/fa/ - Fashion

it's time to move on, man

This is /fa/
I don't want /fa/ turning out like /fit/
Keep questions not related to clothes off of /fa/

>>6246781
ye whats the problem buddy???

>>6246782
we still together

>>6246787
it's time to move on, man

>>6246785
dun u haf a hart?
B~{

>>6246786
she likes the way i dress.

but we just dont see each other like that. we text a lot, and we've called a few times (each time was like from 1AM to 6AM fucking magic talking about errthang) but i just dont see the girl, feelme? this is the first time im gonna to see her in like 3 weeks. how do i see my girl mo ofin

>>6246781
>tfw i love bad bitches its a fucking problem
>tfw i love to fuck ive got a fucking problem

>>6246794
pleb-tier girl problems,
get off /fa/ faggot

get back to ktt you stupid newslave scum

>>6246796
i fukd her doe

>>6246794
"chatting" with girls leads to friendzone faster than anything else.

do you want a girl friend or girlfriend?

the best thing you can do is back off.
don't be so available and get her to chase you.

>>6246814
lol we aint even friends

but we arent bf/gf

its like we have all the rules and benefits of bf/gf (cant talk/flirt with other people, cant fuck anyone else,guaranteed pussy and head, i love you's etc) but we just havent put the title on it because idk, she doesn't like it, but i did ask her one day about it and she said she wouldn't mind the label being there, but it really wouldn't matter, since we're practically bf/gf now.

idk a nigga feeling lonely since school let out a few weeks ago

aye btw the shirt in the op is 50 bucks if anyone interested

>>6246825
thats why you shouldnt stick to just one girl.

btw from my experience "not putting a label on it" means not actually being committed.

if you feel lonely that's your problem and should have nothing to do with a girl.
that's how you get too attached.

>>6246831
i mean i can understand not sticking to one girl, but sometimes i just want a relationship, and this happens to be one of those times. she does have problems with commitment tho, but we've been together for like 6 months, which isn't a HUGE deal, but its long enough for her to get over something, right??

me being lonely doesn't have anything to do with the girl, just with me not being able to see my friends.

no lie i used to be a loser (i was ugly, didnt know how to dress myself, no friends outside of MMOs, the whole 9 yards) and im not used to having a relationship n friends n responsibilities n stuff ykno

>>6246842
i've been there.
i used to date around but then i found a girl i liked and and got too attached.

> its long enough for her to get over something, right??

you shouldn't try to convince her to be your GF.
her not wanting to do it says more than she ever could.
the more you tell her you want her, the less she'll want you.

saying "he does have problems with commitment" is very telling, and you know where im going with this.

>>6246853
>and you know where im going with this

she's getting her meat from another butcher :(

>>6246853
i think you're saying move on. but theres nothing to move on from. idc if im her bf her not. im not attached to her, well equally as much as her, if anything. we just dont see each other, thats my thing and fridays gonna be the day i get some pussy. my thing is i want her pussy more often. and to be with her wouldnt be bad either

>>6246855
no i would no this & we've already cheated on each other but this was months and months ago and we broke up and got back together both times. but she brung up my other girl like 2 days ago, which i thought was weird

I hope ktt and /fa/ become more intertwined

>>6246861
>we've already cheated on each other

>trusting someone whose already cheated, and after you already forgave her once

>my thing is i want her pussy more often

there are other girls out there man.
you are putting all your eggs in one basket, and i would bet you money she does not feel the same towards you.

>>6246865
idk y u tryna say i should move on. there are zero (0) reasons why i should break up w/ this girl...

>>6246867
how can you break up with her if you arent her BF.

im saying to keep her, just get others.

number one way to avoid getting attached.

>>6246876
its just a label, and she didnt teach me that. and im not going to cheat on her again. i made that mistake of doing what ur telling me to do, and i would have been much farther with her than i am now (i probably would be her bf, tbh)

and im not looking to play the field

>>6246884
ok so you are telling me:
you have a girlfriend,
but your girlfriend doesn't have a BF

look, i don't think i can help you man.
you'll have to learn this one on your own.

She doesn't feel the same towards you.
it sounds cliche, sexist, and all that, but it holds true: loyalty is not a feminine trait.

>>6246888
sounds sexist because it is

>>6246888
smh i just wish you would listen

and you really are a biased sexist dbag

>>6246888
he just wants a squeeze its not like that bruv
just do w/e man
if you like her then get closer
if not then stay where u at til u get bored of her
not sure wat u need here friend-o, just invite her out? hard to work w/ these details

>>6246898
what details do u need banana.

but i dont really want a squeeze. i want a gf but i caught feels wiith the wrong gril

>>6246891
>>6246896
be careful out there.

i dont get what advice you want to hear?

