871
seiko or citizen.

>>8223871
>for starters, dont get anything seiko, casio, or gshock. nothing that screams tacticool

Why do you nerds like diver watches so much? They look like shit and I don't understand why anybody would pay for such gaudy garbage.
>inb4 re purposing
>inb4 muh diving

Nobody uses diving watches to dive, stupid. Anybody who thinks otherwise is behind the times and delusional.

>>8223889
Agreed. Brands like Seiko, Citizen, or Casio are total shit and should be avoided. You should stay away from entry level brands and save up for luxury Swiss mechanicals.

>>8223901
i hated divers for a long time, but the deep cases and massive bevels wore off on me.

>>8223889
siekos are just fine. well built with alot classic designs and oppurtunities to mod the fuck out of them.


>>8223912
>total shit

automatic watches are awful at telling time.

>>8223889
i had a g-shock when i was 16 (dont blame me) it looked cool for me at the time, now not that much but it definitely was a good quality and could stand a lot of shit other watches would not resist. But now I want something simple but not that expensive like Nixon

pic related is my current watch

>>8223703
but watches are worn on the wrist, not the ear

>>8223947
narrow down your search. do you want a pilot watch, a diver, a dress watch?
Subdials?
a chrono?
what colour face/band combination?

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=seiko

seiko offers every conceivable style for under 200 with understated, classic designs. i say go with them if thats your price range.

>>8223912
go to bed Archie, you're drunk.

>>8223975
i would be happy with any of those type of watches you mentioned, as long as they are simple and not bulky. Preferably getting one with a leather band this time

http://www.nixon.com/us/en/mens/watches/the-deck-A308.html?sku=A3081530-00
http://www.nixon.com/us/en/mens/watches/the-sentry-leather-A105.html?sku=A1051602-00
these both look nice to me. currently checking out seiko as you said

>>8223999
the sentry is nice looking. the blue accents make it not boring, and i love a meaty band like that as well. 42m is pushing the edge of bulky though, and with a tiny bezel ittl look even bigger.

>>8223999
First is shitty. The second is nice but you can find similar elsewhere. Don't go Nixon.

>>8223345

There's a difference between a fashionable watch and a good watch, it depends if you want a watch that is made to last, like Patek, Audemars or even a Rolex, or a watch a retard would like.

Pic related; retard level watch.

>>8223696
perfect sizing
don't listen to anyone (>>8223735) who says that's small because that is exactly the watch-wrist-ratio should be for that style.

>>8223782
>>8223795
>>8223800
>>8223805
finally someone is injecting taste into this thread

>>8223807
Junghans, Stowa, B&M, Longines,

2nd hand Rolex / Omega


$2,000 is a difficult bracket. there's quite a lot at 1000 and then again at 3000.

Is that Hublot the style you're looking for?

>>8223847
hnnnnngggg!

>>8223866
nice dump m8 i r8 6/8

>>8223901
>diver watches
>>inb4 re purposing
Oh well.

Yes, I dont dive, but i like them anyways. The fact that they are (theoretically) made for diving gives them also some other qualities that make for a very good tool watch:

Easy readable
Robust
Waterproff

And I really like the added utility of the rotating bezel!

I am traveling a lot by train and I use it as a "marker" when i have to change trains at a station. Set the 0 at the minute my next rain goes, and i can quickly and easily glance how much time i have, if i can just casualy walk to the next platform, if i have to run or if i can just give up.

Also it makes for a nice, rudimentary stopwatch and timer.

r8 pls

>>8225685
Tritium is a pretty nice feature.

>>8225693
Forgot pic....

Cant go wrong for 100€ and in house movement

>>8225738
>Nice fake Rolex, anon!

>>8225738

>>8225750
>Nice shitposting, anon!

>>8225786
>Has a Rolex
>Take photos with a smartphone

>>8225909
welcome to /fa/

>>8225909
Not sure if it's exactly shitposting to point out exactly what that watch is: a blatant copy of the very well known Submariner. Everything from the bezel to the hands is a ripoff. People won't care it's a mechanical watch made in Japan that was amazing value – it may as well have been bought from a guy who keeps watches in the lining of his trenchcoat

>>8225750
Come on. It does indeed look very rolexy.
Of course there are only so many ways to design a diver, but that one is quite close to the "original".
Look at the divers from Omega, Blancpain or - at the low end - Vostok, for a design that is definitely a diver, but definitely not a rolex.

