/fa/ - Fashion

>How do you go about doing this

cut the neckhole seam with scissors?? its kinda self explanatory dude.

I diy'd this rick tank about a week or so ago

>>8139640

No, dumbass. I mean how do you go about DIYing a Rick Owens tee. What sort of fabric do you need? Where do you get it?

How'd you DIY that tank? What sort of shirt did you start with, what fabric does it use?

>>8139676
that is a REAL rick tee you dumbass, you can even see the tag

he didn't diy the shirt, he just cut holes into it

>>8139676
wow, chill

>>8139676

>What sort of fabric do you need?

you know rick shirts are all sorts of different fabrics right.

and jesus dude, how can you not tell that my pic is an actual rick tank.

if your gonna be a dick then im not gonna help you

You'd need to source some very fine quality jersey, cotton, silk, etc. depending on what kind of Rick tee you want to replicate. Rick spends generally between $50 - $300 per yard on his material, and you'll need at least 3 yards. Then you'll need to be able to draft the pattern...important features being high armscyes and backseam. You'll of course need an overlock machine to sew the stretchy fabric--can't use a regular sewing machine. So right around starting costs you're looking at $1500 and at least 15 hrs of work. Good luck!

>>8139640

dunno how to make rick tanks because a curved back seam and sewing raw edges seems like too much work, but it's easy to make designer looking tanks to layer or wear alone

it's real simple

just go looking for old tee shirts or tank tops until you find one with a soft, thin material like viscose, look for sheer shirts

then just cut it to how you want it, it takes practice to shape the edges (like the bottom) to drape how you want them to, but it works
>>8139640
and this, you can experiment with shredding the bottoms of tanks to create more texture, then layer with unfrayed tanks to add more contrast

>>8139713

why tho

There is actually not anything that is TECHNICALLY demanding as far as the pattern goes with a Rick shirt - you can definitely go to a local stockist, buy a shirt - riff the pattern and then return it...
(in fact that is exactly what rick did during ealry bits of his career).

the fabric is expensive - VERY EXPENSIVE
such that they often demand a rather large minimum yardage before you can cop a feel

you could email rick owens support, there's a email on his website
alternatively you could bring in a rick t-shirt to a fabric store and ask if they have anything similar...
truth be told you'll be at a loss both in time and dosh spent through all of this so .... ?
what are you trying to achieve?

you can't usurp mr. owens

>>8139719
Not op but for a beginner, what style should one try to apply to a tank for layering? i wanna do a tank because i can size up relatively easy for more room to play on

>>8139693

Yeah, bullshit. I have a rick tee here right now. $300 per yard of this fabric is a hilarious estimate. I could imagine $30-$50.

Ideally I'd be replicating the unstable cotton tee.

$1500 and 15 hours of work is absurd. The amount of work required to actually make this tee is NOT A LOT, the majority of the time would be spent drafting a pattern. Which again, is not very complex- it's a damn tshirt. The backseam is a minute detail but is only marginally important. The most important thing here seems to be the length- the sleeves especially. The sleeves are also tapered toward the opening, which causes the arms to stack as they near the wrist.

There are no hems, everything on this shirt is a raw edge except for the neck hole. This shirt honestly feels DIY'd, the only difficult part about it is figuring out what sort of fabric to use..

>>8139726
>the fabric is expensive - VERY EXPENSIVE

>>8139731
for a beginner? try cutting off the bottom and then layering it under another t shirt

don't make it look fucking stupid though like a skirt

DIY stuff is faggy if you do it badly

after that, just do your research and search the /fa/ archive for keywords like "tank" and "layers" and shit

look up more designer styled tanks, tailor your cheaper shirts to emulate or spin off from them

>>8139732
Yeah the problem is there is a MINIMUM yardage you would need to order.
you could try getting in contact with the factory and asking 'yo could i grav 3m of your finest cash' ???

really the most technically demanding part is the position of the shoulder seam and arm hole.
it is a very specific and characteristic motief, i find it accentuates the pectorial girdle wonderfully

