/fa/ - Fashion

>yellow stitching
I just don't know, all black are tight phat though, peep that.

Patrick Ervell rocks them.

>>6329167
got any pics?

Yes.

>>6329194

>>6329207
where is that even available?

>>6329167
idk I personally like the yellow stitching better. It darkens with wear until you can see just a peep of yellow.

Anyone know if they ever did this in black? the pic is a Raf collab.

>>6329238
Everywhere, google Dr Martens 1461 PW.

>>6329254
They made a black model, good luck finding it though.

>>6329257
So the actual model was just for the Raf collab? Fuck this shit.

>>6329254
>>6329257
?

>>6329279
That is so nice ;_;

>>6329279
Just look how black it is, fuck it's sexy, m8s im gonna cry

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BNIB-Dr-Martens-x-RAF-SIMONS-Black-Monk-shoes-Size-8-EU42-Punk-Mod-/281118764141?pt=UK_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item4173fbec6d

copin with the force of a thousand suns

Mikkel Rude 1969 Boot look better. Dat toe shape. Too bad I didn't have the money to pick a pair up a few years back.

>>6329298
Solovairs have pretty much the same toe box.

>>6329207
looks good problem is theres no stitching instead it has that retarded rubber bumper thing lining it

would have to pass on that

>>6329399
The one with yellow stitching have the bumper as well, it's just hidden a bit.

bump

The best

how about these /fa/?

>>6330952
if anybody is looking for an alternative to these btw, pic related is available on the DM store
will be copping imminently, along with some y-3s ive got my eye on

>>6330970
damn theyre beaut, not on the uk store unfortunately :(

>>6330983
i like the steeds that arent glossy

>>6330983
they're nice but way too shiny for my taste

w-which one /fa/?
cant make up my mind...

>>6331002
they aint steeds tinm8
im guessing you mean the matte version of what i posted (1461 with 84 Last shape)

im kinda torn between the gloss and matte tbh
are they too glossy or is it just ur personal taste?

>>6331014
the left one

>>6331026
twice the price of the equivalent DM, here in the uk
otherwise id buy

>>6331017
oh my mistake i thought they were steeds

and yeah i like glossy, the sole on these is better though imo (pic rel)

>>6331055
and yeah i was thinking of 1461s with white stitching

>>6331055
what model are they? have i missed them on the store or something

>>6331062
ye those are sweet, white laces are too much tho

>tfw all i seem to do on /fa/ is talk about docs with tinfoil

>>6331089
a. sauvage collab

im jealous of the us store, you have monos

i just want 3989s witha wedge sole ;_;

also plannin on snappin up these babies for some summer shoes

sole game ron jeremy

>>6331102
nah im uk as well b :'(
pic?

>>6331111
nice quads

would be goat with a crepe sole/wedge imo
also could do without the blue detailing

Actually yeah, really like em

I've a pair of calf high ones, gonna get aa pair of those tomorrow though I think

was looking for creepers but fuckit ill get docs instead, ill wear them more

>>6331118
i could work with the blue if it was a bit darker
not a huge fan of broguing tho
anyway ive got work to do stay noided bibi

Can someone explain the appeal behind Doc Martens? They just looks too rubbery to me most of the time and they have that massive chunky sole which just looks ungainly to me.

I know they last a long time but so does a polished rock.

>>6331235
some people are into that. i don't like dm's but i actually wanna cop these

>>6331241
those are the most disgusting docs

>>6331235
i like chunky soles b
theyre great value for money as well

>>6331235
different people like different things?
theyre pretty good value

>>6331017
I got the matt ones I love em but it's completely up to your own taste and whether or not you think you can pull them off

>>6331247
>i like chunky soles b
Each to their own I guess, I just walked into a store of theirs one time and decided I didn't like anything in there. I like shoes to have some presence but Doc Martens take it too far in my opinion.

If you lot like them then fair enough.

>>6331262
ye man, im tall enough to go for that imposing vibe, and i like the feeling of some intimidating footwear

>>6331247
all docs are disgusting. and those are basically like their converse version idk

>>6331274
i disagree, i like docs but those ones are awful imo
that sole is puke

>>6331014
pick accordingly to your wardrobe

>>6331014
You can always black out the stitching, but you can't yellow up the black one.
I'm biased though, I like the way the yellow fades with wear.

>>6331779
can you post some pics of roughed up / worn out docs? so i can see how it ages?

>>6329161
These docs work really well with cropped trousers, they're next on my to cop list

>>6332945

these are mine ive worn them often for like a year and a half or so. can take better pics if u want

>>6332963
are those the classic 1461s? like in OPs picture?

& yes please better photos , would like to see the shoe overall & thanks

>>6332976

yeah they are old 1461s, i dont think theyre the same age as ops though, early/mid 90s.

one sec.

>>6332983

>>6332983
can you take a shot of the shape from above pls?

i had 1460s but hated the way they looked from my viewpoint, wanna see if these are different... although obviously these are an older model

>>6333001

>>6332961
cropped trousers & loafer socks.. perfect summer look 8)

>>6333001
any side pics available? it looks like the soles are black..

>>6333011

>>6333016

>>6333001
thanks man

>>6333019

>>6333026

sure man

>>6333001
>>6333011
>>6332963
>>6333016
>>6333019
>>6333021
excellent, thanks a lot. you still wear them?

>>6333060

yeah all the time, theyre great work shoes. also just look good in general imo. i like the shape of them and the thickness of the sole.

here is a recent fit where i was wearing them

>>6333066
sweeet... thanks for the info & help. just confirmed my next purchase

>>6331118

http://store.drmartens.co.uk/p-6678-dr-martens-3989-shoe.aspx

Might cop pic related, although I would cop all

captcha: witcop all

>>6333251
Having second thoughts about the toe box though.

>>6333251

I like that pinked tongue.

>>6333066
uninspiring

I love these but Dr Marten wants to charge me $85 for shipping which I'm not going to pay just because that's a ridiculous price.

>>6333336
Can you link me to where you're tryna cop from cos I can't find these in this colour anywhere

>>6333488
Fuck I linked the wrong colour. Sorry for wasting your time bb :(

>>6333525
But yeah the black is the best but I was going to settle for grey until the shipping cost slapped me in the face.

>>6333525
Damn ok m8. I'll keep searching but sofar i haven't been able to find 'em. Might have to settle for the midnight blue but idk ill probs have to see em in person or in store b4 copping

>>6330983
Link to these?

>>6333572
they are brown tinged, you can pnly really tell in bright light tho

so i'm thinking of copping a pair of 1461s. how warm are they?

>>6334567
what the hell does that mean?

>>6334576
i mean can you wear them when it's around 0 celsius without freezing your feet off

>>6334581
>i'll take what is socks for $200 tom

>>6333016
>>6333019
>>6333021
they could really use some love though

Doc Martens are cheap shit made in Thailand.

Buy Solovairs, man.

>>6334644
You know you can buy the made in England ones or buy vintage pre 2000s ones, right?
>implying made overseas docs are the only option

>>6332963
Damn, if you polished them they would probably look brand new

>>6334664

Solovair used to make the MIE docs.

>>6334664
The quality difference between the Made in England ones and the regulars are marginal at best. Which says more about the Overseas manufacturers though.

http://www.alphabetcityblog.com/2009/05/doc-martens-made-in-england-vs-made-in.html