>>6246904
>i want a gf but i caught feels wiith the wrong gril

you admit she's the wrong girl.
but you want to stay with her?

i really don't get it.

>>6246906
sry loyalty is something dudes fuck up on just as much as ladies

>>6246785
This.
I have problems, too, sometimes. I go to /soc/ or /adv/. Keep this shit off /fa/ if it's not at least somewhat related to clothing.

>>6246904
why cant u see her
the way ur sayin it sounds like she lives far away
don't worry about that other guy tho even if she does a complete 180 and does some super-cheating shite i'm sure u'd b. fine cuz u don't have those r9k-tier emotional reactions

>>6246913
true.
very true

but it's different.
here is a common case:
guy and girl are together exclusively for a long time. both slowly grew bored of each other.
guy doesn't want to leave because he knows it would hurt the girl.
girl doesn't want to leave because she doesn't want to be alone.

When the girl finds a new prospect, she's leaving with no regards to the guy.
the guy would (usually) feel bad for the girl if he left.

studies show that most women look for their next BF before leaving their current one.

>>6246914
lol better than a dozen unnecessary w2c threads and australian threads

>>6246916
i dont have a car
we have conflicting work schedules (im a theater technician and shes a lifeguard, i work varying days n she works weekdays (im seeing her tomorrow doe))
were both at our moms since its summertime

if she cheated on me (again) id drop her ass on a dime. shed do the same. its not that we dont love each other, its just that weve been down that road before, and its not fun. plus she literally tells me shes thirsty, this girl isnt going anywhere

>>6246924
heres another common case:

guy and girl are together exclusively for a long time. both slowly grew bored of each other.
girl doesn't want to leave because she knows it would hurt the guy.
guy doesn't want to leave because he doesn't want to be alone.

When the guy finds a new prospect, he's leaving with no regards to the girl.
the girl would (usually) feel bad for the guy if she left.

>>6246924
surely if the dude found a girl he liked better, he'd leave the girl too though

>>6246934
curious if you've ever been in this situation.

im not trying to judge at all.

>>6246933
wow solid argument.
this always happens with relationship advice though.
someones gonna say "stop being a generalizing faggot" but i feel like i know what im talking about, from experience.
it's hard to handle at first, but once you date enough girls you start noticing the patterns and behaviors.

>>6246941
me and my bf are breaking up soon because of distance and i'm definitely not looking for any other dudes
not interested in jumping into another relationship so i cant relate to this at all

moreover i dont think looking for other people when your relationship is failing is a sign of lack of loyalty nor is sticking around out of guilt a sign OF loyalty
i question your entire premise really

tfw go on /fa/ just after daily browsing of KTT and see more KTT

Is that Goldline fashion's drop off KTT in OP pic?

>>6246949
no its a unknown clothing brand


WHERE ARE YOU BANANA

>>6246927
lol not much i can help u with there
sounds like a physical/logistics problem (lmao)
idk, u could have a fukken sleepover or smthn

>>6246945
ha so you are a femanon
god damnit i should have fucking known...

that explains so much.

>i dont think looking for other people when your relationship is failing is a sign of lack of loyalty

i agree with you.
but a lot of guys (most guys) would not agree.

so much KTT in here

the new generation of /fa/ is approaching
things as we know it will soon disappear
<3

>>6246954
i mean i dont have girl problems, im just ready to see a bitch.

but i guess imma have to take u up on that "fukken" sleepover. time 2 :work: that pussy

thanks

>>6246949
http://www.vladclothing.bigcartel.com/product/black-leather-cut-detail-tee
heres the link

$50

>>6246955
i just know so many skeezy dudes who've hit on me when theyre dating my friends
i just dont buy your argument

i think people should end dead relationships asap though its not worth it for anyone + being single is way cooler than being in a shitty dead relationship

>>6246959
np

polite sage cuz offtopic

>>6246961
ok.
so these "sleezy guys" who are hitting on you are just looking for the next person, right. and that' acceptable according to you.

i really don't think youd be comfortable with your BF talking to other girls in a flirtatious way without you knowing about it.

>>6246967
#wrekt

You guys talk like retards.

>>6246967
tbh if hes talking flirty i think id rather not know bc rationally i dont have a problem with it but it might make me jealous hearing about it
i mean im possessive in that way about anyone not just bfs and based on all the feels threads on this stupid site, clearly tons of dudes are the same way
i dont think thats all that relevant tho

my argument is just that this sense of 'loyalty' and dedicated monogamy isnt just something girls fuck with dudes are bad about it too
it really depends how youre defining loyalty, but i think regardless of definition, it probably doesnt vary that much based solely on gender

>>6246981
glad you see it my way babe.