>>8139732
that's the truth

it's marked up because it's by rick owens, aka a trendy designer, the one that's been trending for years and years

exclusivity bumps up the price
same with common projects man, they raised CPs from huh $150? $200 at first? all the way to $400 retail price present day

>>8139754
... ?
do people not know this?
of course there are mark ups ... when you buy toilet paper there are mark ups there too
the retailer needs to cover shipping, tax, costs of transport, space rent AND THEN flip a profit so they can eat

so of course wholesale is s/t like $60
but where are YOU going to find wholesale?
(protip: you can usually if you're involved with a retail spot that stocks rick, see if you can buy w/ THEIR order)

>>8139750

>Yeah the problem is there is a MINIMUM yardage you would need to order. you could try getting in contact with the factory and asking 'yo could i grav 3m of your finest cash' ???

This is only true if I order directly from the same manufacturer. Which would be difficult, time consuming, and expensive. It is a thin jersey cotton.Surely, someone out there makes something similar to Rick's unstable cotton that isn't impossible or that expensive to get a hold of.

>really the most technically demanding part is the position of the shoulder seam and arm hole. it is a very specific and characteristic motief, i find it accentuates the pectorial girdle wonderfully

Calm your fucking tits, the cut on a Rick tee is not that great. It is a good cut but it is a fucking t-shirt. Fabric and the wearer's body is more important than cut.

>>8139766

I honestly prefer the way this supermarket t-shirt fits me. The problem is that it lacks certain details that the rick tee has. Namely, the fabric isn't as nice, it isn't as long, and it doesn't have raw hems.

>>8139766
>Surely, someone out there makes something similar to Rick's unstable cotton that isn't impossible or that expensive to get a hold of.
Just go to nice fabric boutiques dude

>>8139766
... ?
well thats for you to find out, i really don't think it would be easy though.
Ricks cotton jersey is actually very specific and looked after, yeah maybe another factory produces it but they will probably have minimums too..
maybe a small granny fabric store might sell it but there's a markup there too...

??
i don't think you know how to use that idiome
i'm not saying it's actually hard, infact i said it was very simple and anyone with a rudimentary knowledge on pattern drafting could work one up easy
(me >>8139726)
i just mentioned which bit most riffers muck up is that region (see vtb)

>>8139749
also if you want to layer, obviously don't buy thick tees to DIY

ive had the best luck with very thin tees

if it's soft like 100% cotton or a poly-cotton blend it's very easy to add fraying and distressing, and the cutting for the raw edge on the bottom (which could be anything if you use your imagination, asymmetric cut, some weird cut i dont know)

then you can just layer it with a thicker tee and not feel it

>>8139775

VTB's main problem is fabrics. The designer for VTB is very strange, he is not actually out to copy Rick Owens tees, but rather to create something similar but "better". Having felt VTB tees, they are wayyyy different than rick tees in many ways.

>>8139765
yeah obviously people don't fucking know that dude, why do you think there's daily threads asking "So, convince me to buy Rick Owens clothing, because I think it's ugly"?

dont hound at me you fucking meatball

im just saying what it is, it gets marked up because the supply -> demand

hell man, why the fuck do you think void sold so many DIY sweatpants and t-shirts on /fa/? because there's a market for it, that's what was trending, still is trending, and there's capability to make shitloads of bank from it in 2014 too

fuck you cunt

>>8139780
wow, calm your tits

fuck you and your shitty little enterprise

also your fits look like shit

don't piss on people and then try to get advice later

peice of shit

>>8139778
nah dude there is a substantial lack in technical understanding w/ vtb design. idk man they seem to be trying to smack that demographic whenever i find myself scrapping the barrel
maybe alex wang would be a more appropriate comparison though

>>8139780
i think people have all the knowledge to know it but just don't make the connections - EVERYONE knows it but they just don't sit on it.
wait what... what is the relation with what i said and... "So, convince me to buy Rick Owens clothing, because I think it's ugly"?
why are you ... even ... ?

