/fa/ - Fashion

>>17271675
ah, we moved already?

Where can I get a good datejust under 5k

>>17271724
a Tudor Prince Date could be a decent have for under 5k without being an overpolished shitter and fucked up bezel https://www.chrono24.com/search/index.htm?caseDiameter=36&currencyId=USD&dosearch=true&maxAgeInDays=0&pageSize=60&query=%22Tudor%20Prince%20Date%22&redirectToSearchIndex=true&resultview=block&searchexplain=1&sortorder=0

wristletbros, stay cozy

help a brother out in identifying this watch

>>17271737
presumably some nigger rapper garbage

>>17271794
no. this is expensive

What are some of the best value watches you can get?
I remember getting a Seiko 5 SNK 6 years ago for $50 and I was amazed.

>>17271794

>>17271817
meant for >>17271807

>>17271799
what do you think nigger rappers wear? cheap seikos? they’re all running around with royal oaks and nautiluses for a reason.

Is it possible to find a decent steel case digital watch under $100?
No, the Casio A1000 is not decent.

>>17271817
Gross

>>17271737
That's a De Grisogono FG One with black dial.

>>17271839
I just sold a gshock for $100

>>17271859
wow, this isn’t even a fraction as expensive as i would have imagined. these african warlords need to up their game.

>>17271732
Will do friend, you too.

>>17271878
Well, the gold one like the one in your picture is 15k, so not precisely pocket change.

I got curious about the weight.
LOL This might as well be a deadly weapon if properly swinged.

How are you today, my good friends?

>>17271894
it is by dictator standards, most of them have 6 figure watches.

>>17271900
im good

Cope if you must and you will

>>17271956
Good chart. Lots of good watches to buy with an Amex Black.

>>17271956
>casio
>consumer
>someone who pays $10 for a basic watch that lasts 10 years for everyday use
>luxury brands
>paying thousands for a watch just to show off wealth and keep in a case most of the time

That's the epitome of consumerism.

Last time I got laid I was wearing a casio. Check and mate.

>you have nice things?
>YOU'RE A HECKIN CONSUMERIST
>YOU HAVE TO LIVE IN A PIGSHIT FARM WEAR A CASIO AND VOTE FOR TRUMP LIKE ME

>>17271859
thanks bro, much respect! i knew you guys wont let me down

>>17271970
There's a reason these threads are in /fa/ and not /g/.

>>17271970
>Last time I got laid I was wearing a casio.
Did he complimented your watch? Was he a gentleman?

>>17271900
I wish i had meaty forarms Id wear the shit out of this adorably strange watch

Are these basically cyberpunk?

By "these" I mean the original Giugiaro Seikos.

>>17272037
>>17272043
what kind of absolute lack of taste does one need to have to find these appealing?

>>17272037
Why did you shave your hand or are you 10 ?

>>17272037
No
If you're looking for something like that, there are other Giugiaro designs that are more extreme. Plus, google Vianney Halter.

>>17272046
I'm 33, and I'm just not a muttoid subhuman homo erectus, is all.

>>17272045
Jesus Christ, anon.

>>17272048
>Vianney Halter
>tourbillions are cyberpunk now
Jesus, this general has really went to the toilet hasn't it?

Bye.

>>17272045
>Only plain boring design is tasteful and anything different is ugly

>>17272053
>this isn't cyberpunk
Ok, you numbnuts
>facepalm.jpg

>>17272062
>tourbillons are cyberpunk
I bet you also believe LCD is steampunk.

>>17272055
i look like this and say this

>>17272062
>triple axis tourbillon
pretty nice, reminds me of the titular time machine in the movie, but it is steampunk. Some even look straight of Bioshock with steampunk/art deco lines

>>17272062
cyberpunk is a faggot aesthetic for trannies.

>>17272083
u r not cyberpunk

>>17271828
>>>/pol/

What would a tech-noir piece be?

>>17271900
Jesus
How is your arm not deattached by now?

I am unironic sissy and i really want a pink rolex

>>17271956
>oceanus not ultra luxury
>grand seiko not high end luxury
horrible chart

>>17272093
Fuck I remember when they came out with this shit.

>>17271839
>Is it possible to find a decent steel case digital watch under $100?
yes
>No, the Casio A1000 is not decent.
Then no.

