[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 703 KB, 2592x1944, IMG_20130731_163524.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6603733 No.6603733 [Reply] [Original]

Yet another shoe collection thread.
Ultra pleb here starting it off.
>note: I wear maybe 4 pairs of these regularly

>> No.6603836
File: 486 KB, 2592x1944, IMG_20130726_182152.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6603836

Also have these
>not pictured

>> No.6603854

femanon here, your shoes are ugly. ew

>> No.6603869
File: 1.57 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6603869

>>6603733
Sorry for poor lighting

>> No.6603898

>>6603733
gross fucking filipino goblin detected. disgusting gremlin.

>> No.6603916

>>6603733
You need to replace all of those bro, they're very middle school

>> No.6603962
File: 648 KB, 2448x3264, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6603962

>> No.6603967
File: 370 KB, 920x1204, y3fam1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6603967

>>6603733
1

>> No.6603969

>>6603916
Fuck that, he needs to goddamn clean.

>> No.6603978
File: 1.88 MB, 1380x1364, oc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6603978

>>6603967
2

>> No.6603996

>>6603733
>>6603869
>>6603962
wow
>>6603967
>>6603978
y-3 is so fucking atrocious I can't wrap my head around any of the positive attention it gets

>> No.6604046
File: 2.12 MB, 3264x2448, 20130731_184056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604046

sorry for the blurry picture
i also have a pair of flyknits and freeruns but those are downstairs and i'm lazy

>> No.6604056

>>6604046
why are your nikes unlaced

>> No.6604062

>>6604056
They're unlaced because i washed them yesterday.
Gotta keep them whites fresh.

>> No.6604071

>>6604046
If those Ricks are real then the flash on your camera is making the leather look awful.

>> No.6604077

>>6604071
yeah they're real and yeah it's the flash
they're nice and soft and not that shiny IRL

>> No.6604127

>>6603978
I'm pretty certain those are girls' shoes

post a fit

>> No.6604164
File: 2.54 MB, 2454x1782, IMG_4566er.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604164

>>6603733

>> No.6604175

>>6604164
swagfag pls go

>> No.6604183

>>6604164
internet

(but still pretty cool)

>> No.6604182
File: 2.57 MB, 3470x1215, IMG_4559er.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604182

>>6604164
hopefully the dunks will get replaced with another grail soon 8)

>> No.6604187
File: 1.76 MB, 2592x1936, collection.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604187

>> No.6604191

>>6604164
hey alex do you know if blowzshop on rakuten ships internationally?
user is ignoring me ._.

>> No.6604206

>>6604191
ummm not sure but as long as it's on the global.rakuten.com and not just rakuten.co.jp then you should be fine.

>> No.6604217
File: 3 KB, 300x300, jammys.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604217

>>6604182
those dunks are almost perfect condition
nice

>> No.6604213

>>6604182
damn. want

>> No.6604215

>>6604164
I really like the wear on those Velcro Highs. That being said, your footwear looks like it was selected by the internet for you. Though none of it is bad.

>> No.6604221

>>6603854
I'm a le grill. No one gives a shit. and I'm not even OP

>> No.6604224

>>6604206
they feature on both and the store FAQ doesnt mention international ;_;
checked some items out for NZ but no reply for conformation
japan pls

>> No.6604228

>>6604062
what nikes are those?

>> No.6604232
File: 1.02 MB, 1998x873, IMG_3317.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604232

>>6604217
hehe help me find someone to sell em to :3

>>6604215
ty! heres a closeup

>>6604224
hmm if they don't ship to NZ... skype me bb

>> No.6604238

>>6604175
>>>/mfa/

>> No.6604246
File: 498 KB, 1306x980, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604246

2poor4goodsneaks

>> No.6604269

>>6604232
haha sounds like im avoiding you but literally at uni from 6am-5pm then 6pm-midnight B)

but actually it's actually an elaborate ruse.

idk if you have my emails and it might be a bit staccato but turnleftonfa@outlook.com

>> No.6604296

>>6604164
What is a good price to pay for DBSS high tops with wear

>> No.6604423

>>6603967
HEY we follow eachother on Instagram, yeah dude your shoes are fuckign awesome as fuck, i am V jealous of your collection dude, on the real

>> No.6604431

>>6604296
depends what model/colorway i guess. anywhere from 200-450 maybe

mine have like a pristine sole and i paid on the higher end of that.