i'm just saying your train of thought is kind of base, everything has a markup and of course you will see it a greater monatary level with luxury goods but proportionally the mark up is roughly the same, sometimes less (in regards to fast fashion at least)
yeah ... that's why everyone stocks rick ... because it's the most commercial label atm.
there are literally SEVERAL different rick owens stockists within 1/2km radius in cities that can sustain a luxury market

void offered things that rick did not (that panelled hoodie, those cut up shirts etc) along with rick inspiried shit (t-shirts, dropped trousers and shorts)
i'm not denying that there is a demand but with or without a demand a retailer needs to eat.

im not hounding you man, g2b chill out

>>8139750
haha oh bullshit "seam and armhole"

are you fucking joking man

it's the MATERIAL, along with the fit of the tee of course, but right down to business, it all comes down to the way it was constructed in a fine degradable loungy material

no, the biggest, challenging and technically demanding part is the craftmanship put into these things

>>8139791
>your fits look like shit
you never seen any of my fits bro, i never ask for advice on this forum, im just trying to help you stupid motherfuckers out because you seem clueless

crawl back into your sewer you disgusting rat, we all know you don't even own RO

>>8139800

Yeah. Craftsmanship. Like visible scissor marks on the neck opening, as shown here:

>>8139628

>>8139796
This

Void the brand Odin voksgi and toj brands are, and smell like brands started out of thin air to exploit less knowledgable newly fashion conscious users of forums

>>8139800
???
there is a very specific cut to the armhole and shoulder seam such that the armhole is raised very high and the sleeve sits right into the armpit with the sleeve opening sitting at the top of the lateral clavicle - acromion process, followed with a taper to the hem.
this produces a taunt drape over the muscles involving the pectorial girdle
can you prove me wrong?

the material is also very important in fit, well of course - material dictates course (you're not going to make a sky scraper out of sand)

it's funny you denied me then you immediately credited me...
> along with the fit of the tee of course
the pattern also dictates the fit...

you actually just started forthing for no reason but to try and yell at me (and/or make a fool of yourself??)

oh wow...
>comes down to the way it was constructed in a fine degradable loungy material
so umm... does pattern not implicate construction ... or we all wearing ponchos ???

>no, the biggest, challenging and technically demanding part is the craftmanship put into these things
what are you trying to say here...
like... was anyone every speculating craftsmanship?
how the fuck do you define craftsmanship?

>>8139796
>what is the relation
sorry if that needed clarification

it's just that rick owens is expensive at retail price, therefore there's always the newcomers who've never given any thought to it asking us "Why should I buy expensive clothing if it's ugly?"

that's why we answer QUALITY and individuality of the brand

(rick owens has a unique appeal, and the discussion of it on /fa/ never stops, that's why i chose that as an example for you)

>proportionally the mark up is roughly the same
hahahaha

i hope you don't actually believe it costs close to $1200 to manufacture a pair of geobaskets

void didn't offer SHIT selling wise, all he did was make very few basic "avante-garde" clothing pieces easily accessible to the wide proportion of /fa/ users

he marked it up too haha, because he was in it to win it, come on

not hard to fool /fa/

what was it again? $100 for a pair of his sweatpants? a pair of sweatpants with a back pocket and a zipper? must cost a load for production dohoho

however i think void was a good poster who contributed, was polite, and did post very well put together fits, and i hope he does go very far in his fashion career/schooling

im calmer than you are man, chill out

>>8139827
why do you put "??" and "???" in front of every post
fuckin a man

> sleeve sits right into the armpit with the sleeve opening sitting at the top of the lateral clavicle - acromion process
>this produces a taunt drape over the muscles involving the pectorial girdle
with what? are we not discussing the fucking racerback tank style?

>you actually just started forthing for no reason but to try and yell at me
no reason?
>so umm... does pattern not implicate construction
okay, misconception here

i worded my post wrong

may i ask you post a picture showing an example of how it's specifically the "armholes" that's creating the drape?

