/fa/ - Fashion

He looks like everyone around here. Is that your point?

that guy is so not cute

>>7213156
they all look terrible save for maybe a handful

why did u make this thread

>Wow he has a beard, so classy gentleman gr8 fit

I swear everyone on Reddit has the same stupid looking face/expression

These are all so inoffensive

And I fucking hate how they all take pictures as though they're all models

I like them.
Actually, i like them better than anything iv'e seen here.

>>7213156
>these people are considered top by reddit
>tfw the people who consider them to be top would probably consider you to be godly if they saw your mad /fa/ fits

>>7213236
You sounded a bit autistic in that post.

Also I bet they're trying super hard with those fits, too.

can this faggot make a less stupider expression, he would probably be cool if it werent for the fact that his bland personality reeks out of his face in every pic he takes

learn to smile fucking faggot

>inb4 u dnt kno actual pain

>>7213249
its the godly part I know, I just couldnt come up with better adjectives because I went to public school

>>7213206
oh you mean like /fa/?

at least they don't all have tumblrs dedicated to high fashion (despite wearing low fashion)

Some aren't that bad but most are stupid dadcore shit.

Too bad I don't like the way they dress. mfa is honestly a much better community than this shithole.

>hands in pockets
>hands to their sides
>heads looking down
>grimaces not smiles


All you need to do is learn how to take a good portrait shot and you'll stand out - that counts for /fa/, sufu, sZ.

-from /p/

>>7213254
Don't worry, anon.

Now why aren't we doing a 'november /fa/ top fits'

Also a few of them in there weren't so bad. But most of them look like the plebs on here.

>>7213254
>truncate(251.7*8);
>blaming your autistic adjective choice on your school, and not taking responsibility for your own education.

>>7213175
they all look fine save for a handful

his gut + that neckline ruin everything

WOAH LOOK GUYS HE GOT A GF

and a prtty 1 @ tht

tfw

。:゜(;´∩｀;)゜:。

>>7213250
thats not a bad fit

>>7213299
she knows where the $$$$ is.

>>7213257

>>7213175
because he knew that /fa/, on their high horse, would immediately flock to this thread and bash reddit, only because its reddit. Most of these fits would look fine in public, most of /fa/s would not.

>>7213284
>being this autistic about a joke

>>7213301
I know, he has some good fits, but I am not judging him on that.


ps here is the autist/goob of the bunch

>>7213308
or you know maybe he's a chill dude and not an uninteresting nerd playing pseudofashionista on a japanese cartoon forum

>>7213321
hmm, interesting poi...

nah that can't be it, it's totally about the cashflow

>>7213306
>yfw it was so unfunny that i didn't even know that counts as a "joke"

>>7213317

ya blur out your face because no one would ever recognise you from your high top and beard and goober behaviour

HEY GUYS WHY DON'T WE SHOW REDDIT WHAT WE GOT!

LET'S SHOW THEM HOW FUCKING FASHIONABLE WE ARE!

WE AREN'T JUST SOME FUCCBOI'S, WE'RE /FA/GS.

Post your fits into reply and I'll show them how /fa/ does it

>>7213328
>why is that 14 year old smoking
i like it though

>>7213299
>tfw no qt gf to rock new fits with
;_;

So from what I see here what they consider fashionable is dressing like denim jacket The Driver and dadcore shit?

>>7213333
he's cute as fuck, now post your fit fuccboi

>>7213328

we've done this b4

>>7213323
>yfw u had me spoonfeeding u like a babby cause u hav no sense of humor/are autistic

>>7213339
post your fit fuccboi, we're doing it again.

>>7213338
He is cute. i took this a few months ago

man or woman?

either way wud fuck

(｡+･`ω･´)

>>7213350
thas a chick

>>7213353
nxtlvl

>>7213355
what is she doing in mens fashion advice board? dont tell me... is she gay?!

ヽ༼ ಠ益ಠ ༽ﾉ

>>7213353
Nice pic breh I'm starting up a imgur album, and you're the front cover.

mind if I ask for nudes?

Which is worse? Reddit or SA?

>>7213355
Her legs are almost as skinny as knoch's.

Guys get a load of this guy

>>7213367
what is a midlife crisis....
dont ever go onto a website called stylezeitgesit u will have a stroke

>>7213250
lol that dude is so fucking bald

i swear hes like 50 years old why does he dress like hes 16

>>7213360
awsome and i would mind

>>7213370
that looks good dumbass

>>7213377
fuck you retard.

>>7213374
pls

>>7213250
is that the H&M bomber?

>>7213384

doubt it, it's prolly Rick

>>7213377
>v-neck
>looks good
heh

>>7213380
no fuck off you fat piece of shit
>>7213380
no

>>7213387
damn, thought so, the H&M one looks kinda flimsy compared to that one.