>>17271891
Hamilton looks like that?

>>17272086
yes, i am not a tranny faggot

>>17272043
I'd wear the second one.

>don't tall to me or my son ever again
Now I just need the 42mm one

Should I buy a citizen chronomaster for myself for Christmas? Kind of want a grand Seiko just to flex but I like ecodrive too much.

>>17272138
Go try them on in person and see which one works better

Is ORIENT a meme brand?

>>17272162
good budget brand

Is there a better choice for a cheap digital?
I wish the display wasn't that busy.

>>17272167
Armitron Rubik

>he's buying expensive watches when the global recession is gonna happen and democrats win midterms
LOL you fucking IDIOTS Ahahahahaha

>>17272187
>rural trumptards insisting we'll dive into a depression in TWO MORE WEEKS
every time poorcel rightoids.. every time

>>17272172
You got me really interested until I saw the worse than f91w tier light.
Stills interesting though, thanks for the suggestion.

>>17272110
Your copebrands are trash, poorfag.

Casio tards are more annoying than Rolex purists desu.

>>17272187
Imagine being so poor that you care about recession.

>>17272196
You'll be selling your Rolex to us hardworking folk for pennies on the dollar when everything goes to HELL!

>>17272121
Apparently so.

>poorfag poltards have entered the chat

>>17272172
>>17272190
If you can get past the branding, Adidas released a full steel digital (made by Timex) which is imo the best option out there.

anyone have experiences with these cheap chink watches that are on sale rn for pennies?
the gold + black looks really nice.

>>17272233
Even from this noisy-ass photo they look like absolute dogshit.

Don't be fucking poor, or at least panhandle and F-91's worth of change.

>>17272199
So glad I put all my money into index funds this year like you guys suggested. I'm only down 20%, imagine if I bought a Rolex with that cash, what a waste!

>>17272246
>he invests at all
>he has a credit score
>he has a fucking mortgage
LOSER. Don't you fucking learn anything from this site.. IOJF EWOIUWEFJ CANWSFIUOU JFREAENIJJNKFZDs n

>>17272233
Those cases look 'chrome'-plated plastic.

>>17272276
Hollow, thin plastic. The watch weights 50 grams.

>>17272276
>>17272278
damn that sucks

Pagani Design Oysterdate with NH35 or Daytona with VK63, how much of a fucking loser would that make me?

>>17272306
better than an iwatch

>>17272101
probably some modded f91-w like N-O-D-E's datarunner

>>17272162
Orient is just the better Seiko

>>17272167
I'm a W800h kind of femboy

>>17272306
Oysterdate ugly af in big proportions, the fluted bezel is too damn big

But the Daytona w/ the VK actually has satisfying pushers for a quartz piece, very comparable to a column wheel chrono

>>17272136
Im sad I missed out on buying the tough brand new (right)

>>17272253
Do you have a stroke?

>>17272382
Trump would be ashamed of you.

>>17272037
>>17272043
>no H556-5050

>>17272187
>>17272188
>>17272192
Go back to /pol

>>17272158
But buy direct from Japan while the yen is still in the shitter

Someone talk me out of it $1.6k

>>17272434
why

>>17272162
Orient is a great value brand, I have $150 watches from them that are higher quality than $500+ watches from some other brands.

>>17272434
Better than any Seiko/Grand S O Y K O

>>17271675
Disgusting that they changed the date location on these to the forbidden zone

>>17272491
Everything in that pic is disgusting.

Chingchangcasio

If your wondering how to get a speckled finish on your cheap Casio you just spray it with high strength deet bug spray

imagine trying to ban someone for posting a cock in a fashion thread

Ultimate cope brand or the Rolex successor?

>>17272434
I’d get one but idk where to buy Hamiltons in EU

>>17271900
MORTADELLO RITARDELLO
MANGIATORE DI FAGGIOLAAAAAA

>>17272602
Neither. It's a nostalgia bait brand for boomers and a vintage hipster brand for youngins

>>17272602
they're nice watches.
some
people just want a watch and don't have any agenda beyond that

>>17272613
>FRENCH
>POOR
>NO AMEX BLACK

>>17272602
Why not just get a Tissot, maybe an Oris

>>17272602
Tudor's relationship to Rolex is like Seiko to Grand Seiko since they're sister companies, except Tudor is way closer to Rolex in quality than Seiko is to Grand Seiko. That's my understanding

looks kinda stinky...

