/fa/ - Fashion

First for real men wristwatch sizes are between 39-44 mm

Merry weekend

>>17650840
>Wearing watches under 45mm
Girly wrists detected.

>>17650854
How are you still alive with that one shitty watch, why didn't you buy a Rolex by now?

Prove that you've been outside today and aren't a shut in loser

>>17650835
Explorer vs Black Bay?

Why are you faggots like this?

>>17650840

>>17650840
I hate this meme

>>17650884
>He's wearing a women's watch.
>Don't you mean "she"?

>>17650857
I need a new Cadillac.

>>17650888
What you need is a Porsche.

>>17650867
yeah this is the new explorer with the rotating diving bezel

>>17650890
I may consider it.

>>17650892
Explorer 2 nigga

>>17650876
Jesus fucking Christ that's pathetic. The only time I wear a watch on my right wrist is when I wear my f91.

am I the only one that absolutely refuses to buy a watch with a white dial?

>>17650968
Yes. What kind of deranged retard are you?
You don't HAVE to buy a white dial, buts it's not like white dials are bad in any specific way.

>>17650968
soulless

>>17650968

>>17650835

I’ll take my dive watch with soul, please

>>17650988

>>17650989
>>17651005
>>17650973
SOUL

>>17650991
soulless

>>17650854
Pride month gay

I was told rolex watches only go up in value.
should i be worried about this?

>>17651020
CRASH LOOMS

>>17651020
Investing in watches is absolutely retarded

>>17650884
Saved this from a couple threads ago. Hilarious. Didn’t realize he did this but I’ve always loved the nylon strap on a Rolex. It’s like a shrug.

>>17651020
What the hell is this? Who cares what your watch is "worth".

>>17651037
why the fuck would you wear something worthless?

>>17651037
>he doesn't get sexy black tinder dates by flexing his rolly
ngmi

its the same with tudor too. like, how much lower can it go? seems like it has maybe hit a bottom, right?

>>17651020
>anecdotal stories of ADs are loosening up with the rolex orders
ohbros...????

>>17651060
what are you talking about??

unrelated, was considering a patek but prices appear to be coming down there too. damn this inflation is killing me

>>17651064
Im memeing, but front page of the rolex reddit has a bunch of positive ad stories lately

>>17651053
>right?
No.

>>17651018

>>17651037
Poor people

>>17651019
A whole month?

Does this Sprite GMT look too big on my wrist?

>>17651076
No

Does this Sprite GMT look too big on my 6.5 inch wrist?

>>17651078
Take another pic with the camera farther away. You get perspective distortion with it being so close.

>>17651078
Rolex's left hand GMT is the most stupid thing ever behind the sprooooooooong drive meme.

>>17651078
Unfortunately this isn't' for sale as expected. For shits and giggles I did ask the saleswomen if there was anything actually for sale. She says the only thing they have right now is the SeaDweller.

>>17650884
I bet at the time nylon strap was premium

>>17651093
Premium dogshit

>>17651089
Those are awful. Soulless Rolex OP looking shithouse watch

>>17651089
sneed
buy the sneed

>>17651078
>>17651089
Were you in the boutique of ugly things?

>>17651118
Only good thing in those pics is the Sneedmaster in the back.

>>17651018
hell is this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6ekn3yvPu4

>>17651226
Tooked you 1h30 to make that?

>>17651020
Buy the dip faggot

>>17651226
>actually added a kinda red lipstick kissing the red dick
I know art and that is magnificent.

I just bought this what am I in for

>>17651243
Wow!!! Finally something I can buy my grandson who's 9 and still plays video games!!!

>>17651243
SEXO....

>>17651250
... WITH ANOTHER MAN.

>>17650968
White dials can be cool, to give some contrast. I'd sooner buy a white dial watch than a black dial watch, black dials are boring.

>>17651243
Did you check how big it is?

>>17651265
It's meant for men, not girls like the ones in these threads crying about being wristlets.

>>17651265
lug to lug its 48.0mm

>>17651273
>>17651278
Ah ok, i just mentioned it because i know that some Astrons can be quite chunky.