>>7213388
when I posted the pic I was talking about the pants, shits fucking terrible.
>>7213389
post your fit fuccboi

>>7213399
yeah try dressedbytheinternet.com

Any sauce on this sweater?

>>7213395
here you go

mfa already catch up... /fa/ is finished... tell me how do we keep the edge?

>>7213400
*tips fedora*

wanna see my fedora collection?

>>7213399
>>7213399
geller

>>7213411
no

>>7213399
that fit is nice.

>>7213299
i think i remember seeing that thread, she's not his gf
just someone from ffa that he hung out with with a mutual friend of theirs

>>7213387
its actually TOJ

>>7213405

lunarcore

I don't get it.

The reason MFA is hated is because they give everyone a free pass when their fits look like shit and they need to lose weight. They refuse to be tough on people. If you think it is because we are some super elitist group that dresses so much better than the rest of the internet, you are an idiot.

What was posted was some nice fits. Most were nothing special, a couple were disgusting (that first one made me throw up in my mouth) but they were all nice and rounded, and fit well.

They also have some good stickies. I'd give some of them a read, you'll learn something.

tl;dr talk shit post fit

>>7213405
/fa/ is still more forward thinking and diversified

as retarded as all our -core's are, it keeps us ahead of the pack. lunarcore wont be found on most fashion forums, and techwear doesnt get the showtime it does here.

>>7213317
>>7213178
The only person with some personality. I like him.

>>7213839
That's bullshit, techwear has been a big thing on superfuture for the better part of a decade (ok, so about 5 years), and they're far more invested in it than anyone on /fa/ is, simply because they have the money.

>>7213848
thats cool but check these 5s

>>7213848
it doesnt get any more attention than it does here

>>7213856
damn im out of shape

>>7213856
nice try nerdboy

>>7213854
I'm sorry, but that's rubbish
The urban techwear thread alone, which is roughly 2 years old, has over 100 pages, and is near-unmatched as a resource for technical wear on the internet
http://supertalk.superfuture.com/index.php/topic/116740-urban-techwear/
Technical clothing had been a huge deal on Superfuture even before that. Frankly, /fa/ has next to no claim towards techwear and it's almost never discussed on here in depth save for rare posts by people like Anorak.

>>7213250
whata tryhard

>>7213250
why is he committing suicide

>>7213871
cuz he got negged on sufu

>>7213178
daou's a cool dude

tspf

They're so incredibly... bland. There's nothing inherently wrong with them, save a few, but it just looks like normal average shit you'd see at the mall or at uni except a little more effort going into it.

I think /fa/ still holds the edge, simply because a lot of our fits aren't generic cookie-cutter stuff like that. Though a lot of them can look really stupid, at least there's variety and not just "average white guy".

>>7213898
>/fa/ still holds the edge
>edge
huehue

but you're right. mfa's strength & weakness is that they're all bland and basic and approchable. meanwhile /fa/'s strength and weakness is that we tend to forgo basic for more avant/unique/goof looks

>>7213370

WHY IS HIS TSHIRT SO SHORT

>>7213908
it's H&M so it probably shrunk to shit

>>7213399
My friend bought that from Forever 21, but I think he got it a few years ago. Check there?

>>7213299

tohelloneighbor.com

they're not even dating, just doing this shit for internet validation

All those guys are aweful even by mah slav standards

most are better than the mirror selfie embarrassments that /fa/ churns out

Maybe if we comment on their age or receding hairline or m-maybe their ethnicity it'll make our WAYWT threads look better~~

w-whos with me ??

>>7213156
>yfw most of these fits are good but you're too autistic to admit it

>>7213156
"i like minmalism, but i don't like putting my shit away"

>>7213972
minimal effort though

>>7213968
ok let me see
>shit denim that doesn't fit
>aa tee shit tier
>toj leather jacket which looks laughable with his d-d-daad-c-c-ould-u-give-me-a-ride-face wouldmug/10
>some shitty lowtops which look too flat, also cheap and don't go with nice leather jacket

>>7213866
you dont think we would have accumulated more than 200 pages worth of content if threads didnt delete?

ur real mad rite now man and i dont know why. i only ever said most forums which is true. fukin autism

>as retarded as all our -core's are, it keeps us ahead of the pack. lunarcore wont be found on most fashion forums, and techwear doesnt get the showtime it does here.

absolutely funny time

>>7213978
guess that extends to his wardrobe and appearance as well

>>7214006
>lunarcore

>>7214009
yeah man totally, the paradigms that comprised /fa/'s embarrassing 'lunarcore' had never been realised before the visionaries on /fa/ created them!

the only reason /fa/ thinks its discovered anything is because 90% of you have no knowledge of things that have existed for years

>>7214016
its a fucking joke even before fa 'created' it. bunch of cargo shorts, and bombers.

