/fa/ - Fashion

I'm thinking of getting the Grand Seiko SBGP003 quartz watch with the 44GS case design. Thoughts? Pic rel

>>17223592
>Seiko 5 but with Grand Seiko written on it
pathetic

Cope if you must and you will.

>>17223592
>>17223594
This. Grand Seiko is a fool's trap.

I paid 500 bux for a fake rolex because Rolex wouldn't sell me a real one.

>>17223598
Anyone impressed by a Rolex would get fooled by a fake so its not a bad value.

>>17223592
Looks pretty nice

>>17223592
the 44GS case is really nice in person, i haven’t seen a rollie with equivalent levels of finish.

Titanium

I’m right handed. The difference between my two wrists in size is 0.78 inches (2cm). I figured that downsizing the bracelet for the left wrist leaves some wiggle room that I don’t particularly like. Whereas on my right hand it has a perfect fit. Shouldn’t I just wear my watch on my right and become a leftie or am I overthinking something no one will even notice? I mean, even left handed people wear their watches on their left hand so is it a meme to not wear it on your dominant hand to prevent bumps?

>>17223613
If you can't afford to just wildly swing around the watch on your dominant hand and smash it into things you probably shouldn't own it.

>>17223613

>>17223622
Actually and I’m not joking, when I was about 18 I broke up with my ex girlfriend and for a period of time I began to jerk off with my left hand because it reminded me of how awful and janky her handjobs were. And I just kept going and when I do it I just use my left, and I got so good at it that the right one feels janky now. No shame in that.

>>17223627
Watches?

>>17223592
do it, love me GS

>>17223641
>>17223592
Just get that SARX from a few years ago, it's identical.

>>17223641
I've been happy with just a Seiko 5. With the right band, it looks pretty damn good.

>>17223655
nice watch

>>17223645
Looks pretty budget

>>17223667
It's literally the same shit except the lug shape.

mooooom, the poors in /wt/ are coping again…

>>17223669
Delusional cope

>>17223671
Yes, it is deluded cope to think it looks budget. Thank you for agreeing.

>>17223672
Post yours

39mm is for women

>>17223691
maxed out. looks like dad’s watch.

>>17223588
hey guys im having an issue with my Casio AE1200 module 3299.

i cant fucking set the time or date etc.

when i follow any tutorial they tell me to hold down the adjust button until the seconds flash.
that doesnt happen with my watch it just doesnt flash

>>17223691
>wristlet

Whch one of these is the best? Looking for something for everyday use.
Price: 1300€ vs 1000€ vs 1100 €.

>>17223718
If it weren't for the damn lugs, I'd say the homos. The black would be my second, but idk about the L2L on that one either

>>17223718
nomos is such a soi looking brand holy shit

>>17223718
Middle all day
I don't like the chapter ring on the left and if you are going to get a club you need to pay up for the auto.

>>17223718
Just get the new tudor ranger

>>17223737
Too expensive for me.

>>17223718
left is coolest looking

>>17223718
Lug to lug:
Black Mühle: 42.3mm
Blue Mühle: 47.5mm
Nomos: 47.5mm

>>17223722
Lug to lug:
Black Mühle: 42.3mm
Blue Mühle: 47.5mm
Nomos: 47.5mm

>>17223697
Yeah...
Just download the user manual from the Casio website.

My custom leather strap from Vietnamese etsy girl arrived! 5 days earlier than expected, pretty cool and fits perfectly (it got wet from washing my hands, that's the stain)

>>17223759
The brown is much more colorful irl and the dial is blue irl just for reference, the camera isn't really picking that up. The leather is very soft, feels very well finished, no loose ends, very precise and nice stitching, it feels very high quality and natural, I'm impressed actually. But the girl also has videos of how she makes the straps and it looked pretty legit

>>17223748
Huh. 47 is pretty reasonable
>>17223760
Brown strap gang

>>17223759
why is it the wrong way around

>>17223718
All manual wind so all shit.

>>17223772
You're right that's better, didn't even think about it
>>17223771
o/

>>17223759
>>17223760
>>17223776
I was looking at the BB36 in black for the longest, but the lack of AR kind of dissuaded me. How long have you had it and what is your opinion on the ref?

>>17223776
I always have to think of the phrase "buckle up" to remember where each strap goes.

>>17223691
You definitely should get the 39. That looks comically oversized on you.