>he isn't loooooooming

Thoughts on the Seiko SWR066 as a Cartier Tank cope? I would like to check out whether or not that form factor suits me at all before dropping money on an actual Cartier Tank

>>17651307
>I would like to check out whether or not that form factor suits me at all before dropping money on an actual Cartier Tank
Go to a boutique or someshit, it's Cartier they have a store everywhere

Well, unless you're in buttfuck nowhere

>>17651307
I have a SUP880 and it's pretty comfy
however, it's not a Tank or a replacement for - it's just a rectangular watch

>>17651041
You overpayed for a piece of man jewelry. LMAO

Bros, should I? 75 euros on ebay

>>17651323
Probably not lol

I’m thinking of buying this. Thoughts?

>>17651325
Why? are there better options?

>>17651327
It’s like 1.2k AUD though + import fees probs and I’m poor until I graduate Uni and get a proper job so I’m not sure I should bite the bullet. I have a lot saved and I don’t really spend much though.

>>17651307
I like the look of this a lot but it kinda looks too small for me personally. Like a woman's watch.

>>17651331
Hand wound hi-beat-ish (28,8k) 2 hander from 1975

>>17651332
Get like a 500aud seiko m8
then get a sexy explorer or a sneedmaster when you have the dosh ez

>>17651330
For the price range, you can get an Invicta Pro Diver that looks more like a sub, plus it’s an automatic.

>>17651332
Also check out starbuy, as a fellow aussie myself, that site has constant sales and a pretty nice range of watches + budget

thoughts on kurono?

>>17651344
Great $250 microbrand.

>>17651005

Great looking diver. Shame they don't make it anymore.

>>17651323
>on ebay
why? surely you have retailers around
i'd only get it for diving

>>17651345
they're around $1800

>>17651353
Yeah and? Just don't pay retard.

>>17651354
because it's not an omega or rolex? that's kinda lame

>>17651355
Don't you ever put Rolex and that disgusting Swatch brand in the same sentence you triple nigger.

>>17651355
because it's >>17651345

>>17651332
It's throwing you money away

>>17651344

If I go to Japan again, I'll buy something like this. Looks pretty good.

>>17650835
>got a few citizen chronograph watches because I liked how they looked
>didn’t know the main seconds hand is just for the chronograph
Honest I wish I could just use the seconds hand and disregard the other function. Is there anyway to change the chronograph to the smaller seconds hand?

>>17651383
>>didn’t know the main seconds hand is just for the chronograph
All chronographs are like that i think.

Is there a more recent top 50 Swiss brands infographic beyond 2020? I know there's the top 20 infographics up to last year but quite keen to know the market for 30-50.

>>17651383
LoL, no. They're all like that you muppet. The chronograph is the highlight of them, the main second will serve that function.

>>17651417
I really thought Rolex was selling a lot more than brands like Longines given how many of them there are on second hand sites, it's just that luxury brands are over represented

>>17651018
I always knew Cartier was for faggots.

Does /wt/ fear the dual wielding?

>>17651427
How much is too much jewelery for men
Bracelet + watch on one hand or split?

>>17651430
Bracelets look bad. Maybe watch + wedding band + small chain is ok but anything else looks bad.

>>17650835
>This is the watch Average Hoe was coping isn't too big
lmao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_NJSRVMzf8

>>17651430
Stretchy bead bracelets look so bad with watches. The watch already occupies the ideal place for the bracelet so it has to either stretch out of proportion up over your hand or out of proportion riding up your forearm, and the beads separate and it looks like shit.

A bit of sunday country work. We are all fags, this is the superior watch.

>>17651423
It's not as if they try to hide it. This is an actual Cartier ad.

Does anyone know what this feller is wearing? or something similar looking to it?

>>17651453
Timex

>>17651455

>>17651453
learn how to end your fucking books u fag

>>17651457
Too busy doing cocaine and writing sex scenes involving children to wait on an AD to get him a proper watch.

>>17651462
Prob just wants to wear an "american" brand that tells the time just ok.

>>17651462
That's right, he's pretty based.

>>17651465
Unironically, are there any decent American watch makers left? I think all the historical ones that are worth a shit went out of business and were resurrected in Switzerland?

>>17651448
The watch chosen by the likes of Jocko and Chuck... also Bill Clinton but who cares.