>>7214016
no1 said we created nething u autism fuk

>>7213156

FYI the image you posted in OP was a joke fit, the guy included a "Detail" image which was just a close up of his face

>>7214026

http://www.reddit.com/r/malefashionadvice/comments/1p77p2/waywt_oct_25th/cczf8ye

>>7214023
oh ok but because u all attempt to deconstruct it and categorise its components into a trite little 'lunarcore' checklist - and do so with the eloquence and knowledge of a gaggle of limp legged mongoloids - it somehow makes u 'ahead of the pack'

lol

>just copped palladiums /fa/ finally 10/10 on the checklist! feels good to be ahead of the game

>>7214039
>it somehow makes u 'ahead of the pack'
in terms of internet forums it does

hav u also at all considered that most ppl who like lunarcore and such have liked it from the beginning?

>>7214047
'internet forums'
like what? theres about 5 highly trafficked forums on the internet that discuss high fashion in any serious manner, in terms of knowledge, wealth, experience with owning and handling designer pieces per capita /fa/ is behind every single one.

>like lunarcore and such have liked it from the beginning?
what beginning? thats why you're all so fucking stupid, fashion design doesn't work like that, designers dont make a conscious decision to create something that fits into your pedantic banal little 'core' system. the term 'lunarcore' has never and will never be uttered anywhere but here, that doesn't mean the things you've all come to recognise as being paradigms of 'lunarcore' hadn't all been done before, it just means no one else out there is so stupid as to think there was a beginning of what essentially is a terminology in 'lunarcore'.

there was no beginning, it never existed, all the things you scatter brained idiots called lunarcore had already been creatively and commercially realised; its just that no one was gayboy enough to put it under some faggot blanket term until /fa/.

>>7213156
The guy in the 3rd pic has a really annoying face it pisses me off alot. Also 1st pic is top kek

>>7213299
>Tfw a chubs ledditor has a qt3.14 girl to wear new fits in with
>Tfw no qt3.14 to rock new fits with

>>7213362
Does SA have even have a fashion board?

>>7213399
robert geller dip dye

if u find one DO NOT COP IT, instead msg me on my 4chan inbox so i can get it

>>7213866
lol nerd go spend ur autsim bucks on some of ur shitty techwear bullshit

if u come back to aus ill smash ur head in

>>7214141

You Look Like Shit is the fashion/fitness ofrum

>>7214069
holy fuck autism speaks

>>7213387
>thinking this could be a rick bomber
>tripfag
Fuck off /fa/ you fuccboi.

Is /fa/ actually any better than mfa though? We should set up a fit battle and see what happens.

>>7214225
Yeah, just look at their waywts compared to ours

Their only good ones are generally from crossposters from /fa/ plus the whole karma and registration thing means that no one will actually give you genuine criticism cos they're too busy trying to sound nice

>>7214259
Err have you seen our current WAYWT? Everything is acceptable tier. We should make a compilation of our own and compare it to theirs without using cross posters and see how well /fa/ dresses. Like proper vote on what should go in.

>>7214259
>crossposters from /fa/
Since when do these guys go to /fa/?

>>7214284
He's talking about trips like user and alex

>>7214259
you can say the same with mfa since their good ones are usually from crossposters from other forums as well.

Outside of trips like user and alex, our WAYWT usually falls between pleb into somewhat acceptable though.

Best fit of them all.

>>7214367
what kind of jacket is that

>>7214367

>Hey anon, why are you wearing so much black, it looks so dull! Come shopping with me, I'll take you to Primark so we can get some colourful clothes for once!

>>7213156
>guy with the same exact shit pose and facial expression in 9 different pictures and fits
oh lordy

>>7214367

Those pants are way too wrinkly for that slim a fit

Does he not have legs at all?

For me, the most irksome thing about mfa are not the fits but the attitudes of the posters. They all "act" very nice and helpful because they are all scared of being downvoted. For example nobody there has the guts to call some of the fat guys out(No offense to them). Like this asian guy, if he spent half an hour a day running instead of obsessing over clothes he would be looking a lot better by now. But no, his admittedly pretty good fits (for a fat guy) gets upvoted and complimented and everyone is all supportive which is nice but it only happens because no one wants to be the asshole that tells the fat guy to get his priorities straight. Also I hate the way most of them pose for pictures.

>>7214145
fucking aussies

>>7214367
it's okay, but this isn't really good coming from azurewrath. I feel like it is too top heavy.

Why is it that /fa/ constantly mocks other fits but then posts threads about "feels" that the plebs mock them. And then belittle these same plebs whose behavior they copy.