>>17223785
I've had it for a little more than a year now and I really enjoy it. In some aspects it really feels like a complete luxury watch, on other days it's just a nice reliable tool. It has its quirks but i like it, for some reason i love the lack of AR coating. I don't know what it is, i own other watches with sapphire crystal and double ar coating and I actually miss the reflection on those. For instance this pic, maybe it's my ADHD but I find myself playing with the reflections and the light multiple times a day, the finishing of the indices looks even better when the light is reflected in different ways. It also gives the dial a certain variety because the color changes under different lights. It looks so different outside to inside for example. But that's my opinion of the blue dial, not sure how the black dial is in comparison.

>>17223815
>>17223785
This is what I mean by reflections and also in my second pic of the new strap

>>17223785
Okay last pic to show how different the color of the dial can look on a sunny summer day for instance

>>17223691
Imagine having faux patina on a tool watch.

>>17223691
>Rotor Self-Winding

>>17223787
Thanks, that's a good one

>>17223834
Explain?

>>17223773
No? The Mühle ones are both automatic.

>>17223599
Some of the Rolex fakes are amazingly good too. I spend some spare time trying to tell them apart and some are so hard I would need a loupe or the case back removed to know and I have autism about trying to figure them out.

If you’re wearing a Rolex to roflex it’s a valid choice.

>>17223592
Is that the one with the 9F quartz movement? Try to hunt for an SBQL with an 8F HAQ instead, it's the same thing for 1/10th of the price.

what a shitty thread you guys are having today

seikos and tudors suck sweaty balls

read you next week

>it’s the same thing but cheaper bro trust me
lol every time

>>17223839
>Explain?
Tudor was made for working-class people and Rolex understood that Tudor buyers use small words, so terms like "Automatic" or "Perpetual" would needlessly frustrate and confuse Tudor buyers.
>Spinny thing wind watch good

>>17223718
Nomos best.

>>17223892
Nomos is for homos man, don't buy that trash.

Silver dial PRX, sneed it or chuck it?

>>17223918
sneed it then chuck it

>>17223816
Cute reflections. I would have liked it better in black but I don't dislike the hands as much as I usually do on their other watches. I think since the watch is simpler the hands compliment it better. Thanks for sharing.

which one should i pick for a dress watch?

the black dial look nice but i think it would clash with a white shirt

>>17223939
Traditional dress watches would have a white dial and the black dial looks more modern. It depends on if you're going for a classic or modern look.

Let's say hypothetically Rolex starts selling quartz versions of all their watches. Your local AD calls you and says he can offer you a quartz or automatic version of your dream rolex, but only one. The quartz will obviously be cheaper but they will look the same. Which one would you buy?

>>17223939
ref no. please?

>>17223954
does their quartz sweep?

>>17223954
If by "quartz" you mean "solar quartz", quartz
If it's old-fashioned, battery-powered quartz, automatic

>>17223939
>black
For evenings

>white
for the day time

>>17223939
>>17223957
They look ultra cheap in real life

>>17223960
What would your answer be if it was a sweeping hand and if it wasn't?

>>17223818

>>17223976
if it was a sweeping hand then yes, since it would actually look the same or smoother, probably be comfier since it's lighter, more accurate, and way less maintenance over time. it would literally be a better watch for less money.
if it's not a sweeping hand then it would just be annoying to look at, and paying thousands of dollars to be annoyed isn't good desu

Can the explorer really take a beating as described in the ads? I’m keen on getting one for daily use

>>17223984
So the only advantage automatic watches have over quartz is the sweeping hand?

>>17223990
Rolex are infamous for being remarkably nimble. Trying to wear one daily will result on servicing it every six months. They are dressy, once-in-a-while type of watches, that's why they use a lot of precious metals, even in the "sporty" models

>>17224002
Yep, that's correct. Rolex even goes as far to use their own steel alloy, which is a little nicer looking but much les scratch resistant.

>>17224000
Yes, they are for flexing and show and if you are a gear autist. Only get one of a high price so servicing it isn't a full retard move. If you just want watches to wear buy some quartz.

>>17223957
Poljot DE luxe

>>17223990
Unless you want to polish the cage twice a year, I can't recomend you wear a Rolex everyday. They are supposed to be entry-level luxury watches, rich people have a bunch of them so they can rotate them.