>>17651470
Hamilton by Swatch and Bulova by Citizen. Yes.

Ball im not sure by who.

>>17651457
see the arm twist? it's why wearing it under is better.

>>17651458
Seething trumpfag detected

>>17651233
i'm already fully invested. painful tough

>>17651448
And relaxing a bit now. No need of rawlecks to enjoy life.

What do you think of this?

>>17651491
Boring and generic af.

Does Tudor make anything worthwhile that isn't the BB58?

>>17651491
Datejust wannabe

>>17650921
nice try retard but we can all see the bezel

>>17651527
the bb54 is the only worthwhile thing they make and even that is a cope

>>17651527
Nope.
>>17651491
Boring
>>17651470
No, the only ones of note are Swiss now

>>17651527
Yes.

If you actually dive/snorkel and dont want to wear a Citizen, the Pelagos is pretty good.

The bb58 925 is pretty cool, as is the bb54

>>17651523
Its ridiculous how overpriced are those now. And they give you nothing compared to a Omega Constellation Perpetual Calendar for example.

Apart from sucking Rolex's dick, that seem to be the coolest thing here (and i like Rolex).

>>17651583
>Its ridiculous how overpriced are those now.
Are they really? I'd rather have on of these than a Sub.

Pick one.

>>17651590
That price is absurd anon.

>>17651638
No-date sub

>>17651638
Black pelagos

>>17651638
>all black bezel black dial divers
american moment

>>17651350
Glad they don’t because you can buy it for half of retail now lol

>>17651638
i would only be able to pull off that OP dj so that i guess.

>>17651638
>Pick one.
the rose gold one

>>17651686
This watch should be under 10k. Even if each of the parts in this watch were hand assembled and finished it still wouldn't be worth more. Let's be fucking real. It's as streamlined and conventional as a watch can get.

>>17651638
these watches look so NPC tier. What's the appeal? Why not put all that money into something really special? Are they too scared to stand out? Do they want to flex their Rolex? Are they worried about resell value?

>>17651690
do you think i plan to buy this watch based on logic!?

>>17651690
Your mistake is seeing these as watches.
They're watch-shaped luxury products. Handmade, finishing, all these things you mentioned are irrelevant. Think of the supreme brick or the AP spiderman watch. Its qualities as a watch don't dictate how much it costs or whether you should want it.

>>17651690
I just assume that seeing a Patek IRL is night and day compared to looking at pictures because that's the only way spending so much on these bland looking watches makes sense. The movements do look very very nice.

>>17651638
Out of all these only the Tudor BB58 and Rolex Explorer look decent.

>>17651583
>>17651590
>>17651643

The Rolex cult is becoming a self-parody

>>17650968
I can't handle it. I've tried. But white>silver. Fuck that shit.

>>17651723
That's one fucking ugly watch.

>>17651723
The newer model even.

>>17651727
If it said "Rolex" on the dial, people would be anally masturbating with it.

>>17651475
Ball is perhaps the saddest. They were one of the most influential companies in history for timekeeping standards, they went out of business, a Chinese company bought the name and built a factory in Switzerland to produce them.

An American name on a Chinese watch made in Switzerland.

Guys what do you think about this?

>>17651089
I have trouble with certain colors. Can anyone tell wtf this dial color is?

>>17651735
Too busy and too complicated.

>>17651739
Tikka Masala

>>17651735
>dubious schaltenliterallywho
I don't get this brand. As I understand it they're a small release group or something. That watch doesn't look bad, but looks chunky.

>>17651739
Metallic candy red.

>>17651732
Why are you so butthurt about Rolex?
They've made some fucking ugly shitters too.

>>17651739
Terra cotta

>>17651741
>>17651739
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKtNawQ3cxM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKtNawQ3cxM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKtNawQ3cxM

>>17651744
Holy shit that's fuck ugly.

>>17651744
If that was 36-38mm people would be paying 5000+€ GLADLY, because it says "Rolex".

>>17651750
Not even "superlative chronometer", and 34mm

Does anybody know anything about Egard watches? I never see them come up anywhere except facebook ads but they appear to be using in house movements and some of the shit they put in their watches from any other manufacturer would be easily 3x the cost. They sell this Tourbillon for $2k and they have a bunch of dual escapement options for $500. There's gotta be a catch.