>>17272648
Don't say things like that about your mom.

>>17272648
smells like a used diaper

>>17272630
The Visodate is probably Tissot's best watch, which watch do you think is Oris's best?

>>17272677
aquis and propilot are tied, the finishing on aquis is insane though

>>17272434
It's a good looking watch, and 7753 movement is decent. For me though a four-figure field watch (and the green/tan color scheme automatically puts it into the field category for me) seems a bit excessive, mainly because I end up beating to hell any and all field watches I own. But that's me, and may not be you.

>>17272707
>>17272606
>>17272490
>>17272452

I ordered it. The green/eggshell scheme is sexo to me. Will post when it comes in

>>17272763
Congrats anon; looking forward to the pics and hope that you enjoy it.

which one is more slavcore?

>>17272796
right when not paired with an addidas tracksuit. Left when paired with an addidas tracksuit.

>>17272796
I would go for the Casio, that fake gold color its just perfect

>>17272796
Models from Belarus, Russia and USSR.

Ugh can't pick which Seiko diver. Left or right bros.

the Excalibur has arrived.

>>17271675
A wathc similar to Diesel Mr. daddy 2.0?

>>17272882
that looks gay as fuck

>>17272872
right looks better.

it doesnt have the date window in no-mans-land and the straight lines of the whole watch are sharp and tool-watchy.

>>17272883
sure, insecure manlet.

>>17272043
Top lefts gives me a strong System Shock feel.

>>17272193

>>17272872
i'm all about the slim turtle. I even love the round date window. 62mas looks fine too, I just like left better.

>>17272882
there are many watches that subscribe to the maximalist(more is more) design mindset

i would take a look at gshock, they have many models like that, at differing pricepoints, from a few hundred to a few thousand $.

diesel is not a real watchmaker, but casio is.

>>17272823
How accurate are Russian/Soviet watches anyway? People always shit on Soviet quality so I wonder why watches get a different view.

>>17272901
>How accurate are Russian/Soviet watches anyway
luck of the draw/ adequate enough
soviet/russian watches mainly use calibers that are more than half a century old and are virtually unchanged.
vast majority of their watches dont even have quickset date (including modern vostoks)
there are also some russian brands who in recent times opted to use chinese calibers from seagull.

>People always shit on Soviet quality so I wonder why watches get a different view.
because the people who would buy soviet/russian watches are mostly doing it for the novelty. Accuracy is not a pressing concern, its about having something culturally different. Their relatively simpler movements and no frills purity is part of their charm.

You can always open the caseback and regulate the watch yourself. My old vostok keeps very good time.

>>17272909
What about their quartz? I have to wonder if they somehow managed to mess that up and end up with some inaccurate quartz watches.

>>17272912
I'm not sure desu. I dont own one and vintage soviet quartz is very old. Im not even sure about the batteries needed, you'll have to look it up. Modern offerings should be accurate though.

>>17272918
Got a list of some current watch models or brands? Most of what I find is all vintage stuff and nothing new except for Vostok.

>>17272882
there are none, it's the most unique watch to come out in the last 20 years, truly haute whorology

>>17272922
check out poljot24. de for modern soviet/eastern offerings and Luch (their one hander watches are very kino). Solid little charmer, I bought one as a gift. It ships direct from belarus in a truly horribly dingy soviet tier packaging. Raketa also has modern watches at modern prices but tbqh I'd rather have a vintage piece from them.

>>17271900
Doin' just fine.

>>17272872
Right every time.

left or right?

>>17272941
Left has a much better backlight.

Some madlad actually counted them all.

>>17272947
that isnt even the worst one.
>anxiety inducing
filtered by citizen chad-ness

>>17272949
>that isnt even the worst one.
I know.
Post cluttered dials.

>>17272922
technochas
electronika
intergral

What do you think? I'm probably going to get this next week if I don't find anything better looking in a similar style.

>>17272990
so boomer, so 90s, so fat.

>>17272958
Imagine crashing your brain trying to interpret that memetic kill agent of a dial.

>>17272990
this dial is nearly as ugly as >>17272958, in fact it might be even worse due to the pattern.