>>7214069
nope
you're wrong

>>7213168
that's the point

He's ugly but his clothes make him almost good looking.

>>7214637
not really

he's short and has an extremely gay looking face

the scoop neck just accentuates this. If that was just a crew, then yeah, it would, but he actually looks worse than a guy wearing t-shirt, jeans, and vans imo.

>>7213299
I would lick the bottom of her shoes if she would just spit in my mouth.

>>7214562
UU parka

>>7214637
i think they make him more ridiculous if anything

>>7213156

Some are fucking horrible some are bretty gud 10/10. Sounds about like /fa/. Mad cause you're no better?

>>7213299
>tfw i dress like the girl

i'm a boy btw ; ^)

>>7215154
chears m8

this is so basic but it's my favorite out of the bunch

>>7213250
i like this dude's fits and he has the face to make balding not look totally awful

>>7214367
pants stack weird to me

>>7215357
Jesus I have that jacket

Hope it doesn't look that bad on me, fit is so odd

>>7215367
i think his pose isn't helping it at all

also w2c

what jacket is this

>>7215372
toj

>>7213945
>tohelloneighbor.com
I take it back she is one uggo cunt, unless its the focal length fucking with her face here.

╮(•˘︿ ˘•)╭

>>7215373
I could see a girl looking cute in a jacket with just the top buttoned but this is fucking stupid.

>>7213485
That's the power of makeup.

>>7215403
Probably distortion in a pic this near the face but she still looks good in that photo.

>>7213328
This is so russian, I can't take it

>>7215418
yer the focal length has somthing to do with it but it's not as worse as it would be if the guy had taken 1 step closer

to say she loooks good in this pic, m8 how thirsty r u

>>7215373
bump for name of this

>>7215440
it is common projects x robert geller

>>7215440
Common Projects x Robert Geller trench coat

(^ー^)

>>7214562
its robert geller, not UU

>>7215434
JUST A LITTLE BIT OF GAS... MAYBE A QUEEF

>>7215434
>yer the focal length has somthing to do with it but it's not as worse as it would be if the guy had taken 1 step closer
Yeah her jaw appears to be near the center of the shot so I'm thinking the camera combined with the angle makes it look bigger than it is. Not thirsty, and to be frank, south asians & the like aren't my type. She just looks good. Good facial features and skin. Already better off than most people. How much of a nitpicker can you be?

>>7213299
they're definitely not dating, that is the image of a thoroughly whipped boy.

>tfw you've become a personal accessory

>>7215491
I'll give you the facial features but not the skin, she has some nasty wrinkles, especially under her eye she has some mean eye bags. They would make sense if she was in her mid 30s

>How much of a nitpicker can you be?
you talk like paying attention to the smaller details is a bad thing


>>7215497
inb4 the guy I just replied to is him

>>7215506
cant forget those wrinkles that form inward to her cheek that stretch down to her chin, look closer, they are masked by her make up

>>7215513
I found a pic where you can see them better, she isnt even smiling and you can see that 3 inch long crease

also dat post, if only she knew....

>>7215520
>>7215513
>>7215506
>>7215497
>>7215475
WOW STOP IT Y

YOU FUCKING DICKS

SHE COMES HERE AND IS REAL SENITIVE ABOUT THAT STUFF

WOW ASS HOELS

>>7215524
Stop posting forever.
Please, I beg you.

wow these are depressing

>>7215506
>They would make sense if she was in her mid 30s
In the real world people under 35 don't look like flawless supermodels. Her skin is smooth and clear. The wrinkles aren't even deep. It's what the industry calls 'fine lines'.

>paying attention to smaller details is a bad thing
It's a bad thing when you're saying someone who looks better than the vast majority of people looks bad because of them lel
It's literally pointy elbows level of discussion.

>>7215513
Shes grinning in that picture so she better have them.

>>7215524
lmfao fuckin x to tha z

>>7215575
LOL

no doubt it my mind now you are that whipped boy.

You're so blinded by your thirst that you're trying to ignore those heavy fucking wrinkles under her eyes.

Also I like how you rationalize your argument by using the industry standards as a universal law and you compare her to a bunch of other people to downplay how ugly she is. Of course you did this because you can't dispute shit, and those "fine lines" nice way to sugar coat words, wait til she actually hits her 30s lmao.

>it's only bad to nitpick if you're being mean
cry me a river

>>7215575
>Shes grinning in that picture so she better have them.
yeh ok, refer to >>7215520

#rekt

>>7215595
>>7215520

I wonder if she smokes that probably did her in

>>7215524

she's real sensitive because they're true

>>7215575
Thought I had a better resolution but I guess this is it..

