/fa/ - Fashion

box logo hoodies

>>6739488
>box logo hoodies

Like Supreme?

I need inspiration on jackets as well. anyone have pics of themselves or found with slick jackets or slick layering with jackets?

>>6739480
>Seeing as you guys state that leather jackets are autistic. . .

You learn fast, man. Very good for you. I hope you find great success in your search for a new jacket.

>>6739480

price range fuccboi

>>6739558
>You learn fast, man. Very good for you.

Is that sarcasm?

>>6739571
>price range fuccboi

Price isn't a factor, but obviously under $1000.
If it can be $40, then awesome.

>>6739503
if you're lucky enough to get one

>>6739586
>if you're lucky enough to get one

ew

bomber or fleece

>>6739567
No, not at all! It's just that some dorks here on this board insist on dressing like Greasers, douchebags, BDSM fanatics. It seems that you have better sense than that, and I applaud you for that. Cheers.

>>6739593
>Cheers.

So are you going to help me?

>>6739558
who are you
>>6739567
no i think hes serious

hes right tho,

>>6739604
It's quite hard to pull recommendations out of thin air. Could you give me a kind of style that you want to reference? Are thinking of modern-chic, or workwear, or even preppy? Think this over for a bit and I could help.

>>6739593

please get in a motorcycle crash.

please

>>6739480
>Seeing as you guys state that leather jackets are autistic

Holy shit he got one. Bandit actually convinced someone to not wear leather jackets. I'm impressed.

>>6739620
>Are thinking of modern-chic, or workwear, or even preppy?

Well I wear tone down color shirts (long sleeve and short) skinny jeans tucked into boots. Whatever goes with that. I know it might sound autistic but I don't want to go fuuuull autism.

>>6739636
Okay, okay.

I'm not familiar with this brand or its quality, but this particular piece stands out to me for some reason. It's a denim jacket with minimal styling, and it is not indigo. I think I like the warm tan color. If I saw this, I would incorporate it in an early-fall wardrobe.

This would also look good with appropriate jeans and brown boots.

>>6739657
>denim jacket

OOoooh, denim on denim? Isn't that a party foul?

>>6739657
Haven't seen you around lately.

>>6739670
Oops.

The link is here:
>http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/rvca-jeano-denim-jacket/3533865?origin=category-personalizedsort&contextualcategoryid=0&fashionColor=&resultback=8151&cm_sp=personalizedsort-_-browseresults-_-1_23_B

Denim on denim isn't always a party foul. If you wore a blue denim jacket with blue jeans, then yes, party foul. But what if you wore some black jeans with a blue denim jacket? It might look good.

The Nordstrom model is wearing blue chinos in the pic. The tan of the jacket and the blue of the chinos is a great combo, imo.

In any case, avoid the proverbial Canadian Tuxedo, it is just as bad as wearing leather jackets.

>>6739697
Any other types of jackets?

>>6739657
holy shit bandit isnt just pasting his pasta

>>6739711
Parkas

Is there anything like this out there that also has fur lining? I want the 4 frontal pockets but I can't find one that is also fur lined and doesn't have a hood.

>>6739480
Also, /fa/ isn't a single person. Not everyone here views leather jackets as autistic.

If my memory serves, Bandit made the push for leather jackets=autism a few months ago. Similar to "dadcore" last year.

Everyone has and can have different opinions.

>>6739711
Here's another:

>http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/michael-kors-trim-fit-3-in-1-jacket/3097044?origin=category-personalizedsort&contextualcategoryid=0&fashionColor=&resultback=456&cm_sp=personalizedsort-_-browseresults-_-1_2_D

The styling is crisp and minimal. I own a similar piece in black, sans the 3-in-1 catch.

What does /fa/ think of leather jackets? My grandpa died so I got a sweat leather jacket.

ps how do I get blood off of leather?

>>6739719
I could if you want me to. Would you like to read the "Autism" or the "Mistake" pasta? Both?