>>6247004
wtf

>>6246981
>but i think regardless of definition, it probably doesnt vary that much based solely on gender

Statistically, it should. Females, on an instinctual level, have a lot more to lose, hence why they won't tend to leave a relationship without having another male lined up. Not talking about money, just resources and commitment to caring for children. Males can jump around with more ease and a good portion would prefer it (again, on huge scales). Females will cheat, yeah, but they'll go back to the guy that's taking care of them. She always knows her kid is hers, but the guy can't know (or at least couldn't know for long enough to have it programmed into his brain), so there's always a biological discrepancy in how much a committed relationship means to each party.

It's all about dem babbies, man. Trace it all back to those fuckers.

>>6247044
sorry as soon as you start spewing poorly supported evopsych i lose interest in argument
you can't backwards rationalize everything people do to solely a biological basis. humans are so much more complex than that, moreover there has been centuries of discourses shaping the way interaction occurs and relationships form combined with constant shifts and reorientations of these norms, that even if they began as immediately and purely biological, it's clearly shifted now.

the biggest issue with evopsych is that it's just backward application of current norms and claiming theyre rooted in biology without any real evidence.

i want to point out too that there are so many exceptions to that characterization of human behavior due to different sexualities, sexes, and genders that i think it just basically renders the purely biological argument moot.

>>6247072
if guy: enjoy being walked on and disrespected by women your whole life

if girl: irrelevant and over emotional

>>6247082
seriously though, thats such a typical female response.

"sorry, even though everything you say makes complete sense, i just cant accept it because i dont want to admit/believe it."

>pic related: the female in her day to day life

>>6247082
youre so edgy

>>6247094
just because it "makes sense" doesn't mean it's true
there's lots of things we intuitively think that aren't particularly true, like when you're flipping a coin and you get a bunch of heads, you intuitively feel like it should be a tails next to balance it out but the probability of heads or tails is still 50/50

sorry science isn't conducted based on "hunches" you don't just get to explain away any norms you observe in society using loosely formulated broscience

>>6247072
Statistical analyses don't lie. Induction =/= backwards rationalization. You can't look at individuals or small populations and claim that they render the whole picture invalid (my backyard thermometer said it was cold, so global warming is a lie). Claiming that we're so complex as to make us undecipherable is the worst sort of cop out.

All those genders and sexualities don't emerge out of nowhere. There's a point to it, and it's not purely cultural.

I'm not saying there's no validity to looking at the higher level, but there are consistent behaviors that barely change over history that have strong correlations to the simplest evolutionary concepts. Recognizing them is a good step towards understanding why your boyfriend cheated on you, and why you're so thirsty.

>>6247082
>>6247094
the fact that a lot of guys on this shitty website genuinely believe that if you dont believe all women act in a similar way with some biological background and alterior motives then every girl is gonna treat you like shit

how about being a nice person, not a 'nice guy' but legitimatly nice. then it wont happen

enjoy bein sad lonely losers tho wow u sure schoold me on the gender divide B)))

>>6247104
babe ive been out doing field research testing my hypothesis.

it's ok to not understand it, i don't think less of you. i expect nothing less.

holy fuck do you guys just climb out of the woodwork

stoppppp

>>6247117
whats ur hypothesis 'girls r stinky and my ex cheated on me because im shit in bed wah ):::'

>>6247104
>just because it "makes sense" doesn't mean it's true

Yeah, but it strongly implies it. Correlation does probably mean causation, especially when we can cross-reference all this shit to fossil evidence, cave paintings, written documents and other species of ape. It isn't quantum mechanics, and it's not based on intuition.

>>6247127
CORRELATION =/= CAUSATION THATS LITERALLY THE FIRST THING YOU LEARN ON ANY STATISTICS COURSE YOU FUCCBOI

>>6247115
i didn't say we were too complex to understand, what i said is that a lot of evopsych rests on untested and untestable assumptions of nature/culture that are longstanding debates and can't just be handwaved away. its the oldest statistical argument in the book that correlation != causation.

i dont think theres any evidence to suggest that some evolutionary concept is more valuable than analyzing cultural norms for shaping why people cheat on each other or how sexuality is realized. i'm not saying that there's no biological basis whatsoever, but it's so important to tease out the assumptions we already make before we even turn to scientific practices.