>>7215595
I wouldn't be caught dead in a denim jacket and monkstraps let alone posting it on MFA but think whatever you like. I'm just a dude whos tired of watching idiots call anyone who isn't a 10/10 supermodel bad looking. I doubt you will post your own picture once you're knees deep in your own shit storm.

>Also I like how you rationalize your argument by using the industry standards as a universal law
Kind of like how it's a universal law that some acne is nodular while other acne is comedonal? Not my fault you're a narcissistic retard who doesn't know the first thing about anatomy but is all too happy to critique it.

>and those "fine lines" nice way to sugar coat words
Nope. They're called fine lines because they can be remedied by longterm topical treatments while wrinkles are basically set in stone unless you do botox, fillers, or a facelift. The distinction between wrinkles and fine lines exists for clinical reasons, not making people feel good.

It's not only bad to nitpick if you're being mean. It's only bad to nitpick if you're nitpicking literally because the person doesn't look like a supermodel when they look great relative to the world.

>refer to
And you'll notice that they aren't nearly as obvious in that one as they were in the last. They aren't even lines in that one, just indents.

Sorry but saying #rekt doesn't actually lend anything to your argument. It just makes you look even more pompous and hard headed than you did before.

>>7215636
Well you've done nothing but prove that you're only arguing because you're butthurt that someone is being a dick to a girl you dont even know but you glanced at her once and now felt that it's time for you to defend her honor. If her wrinkles where so easy to fix I am sure she would have done that long ago.

Honestly, you are just venting at this point because you're wrong, not even arguing. Anyone can look at her photo and see the wrinkles it's not a secret, therefore I'm right and you're wrong.

And beauty is in the eye of the beholder, once again your argument is futile and only comes down to: STOP BEING MEAN ON THE NET.

To which I respond by saying, go fuck yourself m8. lmao

>>7215636
Also, you don't even know my taste in women, I never once compared her to a super model so that's how your autism speaks - you just go and generalize me with a crowd of dudes who, alright let's say have "unrealistic" views of women for the sake of you calming down.

Also wanted to point out:

>They aren't even lines in that one, just indents.

I like that back peddling it makes me feel good.

>>7215646
>Well you've done nothing but prove that you're only arguing because you're butthurt that someone is being a dick to a girl you dont even know but you glanced at her once and now felt that it's time for you to defend her honor.
I haven't proved that at all. You've proved that all you can do is scream WHITE KNIGHT!!! when your logic is brought into question.

>If her wrinkles where so easy to fix I am sure she would have done that long ago.
Longterm treatment isn't easy, it's just not as invasive and expensive as plastic surgery. It also takes about 5 years longer. But that's irrelevant because plenty of shit is easy and people don't do it.

>Honestly, you are just venting at this point because you're wrong, not even arguing.
That would be you. I'm talking about the girl's features, how common it is to see those features, how she compares to the mean attractiveness, and you're sitting here crying about my motives. You're the one venting.

>Anyone can look at her photo and see the wrinkles it's not a secret
No shit. The difference is that anyone wouldn't look at her wrinkles and declare her as being bad looking because of them.

>And beauty is in the eye of the beholder
Oh dear. If you honestly believed that we wouldn't even be having this discussion.

Yeah, I'm the one venting. Not you, the person who alternates between mud flinging and backpedaling. It's me venting.

>>7215668
>I never once compared her to a super model
No, you're doing it in your head. You're comparing her to people in the top .0001% of looks in your head. That's where the comparison is happening.

>back peddling
That isn't back peddling. I never said she had lines in that particular photo. I said that she has lines when she smiles in the other one.

>>7215676
>>7215682


Alright then, I'll make it easier for you because you're sperging out and have gone completely off course from the original argument.

Look at those bags under her eyes and answer a simple question for me.

Does she or does she not have wrinkles under her eyes?

>>7215683
>from the original argument
It's not me who went off course. I'm not the one who said I must be some friendzoned beta for defending her. I'm not the one who went on a personal tangent or had some mental block about what a fine line is and why the term exists.

The original argument was about how she looks: good or bad. I maintain that she looks good despite not having completely unlined skin like my animus. If you honestly think I ever said she didn't have "wrinkles under her eyes", then show me where I said it.

>>7215646
I think what he had said more along the line of picking apart your argument against an image as pointless nitpicking and an appeal to criticize in a more productive way from a more knowledgeable position.

But yeah, keep sperging if you want, nobody can really stop you here.

>>7215692
Okay, so then what is the problem with me not liking her because of her wrinkles?

>>7215697
My problem isn't with you not liking them. I think my problem was really clear from the very beginning--its that you declare her bad looking because of them. I don't like certain parts of pretty much everyone's face. I just don't declare them as bad looking because of it because I know they are organic beings, not drawings or plastic dolls.

What is it with reddit that attracts so many boring mildly autistic homosexuals?