>>8225909
>Saves up for expensive watch he wants
>Doesn't spend money on DSLR he doesn't

>>8225786
Nice, I think I already posted mine here, either way here is another

Pic related + an old titanium quartz Orient. The next purchase will be a diver, may be an Orient or a Steinhart. Or may be Vostok, lol, I haven't decided yet, it will depend on amount of money in my wallet before vacation.

>>8225972
If that's a fake it's decent one. If not, why the fuck didn't you take a submariner?

>>8223345
Just bought a Tissot Automatics III for £ 345.00
Quite like it.

What does /fa/ think?

Hey /fa/, can I please get some thoughts on this watch?
I feel like it's overly tacky, but I really like the rose gold plating on it.

>>8226042
ugly tank/10

>>8226035
It is real. I prefer the gmt ii because I travel a lot and I like to keep track of a second time zone. Plus I like the day/night bezel, it is something different than the standard black dial steel sport watch

I don't have money for any other decent watch, and I generally hate Seiko watches.

Is this a decent cop? It's so cheap men.

most recent cop, poorfag coming through

>>8226175
gold is gross, guy.

>>8226210
I feel like gold fits my wardrobe better though.

>>8226175
I've got this one, it's rad, it goes with everything and looks expensive even if it's 30£. kek

>>8226259
Looks expensive? Are you shitting me?

had this for afew years, probably not effay but opinions??

>>8226284
There is a lot going on in the picture and I'm not sure if any of it tells me the time

>>8226259
it does not expensive

the plastic face will scratch
the gold veneer will scratch

u will look like a working class 12 y/o with a nintendo gameboy

>>8226032
that black one looks nice

>>8226042
that shit horrendous

pic related would be my cop if I had the money

Currently have a pulsar quartz chronograph and a seiko 5

>>8226233
I'm sure it fits well with your long black trench coat, comic book graphic t shirt, and fedora

>>8226338
XDDDDD
Shitposting is le fun, rite guise xD *Le ironic fedora tip comment xD???

Nice post m8.

>>8226370
looks like truth struck a nerve :^)

>>8226370
lol hes (your) pretty mad :^P

just relax bro, calm down

I feel kinda hipster-ish. but its useful as fuck

>>8226334
is the seiko 5 any good? i would get one and stick a leather band on that shit

>>8226446
That's like the Fiat Multipla of watches. Never seen anything as ugly.

Sorry bro, as long as you love her it doesn't matter what I think.

>>8226447
It's accurate as fuck, and I think it looks nice and different
I've been thinking about that too.
pic is it.

>>8226446
how often do you find yourself needing to use a calculator?

>>8226281
>>8226305

Lol mad scrublords.

Yeah it does, I was asked by two people which Rolex it is. Yeah plebs I know, but it was nice.

I saw a nigger eye balling it on the bus once, definitly mirin my faux gold.

>>8226475
Can confirm, excellent watch.

>>8226649
>Rolex
>digital
>2014

>>8226204
That would go so well with my striped shirts! Saved for inspo

>>8226038
>pls respond

Mine, step aside plebeians

>>8226704
>wearing a watch built by a toothbrush company

>>8226716
more like the most influental company design-wise of the last century

cop?

>>8226704
>>8226765
I like those minimal Braun Designs.
Yeah, cop.

>>8226716
being this much of a pleb

>>8226446
lol I'm trying real hard right now not to laugh on this train. you actually go out in public with that? please go back to >>>/g/

>>8226655
>excellent watch.

how? it has the same simple function of every other watch in the world...

>>8227186
Well if you insist:
Firstly it's automatic, which means just shake it and it's running again. No batteries, no wining it up manually. The Seiko 5 is also notorious for being unbreakable. It's the Kalashnikov of watches. My father got himself one when he was twenty. The things still running. The movement is not only very sturdy, but also pretty precise. Last but not least, I got mine two years ago and wear it 3-4 days a week. It still has to get a scratch on the glass.
Plus it's somewhere between 50 and 100 bucks which is cheap for an automatic watch.