>>6739734
I think wearing pants and skirts or underwear is autistic as fuck
Ima tryna push dis bottomless trend fam
and the we can eat good at night

>>6739748
what about denim jackets with leather sleeves

>>6739741
>http://shop.nordstrom.com/s/michael-kors-trim-fit-3-in-1-jacket/3097044?origin=category-personalizedsort&contextualcategoryid=0&fashionColor=&resultback=456&cm_sp=personalizedsort-_-browseresults-_-1_2_D

Pretty nice and simple, exactly what I'm looking for. Where could I find something like pic related? Or is it too bad? I want something that screams underworld connections.

Good bombers under $100?

>>6739747
I highly recommend against them. They just look awful. Put on the leather jacket and ask yourself if you look good in it. Be honest with yourself.

>>6739754
this
bottomless friday is the way to go

Denim jackets are the only things to rock.
Effortlessly cool.

>>6739760
I know that North Face makes similar jackets for much less, the only problem I have with them is their branding. I like my pieces to be unbranded.

I swear I've seen similar pieces from APC, but APC hardly screams "underworld connections".

>>6739767
im a greaser in the 20th century
what do i wear now that leather jackets are autistic?

>>6739758
Not a problem, just as long as they have a modern/trim fit.

>>6739800
You know what? Go ahead and wear your leather jacket, but don't act surprised when girls steer clear of you.

>>6739788
>underworld connections.

damn son!, w2c connections with them lycans and them hawt slutty vamps?

>>6739827
Lycans? Vampires?

Sorry, man, but vampires are not my thing. Heck, most modern vampire flicks feature a guy in a leather jacket. Not only is the character ridiculous, he looks ridiculous.

>>6739728
Anyone? Something like this

>>6739922
Nah. You can do better than that. Those epaulets just look silly.

>>6739824
im gay

>>6739803
what about leather jackets with fabric sleeves?

Leather jackets are fine you fucking idiot.
Suck /fa/s dick some more plz.

>>6739947
That's crossing the line. That jacket is absolutely disgusting. You might as well wear those ugly leather vests that fat bikers wear.

>>6739948
Oh really? That's okay, just look for something else to wear.

>>6739960
No, leather jackets are not fine. They have no purpose in anybody's wardrobe.

A leather jacket isn’t a garment, it’s a mistake. A goofy looking mistake.

Look at anon wearing a glossy black-cowhide jacket and you can almost hear the dialogue that goes through his head: “I can’t pull off a leather jacket. Wait a minute. You know what? Screw it. I’m going to be the guy who looks good in one. Wait a minute. Does this fit right?”

>>6739824
>>6739824
greasers are gay, didn't u read the outsiders in the 5th grade?

what about like brown leather why do we always post black leather

You can picture him slipping it on, looking in the mirror, and thinking to himself, “Nice”. What he failed to consider is that a leather jacket makes a statement. Despite the jacket’s fit or design, the statement is not a flattering one. Leather jackets are synonymous with the movie icons of the previous century. Images of the bad boys, James Dean and Marlon Brando come to mind. Younger men, trying to sex up their image, try to emulate these movie icons. Leather jackets have, essentially, been relegated to costume wear. No matter what kind of leather jacket you wear, someone will think, “Wow, he’s trying to pull off the Marlon Brando look.” What does this mean? It means that you cannot be taken seriously when wearing a leather jacket.

>>6739969
speaking of, what about leather vests?

But you might think, “Leather jackets are timeless! They can be pulled off! Post a fit, fuccboi!”

>>6740002
were u 1 of these ppl

>>6739996
you know like an elmendorf or something

My answer: No. Leather jackets are costume-ish. Costume-ish is precisely how the cowhide jacket looks on a hapless fool from /fa/. It’s time to get real. Leather jackets don’t exude coolness or sex appeal. They are tacky and are doomed to clichédom. In the collective subconscious of /fa/—despite ample evidence to the contrary—is the idea that leather jackets appeal to girls. On the contrary, walk down the street in a leather jacket and every girl will perceive you as a threat or entirely pathetic. She will avoid you. She will imagine you as a greasy creep that might possibly grope her ass, or even worse, a greasy little nerd that wants to look like a badass. A leather jacket is a mistake in first impressions.