I mean, 4chan can be pretty gay and autistic, but at least we aren't boring about it. I'd take /jp/s glory hole threads over 100 pictures of some chubby guy with his hands in his pockets any day

>>7215702
So because I don't like a certain feature on women and you do, that automatically makes me wrong?

>>7213370

I actually like this

>>7215720
How can someone be this dense? I don't like fine lines. I just don't declare people as ugly because of them just like I won't declare them ugly because of pointy elbows and sharp knees. Get the fuck over yourself.

>>7215720
No, you're wrong because you're attempting to use circular logic while altering his words.

>>7215727
I'll admit I was getting a kick pulling your leg earlier, but now I'm actually trying to understand you. Would you rather go back to flinging shit or actually talk it out?

So because you don't do something then that means no one else should do it too, in other words why do you believe people should judge others the way you do?

>>7215729
the meaning is the same, he can clarify if he chooses to answer anyway.

>>7213156

at least most of them don't look like they're straight out of high school like /fa/

>>7215735
I honestly don't think you're trying to understand me but it's possible you are just really dense. Throughout the who convo you've been accusing me of shit I never said..

>So because you don't do something then that means no one else should do it too, in other words why do you believe people should judge others the way you do?
Oh please you can say this about anything. So because you don't rape and murder 3 year olds that means no one else should do it? Yes, certain things are unreasonable. I'm not saying it's unreasonable because I don't do it. I'm saying I don't do it because it's unreasonable.

>the meaning is the same
No it isn't. You need to develop your reading/writing skills before you try to rope anyone into phil 101 quibbles.

>>7215513
>they are masked by her make up
you'd think men would know more about makeup given how much they bitch and moan about it

makeup doesn't mask wrinkles
makeup highlights wrinkles because it makes the entire surface of the skin more uniform in color, so imperfections in texture become more obvious
it does the same thing to pores
makeup builds up around a wrinkle to create a crease

>>7215704
communities perpetuate themselves, so even if you went over there and tried to spice things up, it wouldn't be well-received
you'd go back to /jp/ because you want to be among people who can appreciate your contributions

the voting system also keeps things really bland and tame, and you have to remember that moderation is a lot more heavy-handed there
outrageous stuff not only gets voted down, it often just gets deleted altogether lol

>>7215747
Those hyperboles aren't getting you anywhere.

And as I said, I was pulling your leg earlier but not now. This post is the only proof I need to know you're venting, you should spend more time using reason than letting your emotions get to you.

All this time you've been saying "it's not okay to dismiss her as ugly because of wrinkles"

If someone does not have a taste for such an undesirable trait you have no right to try to convince them to settle for it just because you conform to mediocrity.
B)

>>7215747
>spends an entire thread not to compare women to models
>starts using models

I think you're the real retard here

Hey /fa/ if you're so much better than reddit then why do only four or five people here post fits on a regular basis?

>>7215765
makes sense, if you see a mole on a bitches face and you dont like moles then you shouldnt have to throw your arms in the air and shrug it off and like her just cause some faggot is preaching that you better like her despite that nasty mole

>>7214069
piggy stop saying 'paradigms'

i agree with ur post tho

>>7215777
because if you DON'T LIKE a website you're unlikely to USE IT

AUTISM

>>7215747
>So because you don't rape and murder 3 year olds that means no one else should do it?
heh, you used the same shit you were whining about him doing, dat hypocrisy, the rest of it is pretty sound though.

I still wouldn't pick the mole bitch though, you are preaching to the wrong crowd

>>7215789
post originated from poet, which was then regurgitated and spat up on the rug by Tiger, then I guess this pigfucker ate it up and is now regurgitating it here

>>7215765
That's not a hyperbole. It's a hyperbolic comparison at best. Again, reading/writing skills. In retrospect I really should have made it about nazis.

>This post is the only proof I need to know you're venting, you should spend more time using reason than letting your emotions get to you.
You should spend more time in language arts than projecting.

>If someone does not have a taste for such an undesirable trait you have no right to try to convince them to settle for it just because you conform to mediocrity.
If someone is a nitpicking, pretentious, narcissistic, and unreasonable douchebag who won't even share his own face with the board, then I'm going to call them out for it. Settling has nothing to do with calling someone ugly either. I wouldn't settle for Justin Bieber as a life partner but I'm not going to call him ugly.

>>7215772
Another dense person has joined the thread. Look at the lines in her face. It's kind of the point that she's a model. Even a supermodel has those lines but it's true what >>7215757 said, makeup makes these lines more obvious.

>>7215777
Don't a lot more people post fits on a regular basis? Maybe four or five post good ones on a regular basis..

>>7215781
But most people don't have 'nasty moles'. Whereas 99.99% of people who have at least ENTERED puberty have fine lines.