>>8139834
the ugly sentiment doesnt fit into anything...
the whole question posed (involved with why someone should buy rick) has no relevance with what we're discussing (why luxury goods command a particular pricepoint when retailed).
i don't know why ...

you missed the point with the proportional thing...
to make a pair of crocodile teeth rubber, deerskin geobaskets in a DEDICATED factory in Italy has its costs of production (including wage (they get paid well btw), costs of running the factory blah blah)...
maybe the cost of producing one geobasket is 200 (i dont know really, i dont care to know because it doesnt matter in this circumstance) but the cost of making 1 zara t-shirt in bangladesh factory is s/t like 80c? and they flip that for $40?
is that s/t like a 5000% markup?
see thats the connection i made, PROPOTIONALLY the markup is actually LARGER than a geobasket markup which i can GURANTEE is less than 1000% and that's almost the going rate for most consumer goods...

i don't think you have good comprehension.
he actually did offer shit, you could email him and ask if something was possible and go through the steps...
what do you mean he didnt offer something you monogloid?
he fucking offered a mtm service for a select number of models HE produced and a very real possibility for customisation

of course he marked up ... hombre ain makin u shit for free
homi needs to eat, like don't you know how shit works?

i dont know boud you man but when i buy a bit of paper to rub the shit off my ass with i dont feel fooled in the slightest
and it also has a markup

he had to source his fabrics from a fabric store (pricy), zippers everything the markup wasnt that much for a VERY small operation he did indepently out of his apartment - despite taking time out of his program for this he still made it to antwerp - goda rock one for the hustler V___V

you just sound like a bitter stupid nerd tbh
check urself quick because ur vibes ain nothin but static

>>8139853
genuinely perplexed at what is happening
like there are some huge gaps in knowledge here or s/t

i thought t-shirts?
racer backs also have a very deliberate cut which i could expand on if wanted ?

just google rick owens t-shirt perfablly one with a profile, front and back
you'll see how it's taunt over the trapezium and scapularis muscles as well as through the chest (... for the basic run of cotton, silk/visc tees atleast)
the armholes are raised high so that the sleeve can go right into the armpit, allows the fabric to lie close to the body along the chest (compre to a shitty oxford or s/t that has HUGE armholes disallowing this tightness since the fabric floats from the body)
because the top of the sleeve is sitting ON the body and not off the shoulder and into the arm the sleeve is forced to follow from ABOVE the shoulder AROUND the deltoid and into the cuffs (along the arm)
it's actually hard to articulate through words - just google images.

>>8139867
>the whole question posed (involved with why someone should buy rick) has no relevance with what we're discussing
do you not see one? rick owens = luxury goods (if that's what you want to call it)

luxury goods appearing to the untrained eye = "What is this? Why should I buy it? It's just a damn joke with a price this high, nobody must ACTUALLY pay $1200 for a pair of sneakers?"

that's what i meant. sorry it confused you lol
>you missed the point with the proportional thing
how? void sold his merch at the same time the style was peaking in trends, you know, back when people argued whether "gothninja" was a word?
>but the cost of making 1 zara t-shirt in bangladesh factory is s/t like 80c? and they flip that for $40?
i don't get you man. i don't buy zara. i never support fast fashion/sweatshops and that's not my point

it's not my point at all

i'm not talking about "proportionally" zara can flip their shitty goofy tees and make a buck versus rick owens selling his line of clothes


>of course he marked up ... hombre ain makin u shit for free
duh? are you stupid?

yeah, makes sense now

people on /fa/ bought his shit because it's trendy

>you just sound like a bitter stupid nerd tbh
projecting? i guarantee my life is better than yours haha

>check urself quick because ur vibes ain nothin but static
was that your latest tweet?

>>8139878
we're talking about tanks dude

jesus

>>8139911
i dont buy rick because it's a luxury good - people have different reasons for buying rick
if someone is trying to understand why they should buy rick who cares, that's their issue people can burn time on it if they want
it had no relevance when you mentioned and your not making it any more relevant now

i actually dont care enough about the whole first thing, it doesnt even matter really since it didnt address anything ...