>> No.6604465

>>6604164
god I want some beat up velcros so bad.

>> No.6604510

>>6603733
>>6603836
>>6603967
>>6603978
>>6604046
no
>>6603869
>>6604187
>>6604246
maybe

>>6603962
>>6604164
>>6604182
yes

>> No.6604610
File: 148 KB, 574x768, IMG_1989d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604610

Too lazy to take the others. I only wear these two pairs anyway.

>> No.6606004
File: 100 KB, 640x480, 2013-07-31 23.47.14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606004

p shitty rotation right now but hoping to improve in the near future

>> No.6606014

>keeping shoes by your face

>> No.6606024
File: 107 KB, 466x700, heem sleepy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606024

>>6604224
they do. i've ordered from them a few times w/o issue.

>> No.6606031
File: 16 KB, 276x153, Picture 689.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606031

>>6606024

:-)

>> No.6606045
File: 117 KB, 1080x720, Photo on 7-29-13 at 11.48 AM #2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606045

repost lol

>> No.6606049
File: 267 KB, 500x400, whats a god to a nonbeliever.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606049

>>6606031
whatd you get! tl posted a bunch of beautiful leu buttonups the other day but i gotta hold off after the cdgs & y's (both worth it)

>> No.6606056

I posted this last week

New pair of CP tourneys + shoe rack has arrived since, I'll update the pic later

>> No.6606058
File: 588 KB, 1216x2000, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606058

>>6606056

>> No.6606068

>>6606058
what are the boots next to the cdbs

>> No.6606069
File: 924 KB, 1040x547, Picture 617.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606069

>>6606049

they had a sale awhile ago, i got some rick shirts for really cheap that i couldnt pass up, could sell them on sufu for more than i paid probably

>> No.6606063
File: 8 KB, 211x246, 1367265853776.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606063

>>6606045
>mfw people who buy $500-1000 rick footwear have to immediately take the sole to a cobbler to have it protected so that it won't fall apart within a week

>> No.6606065

>>6606058
what's behind the achilles low?

>> No.6606071
File: 1.05 MB, 1500x995, 0003_22.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606071

>> No.6606079
File: 1.17 MB, 1500x995, 0002_23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606079

>> No.6606074

>>6606063
they can put it on after it gets some wear you know
>falls apart in a week
>shoes are from the year 2009

>> No.6606075

>>6606065
buttero tanino

>>6606068
wolverine 1k

>> No.6606081

>>6606063

>still doesnt know that to wear rick you should buy 4 pairs minimum for your rotation

i thought people had learned their lesson by now?

>> No.6606083

>>6606071
>>6606079
gooking dood lan

>> No.6606088

>>6606079
What are they?

>> No.6606091

>>6606063
You don't know what you are talking about, my du.

>> No.6606103

>>6606049

hey whens ur cdg pants going to arrive

>> No.6606109

>>6606049
46 in LEU is big m8
unless ur keen on it but it's like...TTS S so p.big

that's not to say 44 didnt exist...
well...not anymore B))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
also finally found some new combats but duno if theyl fit ;s

>> No.6606115
File: 991 KB, 245x180, plsbetrolling.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606115

>>6606063
>mfw you're ignorant

>> No.6606121
File: 648 KB, 3362x2316, CPs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606121

>>6606058
+ these

>> No.6606126
File: 5 KB, 569x255, 103.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606126

>>6606031
>>6606024
B)

>> No.6606127

>>6606109

are they rick?

>> No.6606130

>>6606127
LEU and Y's

did you see the dusolator shirts going for like 100 or s/t?
i think was cheaper during the sale bu idr
>tfw not 40cm in rick

TIMBER U SHUD GET THEM

>> No.6606140

>>6606130

those shirts have like a 28cm shoulder width, impossible for a dude to wear without it looking weird as fuck. womens knit tee shirts fit so differently

>> No.6606148
File: 244 KB, 500x400, whats a king to a god.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606148

>>6606103
idk havent shipped it, just paid by paypal today. had it sent to my nyc address cuz i figured itd take them at least a week

>>6606109
oh nvm i thought i saw a 44 in that group ;___; didnt look at anything too closely b/c i didnt want to be tempted, but i woulda gotten the cashmere n(n) leggings on the spot if they werent weirdly huge. my whole next string of purchases is just gonna be lilies & rick tees for a while tho

>> No.6606149

>>6606140
yeah, the black one sold
i think the beige one is still up
p.sheer tho
plebs need not apply

mhmm didnt cop on grounds of wy2smal
and...
cotton ;s
need more silk on my nips.