>>8226038
i did a reverse image, and im not sure why you chose to pick the ugliest picture to see approval from. either way, looks ok. bezel looks bulky, rectanglish. there are tissots much nicer than that. pic related is the one i want badly

>>8223703

Your mechanical is aligned no better than a quartz. You just can't tell because it doesn't stop long enough for you to see it.

The misaligned tick is a pet peeve for me on quartz. I have one good Eco-Drive that has a perfect second hand and it took me a year of looking to find it.

>>8227276
>It's the Kalashnikov of watches.
pfft hahahaha

In all honesty though, I agree with you. I have my grandfather's Seiko 5, which he got in the early 70's. I'm assuming that it hasn't been serviced in the past 40 something years, but the damned watch keeps on ticking (with so-so accuracy). These things last.

definitely my favorite watch

bump for watches

>>8227054
Dayum
I want that thing!
W2C?

alwys relevant.

>>8229625
>implying most of us can afford anything other than the very bottom

feel with me, bro

cop or not

>>8229866
not

>>8230153

an AP tourbillon? if you have that kind of money (around 80-100K) buy it.

>>8229625

oris and frederique constant should be a level higher tough

>>8230850
if you have you 80-100k to spend, get some property or at least get something worth enjoying like a car

there is not a fince line between wasting money and enjoying a watch. Dont be autistic

>>8223807

Take a look at some of Nomos watches, they start around that range

>>8223345
>post what you got
Nothing
>post what youll be getting
Don't Know
>post what you want
Seagull Airforce 1963 Black Face 42mm
http://www.seagull1963.com/18-seagull-1963-air-force-watch-42mm-black.html
>post what youll never be able to afford
Junher Chronoscope
http://www.nova68.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/027460100.jpg

Cop?

i'm going to cop this piece of premium aesthetics soon because it's on sale on amazon

also thinking of a seiko 5, i'll probably get the one with the black canvas strap. all i really want right now are simple, durable automatics to replace the scratched, broken piece of soviet windup crap i've been using

h-h-how did I do /fa/

Gold is back

>>8232604
Gold only looks good on the swarthy.

>>8232624
lmao so tru

>>8225972
Nice watch, I got a submariner myself. 116610LN.

pic is just generic photo i found on internet, too lazy to upload my own.

>>8232647
Ye, but brown leather goes with whitey like peas and carrots

">>>/k/21176923"

/k/ has their own watch thread, what do you guys think?

>>8232688
more like too poor to actually afford one

dream on fuccboi

>>8232695
2 much plen, can't even hold it

>>8232701
meh, i don't need to prove myself

>tfw when scared to buy a watch b/c I'm afraid it'll look like shit irl

>>8232721
>tfw when
whoops

>>8223345
p could do better but I'm satisfied w/this atm

>>8232912
holy shit... that is a LOT more of a detailed pic than I thought it would be...

excuse the ant bites

>2014

>>8226284
On the scale of Chrono to Best it's a 4 at most.
>but the watch rating sub-dial is nice

ok somebody tell me how that second-hand works. it blows my fuckin mind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Yvo89S6GA

>>8232996
It's a gear turning within another gear turning. Think of those spirographic stencils you may have played with as a kid.

>>8233044

but the hand just floats over that dial. there is nothing screwed down..

>>8233053
The subdial is clear with the markings and numbers printed on it. The hand is underneath, connected to the seconds post. Sitting between the hand and the seconds post is the white background of the subdial. The entire subdial is moving.

Instead of watching the hand turn as it goes around the subdial, try looking at the center of the hand: it will look like the movement of a normal seconds hand.

Alternatively, draw a Cartesian plane with a domain of [-5,5] and a range of the same. Take another color and draw lines connecting (0,0) and (0,5), (1,0) and (0,4), (2,0) and (0,3), (3,0) and (0,2), (4,0) and (0,1), and (5,0) and (0,0). Repeat this for each quadrant and you will end up with that thing they show in the beginning of the video.