>>6740005
leather dresses?

>>6739996
Brown leather jackets are just as bad.

>>6740021
leather shorts?

When a leather jacket is thrown over an outfit, it serves as an event horizon; the point of no return. That leather jacket instantly ruins the outfit, and it testifies the poor fashion sense of the wearer. Leather jackets never look good. Never wear a leather jacket.

>>6740031
leather booty shorts?

>>6740037
leather pants?

>>6739944
Where would I find something like that without anything that "looks silly"?

>>6739985
You're a mistake. A goofy mistake.

>>6740048
golden leather halter tops?

>>6739994
>>6740002
>>6740007
>>6740016
>>6740024
>>6740033

>>6740054
foiled leather miniskirts with washed and treated leather jackets?

>>6740060
post leather mask please

>>6740060
pls respond

>>6740049
Is this acceptable?
>http://www.barbour.com/mens/jackets-and-coats/cotton/mens-heritage/harwell-jacket

You can find one in charcoal grey.

>>6740060
What am I even looking at? That fit is total diarrhea.

>>6740070
There are a million buttons on that, navy is the preferred color

>>6739922
more jackets like this. say what you want I kinda think th style is cool too

>>6740077
it's a jacket, skirt, and leggings. i don't really know what you could even possibly find wrong about it

>>6740085
Take a look at:

http://uscheckout.apc.fr/browse.cfm/4,3341.html?nav=men&subnav=jackets

It's not what you're looking for, but it is something that I would look into.

>>6740093
THANK YOU, I thought I'd be the only one since I'm not a regular here.

>>6739697
>>6739741
>>6740070
ugh even though bandit is a shitposter, he is making solid recommendations. I don't know what to think anymore

>>6740138
Fuck it I screwed up my trip. I'm giving up this charade. Leather jackets look great. Leather jackets for all. Fuck the police. Here's my trip:

Bandit#O,QRVSUK

woah man this is beautiful. life is beautiful

>>6739480
>you guys state that leather jackets are autistic,
except it's really just one guy who spams the same shit over and over again

/fa/ hates *shitty* leather jackets. By that I mean shit leather, no style jacket is intrinsically bad

>>6740162
Bandit#O,QRVSUK

have fun

>>6740147
>Bandit#O,QRVSUK
was just starting 2 like u buddy

>>6740183
Thanks. Feel free to take on the role of shitposting in leather jacket threads. It is a seemingly care-free task, but it is methodical in practice. Remember the copypastas. Post bad fits. Repetition is key, and be steadfast in your approach.

I WEAR AN ACID WASHED DENIM JACKET NIGGAS FUCK WIT ME

What does /fa/ think of this?

http://shop.nordstrom.com/S/g-star-raw-west-lightweight-jacket/3489758?origin=category&BaseUrl=Coats+%26+Jackets

>>6740199
For the heck of it:

"Leather jackets are autistic. They just look awful. Leather jackets are pretty much costume wear. You might as well wear a clown outfit, because no one is going to take you seriously when you wear a leather jacket.

You probably think you look like Marlon Brando, but the truth is that you don't. You actually look like a nerd that is trying to look badass when wearing a leather jacket.

My advice: Leather jackets. Dont wear 'em. Why shouldn't you wear them? They look like shit. All. The. Time. Get real. Stop trying to look cool, because you are not cool and you are not a badass. Wear something else that looks good and doesn't make you look stupid.
The truth is, leather jackets never look good. You should never wear a leather jacket. They are pretty much the fedora-level jackets. Let me tell you one thing. You will look autistic when you wear a leather jacket. Again, never wear a leather jacket. They look like shit."

Now I'm going to find another trip to shitpost in.

>>6740138
well said
-mud faggors

>>6740104

wtc?