>> No.6606160

>>6606148
>yfw it arrives at NYC addy in 3days only to be greeted by mbd who quickly snatches it up and resells it for $$$$$
>[spiler]and then buys $7000 ccp pants[sopler]
nah no worries had the same fairs when i was moving tbh also bought inbetween and all the shipping went smoooothhh
>apart from 2weeks of DHL guy fucking up ofc but that was a different parcel ._.

>> No.6606168
File: 88 KB, 312x595, Picture 631.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606168

>>6606149

ricks cotton is great though, honestly love how unstable cotton wears, although i do want a 85 silk 15 viscose shirt.

>> No.6606173

>>6606160
mbd from sz?

link 2 expensive pants plz

>> No.6606192

>>6606168
>>6606160
>>6606148
way to go, tripfags, you derailed a thread dedicated to posting shoe collections in order to circlejerk about shit you want to cop

>> No.6606196

>>6603869
>penny

>> No.6606202

>>6606192
>i can't afford any of this shit so i'm just going to be bitter about it instead of acting like an adult

>> No.6606205
File: 416 KB, 431x577, Picture 692.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606205

>>6606192

nah i posted my shoes already.

>>6606069

>>6606168

also whats really cool is this tee from 08 has silk sleeves and an unstable cotton body. i tried to capture the contrasting fabrics but its impossible to tell without looking closely at the shirt

>> No.6606216

>>6606088
ANSWER ME

>> No.6606220
File: 377 KB, 1627x1172, dadcore.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606220

hunting for some bambas

>> No.6606223

>>6606220

what size do you need? black?

>> No.6606229

>>6606088
RW beckmans

>> No.6606234
File: 1.02 MB, 707x711, shoess.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606234

My pleb collection. What should I get next? Aussie so summer soon, no boots

>> No.6606236

>>6606223
yes black, but i think i know what your talking about. The one thats around 800 US sz 41

>> No.6606238

>>6606202
that's a very inaccurate assessment

>> No.6606240

>>6606236

http://www.stylezeitgeist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16658

715 shipped to the us, probably could get him to go for 650

>> No.6606248

>>6606240
yep thats the one, but they run a size small unfortunetely compaired to all other foreign shoes

>> No.6606249

>>6606220
if bambas 2 there's factory defects in which some productions are 3sizes smaller than what is listed
was going to cop a pair sz41 for $200 a few months ago, skipped on it due tot hat.

>>6606168
maybe but i like the silk blends more.

>> No.6606263

>>6606249
*something like 3szs too small, whatever it is it might be wayyyyy smalle than listed
imo check w/ seller etc
>never handled in person, just readings from the time.

>> No.6606266

>>6606249
shit two hundred...

>> No.6606271

>>6606263

yeah theyre an odd shoe. I love the upper, i just think the outsole is disgusting, otherwise id get a pair, i think the rest of it is great

>> No.6606281

>>6606266
they were retail aswell but again...sizing issues
i could be mistaken though but...popular shoes don't make it that deep in sales w/o a problem so i think it was problematic.

do a bit of background.

>>6606271
> think the outsole is disgusting
the only thing i didnt like about it was how sort of boring the leather/texture was in compared to design but otherwise...
youre dadcore.

>> No.6606296

>>6606281

>youre dadcore.

lol u dont even have sneakers pops, just ur brown dad shoes

>> No.6606306

>>6606296
d-d-dont remind me ;_;

>> No.6606313

>>6606263
wtf my bamba 2s fit 1 larger

>> No.6606312

>>6606306

i feel like u should save up for some green or greyish drips

>> No.6606320
File: 59 KB, 652x394, shoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606320

Is it possible to be /fa/ with size 16 shoes?