>>8233053
I think it floats under the glass of the dial, where the numbers are printed on.
Fun mechanics, but i am doubtful of its readability.

>>8229530
Not for sale yet.
http://www.raketa.com/

>>8232572
>Still more expensive than watchunique.com
Don't.

>>8233090

got it. pretty fuckin clever.

just got my iwc pilot chrono 3777 back from the watch repairer. It feels like I'm wearing a new watch...I'm in love again hehe

Pic related: old pic

this vid gave me a boner:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJTGPtYtqA

>>8224835
Could you name some at 1000AUD?

Specifically below 1000 though because that is my absolute maximum

Getting tired of the nato, which strap should I cop?

>>8232540
that's nice. the bezel is a bit thin compared to the other watches i have. but i would buy that i think, looks real nice. it's not even that expensive.

about to pull the trigger on this, opinions?

$90

>>8233777
Don't buy watches from fashion brands.

>>8233777
lel. dont be stupid.

>>8233831
This.
Tommy, Ralph, Ben Sherman, Gucci, Armani, Diesel, Nautica ect.
All terrible quality watches built very poorly in Chinese factories.
This watch will feel empty and tinny. Invest in a watch from a reputable brand. Doesn't have to cost an arm and a leg. Seiko, Citizen or Casio are 5x better than a tin watch with Tommy Hilfiger written on it.

>>8223345
Just copped 1987 Rolex DateJust
Traded my 53' oyster perpetual
Prolly never be able to afford a presidential tho my jewler has 3 or 4 in gold yt gold and plat

need ID on this watch

>>8233936
Probably something for tasteless nuveau riche, so i would guess Hublot.

>>8234014

yeah that looks ugly. so its probably a Hublot.
Why do people buy these again?

Not my daily watch, but it's still a good looking timepiece

Not my daily watch, but still one of my favorites

>>8233499
Jubilee Metal Bracelet.
Just copped one for myself

>>8233831
>>8233848
>>8233852

Cant find a better looking similar style watch under $100

plus Im only gonna use it for
Cant find a better looking similar style watch under $100

plus Im only gonna use it for like a year or two.

So, movements and build quality aside, is pic related better looking?

>>8234912
Sorry for the double sentences, mobile browsing is a nightmare

pls r8

Repost + r8 please

>>8229625
>tfw in uncles will for his 25k patek philippe

>>8234945
Basic china-made shit.
Titanium is light as fuck and it's pretty thin, but still it's not that great watch.
>>8235172
Great budget watch.

>>8234912
well yea, if the only website youve browsed is macys.com, you probably wont find anything, pleb ass nigga

>>8234945
fugly. i almost bought one until i saw pics from the sides. then ive actually seen people wear them, and they look even worse. super thin. looks ugly

>>8226655
that stitching is p gross, tho

>>8234945

pls r8 m8s

>>8233499
>>8234650
2nd for jubilee

Probably one of the most comfortable metal bracelets I've worn, looks damn good too

copornot

I'm fully aware that I'd have to buy a fake from ebay. Is it going to be shit and break on me?
Also silver or gold? I wear gold rimmed glasses but I'm not so sure if that will matter.

>>8236508
cop, looks sexy af

>>8234945
5/10

>>8235172
8/10

>>8235390
>two-tone
6/10

>>8236508
Not.

>>8236519
You can't afford a real one? They're not even that much.

pls r8

>>8236602
I thought new ones were like £350, I'm a student on a min wage part time job so not really.

>>8236607
>I thought new ones were like £350
Did you even look at Ebay?
Who makes fakes of those anyways?

>>8235370
The strap is ~10 years old. It was on my first watch and I just re-used it for my Seiko until I got something better.

>>8237930
Pretty shitty picture but whatever.

>>8237930
/b/ro, this isn't the 90's. no one wears rolex. they are on the same standards as sketchers

>>8226440
You're*

>>8226334
i like that date window

>>8236605
6/10

i hate polished steel, and the massive leather strap is too bulky for the delicate face.

>>8234912
>>8233777
black fits with more shit, brown looks better overall.