>>17272998
What do you think is ugly about it, what are you talking about? It's perfectly symmetrical for one. It doesn't have bullshit industrial stripes like a child's toy anywhere. It doesn't have a date window in a random spot with nothing around it. And so on. How are they comparable?

>>17273001
i am impressed that one can give off the impression of having such an eye for detail while simultaneously having no taste whatsoever.

>>17273004
Yeah hurr durr to you too, now answer.

>>17273005
no no, taste isn't something that can be taught. sorry for your loss.

>>17273001
i think its just too bulky and clumsy looking and not in a good way.

that said, buy what you like

watches are for you, the owner to enjoy.

>spent 30 min trying to figure out how to fix my f91w
>can't be properly sealed because one hole of the screws got loose
>even tried to put the module on a fake casio case
>buttons have to be pressed really hard to work

With the time I have wasted doing this I could have bought a better watch.

Thoughts?

>>17273019
looks like it desperately wants to be a grand seiko

>>17273019
I think it looks pretty good, with the exception of the date window.

>>17273023
its very rare to find a japanese watch without a date window.
they value the salaryman lifestyle and cannot fathom why anyone would not want to know what date it is.

>>17273019

>>17273019
Pretty cool dial, the lugs are nice too.

Why do JDM models have dials in English?

>>17273017
It's a $15 watch, why not just replace it instead?

>>17273044
Maybe I'm not as intelligent as I once thought.
But yeah, this shit is breaking my balls and it's not worth the time.
I've had it for 7 years so I guess it has already earned retirement.

do you personally consider owning watches a hobby?

i have a rotation of 5 watches and i don't. I just think its consumerism

>>17273065
I basically treat my F91W as disposable, when the battery dies or the strap breaks, it gets replaced.

>>17273071
owning them is not a hobby and no faggot can prove otherwise, but being interested in them, knowing how they work, how they're different, reading about them etc etc can be considered a hobby, and is
watches as a hobby has nothing to do with owning watches

>>17272648
idk why but this watch screams Scarface to me. to me it looks like something hed buy after he made it to the top

>>17273071
it's not a hobby unless you are actually fixing watches. Otherwise its merely an "interest".

>>17273077
>>17273123
thanks for the morning comedy fellas

>>17273071
Why are you people trying to complicate and apply reason to buying, owning and appreciating watches?
We like watches.
Simple as.

>>17273071
Pure consumerism that borders into autism.
On par with people that collect mechanical keyboards or knives they never use.

>>17273134
yeah, collecting knives or keyboards is not a hobby either
>is wearing clothes a hobby
no
>is tailoring, sewing, knitting a hobby
yes

simple as

>>17273008
>i think its just too bulky and clumsy looking and not in a good way.

>if I don't find anything better looking in a similar style.

Well, any suggestions?

>>17273071
Is owning watches the dictionary definition of a hobby? Yes. Do I consider it a hobby? Yes.

/wt/ fears the dictionary

>>17273169
Rolex Explorer 1

>>17273027
>>17273019

the dial texture looks like a jawbreaker.

a blue raspberry jawbreaker.

>>17273191
why recommend a watch with class to someone who obviously has none?

>>17273024
I personally like OP, Explorer 1, No Date Sub, and classic field watch designs without a date window.

but maybe the date would better incorporared as a hand like JLC or Longines does it. Perhaps, then, it would be mechanically less fragile.

>>17273197
>class
its a fucking tool watch. Stop attributing class to things that werent meant to have them. Its like saying a pair of work boots is classy.

>>17273203
a pair of work boots can absolutely have class, and the explorer, tool watch or not, absolutely has it, especially the older 1016s with the softer fonts.

>>17273197
https://youtu.be/QuwBhHDPyws

as a tease.

He could double down on his sour grapes and avoid ALL simple watches more, or tie up the waitlist at his local AD driving up that sweet sweet artificial scarcity. And as a show to any bystanders that read this here or in the archives what the archetype for "sensible" watch is.

>>17273203
>boots
Bates Lites have class.

1st class CFT and Expert (1st class) on the rifle range.

>>17273203
also, Sir Edmund Hillary probably outranks you in social class by leagues and fathoms, Mister High-Society-Gatekeeper.

What watch in Putin wearing here

>>17273233
looks like that jewish candle holder

>>17273239
Surely someone here can ID the logo or the buckle?