>> No.6606322

>>6606320
post feet

>> No.6606324
File: 574 KB, 2000x3000, IMG_6818.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606324

>>6606312

>> No.6606327
File: 156 KB, 1000x697, P15A2897.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606327

>>6606324

>> No.6606330

>>6606313
http://stylezeitgeist.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-2536-p-13.html
>ctr + f bamb

>> No.6606335
File: 312 KB, 729x972, IMG_20130801_001358.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606335

>>6606322
The toenail on my big toe is messed up because it was ingrown.

>> No.6606344

>>6606330
ccp are weird too. They run around 2 sizes too small so if your an 8-81/2, its recommended you get a 6

>> No.6606345

>>6606344
2 sizes big*

>> No.6606360

>>6604228
lunar speeds

>> No.6606364

>>6606192
The majority of the shoe collections were garbage anyway.
>>6606335
You look to be more a 13-14. Which is workable with designer footwear.

>> No.6606372

>>6606364
Do designer shoes run big? Wearing pleb sneakers I can't fit into anything smaller than 16, in a 15 my toes are pushed right up against the front of the shoe.

>> No.6606384

>>6606372
Nikes, for example, run small many times. So you have to buy a size 15 when you may actually be a 13-14 true size. An exact measurement in CM compared to a shoe chart on any fashion retail site will give you a more reliable size than any Nike/Vans/Adidas size comparison.

You'd probably be a 45-46 in designer footwear which exists at least, unlike 47+ for true 15s.

>> No.6606391

>>6603962
w2c white hightops

>> No.6606396

>>6606372
I'm a size 10-10.5 and have to wear 11.5 nikes and own a 12 sneaker as well.
popular sneakers usually run small, no idea why.

>> No.6606401

>>6606384
>>6606396
I never even thought that the shoes could be the problem, not my foot size. I'll look into trying some nicer designer shoes in person, I don't trust spending a lot of money online on something that may not fit.

Thanks for the insight.

>> No.6606431

>>6606391
Adidas most likely
>>6606401
Most boutiques offer like $5 return shipping if something doesn't fit. Really if you just measure your foot and find your EU size you should have zero issue buying shoes online.

>> No.6606442

>>6606088
They're Wolvie 1k miles
>>6606229
Naw.

>> No.6606913
File: 580 KB, 2000x3000, ccp drip low tops.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606913

>>6606312
>not having a drip for every occasion

>> No.6606916
File: 204 KB, 1277x958, ccp drip derby.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606916

>>6606913

>> No.6607078

>>6606148
>>6606140
>>6606130
# Rakuten gang **repping dis bitch**

>> No.6607197

>>6604423
hey thanks! Unsurprisingly, /fa/ doesn't like anything that isn't all black and minimal!
Also, if you're the white guy, your fits are p. cool.

>>6604127
they're unisex (but the sizing was for men's), not like they'res anything wrong with wearing women's shoes. also, they're relatively new so I don't really have a fit pic of them.

>> No.6607204
File: 535 KB, 2000x3000, dripblackleather.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607204

>I will never have these

>> No.6607284
File: 2.53 MB, 3264x2448, Shoes1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607284

Gave away/sold loads of shoes recently and I'm feeling pretty happy with these as my rotation.
Thoughts on anything that needs adding/removing?

>> No.6607300

>>6607284
what are the black boots
I don't like those captoe shoes
why do the freeruns look so wide & misshapen
those comme sneaks are such lazy design imo. take a 40 dollar shoe and slap a logo on it

>> No.6607307

>>6607300
i'm not saying you aren't paying a lot for the brand, but they do remove things that make regular chucks bad, like the contrast stitching. I don't like the black Play cons because of the contrasting toe but the off white ones are really cool imo.

>> No.6607324
File: 904 KB, 559x745, myawesomeshoes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607324

>> No.6607327

>>6604187
do you have another pic on those black hightops?

>> No.6607330

>>6607300
The black ones are Crockett & Jones
The captoe are just a thrifted pair of shoes, ideally I'd like the Doc x Adrian Sauvage.
The frees are the new Free Flyknits that came out this morning, they're a bit weird when they aren't being worn - http://www.highsnobiety.com/2013/07/18/nike-free-flyknit-preorder/
I do understand the hate, but I really like them (I love the white strip detail on the heel). Also I just wear them to work, it's the only part of my work fit I'm allowed to have fun with.