Too bad the watch is like 200€ in europe, otherwise I'd buy it.

>>8237930
>says SUBMARINER on dial
>only GMTs have 2-tone bezels
>that fucked up magnification
>probably has shitty folded links
>clearly aluminum bezel insert when Rolex uses ceramic
>pearl entirely missing???
Bad fake, would laugh at from across the room/10

Love the aesthetics on this, but it's pretty pricy and I've heard shinolas aren't the best value. Anyone know of a better buy with a similar look?

>>8223622
i like the fact it doesn't have any brandname personally, 8/10

I'm aware I might get verbally raped, but does anyone like any of the tokyo-flash watches? i like minimalist anologue watches but I don't think they'll work well with my (probably failed) attempt at techwear

>>8239787
Wanted to see how long it would take, surprisingly long it seems.

I've posted this before, but nobody ever rated my watched.

I've posted this before, but nobody ever rated my watches.

>>8240206
I love my rogue, personally

>>8240437
what the one on the right, i love it

>>8240467

fuck, i meant >>>>8240424

>>8240257
because no one here cares about rolexes anymore?

>>8240469
Seiko SKX009. Great watch. My only complaint is that there's no dive extension link in the bracelet so it's kind of hard to get it over any outdoor gear (gloves, wetsuits, etc.) I'm in the process of searching for a canvas strap that doesn't look stupid with a pepsi bezel.
>>8240490
But that's just wrong. Rolex makes great watches, although the name brand premium is higher than it should be. Sadly, the brand has been tarnished by nouveau-rich wannabes and the enormous replica market.

>>8240500
I said no one here as in on /fa/
Every watch thread when a Rolex comes up people shout fuccboi. No one cares enough to try and spot a fake.

Also, how can you rail against the replica market when you have one?

>>8240511
>Also, how can you rail against the replica market when you have one?
But... I don't? I'm not the one who posted the awful fake Rolex, if that's what you mean (in fact, I'm the one who called him out)

Quick advice: which one would you pick?

>>8240580
save your money

if you really must, buy the left one

>>8240580
What's the chance ?

I also can't decide between the black casio model and F-91W.
It's going to be my daily wear.
I need it to be cheap, durable and as light as possible.

>>8240589
They are really cheap ~10 EUR on ebay.
I personally like them for the minimalistic look and slim body.
What would you go with instead?

>>8240580
all black one for sure. the gold is tacky

Just curious what /fa/ thinks about it.
I already own it, kinda regreted the purchase.

>>8240622

Shit

>>8240500

thanks for bring this blog to my attention!

i had a good chuckle!

>>8236519
thats the photo I took, and yeah they're worth it, awesome watch
I paid like 178US for it. wearing on a NATO lately

>>8237930
so fucking fake

>>8237965
get a load of this guy

>>8239819
maybe something by Laco?

>>8237930
kek i don't even know much about watches and i can clearly see it's fake
>that magnification

Orient Star Retrograde

Cop or not? Can get it at a discounted rate.

>>8241069
go back to /b/ this is sfw board

>>8240206
That's some fucking Tron shit right there.

I love it.

>>8234945
If it was thicker it'd look better.

>>8240206

I like it. Looks like it'd be great for nighttime wear and going out in clubs. Great conversation starter too.

...I actually just bought one after seeing your post.

that't some dope cheap shit right here.

>>8242248
that's some really fucking disgusting shit right there

keep on SS or get a leather nato?

have: military watches with shitload of nato straps (weekender, military 5), a hublot ripoff
want: an android wear watch if it doesn't end up being autistic, a reasonably stealthy big bang or royal oak

>>8242316
>have: military watches
>want: an android wear watch

it's like you people have absolutely no sense of style

>>8242305
take a better picture so i can point out how shit your fake rolex is

>>8233887

ugh, I can't stand fluted bezels, it just looks so wrong

>>8242570
fuck you you piece of shit

>>8242531
go ahead, i don't care

>>8242502
>/fa/
>fashion
>not an inane clique of teenagers buying things that make them look "dope"

>>8241498
>fully mechanical w/ power reserve, flyback day, and date wheel
>hand winding and possibly hacking movement
>$400
If I had a budget for it right now, I would buy that in a heartbeat. The only thing I don't like is that 31 and 1 seem to occupy the same index on the wheel.