>>6247111
first, props for breaking down "nice guy" vs a nice guy. that actually is something most people can't understand.

i do consider myself a nice guy.
i've been hurt, and fucked over by females, and blown away by it.
left wondering "how could that be possible"
then i realized that it was my own actions that led me to that point.
i saw that i could have made the relationship worked if i "played" it correctly.
since then i think of everything as "game", and have been 1000x more successful in my life.
people aren't that complex, but girls are a lot more complex than guys.

i believe that if a woman hurts a guy, it is the guys fault. always.
for allowing himself to be in a position where he gets hurt.
sad, but that's how i see it.

>>6247126
girls smell nice, imo, except for when they dump all that perfume on themselves.

i've never been cheated on either.

>>6247134
lel completely missed my point. gj nigguh, keep reciting that line without applying it.

>>6247163
so what was your hypothesis then buddy

>>6247139
>its the oldest statistical argument in the book that correlation != causation.

"Necessarily" needs to be added in there, I swear. No, almost nothing we can reason through induction or correlations can ever be proven for certain, but it can become more reliable over time if it doesn't fail a test. Almost all of our knowledge is based on this unreliable method that we nonetheless accept as facts or laws.

>i dont think theres any evidence to suggest that some evolutionary concept is more valuable than analyzing cultural norms for shaping why people cheat on each other or how sexuality is realized. i'm not saying that there's no biological basis whatsoever, but it's so important to tease out the assumptions we already make before we even turn to scientific practices.

Both methods are valuable and provide information. I agree.

>>6247175
most important thing:
never hold a girl above yourself.

yea it's basic but i didn't exactly understand it exactly before. now i know to never compromise my own happiness for hers, and not get attached.

>inb5: good luck keeping a girl

i know that a girl can, and will leave for any reason, as soon as her perception of my value drops.

i "challenge" girls.
i make THEM show interest in me, and work for me.

essentially, i let girls earn me, i don't earn them.
i don't listen to a girls words, i watch her actions.
i don't listen to her words as "honest" i take them as emotion.

i can elaborate, but theres no point since "sexist"

>>6247244
please elaborate

>>6247232
okay so you said a whole lot of nothing

my point through all of this is that you can't reduce every behavior anyone ever does to biological motives because the reasons people do things are multiple and our biology is in fact so influenced by environment (vice versa is obvious). brains are so malleable. when investigating these scientific claims, especially ones that have such serious ethical implications, it's so crucial to tease out all the assumptions that are being made. for example, an undercurrent to all of this speculation is that there is a clearly demarcated binary of sex, when science itself has repeatedly shown us that this is not the case at all that sex is manifested in a number of ways, without even considering all the complication of gender.

>>6247244
o i thought you meant you were a genuine psychologist and you were actually testing out a hypothesis, i was ready to fuckin pounce on that

nah anyone that regards girls either higher or lower than themselves is setting themselves up for hurt or embarrassment
like not looking down on girls is fairly obvious whats the fuckin point you just look like an asshole. Placing them on a pedestal way above you is stupid as well because they're gonna get complacent and take you for granted and then you're gonna be like 'oh girls i treat them well and they treat me like shit!! grr!!'
Like
if you put ANYONE above yourself for a while they're gonna do that

just treat everyone as an individual duder u feel me B))

>>6247244
this sounds so condescending im glad im not dating u anon

>>6247269
i dont see them as lower either.
well, lower than myself.

but not lower than men.

>>6247271
what point babe

>>6247273
ha you think youd realize i was like this if you were dating me?

it's not condescending at all.
it actually makes a lot of sense?

why?
because i don't waste time with uninterested girls.
if you were interested in me, you would have no problems showing me your interest.

none of this stuff is a turn off.

>>6247280
everything
how do you get them to chase you
how do you challenge them
how 2 "never hold a girl above yourself"
teach me, master

>>6247296
taking her words as emotion rather than honestly sounds hella dismissive

>>6247266
> can't reduce every behavior anyone ever does to biological motives

It's not necessarily a reduction. You just have to start somewhere. I think there is a biological root to all behavior and culture that can be traced down the complex concepts and behaviors that have been built up over time. You can't separate our behavior from the genetic component completely, and you can't have a holistic understanding of human behavior without considering the evolutionary perspective. Whatever emergent complexities arise are the other matter that I agreed with you on. Both are informative in different ways.

>>6247317
firstly babe, im not a master, and never said i was.

when i say "chase" i mean, i keep them wondering, and working to get me.

if i approach that's good, i make them laugh or whatever, and get their number.
then i text them back a couple days later (depends on a few things, but usually just when i have free time) asking them out.

then i do nothing else.
if she hits me back with a yes, or offers a different time, i agree, then text a day before the date.

if it's a "no" or no response, i'm done.
again, a lot of guys fail here. they try to keep contacting them.

challenging them means a lot, but the easiest way to apply it is to simply disagree with them.
not argue, obviously.
just "make fun" of her taste in movies or whatever.
girls like getting teased and shit.
they like a guy who leads.