>> No.6607329
File: 788 KB, 799x640, nxtlvlftwr.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607329

get on my level fuccbois

>> No.6607333

>>6607324
>all those shitty ugly skate shoes

>> No.6607334

>mfw 12 pairs of fake converse in all colors

umad?

>> No.6607336

>>6607324
Selling all that, you won't even afford ricks ahuehue

>> No.6607340

>>6607324
You need a clearout bruh

>> No.6607344

>>6607330
>C&J

well, respect for that alone. don't see many of those on this board

>> No.6608504
File: 782 KB, 2396x400, Shoes-p1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608504

1/3

>> No.6608508
File: 1.02 MB, 3004x400, Shoes-p2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608508

>>6608504
2/3

>> No.6608516
File: 256 KB, 4200x400, Boots-All-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608516

>>6608508
3/3

Can't say I'm all that happy with 'em, but I'm a pleb so what do I know/care.

>> No.6608640

>>6608516
disguistingly ungrateful

>> No.6608697

>>6608508
What brand are the far lefts?
>>6608504
Are those adidas sambas?

>> No.6608702

>>6608697

oops, mixed up my quotes. It should be the other way around.

>> No.6608717

>>6608697
>>6608702
Assumnig I got it right, the white Adidas are the Baltic Cup. The grey suedes are also Adidas (collab with Soloist, Rod Laver Vintage).

>>6608640
Don't be mad that I want to do better.

>> No.6608730

>>6608640
Though I did just notice I was supposed to write "Can't say I'm happy with all of them". Oh well.

>> No.6608958
File: 1.05 MB, 3264x1836, DSC_0047.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608958

I'm not sad but I'm not happy about it. Can usually find something to wear at least. Not pictured are Cheaney black darby and ugly running trainers.

>> No.6608966

>>6608958
*derby

>> No.6608984

>>6604046
what are the shoes on the far right? (Brown ones)

>> No.6608986

http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/gsc-rinkan/item/r01omsn1206030315500/

is it normal for black raf lows to be this cheap on rak?

>> No.6609001

>>6608986

sometimes they go for that low on ebay s well saw a pair of lows go for $200 recently

>> No.6609009

>>6608986

no, very rare

>> No.6609016

>>6609009
:(
my size too
:(

>> No.6609022

>>6608984
bump for answer

>> No.6609042

>>6609009
useful critique is really rare here. most people here are just trolling and dont know shit. and sufu reps suck as a concept because noone ever says whats wrong with a fit

>> No.6609176

>>6609022
plz

>> No.6609194 [DELETED] 
File: 2.02 MB, 2592x1936, IMG_0428.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609194

It's whatever

>> No.6609202

>>6609042

uh i was talking about raf simons sneakers on rakuten

>> No.6609206
File: 2.66 MB, 2592x1936, shuz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609206

>> No.6609250

>>6609206
What are the white nikes called?

>> No.6609280
File: 592 KB, 1600x1200, IMG_0238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609280

probably going to get rid of my bballs soon...

>> No.6609284

>>6609280
what are the middle?
y3?

>> No.6609286

>>6609250
Nike high top Dunks. I got mine on ebay for cheaper than this, so I'd poke around for them. I haven't really come across them since. Also, the black outlining on the tongue I did myself,, just to clear up any confusion.

http://www.batmannikedunk.com/hot-sale-nike-dunk-white-black-high-tops-p-78.html

>> No.6609287

>>6609284
slvr, but I think they have a y-3 variation

>> No.6609298

>>6609022
>>6609176
>>6608984
nobody knows?

>> No.6609307

>>6609280
why are you going to get rid of the bballs? what size are they

>> No.6609312

>>6609286
Thanks man I just had to know. They're fresh as hell.

>> No.6609317

>>6609312
they are the shoe that inspired rick to appropriate the swoosh and resell it to you for $1000

>> No.6609401

>>6609307
idk they're still my favorite hi-tops I'd just rather wear achilles over them most of the time.

they're 41

>> No.6609423

>>6603978

love the flowerly ones, what brand are they?

>> No.6609443

>>6609423
Adidas x opening ceremony

>> No.6609586
File: 2.74 MB, 3264x1836, shuz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609586

>> No.6609613

>>6609401

how much are you gonna sell them 4

>> No.6609621

>>6609586
Boots, back, 2nd from left. W2c?