???
do you know what proportional means...?
propotionally the markup on zara is greater than that on rick...
proportionally the markup on toilet paper is the same if not higher than that of geobaskers
i actually made explicit references so you could understand better
there is nothing outrageous about luxury good markup - PROPORTIONALLY it's the same if not better (for consumer).
im not going to burn more time on this.
the whole zara thing was to explain how markups work...and then take it to explaining what proportion means
like idk is this one of those 'i'm just pretending to be retared, lol trolled u' scenarios?

your whole understanding on void is whack af and i dont really want to dicuss my main man or partake in arguments pertaining to the legitimacy of 'gothninja'.

what IS your point?
have you ever had a point?

yeah sure - they bought it because it's trendy, sure im okay with that ...

you actually just sound like your jealous of void lol...like idk man you just sound hella angry for w/e reason
guess im projecting though
these yohji panz and c-diem boots sure make it hard to hate the world though

it's my manifesto homi - nerds need to keep themselves on chill while im on my moment V___V

>>8139913
nah guy was talking boud sleeve - ain no racerback that got sleeves

>>8139930
>people have different reasons for buying rick
agreed
>if someone is trying to understand why they should buy rick who cares, that's their issue people can burn time on it if they want
yes i agree
>it had no relevance when you mentioned and your not making it any more relevant now
it still doesn't make sense to you? forget the name then, forget i said rick owens, my point was about price and people who don't give a shit about clothes at first being dumbfounded seeing them highly priced
>do you know what proportional means...?
yes, i was speaking about /fa/, as at the time this was the trending style

before anything shifted and moved onto this whole techwear/lunarcore/normcore/what-have-you puddle of muck
>propotionally the markup on zara is greater than that on rick...
ok......
>proportionally the markup on toilet paper is the same if not higher than that of geobaskers
ok.......

>your whole understanding on void is whack af
why do you think so? shed some light
>what IS your point?
rick owens is marked up

read >>8139780

i never said people buy rick because it's trendy if that's what you think, dead stone cold opposite there mate

do you need this to be spelled out?

void profited off /fa/ selling basic ass 'spinoff' shit

don't fucking pretend he sold anything worthwhile like on that runway he used

and
>what IS your point?
rick is marked up

that's all i was saying

as with void and many other brands, it's marked up

you aren't paying the entire retail price for "luxurious" materials and dalai lama skin impossible to find elsewhere

fucks sake, you keep calling me a nerd, youre the one wearing autistic person clothing
>carpe diem
>yohji pants

lemme guess, this is ph?

>>8139878
I can just fucking tell this is turnleft. Put your trip on.

>>8139911
I don't know if you're deliberately eskewing stuff to fit your agenda, or if you seriously don' understand how an argument works.

The dude you were talking to explained (pretty cogently) void's motives and explained to you that everyone knew void was making a little money (probably not much when you consider his time spent/materials and the small production numbers) and you replied with this:

>duh? are you stupid?

>yeah, makes sense now

>people on /fa/ bought his shit because it's trendy

What the fuck is your point bruh? Please try to type more coherently

peace-

>>8139966
the first everything until markup w/e

everything is marked up.
relatively ricks markup is tiny.

he actually sold things from that same runway
like the exact same designs.
again, the hoodie with the cable knit wool back panel
the t-shirt with the tears

if that's your point than i got some real shit for u
e
r
ry
th
ing
marked
up

nah dude - i aint paying retail at all

feeling autistic ain ever feel this gud

>>8139985
brom this entire thread is nothing but me
me
me
and more me

this is my thread
go home anons

>>8139966
>rick is marked up

>that's all i was saying

Why bother posting several diatribes about this. Literally every piece of clothing one can buy is marked up. It is universally known tha clothing is marked up.

People are just explaining that rick's materials/productions runs/labour is more expensive than fast fashion shit.