It also depends entirely on what the mole is like, samefag. Is it greyish, raised, and 2 cm in diameter? Are there dark hairs sprouting out of it? Or is it just a mole? You reduce the mole beyond absurdity.

>>7215812
Samefagging again? What am I doing that I bitched about him doing? I'm not putting words in his mouth. I'm showing him the errors in his logic by extending it.

>>7215840
> spend more time in language arts than projecting.
You're the one going ad hominem on me, thus you're the angry one here not me.

If you can't dispute:

>you have no right to try to convince them to settle for it just because you conform to mediocrity.

Then you are done here, ya lose.

B)

>>7215840
1 out of 2 here faggot try again top kek

>>7215840
threads over everybody go home, I shouldnt have given you the benefit of the doubt, and basically you stooped to insulting the guy when he stopped a long time ago

>>7215840
>f someone is a nitpicking, pretentious, narcissistic, and unreasonable douchebag
and this type of shit isnt helping you either, it's really like you're just projecting

>>7215883
you know someone is autistic when they start shouting samefag out the ass

>>7215849
>You're the one going ad hominem on me
Saying you're projecting isn't an ad hominem. It's the truth. When you begin a discussion by calling someone ugly, you probably shouldn't whine about ad hominems anyway because unlike ugliness projection isn't subjective in the least.

>If you can't dispute:
I did more than dispute it. I proved it's irrelevant to the discussion, and you didn't address it at all. 10 posts ago you were saying some shit about being mean, and now it's all you'll focus on because you're at a dead end.

>>7215883
>when he stopped a long time ago
He never stopped. You should ask yourself what it means to insult someone when they are doing something that insults themselves. Am I insulting him by pointing out what he's doing? If someone trips over themselves repeatedly, am I insulting them by saying they did it?

>>7215889
Explain how I'm projecting. Explain why my accusations against him aren't legitimate.

>>7215900
You know someone doesn't have a point when they have to resort to
>autism

>>7215840
>I wouldn't settle for Justin Bieber as a life partner
i would

>>7215849
you're stupid

>>7215913
It's relevant because you spent this entire thread arguing that someone shouldn't be called ugly because of a single feature, why wouldn't someone be allowed to call them ugly if that single feature was such a disgusting one, like those wrinkles. And thus:

You have no right to convince anyone to not consider a person ugly because they contain an undesirable trait.

Also, the ad hominem just shows how petty and mad you are, not really whining about it.

>>7215955
forgot my

B)

>>7215913
I'll give you nitpicking and unreasonable that's for sure.

>>7215955
>It's relevant because you spent this entire thread arguing that someone shouldn't be called ugly because of a single feature
No, that wasn't it. It was the feature itself: fine lines.
>But most people don't have 'nasty moles'. Whereas 99.99% of people who have at least ENTERED puberty have fine lines.

Yes, even you have them.

>>7215994
Nope, wrinkles under her eyes were part of it as well. I knew you couldn't dispute that so you would shout IRRELEVANT!

PS you can easily generalize fine lines as a single feature.

B)

>>7215403
Well I hope I can put an end to this argument by agreeing that his bitch is really ugly as fuck.

>spending an entire thread defending an ugly bitch

really /fa/? you sank low

>>7216019
chick in that ad is just as ugly if not uglier tho

>>7216021
and she has the mouth things he was complaining about lol

>>7216021
I'm not too big on nips either, but I like to post random shit.

>>7216002
>Nope, wrinkles under her eyes were part of it as well.
That's what I said. Fine lines. Fine lines doesn't refer to fine lines on what area of the face. It refers to all of them.

>I knew you couldn't dispute that so you would shout IRRELEVANT!
I never wanted to dispute it. Disputing it was never the point. You're missing the point.

>PS you can easily generalize fine lines as a single feature.
You're missing the point so, so hard. It doesn't matter if it's a single feature or a dozen. It's the feature itself that you're whining about.
>But most people don't have 'nasty moles'. Whereas 99.99% of people who have at least ENTERED puberty have fine lines.
>Yes, even you have them.

>>7216027
Heh.

>>7216027
I just noticed that, pic related the only guy who can pull them off.

still that bitch ugly no doubt

>>7216030
LOL, now you're just back peddaling,

>you're missing the point
>you're missing the point

I don't care what point you were trying to make, the original subject was that she's ugly cause of the wrinkles that you sugar coat as fine lines. Sure is easy to tell someone you are missing the point when you can't prove them wrong.


"You have no right to convince anyone to not consider a person ugly because they contain an undesirable trait. "

this is as real as it gets, ya lost.