>>17224011
>Only get one of a high price so servicing it isn't a full retard move.
What do yu consider a high price? Would you say a 1000$ mechanical watch is already good? 5000$?

>>17224000
from my point of view yes. quartz is superior in every other way. only other advantage automatic has is that you don't have to replace any battery, but that's negated by the servicing required throughout the years. if there was a solar sweeping quartz, it would literally mog every automatic in every way possible for a fraction of the price

>>17224019
Yeah i would say minimum 600 dollars and even then unless its a common movement it will be a pain to repair compared to just buying another copy of the watch. If your aim is to keep the mechanical as a piece for your whole life, use it, and/or sell it forward at least aim for 800+. Now that's not to say every mechanical watch is a porcelain vase you will shake into non function by wearing but you will eat a service charge if you wear the watch frequently.

Whole lotta fud going on

>>17224021
Well why isn't there?

New Louis Errad. What do you guys think? I like Louis Errad but it's a little too smart watch like for me.

>>17224032
idk anon i'm not a watch company lol
i know making a quartz sweep is much less energy efficient since it needs to tick a ton more, so my guess is that solar simply isn't good enough yet to keep up with the increased drain.

>>17224032
Not him, but the reason is there would be no demand. People who appreciate solar quartz are practical and don't give a shit about a sweeping second hand. Actually they don't give a shit about a second hand at all, as casio, who started getting rid of them, perfectly understood.

>>17224037
more like louis retard lmfao

>>17223974
They are cheap watches, but I love mine

>>17224000
>>17224011
Sweeping hand look nice, but much of its desirability comes from being the immediate tell-tale sign that you are wearing an automatic, which is perceived as a higher quality product. I assure you no one will care anymore about the sweep if tomorrow it becomes standard in quartz watches.
The only reason to prefer an automatic to a quartz variant of the same watch is that you appreciate the old school way of solving problems with ingenious mechanism.

Let me guess: you need more?

>>17224045
c'mon man

the poors are coping again

>>17223201
Same, once I saw that ad I lost all interest

watch dyke is my new favorite watchtuber!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmSvOGA9dpI

>>17223156
What's wrong with it exactly? You can't play piano I assume?

>>17224059
>no forearm hair
No thanks.

>>17224059
is this keffals

>>17224064
she has a wife so no arm hair needed
>>17224065
who?

>>17224059
>women
no thanks

>>17223954
>quartz will obviously be cheaper
I thought oysterquartz was a premium and sold for a higher price.

>>17224067
>who?
look “her” up, you’ll understand in due time :^)

>>17224052
>but much of its desirability comes from being the immediate tell-tale sign that you are wearing an automatic, which is perceived as a higher quality product.
i mean, maybe for fags trying to show off their watch like jewelery. personally i just prefer the way it smoothly goes around the dial. there's nothing worse than looking at your wrist and seeing the second hand hitting in between the marks.
>appreciate the old school way of solving problems with ingenious mechanism.
that's nice and all but at the end of the day, if muh craftsmanship doesn't make my watch any better than a quartz then it isn't worth it

>>17223990
Nah, you are not supposed to use them daily. You wear them a couple of times until their movement shit the bed and you throw them away. Like Timex but for middle class Erics.

>>17224067
A tranny who is campaigning against Kiwifarms (a forum for insane losers to cyberstalk and autistically document the real life trolling of people).

>>17224075
I kinda enjoy watching the pointer hitting the indices precisely while wearing my quartz, and the accuracy it provides.

>>17224024
I once read that you'll pay in the first 5 years after buying a mechanical watch it's full price for the service on top.

>>17224075
It's difficult to be completely utilitarian about watches today, as they have never been more useless than now. They are in fact, jewelry. To the point that even cheap ones like casios are mostly seen as lifestyle choices, rugged activewear gshock and nerdy fw91 alike.

>>17224094
It depends on the watch and manufacturer but a reason to not bother with cheaper mechanicals is servicing it will cost 2-3x the cost of the watch on the first service not to mention life time so you might as well get something decent if you want one. It's like a boat, you can buy a cheap beater boat from the marina and then eat thousands in upkeep costs for your shit free boat or just get a decent boat and have those same costs but a better boat.

>>17224088
Jumping seconds was one of the most complex movements and highly sought after until quartz democratized it.

>>17224101
You could get a habring2 for not much monies if you want one

>>17224101
The ticking elapsed minute hands on chronograph still is.