I smell turnleft and/or deux oiseaux

>>8139990
yeah, everything is marked up, i was answering the original question right here man >>8139765

>do people not know this?
>of course there are mark ups

and i said yeah

which is exactly what the fuck i said in my original post, that everything is marked up, especially an EXAMPLE LIKE COMMON PROJECTS IN WHICH THE HYPE INFLUENCED THE MARKUP

jesus... you are so braindead..

>>8140000
>Literally every piece of clothing one can buy is marked up.
dude, everything in the world is marked up

i didnt mean to write walls of text but
then you shouldnt hound at me

you fuckin meatball

>>8140012
lol you're so fucking stupid

>dude, everything in the world is marked up

that's exactly what i said and exactly why I'm wondering why you spent so long writing these paragraphs to explain something EVERYONE already knows.

>>8140006
?
it's not marked up because its rick owens....
it's marked up because people need to eat

that was precisely my argument
everything is marked up - mark up ain shit.
it doesn't get marked up because supply/demand, the price might increase because the demand rattifies it but... maybe you meant markup increase?

then some crazy rant about void and /fa/ forum culture
both of which you clearly dont understand

your exclusivity part is also whack
exclusivity does not bump up the price...
high prices induce exclusivity ;s

ur whack as hell man, ref. back to chilling urself

>>8140018
>explain something EVERYONE already knows
there we go again

not everyone knows it, dipshit

why do you think this board lacks quality trips and posters? why do you think this board collectively dresses like shit wearing nike trainers and sweats? why do you think this board isn't a fucking toilet bowl man?

you're entering a world of aussies and shitheads

>>8140024
Consider thinking about markup not only in terms of %, but also in terms of profit made on each item.

Also consider the size of RO's operation compared to say, AA and how that would affect his expenses.

>>8140024
>it's marked up because people need to eat
that's wrong though

CPs sold for 150-200$ before everyone hyped them up

what exactly do you mean, the markup is there for "people to eat"? CP does not continually produce their shit, number of releases are per season

the reason i got into void's situation was because he did the simplest work to make money before he head off to antwerp

and i commend him for that because you guys sound like shitheads

>>8140034
?
the umm....
profit made on each item is arbitrary, the mark up is a more accurate indicator of monetary gain.

i addressed the second part, zara instead of AA because AA is weird.
well, not fully because i didnt feel like i needed to explain how cost of production decreases with increased volume but, do i really need to explain that if im trying to prove mark up comparisons?
i guess volume is a concern there but do people not know that there is a much greater volume of zara than rick?

what's your point?

>>8140030
lol that image.

I honestly think everyone is aware of that.

Again, you're arguments are really incoherent.

I'll try to explain why.

you said

>not everyone knows it, dipshit

and then you said this as if it backed up that not everybody knows markups exist on clothing products.

>why do you think this board lacks quality trips and posters? why do you think this board collectively dresses like shit wearing nike trainers and sweats? why do you think this board isn't a fucking toilet bowl man?


Maybe you're trying to say this board is filled with idiots. That's kinda true, but even idiots know that when they buy their flyknits or whatever, Nike corporation will be making some profit from them.

To answer the question though. Most of the content is shit on this board because it's not really a fashion board like it should be. It's a "what are some dope white sneakers for < 150 dollars" board. I'm not hating on people who have a strict budget, I'm just saying the demographic that this board attracts is one that is young, often lacking in taste and isn't interested in quality.

pece tho


btw im so sure turnleft is somewhere in this thread trying to brag about his sz core shit

>>8140047
>profit made on each item is arbitrary

>>8140052
the # values dont mean anything.
% is better.

>>8140049
dude I AM like half this fucking thread
this whack ass dude trying to flip his bunk looking rick riff that's pilling in all corners and looks like someones god damn mutt let rip on the neck is trying to throw me some croney ass argument
and im all here like
my panties feel like gold and u smell like piss

>>8140049
maybe im trying to say? i AM saying that

also fuck turnleft

i don't get how you find it incoherent honestly

>it has the markup because it's rick owens, an amazing, top of the line designer who has created his own niche people want a part in
>exclusivity takes in, and the price is marked up from the original overhead/production/employee/employer price (which the original cost of BNIB geos could be less than $600 for all we know)
>CPs are beautiful, albeit not as well made as RO, but their markup is not justifiable by the means of "people need to eat", it's because "people need to feed the monkey"

do you understand now?