>> No.6609687

>>6609621
I picked them up at an estate sale, the dude said they were his dads from ww2

>> No.6609886

>>6609687
They look really well made. I'm jelly.

>> No.6609961
File: 371 KB, 1220x810, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609961

took a pic just for this thread, all arranged and everything.

>> No.6609999

>>6609961
nice

>> No.6610008

>>6609961
mirin those brown brogues

>> No.6610031

>>6603733
What are the black and white ones on the front row?

>> No.6610180
File: 2.66 MB, 4128x2322, shoz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610180

k

>> No.6610189

>>6610180
4 nb?
i love nb shoes, but why not just get 1 or 2 pair that you just love?

>> No.6610204
File: 2.33 MB, 480x368, 1343445200499.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610204

>>6610189
i only have 3 and why not? i like them, plus i can wear a different pair with a different outfit

>> No.6610225
File: 10 KB, 300x300, bbytomatos.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610225

>>6610204
o
thought those adidas were nbs

dif strokes tho
ps: i like the green ones alot

>> No.6610226
File: 572 KB, 1632x1224, 20130802_084422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610226

Sorry for the shit-poor lighting, best I can do.

Here's 90% of my shoes anyway.

>> No.6610244

>>6610226
>lanvins

ugh~
something about those i find repulsive.

not a bad collection though.

>> No.6610252
File: 284 KB, 500x376, tumblr_m15inkUcai1r9ukfio1_500.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610252

>>6610225
yeah the green ones are my favorite

>> No.6610449

>>6609280
What are the bucks?

Also how much do you think you're gonna sell the bballs for?

>> No.6610468
File: 1.97 MB, 2000x1479, MuhShoes1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610468

My new bespokers on the left, super comfy and match nothing I own. I think they are wonderfully hideous. My version of tennis shoes.

>> No.6610726
File: 21 KB, 185x316, hank hill.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6610726

>>6610468

>> No.6610741

>>6610468

Jesus H. Christ.

>> No.6610757

>>6610468


I've seen some weird shoes in my time, but I don't think I've ever seen a loafer with a camel toe before.

>> No.6611132
File: 1.32 MB, 2000x1187, MuhShoes2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6611132

>>6610757
>>6610726
>>6610741

Priceless! I LOL'd.

I'm glad ya'll love 'em as much as I.

>> No.6611142

>>6611132

I must feed my morbid curiosity. What forums did you dig up these pictures?

>> No.6611165

>>6611132

be we don't love them at all..

>> No.6611196

>>6611142
I took them using my own equipment earlier today.

It's my shoes for pete's sake, is it hard to believe?

>> No.6611206

>>6611196
>is it hard to believe?

Yes. GIS, unfortunately, doesn't turn up anything and I'd love to know where I can go for another solid chuckle. And if they really are yours, then please continue posting. I am sorely low on chuckles.

>> No.6611219

>>6607284
get some shoe and boot trees guy

>> No.6611224

>>6611206
Top lel

Which pair would you like me to photograph now with this post on my monitor as the background?

>> No.6611231

>>6611224

Oh, the "bespokers". For sure.

>> No.6611240

>>6611231
U got it dude, give me a few minutes.

>> No.6611255

>>6611206
>hey why don't you post your
because you never will

>> No.6611272
File: 1.05 MB, 2000x1500, MuhShoes3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6611272

>>6611240
Wah BAYUM!

>> No.6611297

>>6611272
top kek

>> No.6611333

>>6611272
hahahahahahahaha

>> No.6611334

>>6611224
>top lel

You're trying so very, very hard.

>> No.6611342

>>6611272

Can we see more details? Like the sole construction? The lining? And so on?

>> No.6611371

>>6607284
This is like the /fa/ shoe equivalent of /mu/'s essentials. With that being said I'm not sure how I would feel about someone's record collection composed entirely of /mu/core. The shoes do look good though.

>> No.6611372

>>6611342
That's all the pix I'm taking for now. If this thread still exists tomorrow, I might take a few more if you're really that into the bespokers.

>> No.6611404
File: 1.68 MB, 2448x3264, Shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6611404

>>6611219
I have two sets, one plastic, one timber. They're so expensive though.