B)

>>7213178
>implying you dress better

>>7216043
>LOL, now you're just back peddaling
No, I'm not. What's happening is that you're getting these ideas that I care about it being a single feature or something when I never did. When I tell you that I don't, you perceive it as backpedaling because you can't bear the thought that you were wrong..even though you can't find any text from me saying I cared about it being a single feature or that the lines under her eyes aren't fine lines.

>I don't care what point you were trying to make, the original subject was that she's ugly cause of the wrinkles that you sugar coat as fine lines.
>sugar coat
I've already told you why this is bullshit and you couldn't even touch on it.

>Sure is easy to tell someone you are missing the point when you can't prove them wrong.
Sure is easy to build strawmen and then get whiny when you're told you've been missing the point and putting words in other people's mouths. Sure is easy to ignore these
>But most people don't have 'nasty moles'. Whereas 99.99% of people who have at least ENTERED puberty have fine lines.
>Yes, even you have them.

>"You have no right to convince anyone to not consider a person ugly because they contain an undesirable trait. "
Report me to the authorities because I guess I have no right! Lol. I have every right to, and you're STILL missing the point because it's not about having the undesirable trait, it's about what the undesirable trait is. I think you need to brush up on what rights are.

>>7216141
>deas that I care about it being a single feature
This was never about you though was it? It was always about you trying to convince me how unreasonable it is to call someone ugly because of "fine lines."

>I've already told you why this is bullshit and you couldn't even touch on it.
Google fine lines, nothing but a bunch of 30+ year olds and old ladies, aka sugar coated wrinkles. There, consider it touched and trashed.

>Sure is easy to build strawmen
but it's a lot easier to tell someone "you dont understand/missed the point etc," the way you did, so my point was legitimate and if you keep crying about that then I've exposed you as an even bigger hypocrite. B)

>Report me to the authorities because I guess I have no right!
Refer to my previous point, one moment you cry about straw mans and the next you straw man yourself. No one is gonna take you seriously with all your contradictions.

You want me to play your game? Alright.

You can't convince me to not consider her ugly because of those wrinkles on her face that she should have fixed years ago if what you ever said was true - and it's not so unreasonable because if what you said is true they should be curable.

Can't dispute it, get outta my sight.

B)

>>7216187
>This was never about you though was it?
When you're arguing with someone and say something like that as though you're proving something, then yes, it's about them to some extent.

>It was always about you trying to convince me how unreasonable it is to call someone ugly because of "fine lines."
For once, you haven't missed the point.

>There, consider it touched and trashed.
I won't consider it either because you didn't actually prove anything. I'd ask you why you think google is the divine truth but I'm not even sure what you're trying to prove with it.

>but it's a lot easier to tell someone "you dont understand/missed the point etc," the way you did
I don't know why you're so butthurt about this. You missed the point. Whether or not it's easy to tell you doesn't matter--you missed the point. How difficult it is for me to tell you that you missed it is so irrelevant that I can't understand why you'd even focus on it.

>so my point was legitimate
No, it wasn't. Because saying it's easy to tell you that you missed the point isn't a legitimate point. It's just saying it's easy to say it. And that doesn't matter. What point do you think you prove by saying it's easy to say it?

>Refer to my previous point, one moment you cry about straw mans and the next you straw man yourself.
Now this is autism. Lighten the fuck up. It's not a strawman. It's a joke. You quite literally said I didn't have the right to do it, so my joke was apt.

>You can't convince me to not consider her ugly because of those wrinkles on her face that she should have fixed years ago if what you ever said was true - and it's not so unreasonable because if what you said is true they should be curable.
First of all, you need to convince me that she and the people around her give half as much of a fuck about the lines as you do. I guarantee they don't.

>>7216187
PLEASE, take a phil 101 class or something before you try to throw around shit like ad hom or strawman again. Or maybe before you try to argue at all again. You also don't know what dispute means--it just means to disagree. A dispute isn't a refutation.

>>7216187
never seen so much irony in just 1 post

this best be a troll

>>7216285
>I'd ask you why you think google is the divine truth
Sound familiar? Just the way you act as if what the industry states is divine truth earlier.

>You missed the point.
I got the point loud and clear a long time ago, but there was no reason for me to get straight to it when I was having such a laugh.

>First of all, you need to convince me that she and the people around her give half as much of a fuck about the lines as you do. I guarantee they don't.
No I don't because this argument is between me and you not them. You even said so in the first part of your post.

>>7216293
You understood what i meant so it's fine.

In the end you were unable to refute it.

Ya lose.

B)


>>7216302
point out the irony for me so I can laugh at myself with you

>>7213250
Seriously, how can people like his fits outside of SZ? he's like one of those middle age guy with mid life crisis who feels like he need to dress like a 16 years old despite looking like he's 50.

>>7215789

who cares what you think though

you're like 16 and don't know shit about fashion