[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 609 KB, 1452x698, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592521 No.6592521 [Reply] [Original]

Which one fa? I'm leaning towards the plimsolls but the white sneakers have a appeal of their own.

>> No.6592530

Plimsolls for sure

>> No.6592539

mmmm I love the plimsolls.
w2c?

>> No.6592547

>>6592521
kenties

>> No.6592563

The sneakers are Kent Wangs.
http://www.kentwang.com/shoes/sneaker-white.html

The plimsolls are ASOS.
http://us.asos.com/pgeproduct.aspx?iid=2239634

>> No.6592561
File: 193 KB, 1500x592, 81UjiU90tsL._SL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592561

Clarks Winston Run

>> No.6592578
File: 385 KB, 2000x2000, HOMMEEU13SSPROVENCALE_LE002_CREMAR_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592578

Le Coq Sportif - mod. Provencale Lea (also in black)

>> No.6592608

>>6592578
The thing is, if I get suede, I want it to be entirely suede otherwise when it gets dirty it'll start to contrast with the rest of the shoe in a bad way.

>> No.6592919
File: 53 KB, 730x1095, 27706993_061_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592919

>> No.6592922
File: 53 KB, 1000x667, generic_surplus_fa13_7_82-90_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592922

>> No.6592926
File: 80 KB, 468x671, VANX-MZ21_V3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592926

>> No.6592943

>>6592608
Ever seen a well worn pair of GATs? Contrasts in a beautiful way and I'd really say the same with any smooth leather / suede combination shoes.

>> No.6592959

>>6592563
don't buy asos shoes, I have a pair and they literally feel like walking on cardboard

>> No.6592987
File: 147 KB, 500x333, 31332481978e82dff245.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6592987

>>6592943
Nope, it just looks dirty. Besides GATs have a terrible silhouette.

>> No.6593001

>>6592987
is that the true german ones vs MMM?

>> No.6593021

>>6592521
Given the quality of the two, go for the Kent Wangs. Plimsolls look like they have a glued sole. :(

>> No.6593039
File: 72 KB, 1571x2000, 44502036tx_14_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593039

>> No.6593167

>>6592987
>le silhouette
what the fuck are you talking about

GATs look good

>> No.6593217

>>6593167
>GATs look good
They look mediocre, only a step above tennis shoes.

>> No.6593230

>>6593217
They are a solid design. I think you are jaded by some goffwang shit that prevents you from seeing that.

>> No.6593232
File: 51 KB, 1000x660, black_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593232

Was gonna get some kent wangs but they don't restock until after I leave for my trip. Never bought Generic Surplus, any good?

>> No.6593327
File: 76 KB, 960x960, kden.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593327

>>6593217
herb

>> No.6593338
File: 160 KB, 728x453, 1353411830strayhorn_blk_suede_tobacco_3_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593338

>>6593230
What makes you say that? I believe they are a bad design because of how the suede ages in comparison to the rest of the shoe and because of how it makes the foot look like a poorly wrapped potato.

>> No.6593402
File: 489 KB, 1920x1080, 1374550939876.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593402

>>6593338
>calls gats ugly
>posts shitty skate shoe chukka vans ripoff by fucking clae
6/10 because you made me chuckle

>> No.6593407

>>6592521
i have those kent wangs, plimsolls will be more versatile