>>6247326
there's mutual co-constitution here though of nature/culture that gets neglected when we assume desires are innate and reinforce that dichotomy

>>6247334
okay

sth i always have trouble with is finding something to talk about. any tips for that?

>>6247345
yea i used to be like that too, but i found it's best to let them do most of the talking.
just ask questions, and let them talk.

it works.
and if they are interested, they'll ask you stuff.
still, never just spill your guts, keep it short.
mystery is a turn on to girls.

>>6247361
mystery is such a turnoff for me if dudes try to act to mysterious i immediately lose interest though
i really think you have to find a balance
im not interested in people who want to put up barriers and generate distance and will assume a person is not worth my time if they do this

if you read this the opposite way, this is exactly what deters you from girls not sure why this would universally work on women

>>6246827
looks like someting kanye would wear,eh pass

>>6247371
yea you have to be smart about it.

the way i do it is i just keep my answers short, or deter with something funny/sarcastic.

>>6247377
what im saying is
>if dudes try to act to mysterious

i don't ACT mysterious. i am mysterious.
therefore you wouldn't see it me as acting like anything.

>>6247383
thats what i mean youre probably more transparent than you realize
i pick up on it when people are being terse or deflective with me and stop talking to them and im sure lots of people are the same way

it seems so funny to think of a person like you running into a girl using the same strategy and then neither of you ever talk to each other in any meaningful way and miss an opportunity that couldve been good
so sad :'(

fuck guardedness tho im immediately drawn to people who let themselves be vulnerable

>>6247383
>i don't ACT mysterious. i am mysterious.

i exploded with laughter

>>6247371
>dudes try to act mysterious

OBVIOUSLY NIGGA.

But guys who naturally have a mysterious way about them are pretty much covered in vagina.

>>6247406
maybe for some but i bet it deters a lot of people he might otherwise get on with really well

i guess what does it really matter in the end tho since were all just here to procreate and not find love or meaningful relationships anyway ;3

>>6247399
i dont think you know me, to be fair.

there have been times where i've felt ive missed a connection with a girl, but i blame myself, and learn from it.
almost every time i see a girl im drawn to it's clear there's a mutual attraction.

i do believe in that.
or it's cuz my boss swag and god tier attractiveness.

i'm good at reading girls and figuring out the best approach to get them.

yea, i am guarded, but socially smart and able to adjust as needed.

>>6247402
if you exploded youd be dead stupid bitch.

try harder 0/10

>>6247414
lmao ok buddy

>>6247419
thanks matt

>>6247426
im not mat homo

>>6247435
thanks matt

>>6247436
reported and filtered.
enjoy ban

>>6247442
thanks matt

>>6247442
thanks dan

>>6247442
thanks SQUIDS

i sure hope lelders isn't responding and accusing me of being mat because i filtered him and wont see it or respond.

>>6247449
thanks twerk

>>6247442
>>6247443
pfff hhahaha

>>6247449
thanks alex

>>6247449
thanks autism

>>6247449
thanks manlet
wait, photoshop

>>6247449
thanks shirtspammer

>>6247449
thanks thanks

>>6247449
thanks alekzia

>>6247449
thanks aziz

>>6247474
Wrong aziz, aziz

>>6246781
so howre you liking effay so far lolz

i love the shitposting tonight keep em coming guys thanks matt

damn i miss prodigy

>>6246958
;_;
i..i..it's just schools's out right its a temporal thing right?

>>6247500
i want this mag w3c

>>6247019
you're a banana i just had you with bran the only thing u should understand is the botttom of my loo

>>6247144
how did u became a pua

>>6247507
thanks matt

>>6247525
im not and i dont even like the term.
it has a sleazy vibe to it.

i did read "book of pook" and it opened my eyes.
then i did what most guys do, and actually practiced.
rejection doesn't phase me (rarely even happens any more).

>>6247530
yes perfect

>>6247540
thanks matt

>>6247542
wtf

>>6247504
it looks like cosmo or seventeen (they run this articles every season change esp summer)

>>6247558
thanks matt

>>6247476

Go back to /fit/ aziz

>>6247553
thanks matt

>>6247562
thanks matt

>>6247565
thanks matt

>>6247565
fuck you you stupid cunt

>>6247530
fuck off natalie

>>6247572
you ruined the song faggot cunt delete this post

>>6247579
thanks matt