>>17224107
Is this something quartz can't do?

>>17224097
Makes me reconsider my first purchase, I'm not sure anymore if i should buy one for my ~1400€ budget or if it will be just a moneysink.

Should I return this? I just noticed a small hair next to the 1 in the date window. Seiko SRP143

>>17224113
Same, I'm appreciating the logic of this general a bit more now. Might as well either go Rolex or Casio, everything in the middle is a waste

The B in the center of that left and right wing
The only time you'll ever see me next to Breitling (Skrrt)

https://genius.com/25524252

>Pusha boasts that he wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a Breitling watch, which cost an average of 1-10K – a very nice watch to most people.

>However, Breitling makes the interior clocks for Bentley, so Pusha does inadvertently own a few Breitlings.

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>17224117
Yes

>>17224113
It's not that much
The casiofag is afoot
Lies, false equivalence, bitterness, it's all on display when s/he posts

>>17224119
do nigs actually

>>17224117
That adds to the valyoo

>>17224119
holy based

>>17224113
1400 is a perfectly fine price point service would range 200-500 dollars unless you buy some wacky watch and unless you smash it against the rocks like a caveman that would only happen every few years, and with proper care and handling you can make them last much longer. I was just cautioning buying any 300 dollar mechanical that noobs sometimes go for.

>>17224133
>I was just cautioning buying any 300 dollar mechanical that noobs sometimes go for.
hmm at that price point it might make more sense to just replace the entire movement instead of getting it serviced desu
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/3256803161822926.html?algo_exp_id=5cbe76c2-1f02-49d3-b632-26980712a0f8-5&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22sku_id%22%3A%2212000025343730283%22%7D&pdp_npi=2%40dis%21USD%21%2121.1%21%21%21%21%21%402101e9d216620513184683673edbde%2112000025343730283%21sea

>>17224138
Yeah but how much does it cost to pay a guy to replace the movement, maybe if you have a local place its an affordable proposition and it always rubbed me the wrong way like you are losing the watch you purchased though I'm sure some more expensive services do end up just scrapping half the movement anyways.

>>17223974
not really, and at 80$ for a mechanical dress watch this good looking its a steal.

>>17224047
the bracelet is trash but the watch itself is way above its price

>>17224140
Why would it matter

mogged

>>17224151
It just feels dumb to pay a guy to fix a cheap watch, like its purely arbitrary I understand if you like that watch and its dial then arguably its worth to pay out the ass to repair but it just feels retarded on some level for me I don't know.

>>17223787
good work anon

>>17224119
not gonna clicking that

>>17223588
i like it bros. it's so tiny. i have a concerning urge to chew on it like it's a piece of candy

>>17224138
These people are retarded,
A seiko nh35 costs $35, buy one take it to your watchmaker and he can swap it out in 5 minutes, he isn't going to charge $500.
Anything that uses an eta 2824, you can buy a full new movement on ebay for less than $200 same deal replacement is a 5 minute job.
I mean you should also be getting the seals replaced and stuff like that to maintain water resistance but it won't cost $500 to service a seiko unless a watchmaker just gives you a high quote hoping you will fuck off because he doesn't want to do the work.
You can look up the servicing costs for any major brand, they will have it posted on their website somewhere if you want to send it to the manufacturer to get it serviced. Iirc omega charges something like $500 for a full overhaul cleaning etc.
Any way just look up actual servicing costs nobody that posts in these threads still knows anything about watches

>>17224162
its dolphin porn

This or the Longines Conquest? Keep seeing both recommended here and other places.

>>17224117
Should have bought swiss, anon. LOL

>>17224190
that's a rolex

Omega

service intervals are a meme. the average rolex owner i know hasn't had his watch serviced in 20 years and they all run fine

>>17224188
I like the conquest more

Will women laugh at me for wearing a G-Shock?

>>17224109
Quite the opposite.

>>17224208
Thanks, probably picking that one up.

>>17224211
No, g-shocks look great

>>17224211
Yes, g-shocks are fugly

>>17223726
>>17223907
nta but I'm an actual homo and I don't think onions is an insult, these posts are just making me want to buy a homos

>>17224133
Sounds good, I was looking at Nomos among others and their charges for service seem reasonable.

>>17224225
>>17224228
The duality of man

>>17223954
Rolex should bring back the OysterQuartz, make the movement in the same way with that iconic tick.