>>17651643
13k for a solid gold Rolex is absurd? What's more it's 36mm, an Oysterquartz (they look nice and are relatively rare) and a DayDate. For the same money as a boring stainless steel Submariner.

>>17651752
retarded chinese movement shit that is against trans pocs and lgbtq+s and pro police and trump it's the ultimate chud watch

>>17651752
The two barrels aren't lined up horizontally, it would trigger my OCD and is therefore trash.

>>17651753
>>13k for a solid gold Rolex is absurd?
Yes retard.

>>17651745
>>17651741
>>17651743
>2 browns, one red
ok thanks
It's hideous.

>>17651754
If even half of this were true it would only be more reason to buy one of these over an Omega.

>>17651768
>>If even half of this were true
It's all true, literally they have "keep trans women out of sports" ads.

Is this the clearest, easiest to read and then perhaps the best layout for a perpetual calendar?
Do you prefer anything else?

>>17651769
See, this is what you get when you try to go out of your way to shill for diversity and inclusion on a global scale - a lot of the brown and other various colors of people you shilled for start developing based opinions and it's too late to criticize them for it because you already set the stage for everyone who criticizes a colored person for any reason is a bigot.

>>17651740
What if it said Patek on the dial instead?
>>17651742
It's a dead brand at this point, it used to be popular like 15 years ago.

Thinking of replacing my G-Shock with pic related, its the garmin instinct 2 solar. I know you fags don't go /out/ but thoughts?

>>17651773
someone posted this recently

>>17651773
>year window
I get that perpetual calendars are more about flex than utility, but this is ridiculous.

>>17651786
I like that addition if only because no other pc calibres do it.

>>17651423
>>17651449
Was thinking about buying a Cartier, not buying anymore cause im not a homo. Rolex truly is the only luxury watch to buy and maybe a sneedmaster

>>17651804
Could you, perhaps, buy a watch because it matches the functions or the design you like instead of just what brand whoring and marketing brainwash tells you to buy?

>>17651783
Only buy it if you really like the Garmin ecosystem imo. If not, consider the new DW-H5600, about the same price with classic square look, high legidibility MIP display and about the same "sport watches" functions (except maybe GPS), but with G-shock solidity and durability.

I'm personally wearing a square GW-M5610 solar+atomic clock everyday, I don't like smart watches but the DW-H5600 looks alright.

>>17651830
Nonody gives a fuck anymore about design, quality, functionality etc. people just want something to easy flex that normies recognize.

This "hobby" is a disgusting shitshow.

>>17651833
Only buy it if you really like the Garmin ecosystem imo. If not, consider the new DW-H5600, about the same price with classic square look, high legidibility MIP display and about the same "sport watches" functions (except maybe GPS), but with G-shock solidity and durability.

For some reason my first post got deleted, idk why.

>>17651837
Answering to
>>17651783

>>17651018
jesus christ.

G-SHOCK /fa/gs:
Do any of you know whether a version of pic related exists (smaller, classic g-shock) but with the gold kind of screen panel instead of this standard grey/silver kind? Not inverse/negative.
I've found that the gold panel g-shocks are for me the most legible, even in negative.
>tough solar
>multi-band not necessary
?

114 euros, yay or nay

>>17651901
Save and buy a Rolex.

>>17650835
Mama kicked me out of the house after she saw my rollie. Oh my

>>17651901
>day/date window inset so far
itty bitty quartz movement in a gigantic case with empty space filler
there's a better citizen ecodrive field watch out there that doesn't look like gramps' timex easy reader

>>17651920
How about this? Differences: no day-of-week window, sapphire face, crown guard. 169 eurobux

>>17651887
DW5040PG-1

>>17651638
Rolex Explorer II

>>17651901
if only the date was above 6

Is this a good versatile sports watch? Like for motorcycling, beach, night out...

You can get it brand new for less than 1000€

>>17652020
A bit boring, but yes.

