[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 59 KB, 762x544, tlboots.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7030353 No.7030353[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

looking for some sub $200 water-resistant boots for the winter. something like these timberlands, though I heard that these are uncomfortable and fall apart easily

boots general

>> No.7030378

>>7030353
http://www.supercasuals.com/Corcoran/Corcoran_1510.cfm?scsrc=pla&utm_source=googlepla&utm_medium=cse&utm_term=1981_BRN_640&k=1981_BRN_640&gclid=CNuX6aORhboCFfA7MgodQkAALA

Thats what i have. Super comfy, though they take a while to break in.

>> No.7030388
File: 96 KB, 500x346, tumblr_m9ga7ebk6y1rp1d29o1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7030388

Those Timberlands are ugly as fuck. For less than $200 look at Thorogood

>> No.7030398

>>7030388
w2c

>> No.7030405

>>7030388
oh nvm Thorogood

>> No.7030400
File: 149 KB, 1000x667, stussy-timberland-boots-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7030400

To bad you don't want Timbs. Sick collab imo.

>> No.7030411

>>7030353
This is relevant to my interests. I want a brown leather boot that I can hike in that has a similar look to Iron Rangers.

>> No.7030414

>>7030411
I'm willing to spend 400 bucks.

should I get the rangers and some shitty timberlands or is there a good crossover?

>> No.7030420

>>7030400
w2c pls

>> No.7030439

>>7030420
Google timberland you lazy fat piece of trash

>> No.7030480

>>7030353
i got a pair of earth keepers a few years back. Had to give them to a friend because they stretched out so much. Also i wore through the sole pretty fast. This was also back when they were about 150. Would not recommend, unless you find them for a really good price. These are my vote for cheaper boots:

http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/49464?page=mens-katahdin-iron-works-engineer-boots

Don't own a pair of these, but I do have a pair of chippewas, and they are my favorite boots. Super comfy, and hold up really well. I know they are a bit out of your price range, but when it comes to boots you don't want to go cheap and 30 more bucks in the long run is not that much.

>> No.7030498

>>7030439
I was hoping for a specific website for that specific shoe. Why be such a cunt bro, what do you have to gain?

>> No.7030499

op what size boot are you?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/L-L-Bean-Mens-11-5-D-Medium-Katahdin-Iron-Works-Engineer-Boots-Chippewa-/290990454841?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item43c061f839

>> No.7030570

>>7030498
You're a fucking retard. I could find those within 5 minutes and by finding it myself could see similar alternatives along the way. It's not even worth the post to ask. Some fag did that for some zigns and I made a pic of me finding the exact boots in 5 minutes by googling. You're already on the computer, like what the fuck is so hard?

>> No.7030609

>>7030570
Sounds like maybe you're just a cunt. You can't actually be this mad, if you really are though, what the fuck is wrong with you; You need to chill out you tightly wound psycho

>> No.7031100

>>7030480
I'm torn between these and a pair of red wing iron rangers.
Will they both survive light winters as long as you take care of them? I need an autumn/winter boot but I don't want something that'll look like clown shoes on me. (Skinny legs)

>> No.7032031

>>7031100
A-anyone?

>> No.7034726

>>7030378
autistcore

>> No.7034771

>>7030480
This guy knows what's up.

>>7031100
RWs will last longer and are more reputable but they're uglier imo. The Chipps should last fine if you care for them.

Also the RWs are bulkier than the Katas if you're worried about clown proportions

>> No.7035708

>>7030480
are you me bro