>>17224229
it’s right up your alley, among other things.

>>17224235
Seeing the massive success of the Moonswatch, Rolex might consider a quartz.

>>17224242
What other watches should I be checking out?

>>17224247
cartier if you’re into crossdressing

>>17224235
id unironically buy one

>>17224251
Funny, I was just noticing how cartiers are wildly popular with gay guys, the only watch I see more at gay bars is the datejust. My boss has a cartier though so even if it was a watch I liked the looks of (I'm lukewarm on them), that would be a no-go for me

>>17224258
u suck and smell

>>17224265
I generally am the one being sucked, and I am extremely fussy about personal hygiene, I guarantee I smell better than you

Talk about ROLEXROLEXROLEX and refer to the chart.

>>17224273
get a job, freeloader

>>17224269
then reverso

>>17223696
>>17223702
>>17223834
>>17223825
Sekiofag cope

>>17224211

as general rule:

- plastic watches look cheap.
- women love money/social status

wearing a plastic watch means you're either broke or a blue collar worker (which is about the same)

>>17224117
japanese pube is not a mistake, its craftsmanship.

Rolex are like BMW and Pitulls, only douche bags like them

>>17224350
same for omega and tag

>>17224350
>pitbulls
that would imply their target audience is niggers and women; only one of those things is correct.

>>17224350
>>17224353
Poorfag cope

>>17224354
just like Rolls Royce only scummy rappes and drug dealers buys them.

they may not be their target audience, but at the end of the day they attract trash that no respectable man would want to be associated with

>>17224361
persian detected

>>17224366
women. women can’t afford rollies. nigs can, alongside royal oaks and nautiluses.

>>17224235
objectively the best roolex

>>17224168
What is the name of this shape and what are some other examples? It seemed very popular before.

>>17224440
Tonneau.

>>17224440
no idea lad i bought it because it's shiny

>>17224440
That's a cushion case.

>>17224450
>Tonneau
No. Tonneau has curved sides and flat top and bottom.
>>17224464
>cushion case
No. Cushion cases have round dials.

The closest I have found is "rounded square" watch. Omega used to make similar ones.

>>17224507
I mean just searching "tonneau" comes up with all sorts of slightly different case shapes, some with round dials some with rounded squares. Doesn't seem to be a hard rule for them.

>>17224507
Just google TV screen watches

8 pointers, what are they even measuring?

>>17224512
Tonneau is a very distinct shape. There is little variance.
>>17224514
That's a bit closer but not quite there yet. I hate being facetious but these seem very distinct to me.

>>17224518

They’re measuring the sack of the absolute alpha chad who can afford one.

The flippers are going to eventually run out of customers r-right?

>>17224340
>all dat cope

I wish GS would use lume on their heritage pieces that aren’t GMTs.

>>17224518
deez nuts

>>17224556
its a fact
and i own a a Gshock

>>17224340
>t. gf stolen by a construction worker

>>17224211
Wearing a Cadioak while doing manly outdoors things will make her wet. Wearing a G Shock in any other situation will make her dry up like a prune.

Thoughts on this watch? Can't tell if I love it or despise it.

>>17224652
I used to work with a basketball american who was pretty smart and articulate for the most part but had some absolutely awful habits he couldn't shake, such as wearing the most gaudy awful Diesel watch shit you could possibly imagine. He also told me one time his favorite brand was Invicta. Every time I'd see him I'd make it a point to ask him about the watch he was wearing just to see the awfulness up close, yet he fucking loved them.

>>17224623
must've had a bigger shaft

watch for this feel?

>>17224669
I will say that diesels designs are absolutely vile, but this watch is actually pretty small. It's a rather simple design.

>>17224690
Mogged by gucci

>>17224691
A bit over the price point of diesel.

Do I get a Seiko SNK361 or SNKL45?

>>17224188
Update, went to the Citizen AD to get my Fugu resized for my wrist, getting the conquest.

>>17224700
45

>>17224340
>>17224633
Absolute bullshit

However if you >>17224211
are so insecure that you have to ask "will women laugh at me for wearing X watch?" then you should not wear X watch

>>17224701
Wow that's exciting
An auto and a quartz, nice combo

>>17224745
life changing

>>17224211
unfortunately yes, most will

Fucking retards in this thread with thier dogshit anti-chart Citizens and Tag HueHues and Omegays. Just talk about ROOOOLEX

>>17224800
People like you are why these threads suck now

>>17224206
anon I think theres something wrong with your wrist

>>17223592
Great watch. Try it on in person if you can, the 40mm size can look different in person than in pics.