>>8242611
If it's fake, it's not nearly as offensive as the other piece of shit in this thread. From the two shitty pictures you've shown, I would think it's real.

>>8232604
>Not this one

>>8241498
it's a little chunky but if you have big wrists, go for it

>>8223927
>automatic watches are awful at telling time.
Well yeah, but people that actually like watches like them because they're cool little pieces of machinery. A quartz watch isn't.

about to get a large payout so looking for a good watch around the $2000 mark?
>pic related current watch
>rate it

>>8242502
>muh patek
>muh classy gentleman watch

>>8244471

>implying

>>8242502
>military watches
If you need an utilitarian design and need your watch as a functional tool, there is nothing wrong with those.
>android wear
Those however…

>>8244688

And welcome to the program... FUCKERS

poor Arch having to sell his Annual Calendar.

>>8245297
His breakdown was inevitable. Goodnight sweet prince

>>8244247
A case of Christopher wards and custom straps in every color.

My daily wearer.

>>8244247
>gold
that's a pic from either the 80's or youre a very hairy grill

>>8229625

>IWC on the same level as Lange
>Lange not way, way above IWC

i love both but seriously that is just wrong

>>8229625
Lange and Vacheron are both better than Patek.

Which one and why?

>>8247413
Oh, and

>>8247413
It depends what you're wearing. Far right would only look good with earthy tones. (dark browns, greens, etc.)

>>8247425
I think I'm between the left one and the middle one.

>>8247446
Middle one would work better with more fits.

hnnng

>>8223345

>>8247413
>8247413
center. closet to classic flieger look

just ordered a Casio F-91W

>>8249325
i have one and i fkn love it
cheap n kool

>>8249328
>>8249325
>lol it's like they don't even daiso

>>8226175
have a silver one myself, looks decent i can't complain. never thought to get gold but saw a guy wearing one and it looked pretty damn good

>>8233090
>Alternatively, draw a Cartesian plane with a domain of [-5,5] and a range of the same. Take another color and draw lines connecting (0,0) and (0,5), (1,0) and (0,4), (2,0) and (0,3), (3,0) and (0,2), (4,0) and (0,1), and (5,0) and (0,0). Repeat this for each quadrant and you will end up with that thing they show in the beginning of the video.

too much, fine with just "entire subdial moves"

but thanks anyways!

>>8249409
>HURRDURR HOW DUZ IT HAPPEN IZ IT MAJIC
>someone takes the time out to explain the mechanism and satisfy your curiosity
>HURR 2MUCH THOUGHTING

lel what a retard.

>>8247413
far left

>>8240594
F-91W. >>8240580 look insanely shit in real life.

>>8223800
I like

Ive never owned a watch besides random CHEEEAP ones as a kid but I really like this
Junghans Meister Chronoscope £1000/$1700

>>8250567
that shit is nice as fuck. too bad i cant justify the price. maybe one day when i have too much cash

>>8233777
>>8233848

>>8250608
lot of money for an ugly watch

Got this as a birthday present
Should I return it /fa/? It costs $600.

>>8250725
mmm not keen personally but a ton of my friends just said my friend who just hit 30's Tag Huer watch thats like $2500 is nice but far too fucking busy for my taste. Point being is I may be in a minority because I like very subtle designs (Posted the Junghans above)

>>8250725
I would return it. You can do better for $600.

Buy a better looking cheaper watch and pocket the remaining money.

pls r8

>>8251334
youre kidding, right?

pls r8 got it for $70, it retails at $400

>>8251334
>>8251361
get on my level plebs

>>8251334
Metal is cheap and bends dnc.

GIB

GIB PLS NOW GIB

>>8236519
>>8241065

fuggin nice. i want one

>>8232624
own gold jewelery, am swarthy

can confirm, looks great

>>8251640
those watches are like 25 bucks.

>>8251374
>it retails at $400
That's just what they want you to think.
Looks like it worked.
Idiot.

>>8251696
not to mention that the watch is fugly