>>17652020
yeah, I've got a similar one (spb143)

WRISTCHECK
NOW

>the Reverso Classic Small Seconds in steel is now over 11k€
>movement hasn't been upgraded since the 80s
>no anti-magnetism, no shock resistance
>only 3hz
>only 40h of power reserve
>no accuracy certification whatsoever
>meanwhile the brand invests millions in niggerkike brand ambassadors
So... when did you grow tired of JLC?

What's the closest thing that l can get to an SKX013 currently that doesn't cost $500+?
I need something automatic and 40mm or less

>>17651665
Obsession

>>17652020
Yeah if your 12.

>>17651735
Ok so I shouldn't get this?

>>17652026
Opinion on the Inox ? From what I heard they're pretty good quality for the price but rather chunky.

Why not to buy a Citizen Tsuyosa and just call it a day?

Would you rather have a 6 o'clock date or no date?

>>17652031
>>17652042
I was responding to that

>>17652042
No 36m version. Tremendous oversight. If it just had a 36mm case version they wouldn't even be able to keep them in stock, it would be the go to datejust cope watch.

>>17652042
>>17652044
>n-no I don't want a Rolex
*buy a Rolex knock off*

>>17652048
Who said they don't want a rolex?

>>17652048
Well, if you buy a Tsuyosa por 270€, you can just confidently say "i like this kind of watch but cant afford a Rolex", if someone asks. Whats the problem?

>>17652030
As evidence by your own post, they can still evoke seething. Once that stops, then they're in trouble.

Id the watch

>>17652026
Logging in. Haven't worn any other watch since getting this gshock

I feel like cheap watches make you look cheap if they are not utility, so I only buy field watches and stuff
like, if I see someone wearing a 500 USD metal strap watch I immediately think them as losers, if they are indeed wearing something 2k+ its then OK

I dont harbor any similar feelings about any other clothing items, accessories but watches, they just feel like rich guy's hobby unless the watch is sportsy

>>17652044
With date for me

>>17652044
I can't explain exactly why but I just cannot stand date windows anywhere but 3oclock.

>>17652026
Still wearing it.

>>17652072
Congrats on your new watch, anon.

>>17651945
Unfortunately not solar. Thank you anyway.

>>17652119

>>17652072
Holy dinner plate batman

>>17652128
lol Thanks, friend. Now I'll spend the rest of the day thinking I'm wearing a Disney watch.

>>17652044
A date at 3 and day at 6 o'clock.

>>17652030
>no shock resistance
I was going to shit on you and point out that basically every watch made since the 50's has had shock protection. Then I looked it up.
What the flying fuck? It's not that the calibre didn't have antishock, it's that in the past decade they REMOVED it.
Reason
>errr new magic oils and uhh, special balance illuminates the need for this protection and makes it more accurate
smells like corner cutting richemont goycope to me.

>>17652058

>>17652146
>*eliminates
fucking

>>17652147
Close, but there isn't a red hand in the photo

>>17652020
don't
not this
not any

>>17652153
Then it could be the blue no gmt variant. That or it's some homage.

>>17652171
wrong pic.. perhaps some other brand did the same bracelet design idk

>laugh at Tudor
>99% of thread too poor to afford Tudor
Typical

>>17651053
Not much of a change honestly

>>17651089
Buy the seadweller you lunatic

What's so bad about the Timex T80, really?

>>17652026
Bought this AliExpress titanium mod kit, I didn't like it completely at first but I am wearing it almost everyday since it's light and comfortable. I have a black rubber-gold casioak arriving tomorrow and I'll put the bracelet on that and will wait for the white OEM bezel and strap

>>17652119
Hey retarded fat bag of stinky shit how's it going?

>>17652175
The bracelet design is completely different blind moron.

>>17652251
strongly disagree

>>17652267
You're also blind.

>>17650835
What is the actual reason that makes tudor incapable of making dive watches as thin as submariners?

Is it really that difficult to create a thin movement? rolex seems to have figured it out like half a century ago

>>17652286
>why does this watch brand that is owned by the same people as Rolex doesn't have watches that are ten times cheaper than Rolex with the exact same features
???

>>17652249
I love how poortards seethe at the mere sight of something expensive.

>>17652286
Both the black bay 54 and 58 are thinner than a submariner.

>>17651307
Just get a replica tank, might as well save your cash.