>>17224803
Oh but to be a poor like you.. The simpleton from America who just.. doesn't GET IT.

>>17223645
>Just get that SARX from a few years ago, it's identical.
Except for the case shape, proportions, Sallaz polishing, and the finishing on the dial, hands and indices, and the movement.

>pic related the thread wearing Tag HueHue and Turdors and Omegays and Seiko Grand and Shitizens and G-Shits

Casio Chad here, rolex dweebs.

Pic rel is on the way to me. Stay salty.

>>17224820
Refer to the chart.

Hello.

I'm a marking director at Richemont SA.

Please tell me what it would take to get YOU to LIKE this BRAND?

>>17224825
Give me a free Overseas and I'll shill it for you on youtube

>Longines HydroConquest
>$550 on ebay
This shit had to have been stolen right?

>>17224825
1) Eliminate the fiftysix line as it's a betrayal of everything VC should stand for.

2) Turn the 222 into a complete range as it gives VC an integrated bracelet sports watch line that isn't seen as a third place also ran to the Royal Oak and the Nautilus.

3) Look at the success of the historiques collection and understand that non-Overseas VC buyers want VC to showcase it's unique history and brand identity, not to try and have an also ran entrant in every niche PP is in.

>>17224825
its too late, i already do

I just bought a new with tags (pic related) 2022 Speedmaster 3861 Hesalite for a total $5,363.05 (with tax included) off of EBay

Is that a pretty good price? I'm looking around and don't see a lower price.

>>17224841
Grats anon that's nuts.

>>17224841
Assuming it's legit that's a pretty good price.

>>17224821
>following a meme online chart

My sides. Leave your room.

>>17224843
>>17224844
thanks I was worried I might not have gotten a good enough deal. the photos the listing has looks real nice.

>>17224854
Looks legitimate to me but I'm not well versed in these anymore.

>>17224857
Yeah apparently Ebay has a authenticity guarantee where the seller must send the watch to a third party to get it checked out to ensure its legit.

Just from the photos it looks good. I don't think there are too many replicas of speedys out there. Can't wait to get it!

>>17224859
I've used their authentication for a pair of sneakers and it went well, they ship it to Ebay, take a look at it for watches they might open the back up and check the movement and decide if it's legit or not. It might come with an Ebay authenticity certificate/tag

>>17224859
Cool, post pics when you get it anon.

>>17224866
Will do mate!

>>17224691
is there any reason not to bootleg fashion watches like this
i can't imagine the craftsmanship matches the price on these kinds of watches

>>17224830
That is the average price they sell for. Don't go by the price sellers are overcharging. Look at the ones that actually sold.

>>17223697
Make sure you're in the home time zone (T1) according to this wideo sir:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4ZrOnHa94

If this answer was helpful give thumbs up so I can feed my family.

>>17224896
No i would have no shame buing a fake of that, it's $900 on jomashop and its quartz, i don't even want to know what the msrp is. But you can get similar quartz watches that arent gucci for $80 or something.

>>17224691
Looks like a set of bathroom scales

>>17224117
that's no hair, it's a 9. It's the 19th.

General consensus on microbrands?

>>17224937
memes, but do whatever as long as they don't rip you off.

>>17224937
Shite unless very expensive.

>>17224937
whatever you do never buy a ming

>>17224937
The edges of those hands look pretty fucking rough.

>>17224937
WTF is that trashpile, looks like the hands were stamped on a Schuler press

>>17224944
>>17224947
SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU CANT SEE THAT WITHOUT A MICROSCOPE

Generals dead and autism brand loyalty killed it

>>17224999
cant afford a rolex?

>>17225003
Missing an apostrophe there, ESL.

>flip burgers for 3 months
>buy a op41
>instantly have a better watch than 99% of the thread
based?

>>17224859

Very nice, another Speed-masterRace enters the arena. A man of exquisite taste.

>>17225013
>still flips burgers
>still lives with his mom
>still has no wife
>still has an ugly car
unbased

>>17224691
LOL
LMAO, even

>>17225020
>still makes anon seethe
Based

>>17225034
I don't see anyone seething. Buying a cheap Rolex while your life sucks is like buying a used BMW 2 with shit mileage while working for DoorDash

>>17225013
pretty shit financial decision

>>17225013
>this is what neets actually believe
lol

>>17224825
i already like them the most of the trinity

>>17224999

why does this generate so much seethe here?