>>17273216
>boot-licking people who are long dead
stop being so cringey, please.

>>17273204
>>17273197
so?

a proper dress watch like the orient bambino has more class than a tool watch like the explorer 1, just like a suit has more class than a pair of cargo shorts.

Sized down my bracelet for the colder weather and it fits just perfect. Feels so good.

Was able to pick up this Seiko 5 Automatic GMT new for 40% off MSRP

how did I do?

>>17273380
Its a cool little shitter

>>17272602
It’s a cope brand but they still make better watches than almost everyone else in their price range and lower. There’s a lot to like about Tudor these days.

>>17273345
>proper dress watch
>fake gold
>seconds hand
>date
>automatic
>”water resistant” on dial
kek. Who are you trying to fool?

>>17273380
40% off is the minimum required off the price so you did OK if you like the watch
got my presage at 50% and I love it, wouldn't have at the full price though

>>17273233
He wears Blancpain

>>17273469

>>17273490
Poorfag, your
>proper
dress watch is about as proper as wearing a tuxedo to Olive Garden. Stop pretending, we can all see that you are an ignorant, tasteless poorfag. Nice shoes. Allen Edmonds factory seconds?

>>17273494
>>17273469
ease your butthurt by shoving that explorer up your butthole, kek

>seconds hand
>date
>automatic

this classic $40,000 dress watch from PATEK has all of those things.

>>17272823
how do I even find those on eBay?
I'd love to get one.

Only had my first mechanical watch for 2 days and I'm struggling to not buy another one. Help me bros. I'm eyeing the srpe61 (dress kx)

>>17273539
just come back in a month

>>17273506
>my orient is the same as Calatrava!!! LOOK!
Lmao. This post reeks of desperation.

>>17273539
>snk
>in 2022
how much did you pay for it
>I'm struggling to not buy another one.
honestly i would wait for a bit, especially since they are both seiko 5s

its not a race or a competition

>>17273345
no, that mallshitter does not have more class than an explorer one. also nice whataboutism faggot.

>>17273543
>>17273548
cope

you're just nitpicking on the orient because it happened to be affordable when HAUTE HOROLOGIE watches like pic related break those rules all the time as well. Your classless money worshipping is exposed.

>>17273548
>an explorer one
GOOOOOOOOD MORNING, SIR

>>17273539
For me it's the opposite, bought it years ago and I have no desire for another one.
Using it with a leather strap now.

>>17273553
you wouldn’t know what makes or breaks a watch design if you tried, given you apparently think all a dress watch needs to be good is to look gold and have minimal complications. and again, whataboutism.
>>17273554
pills.

Is there a watch more understated than this?

>>17273558
so the VC is as tacky as the orient?

you can't pick one over the other.
they have the same design elements.

>The Vacheron Constantin Patrimony is an understated expression of sophistication. Inspired by the brand’s watches from the 1950s, this collection of dress watches is characterized by simple round cases, thin profiles, and restrained dial design.

a money WHORE might even call something like pic related 'classy' while snobbing on a simple bambino.

>>17273564
VC make beautiful dress watches. it's not about the elements, it's about the execution, and even with that the orient and the VC do not have similar details, just a similar basic outward appearance. then again i'm not surprised you have no concept of subtlety given all it took for you to snub on the idea of the explorer having any sort of class was for it to be considered by lolex to be a "tool watch".

>>17273513
The new one you can try to buy from technochas.ru
Used - search electronika on ebay.

>>17273566
this comment reeks of preteniousness

"class" is not defined by cost, or even execution.
its about how you conduct yourself.

>>17273553
That’s not a proper dress watch either. You’re the one who used the word proper, poorfag.

>>17273553
>look at how “classy” my gold toned mallshitter is
Ohohoho…heheheeh….AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>>17273568
yes, and the bambino conducts itself poorly based on how it handles design elements. even a modern explorer conducts itself better than the bambino just based on how the dial handles symmetry and the spacing of elements; i would sooner use it as a dress watch than the bambino just because of that. again, any and all subtlety or nuance is apparently beyond you.

>>17273567
Thanks anon.
I might get one if I decipher that website.

>>17273572
>treating a tool watch like some priceless art just because of its branding
stop being so cringey, please. I'm getting second-hand embarrassment.