>>17652308

>>17651243
>what am I in for
No one to pass this down too.

what do you recon is the minimal wrist size to be able to pull off pic related

>>17652353
wtf lol

>>17652353

>>17652360
lmao

>>17651032
Apparently he borrowed it from a producer but it didn't fit him on the bracelet so they threw it on whatever was available

>>17652324
When it comes to a steel tank? They are

>>17651638
lovely case. where to cop

>>17652026
At work so I’m wearing my duty watch

>>17652119
Thanks friend.
>>17652134
I mean it is a gshock, it's not even that big for one. It actually roughly the same size as my Arnie, I used the same crystal protector for both of them.

>>17650840
.t

I will never need anything beyond those two. I've craft the most kino combo ever worn.

>>17652386
Love the belt.

>>17652119
Fat mortadello

>>17652119
Nice Dayto--oh...

what happened to this watch? why did they stop selling it?

>>17652426
Not the owner, but I personally think it’s a cooler watch than the Daytona

>>17652426
Better than a Daytona

>>17652437
>>17652438

>>17652353
>put off the shelf cheapo pocketwatch movement into a wristwatch case
>sell it to chinks during the height of panerai mania
>don't profit because it looks retarded and isn't panerai cept the cheapon off the shelf movement

>>17652436
>what happened to this watch?
It was discontinued
>why did they stop selling it?
not enough people liked it enough to buy it.

>>17652455
>not enough people liked it enough to buy it.

are watch enthusiasts that boring that something even slightly deviating from the same designs we've seen for 100 years is seen as too adventurous?

>>17652462
>are watch enthusiasts that boring that something even slightly deviating from the same designs we've seen for 100 years is seen as too adventurous?
Yes.

The only exception are Hublot owners, and everyone hates them.

Thoughts on copebuying a tudor

>>17652426
Daytona is overplayed, nigro bait and overpriced.
El Primero is understated, technologically better and faster at 36,000 vph and doesn't have the retarded screw-in pushers.

>>17652452
>rawlecks fags
They are overpriced even at retail and the only reason to own one is to scam retard flexfags

>>17651327
>>17651332
Don’t bother if poor but for what it’s worth I absolutely love mine. Gave me a little buyers remorse for my other watches

>>17652452
Daytona is the wordt looking Rolex and it's cope to argue otherwise. People only like it because it's expensive. Old daytonas were kino.

>>17652476
apparently some of their newer models have some serious quality issues related to the movements themselves. check watchuseek for reviews before buying.

>>17652476
No one except internet autists think of it as a cope watch.

>>17652513
Ok, Mike Tyson.

My two watch collection. What watch should I get next? $10k budget.

>>17652513
What do you think of the one on the left? >>17652395

>>17652521
Rolex Explorer ii

>>17652521
Explorer, OP or a Cartier Santosussy

>>17652044
Yes
And a big ass day.

>>17652119
>1/10 of a second

>>17652501
>>17652503
>>17652513
>it's bad because it's expensive! Because that means...it's bad!

>>17652521
>What watch should I get next? $10k budget.
Sell the Speedmaster (should get you 4-5k) and the Seiko (should get you about 10 bucks). Get a Rolex Datejust and never think about buying another watch again. Unironically.

>>17652522
I like both of them. You assembled the left one yourself right?

>>17652539
It's bad because it's ugly you retard
>>17652547
Kill yourself

>>17652501
>El Primero is understated,
three different colored subdials is the opposite of understated
>technologically better
Look up the Daytona's specs and then kill yourself. The El Primero hasn't been state of the art for decades
>and faster at 36,000 vph
who fucking cares
>and doesn't have the retarded screw-in pushers.
lol 50m WR.

>>17652558
>It's bad because it's ugly you retard
Your mother was ugly but that didn't mean I didn't fuck her brains out nine months before you were born.

>>17652539
Brain dead

Best women's watch. Go.

>>17652605
36mm Rolex. Done.

>>17652607
I counter with Cartier Tank Louis

>>17652561
Excellent rebuttal, I expect nothing less from a low IQ troll.

>>17652615
Shush, boy. You don't speak to your father with that tone.

>>17652558
Post something better...or just continue simping for a fat man. Either way, you will never be a woman.

