[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

File: 33 KB, 600x400, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Feb 23 14:45:19 2014 No.7838609 [DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

Jack Purcell or Stan Smith? Which is the better affordable classic white sneaker?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 14:49:48 2014 No.7838637 lmaoooooo come on man

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 14:49:48 2014 No.7838634 >>7838609 Stan Smith for sure. They're stitched and more comfortable. A little chunkier so work with more things. Jack Purcell has been shit since Converse decided to cheapen out and changed the design.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 14:54:18 2014 No.7838666 >>7838634 How chunky are stan smiths?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 15:02:18 2014 No.7838709 >>7838666 Not as chunky as you might think imo. The black ones are really versatile.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 16:14:05 2014 No.7839022 >>7838709 Could I wear them with skinny jeans. I have SLP legs btw

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 16:35:35 2014 No.7839155 To anyone have a fit with stan smiths?

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 17:18:36 2014 No.7839397 >>7839022 I wear them with skinnies all the time. They're not as chunky as people say.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 20:26:34 2014 No.7840379 >>7838709 >black >really versatile

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 20:30:34 2014 No.7840396 I just copped two pairs of these, and I wouldn't call them chunky. For reference, they're notably slimmer than both Gazelles and Sambas.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 20:33:04 2014 No.7840411 black jack purcell

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 20:56:07 2014 No.7840524 >>7838609 they both look like shit

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 20:56:20 2014 No.7840520 >>7839397 >>7840396 Post fits please

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 21:00:36 2014 No.7840538 w2c Stans in Canada? I'm looking to try them on since I can't risk paying $130 to import the wrong size and have to deal with returning it

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 21:07:36 2014 No.7840569 >>7840396 I doubt they are slimmer than Sambas

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 22:03:06 2014 No.7840813 >>7840520 This. I've never seen a pair

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 22:30:40 2014 No.7840942 File: 312 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7840520 Here's mine. Sorry for the shitty lighting. They're really comfy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 22:57:26 2014 No.7841053 File: 81 KB, 312x312, 1378274438313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7840942

>>	Anonymous Sun Feb 23 23:22:16 2014 No.7841191 >>7840942 considering coping these or af1's

Anonymous Sun Feb 23 23:23:15 2014 No.7841198
File: 79 KB, 431x444, gazelle on the right.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7840538
I ordered mine online; if it's any help I sized 1/2 down like if I were wearing chucks and they fit really well (not slipping on the heel or anything like that).

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 01:43:05 2014 No.7841984 bump more pictures please

>>	Young Gira !pQ0XzV3PLA Mon Feb 24 09:21:36 2014 No.7843203 >>7841198 Kinda disappointed that it's off white but it does look comfy.

>>	Young Gira !pQ0XzV3PLA Mon Feb 24 09:29:36 2014 No.7843222 File: 45 KB, 500x666, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Kind of bummed I wasn't paying attention when these dropped

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 09:32:36 2014 No.7843227 >>7843222 >patent leather see >>7841053

>>	Young Gira !pQ0XzV3PLA Mon Feb 24 10:26:37 2014 No.7843388 >>7843227 Implying there aren't good patent leather shoes.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 12:56:33 2014 No.7843904 >>7843222 Shit nigga wtc

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 12:58:03 2014 No.7843919 This: >>7840524 Common Projects or Kent Wang, son.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 13:49:50 2014 No.7844148 >>7843919 >Kent wang That's literally worse than stan smiths.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 14:01:50 2014 No.7844190 Fuccquestion: Why are there no all white Stan smiths any more? Also, are national standards a good middle ground between stans and cps

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 14:02:50 2014 No.7844193 >>7844148 You prefer shitty branding and an awkward accent color. Not our problem.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 14:08:50 2014 No.7844215 >>7844190 i'm sure someone mentioned a while a go that white stans will be back in summer

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 14:26:20 2014 No.7844295 >>7843919 Brand fag. >muh quality more like muh ripoff

>>	Young Gira !pQ0XzV3PLA Mon Feb 24 14:27:20 2014 No.7844301 File: 63 KB, 398x600, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7844193 Implying the branding and heel accent don't give the shoe it's classic charm.

>>	Young Gira !pQ0XzV3PLA Mon Feb 24 14:29:20 2014 No.7844315 >>7844295 This guy gets it

Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:02:20 2014 No.7844725

>>7844295
>Brand fag
>muh quality
>more like muh ripoff

You're a moron. The Kent Wangs are $95, and if that's a lot of money for you to spend on shoes then you're a poor piece of shit as well.

The reason CP and KW are better than OP's choices is that they aren't ugly as fuck. Clean, simple designs with no branding or double-decker bulbous toe.

Jesus, do you underage retards need everything spelled out for you?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:03:50 2014 No.7844732 >>7838609 every fucking day

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:03:50 2014 No.7844734 >>7844301 >my ugly-as-fuck branding isn't ugly-as-fuck o-okay. >>7844315 ...and the monkey flings the poo.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:05:20 2014 No.7844737 >>7844301 You're parroting words you clearly don't understand.

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:08:20 2014 No.7844751 File: 79 KB, 1024x1024, 1393276081574.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] how about reebok x palace?

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:08:50 2014 No.7844753 >>7844751 not as good as air force 1 lows

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 16:10:50 2014 No.7844761 >>7844753 I personally find AF1 to be too chunky

>>	gaspar Mon Feb 24 23:34:14 2014 No.7846584 Stan Smiths for sure. Bask in the reunion tour of them

>>	banana Mon Feb 24 23:36:44 2014 No.7846594 >>7846584 are you getting a pair

>>	gaspar Mon Feb 24 23:37:44 2014 No.7846605 >>7846594 For sure~

>>	banana Mon Feb 24 23:40:14 2014 No.7846615 File: 546 KB, 802x579, adidas x MMJ Stan Smiths.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7846605 which oness

>>	gaspar Mon Feb 24 23:42:15 2014 No.7846630 >>7846615 mmmm, Probably the Blackouts or the Raf Simons ones.

>>	banana Mon Feb 24 23:44:15 2014 No.7846641 >>7846630 nice

>>	gaspar Mon Feb 24 23:46:45 2014 No.7846652 File: 32 KB, 403x537, 1393303593581.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7846641 the branding is not bad lol

>>	banana Mon Feb 24 23:52:15 2014 No.7846682 >>7846652 lol tbh i wish there was more stuff different about em than just the perforations but I guess he/his team liked them the way they were

>>	Anonymous Mon Feb 24 23:55:15 2014 No.7846697 >>7846652 lmao p dope

>>	Young Gira !pQ0XzV3PLA Mon Feb 24 23:59:32 2014 No.7846711 >>7846652 Fuck imma cop a cheap pair in navy and then the raf one when they drop.

>>	gaspar Tue Feb 25 00:05:01 2014 No.7846745 >>7846711 They better be priced adequately, I'm not paying above 200 for R perforation and name near the heel.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 25 00:20:17 2014 No.7846817 >>7843203 Yeah the picture isn't that great but it has a really light neutral grey tone. Not especially noticable in person mind you.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]