>even a modern explorer conducts itself better than the bambino just based on how the dial handles symmetry and the spacing of elements
ahahAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAAAAA

Why are you poorfags arguing about watches you could never afford?
YOU ARE BOTH DIRT.

>>17273576
buddy, that's an explorer ii. you're embarrassing yourself now. i don't even like rawlecks, i think divers are gay and tacky but the explorer i is rightfully considered a classic sports watch that goes beyond being a simple tool watch in design.

>>17273544
I got it for $90 new on ebay, seemed like a good deal, I know they used to be $50 but even at $90 I didn't see any other field watches around close to that price I was interested in.
>>17273557
Nice. I picked up a leather nato for mine and it looks awesome, but I've been wearing it with this green canvas one so far, less delicate, less flashy, better for work.

>>17273583
>EXPLORER
>SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER
>OFFICALLY CERTIFIEDDDDD

>can't make up its mind whether to have numbers or indices for the hour markers
>a random arrow, just because
>wall of text on the top as well, why not!
>a hour hand shaped like a circumcised penis

>classy

AHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAAAA

>>17273590
you can easily paint any single design element on any single watch as being tacky or poor with that tone of voice. you already lost when you made it clear you had no idea that the explorer i and ii were completely different watches, so why bother?

>>17273591
>n-no, i meant the explorer 1 and not the explorer 2!!!11

OFFICALLY CERTIFIEDDDDDDDD LMAO

>>17273592
why do you think i said
>explorer one
over here >>17273548
did you actually think this post through when you made it?

>>17273592
Can you please stop typing like a 4chan bot

>>17273590
How are you so fucking stupid? LOL

>>17273594
>>17273595
wearing a rolex is like wearing a shirt that says

100% COTTON
MADE IN THE USA
MACHINE WASHABLE

in big bold letters at the front
a rolex will never
ever
be classy

you just demonstrated you fell for marketing

>>17273602
oh, so you didn't. got it thanks. have a nice day, machine learning AI.

>>17273605
>i lost the argument so now i have to quit while trying to save face

OFFICIALLY
CERTIFIED
LMAO

>>17273602
Sure, but don't cope with your mall tier bambino

>>17273608
you don't know the difference between explorer i and ii lol, there never was any argument.

>>17273612
both the explorer 1 and 2 are equally tacky, don't kid yourself
they are just tool watches, not the mona lisa
>>17273611
>sure
thank you for conceding

>>17273617
so how bored do you have to be on a friday afternoon to be posting such lame bait on a niche 4chan general?

>>17273617
The biggest cope is that you think this looks "classy" when it looks like that

>>17273623
unlike the explorer, this thing actually sticks to making all indices roman numerals.

it also has 50% less text
it has zero cut numerals nor a cyclops
it also has simple hands that aren't tryhard

>>17273624
are you avoiding my innocent and easy to answer question >>17273621?

Used to hate the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger but they've grown on me fast. Once you see them in person it all changes.

>>17272037
Is that Ripley's?

>>17273638
I used to hate the Orient Bambino as well but having seen one in real life I like them now too

>>17273644
It's a nice watch anon. That's all that matters.

what watch would fit and look nice on my thin wrist?

>>17273669
richard mille

>>17273669
invicta

>>17271900
Pretty good, lawyer. Happy friday.

>>17273669
Daydate

>>17273679
>posts a datejust

>>17273684
he tried

>>17273638

>>17273697
noice

>>17273572
If the Explorer is symmetric in any way to you, you are mentally ill.

>>17273643
It's a "Bishop".

>>17273701
that’s definitely a new one, how long did it take you to come up with this?

>>17273705
10 seconds, I've just read this pathetic thread.

>>17273707
lol if you say so buddy

Just ordered some popeyes

>>17273684
wew, didn't even notice
in my defense at least it's a yellow gold Rolex

>>17273738
this nigga wishes it was a nautilus so bad

The rage Rolex invokes is worth the price tag alone

Does anybody else use this kind of spoked gears?

>>17273669
>nice on my thin wrist
snk355
snk357
snk361
snk363
snk365
snk366
snk368
snk377
snk379
snk381

snxs73
snxs75
snxs77
snxs79
snxs80
snxs81

Orient Bambino 36mm
Tissot PRX 35mm
Timex Marlin

>>17273762
well that's one way of spitting on someone digitally

>>17273755
youre going to need to be a lot more specific here m8

>>17273769
fuck off!