>>17652623
>>17652627
I remember now why I stopped browsing. I can't tolerate you idiots anymore. Absolutely brain dead conversations that serve no purpose. This place is just as bad as reddit just in the opposite sense.

>>17652631
So it’s good?

>>17652647
No instead of a circle jerk it's just endless shitting. Nothing of value is said in rither place.

>>17652653
Can’t handle a bit of friendly banter?

>>17652627
The fact that you're placing the quality of a watch in if it's owned by a anon that you hate or not goes to demonstrate that you're a chimp with no rational arguments and you're just butthurt for being reminded that you're poor and mentally ill.
Most probably, if lawyer had a Daytona instead of El Primero, you'd be going on and on about Zenith's being better because bla bla bla... fat.
You're retarded and a waste of oxygen.
I honestly pity your mother for birthing you. kys already

>>17652690
Lol you're fucking stupid. Shitting on every watch that isn't a Rolex isn't friendly banter, it's just shit posting. Replying to any criticism with calling others poor isn't banter. I don't know why I even bothered coming back, there's nothing here. Bye.

sexo....?

>>17652738
Not at all, keep trying

>>17652738
Only with yourself.

>>17652521
Get a cool vintage Rolex and be forever done with watches.

>>17652860
The whole point of being into watches is wanting more watches.

>>17652860
That Rolex is ugly though.
>>17652864
That's why you shouldn't be into watches at all. Buy a Rolex, wear it all the time, and never worry about watches anymore.

My nigga Derrick flexing a full gold GMT Master.
Absolutely based.

>>17652881
Who is that fetus-faced faggot?

>>17652919
>he doesn't know Derrick
Amerilard spotted.

'ate chronographs
'ate divers
luv vintage dresswatches
T: 6 inch wristlet

>>17651356
Ok winnie, your first lunch money R*lex is just as chinky as an Omega, if not even more.
"Swiss" made, sure, but assembled by trafficked Uyghurs and Tiananmen copypasta spammers deep within the Rolex glass citadel using the finest (40% Chinese) components.
All articles and photos about their manufacturing are AI generated, there's actually not a single Swiss person in sight.

>>17652974
My barber is like that and looks dope wearing his vintage Long-jeans

>>17652974
My wrist is nearly 8 inches and I'm still not really into big rotating bezels and extraneous subdials even if I can pull them off. I like GMTs and I'm okay with the bezels on those because the bezel serves the function of the complication but I am literally always on the hunt for smaller more field watch sized GMTs with no rotating bezel. If I wasn't into watches and you told me the most popular watch category is dive watches I don't think I'd believe it. Even now I question if people actually like them or if they're just chasing the hype surrounding them from everyone else telling them what the cool watches are.

Ok boys, I'm thinking a solid gold Rolex for my next watch, between one of these five. Personally I'm leaning towards the Yacht-Master, just because I already have a Sub, Daytona is a bit big and I'm going to be inheriting a GMT (Coke).

>>17653094
Pic related.

>>17653094
The Daytona is physically smaller than the Yachtmaster, isn't it?

>>17653095
so, I don't know anything about Rolex watches, but here's mine opinion, dial is too dark on the first one,
blue color on second one looks too childish, third one is just bad,
color of bezel on 5th watch is too amberish, 4th watch is the best one, colours compliment each other

>>17653095
middle or far right

NEW THREAD WHEN?

Can I into the cool watches club with this?

>>17652974
I'm a 5 something inch wristlet and I love divers. It's a pain finding ones that are a sensible size, but the utility can't be beaten, I use the bezel pretty much every day.

One thing that's funny, I can wrap my thumb and index finger around my wrists and touch them, but I can't wrap them around my dick.

Can someone ID this thing

>>17650991
This is the correct watch. Everything else is jewelry. Jewelry that costs many times more than this and has worse timekeeping abilities.

new thread

>>17653222
>>17653222
>>17653222

>>17651323
I like it. go for it. dont worry about others

>>17653126
I'm a big fan of tacky ana digis but even I can't get behind that one.

>>17653095
I own just a pair of jap shitters but my plan is to get just one Rolex and it will be a yellow gold one.
I've been thinking this through a lot and for me, the best YG Rolex is the DayDate.