>>6611371
Yeah, that's what I went for, just the essentials.
Pic related is what I used to have, it feels really good to downsize so drastically.

>> No.6611410

>>6611372

Absolutely.

>> No.6611425
File: 367 KB, 414x581, Screen Shot 2013-08-01 at 10.27.16 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6611425

can anyone identify these sneaks? not a great pic I know

>> No.6611625

>>6606069
red wangs?

>> No.6611758

>>6611425
jordan spizikes, one of the newer shitty colorways.

>> No.6611790

>money comes in
>Y3s in my size sold out
Such is life :(

>> No.6611850

>>6603962
>>6604046
>>6604164
>>6604246
>>6606220
>>6608958
>>6609961
>>6610180
What's up with everyone having 1 black pair of Nikes, workout shoes?

>> No.6611863

>>6610244
>something
>not everything

They're even uncomfortable.

>> No.6611887

>>6611850
This.

How many of you actually workout in those?

I've got a pair of 2 year old running shoes for cardio / lifting and I only use them for working out. Ugly as shit (neon / grey / pre-fa) but they get the job done, and I'm not in any rush to replace them.

>> No.6611955

>>6604187
w2c the back left boots?

>> No.6611975

>>6608516
w2c that third one?

>> No.6612105
File: 1.93 MB, 2592x1936, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6612105

Needed something white so I just bought the all white SS13 Geobaskets. Waiting for the mail :D

>> No.6612173
File: 149 KB, 1600x1066, $(KGrHqV,!lcFHt,)M11tBR8o(Z3V2g~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6612173

>>6612105
>Those

>> No.6612186

>>6612173
You just HAD to bump it to show everyone "HEY GUIZ I GOT TEH GEOBASKETZZZ" right? Judging by all your shit tier shoes, you probably won't have the wardrobe to pull it off. But what do I know, that color way is really inexpensive, and for all I know you might pull them off.

>> No.6612206

>>6604246
>>6604187
two best groups posted.


>>6604510
fuck this douchenozzle

>> No.6612221

>>6612186
we all gotta start somewhere

>> No.6612227

>>6608508
ey breh whats the name of those with the brown uppers? look siiickk

>> No.6612282

>>6612186
Exactly what I was thinking when I bought them. I mean, it's not like I have any goofninja in my wardrobe, but I'll be fine compared to most of Geobasket tumblrs out there.

>> No.6612287
File: 69 KB, 762x1100, clarks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6612287

Are these acceptable for summer? Help

>> No.6612300

>>6610468
did you get those tan loafers in clearance at khols for 7 bucks?

>> No.6612310

>>6612300
no I accidentally jizzed on my visvims after fucking your mom so she let me borrow some of your dad's shoes #lmao #rekt

>> No.6612317

>>6611272
idk why. but this post reminds me of archer going "danger zone"

>> No.6612326

>>6611272
idk why. but this post reminds me of archer going "danger zone"


>>6611404
how are the chelsea boots. i always wanted a pair but i think the elastic is a little to garish,

>> No.6612373

>>6606220
I can only wonder how much each piece cost on that rack

>> No.6612374

>>6603733

What are the nikes?

>> No.6612377

>>6612310
i wasnt trying to insult you. it was a genuine question. i saw a pair that looked exactly like that i wanted to buy but they were too small for me.
anyways, kudos for fucking my mom, and getting a free pair of shoes out of it.

>> No.6612530

>>6612227
Some Spanish company called Gaimo. Got em used, though.
>>6611975
No idea. Logo says "Time&Co", which turned out to be some awful Italian shoe/bootmaker (everything was gaudy or cowboy-core). I bought them at a Winners like 5 years ago.

>> No.6612582

>>6610031
addidas x ransom army tr mid (im not op)

>> No.6612595

>>6610226
whats very bottom right?

>> No.6612703
File: 1.14 MB, 2057x1536, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6612703

>> No.6612735

>>6610180
Very nice, what're the black ones by the black roshs?

>> No.6613045
File: 381 KB, 500x500, 1373004147416.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6613045

>>6612703
Must suck having one foot.

>> No.6613152

>>6612374
Nike SB Eric Koston

>> No.6613333

>>6612703
what's the orange one and how do you fit your foot into it
post fit pls