>>17273777
i don't know dude, it's kinda rude to presume that people are that poor and have that little taste.

>>17273780
fuck off!

>>17273783
maybe you should be the one fucking off for disrepecting people that much online. how about that?

>>17273780
>i don't know dude, it's kinda rude to presume that people are that poor and have that little taste.

>>17273804
i don't care about this fat man???

>>17273476
I know that but that's not the only watch he wars, this is something new, there are no Blancpains with that kind of round buckles and the logo is different

>>17273807
You should, because you definitely sound like him.

>>17273811
i don't care???

>>17273812
You sure give a lot of (You)s for someone who does not care.

>>17273821
i don’t care???

Love my dress watch gshock. It's almost as classy as a Rolex Explorer I superlative chronometer.

>>17273834
lol he’s still trying to bait with this hours after people stopped caring

>>17273835
No one ever cared, retard.

>>17273837
lmao

>>17273750
>The price tag

>>17273762
what about snk309? would it fit?

>>17273785
fuck off!

>>17273849
Yes. But field watches are for idiots.

>>17273857
you kiss your mother with that mouth?

>>17273775
See those three at the top level?

>>17273864
fuck off!

>>17273867
spammer AND rude.

>>17273869
fuck off!

>>17273865
Ah, so youre more interested in the curvature in the gears?

I am really not sure. I think it is a nice touch, although if my poor gear theory doesnt remember if it creates an advantage or not. Apart from the less weight obviously that is. If I were to guess, it allows for a greater application of torque to be applied to the shaft.

>>17273865
>>17273877
http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk
Heres a good resource if you want to sift through movements lol.

But if I had my guess why they pulled away from curved spoke gears is due to manufacturability as it would increase the complexity of finishing the gear

do you guys lather your watches in soap when you wash your hands

>>17273865
I see. To my knowledge, AL&S, Parmigiani, Romain Gauthier and Peter Speake-Marin have some movements that use thay kind of gears.

>>17273862
why?

the basement dwellers itt buying diver and pilot watches

>>17273908
As opposed to what? They can't afford swiss high-end watches.

Going on a cruise next week on Royal Caribbean. Apparently they will have a Rolex watch showcase. Wonder what they will have.

>>17273931
ask if you can test the dive watches by throwing them overboard

>>17273906
Because army is for idiots.

>>17273931
if its pre-owned, expect prices higher than what you will find on chrono 24 and places like TRF. will be cool to try on pieces if you've never seen them irl, but to buy they will most likely be a rip off.

>>17273931
Only retards think they are getting a good deal buying jewelry on a cruise ship. When the fucking thing breaks good luck with your 3rd party warranty

>>17273931
Get yourself a list of what the current used and new prices for various Rolices are and bring it with you. If something tickles you in the right way and is decently priced, why not buy one?

>>17273931
Oh shit they have an Invicta for 75% off holy fuck

>>17273931
>>17273962
Who the fuck goes on cruises
You are the dumbest retarded useless breather if you go on a cruise as your vacation

>>17273962
jfc this is a once in a lifetime opportunity, jump on it anon

>>17273931
>Going on a cruise
Good luck surviving the infestation.
:)))))))))

>>17273978
covidiot spotted

>wearing Hamilton Khaki King
>replace ghetto strap with hadley roma strap
So this strap is awkward on my wrist. Currently the watch slides up and down and sometimes sits on the bottom of wrist. Its like the perfect hole would be one in between the two I have available on strap. Whats a good tool to use and method to add a hole so the strap, and watch, fit perfectly on my wrist.

>>17272101
das it mane

>>17274036
>>17274036
>>17274036

>>17272677
This is my next purchase. I love it for the price.

>>17272990
I love it. I have the aerospace and I prefer the one you posted. Good price?

Is a gently used submariner for 3000 worth picking up? He’s got all the paperwork but I’m going to have it checked out anyways.

>>17273962
So it's selling for its true MSRP then? Cool.

>>17273679
that's a ladies Datejust--it IS a president bracelet tho

>>17273994
not even joking, swap the straps and try them reversed/upside down