>>8140073
whoa dude im not OP im the guy who's arguing and if you are holding an aversion to the argument because you think i own that "mutt rick piff" that's funny lol

>>8140086
nah it was an afterthought after thinking about my panties

>>8140079
who cares dude, ur clearly stupid and wrong.
can we just mire my panties for a minute?
give me that attention

>>8140079
>do you understand now?

I've understood that since I was like 8 years old and I think everyone else does too.

Stop posting man you're just wasting time.

>>8140073

so Are you saying you're turnleft or what?

You the guy bragging aout getting in on boutiques wholesale orders?

If so I'd be interested in how you did that. I guess you're just friends with the manager or something. That would make a lot of sense.

>>8140104
wheredatbragging@?

>>8140104
you understand that the majority of /fa/, especially the new users, think that a markup is always warranted?

hahaha, enjoy your 2nd hand athletes foot CPs then bro
aahahahahah faggot

>>8140128
in what circumstance is a markup on clothing not warranted?

I don't own any cps. In my experience people who type hahahahhaha lol fgt xd are anally anguished nerds who are trying to appear cool and ironic.

>>8140147
>in what circumstance is a markup on clothing not warranted?
cee fucking pees if youve been following and not drooling on your desk

F-

>>8140153
your shit's weaker than my diarrhea.

I could easily argue that cps are worth the markup more than geos or sidezips because the minimal aesthetic will be more enduring than rick's one.

>>8140158
lol
argue it my man

i got my kidney in check

>>8140158
lel

i own geos

try me

your shitty cupsoled sneakers dont last nearly as long as boots do

>>8140128
Fa is all new users, they don't have a scale. Muggy azalea would be cute if you have never seen a chick before

>>8140161
>>8140164
I seriously gotta get my work done so I'm out. I would never buy cps because I think they're boring and I own a few Rick pieces (I'd have more if I had more disposable income). I totally understand and love Rick's aesthetic, but I'm not stupid enough to think that it's going to be as enduring as some tasteful and conservative lowtops.

>>8140165
lol sieg smelled some fresh shit and came bounding over

You fuckin meatballs

OP here. I'm back. This is such a shit thread.

I just wanted to know where I can find cotton similar to Rick's unstable cotton. You are all retarded.

no idea why that retard thinks I'm trying to "flip" my rick shirt. I posted the pic of it to show the "craftsmunship" of the garment (lmao nice fucked neckline) and how it could have been DIY'd.

>>8139713
this image is still relevant for the whole thread

>>8139713

wtf is this shitty undercover ripoff

>>8140164
>i own geos
>your shitty cupsoled sneakers dont last nearly as long as boots do
its ironic that you're talking about longevity while talking about owning geos. how are those heel staples treating you retard

i dont own cps or geos but i would definitely think the cps would outlast the geos from both a durability and aesthetic standpoint

in before "you down own them so you don't know"
no fucking shit that's why i mentioned not owning them

>>8140807

>its ironic that you're talking about longevity while talking about owning geos. how are those heel staples treating you retard

geos havent used staple construction in ages

>>8139628
how can you see scissor marks on fabric that's lasercut?

i'm a fashion student and 100% capable of helping you, i've actually already stolen the pattern from my rick ts, but i'm not going to because anon is right, you are acting like a dick and i feel like my time would be wasted anyway.

>>8141962
lmao wait, i finally opened the op
you bought an obviously fake tshirt homie. literally everything is wrong; the tags, the neck binding, that the spine seam is overlocked instead of coverstitched...

gg idiot

>>8141962
If you're actually legit can you post your email so i can hit you up?

I'm
>>8140182

so you can judge if im worthy because you seem to be into that

cheers

>>8141962
i just got a sewing machine from my grandma, mainly for fixing holes and trying stuff so i too would be happy to get the pattern to try making my first tee