>>17225088
Chartfag is mentally ill

Alright guys, I've been racking my brain over this and I need you to pick for me. Should I play AD games to get the new Tudor Pelagos, or get a beat-ass midsize Seamaster for significantly less?

>>17225096
>ad games for a fucking tudor
just get the sea

>>17225096
Which one do you want more ignoring how difficult or not it will be to get?

>>17225096
this nigga whorin himself out for a tudor, not even a proper rolex lmfaoooo

>>17224687
I think you know the answer anon

>>17225098
I wanted the semenmaster until the new Tudor was released, now I want both. I think I'd be equally happy relatice to what I'd pay for it with either.
>>17225097
>>17225100
Yeah I fucking know, if I could just go into a store and buy one I'd probably get it but it's either order the Omega sight unseen, or play dumb waiting games for the Tudor.

are the bands on citizens worth a shit? should i snag a different band when mine comes in?

>>17225108
some of them are comfy, some are shit, hit or miss, honestly just swap it out if you dont like it.
nice watch btw

>>17225088
It's nice and classy but it's a bit boring m8

>>17225096
seamaster
dont buy non-grand tudors

>>17225118
average diving watch buyer be like

>>17225121
I like Mickey Mouse watches

>>17225124
what’s it like being a shill for one of the gayest companies in the world

>>17225127
he's not chartfag though

>>17225142
i said “one of the gayest” not “the absolute gayest”

>>17225108
swap the whole watch out

>>17224999
Trips make it true

>>17225124
baced

>>17225124
saw some mickey citizens at the citizen ad today, they were cool

>>17224825
Give me free shit.

>>17225151
Gotta get the wedding bangs first

https://www.egardwatches.com/pages/womanhood-necklace

Holy shit Egard is based, they're explicitly anti-tranny.

>>17225236
Sad their watches are an unholy travesty of shit movements in even shittier cases.

>>17225236
if only it was a major brand doing this

I'm afraid my mom might be ill.
We're going to the doctor tomorrow.
I hope she is ok.

>>17225250
Hope you have to sell all your watches for years of medical treatment only to see her die anyway.

>>17225253
my brother in christ you are about to bring misery upon yourself for wishing ruin on others

>>17225259
Don't care, everyone called me a dumb lazy poorfag when I said the exact same thing happened to me a few years ago ITT, so you can suck it.

Glad I'll never fall for the 39mm meme

>>17225262
too big for you son

tfw 6inch wrist

>5 years power reserve
>rechargeable

>>17225250
I know she'll be ok.

>>17225274
jfc

>>17225253
>Not having health insurance
Ameritards are really, really fucked.

>>17224901
thanks i got it now

>>17225266
Ask me if I give a shit faggot

>>17225262
This is what buyers remorse looks like

can someone post the omega comic
the one where he wanted a rolex

>>17225342

>>17225345
thanks

>>17225345
very good but its supposed to be seamaster 300 i believe

>>17225339
Had it two years now, never been happier with a watch

Keep malding. Nobody cares about your r/mfa timepiece

>>17225262
Wristlets coping rn

>>17225262
>Tudor

Just save up a bit more and buy a rolex... or don't fucking bother.

What's some non-gay, affordable German watch company? Don't want soi Nomos.

>>17225372
lange

>>17225360
Enjoy your carpal tunnel

>>17224825
The simple reality is you can't wear a Vacheron in real life. If your boss sees a Nazi iron cross on your watch you're going to lose your job. Simple as.

>>17225375
I meant affordable for a pleb.

>>17225379
my boss is also a nazi, what now

>>17225372
Sinn

>>17225250
Good luck to your mom.

>>17224518
Wealth

new
>>17225463
>>17225463
>>17225463
>>17225463
>>17225463

>>17225372
Damasko
archimede, Limes (both made by case manufacturer ickler)
muhle glashutte
Sinn

>>17224691
Bathroom scale

>>17225369
>muh shitmariner that you'll see 20 times a day after being waitlisted for 2 years

>>17225262
>bezel
What are you counting? Your jerk off refractory period?

>>17225372

2022 Germany is powered by migrant farts anon, wrong country

>>17225262

You should