/fa/ - Fashion

Also first for this chart is for retarded gay manchildren

Fr fr please rate my bussin' collection. No cap on God. I'm trans btw if that matters.

>>17206275
ong fr fr tho BASED as hell iced out check my one and only out fr!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gByntaxSvXY

Let's add the olde chart too.

>>17206275
Show bussy

>got led on and friendzoned by a girl in social circle because I was plan B
>she has thrown herself in my orbit (probably for attention)
>act not interested
>There's another girl in social circle that brings up and talks about said girl occasionally
>I know they gossip to each other (probably about me)
>ask other girl "hey there's this one girl that says I should grow out my beard, you think I should keep shaving it?"
>who's this girl I it a girlfriend she asks
>"no, not at the moment, my cousin introduced me to her friend from college about two weeks ago and we've been taking things slow"
>"wooooow nice, what's she studying?"
>tell her she's studying to be a veterinarian
>"nice! How old is she?" Tell her she's 23, I'm 29 and girl that friendzoned me is 25
>mention she has a great head on her shoulders and picked a humble thing to study
I figure she's going to run and tell this other girl about it, I have also been having a great attitude and have dressed nicer which makes it believable. How pathetic is this thinking I'll end up hooking up with the girl that friendzoned me. FYI these two girls aren't in social circle with my good friends so I can easily lie about it

>>17206300
wrong general numnuts

>>17206302
>older/wiser gentlemen post here
No, this is the right general

>>17206302
/wt/ isn't about watches. It's mostly a safe space within /fa/ for old and/or fat guys.

>>17206300
flash her your cock
>>17206307
im not fat

>that's a pepsi
>that's a hulk
>that's a she hulk
>that's an iron man

>>17206300
Don’t care you pathetic fag

>>17206275
I rate sex out of eight mate. I don't like the two on the top right but the rest are "fire" as the youths say.

Most Nazi watch I could buy?

Budget: $50,000

Thank you

>>17206320
Literally made for Nazi pilots.

https://www.chrono24.com/alangesoehne/a-lange--soehne-wwii-pilot-flieger-b-uhr-zertifikat--id22237922.htm

>>17206300
What watch does that girl who friendzoned you wear?

>>17206321
>55mm wide
>20mm thick
Kek, I hope our Nazi isn’t a wristlet

>>17206324
She's a watchlet. Nothing, maybe I dodged a bullet

>>17206300
If you have nothing better to do knock yourself out. Personally it sounds like petty womanly things that I try to avoid myself. I recommend you buy a GM-B2100.

>>17206325
Those watches were designed to be large enough to where you could read them while piloting an airplane. They were also worn over the flight suit sleeve.

>>17206332
Thanks I figure I have nothing to lose here. Either she's interested in me again or not fuck it.

Grand Seiko

>>17206345

Japanese can get in closer for fine finishing with their small Asian hands.

>>17206345
Respectable Anon-sun however neither I myself or others look at their watch through a microscope. Zoom out and you will see a very expensive watch with an unappealing design and hefty price tag.

Grand Reddit

>>17206333
Yes, these are tools, not built for sliding under a cuff. But I can’t help but to crack up when I imagine a internet Nazi Larper with an authentic 55mm Flieger dangling from his spaghetti wrist.

>>17206350
Rolex and Tudor are the most discussed brands on R*eddit.

Grand Seiko

>>17206353
It’s a neck beard watch and not in the good way, Reddit or not. It’s always a really unappealing design, finishing and technicals aside.

>>17206355
Afternoon ESL

>>17206321

Thank you. I was thinking something modern, but with some similar aesthetic principles.

Also I’m not a Nazi, just an aesthetics appreciator

Tissot PRX is unironically great. Call me Reddit if you want. I'm getting my 15 year old brother it as a gift for Christmas.

>>17206328
I think you have. No watchlet is worthy of your seed.

Invicta

>>17206350
Im with you on the bad design of GS. But if you drop five figures on a luxury product you‘d hope that it is as close to perfect as possible.
Especially PP & JLC are guilty of going out of their way to make their new releases worse to save a few bucks. It definitely doesn’t hurt to have some asians deliver better finishing for a few thousands than the swiss old guard which seems to have grown a bit lazy.

>>17206353

>howdy reddit, just got back from the AD. I completed stage 3 today. First I introduced myself in stage one, wearing my best suit and tie, and showing them my resume and credit status. For stage two I had them meet my gf. Strangely they asked for her to only come wearing a towel, but I did what I was asked and they brought her to the storage room for about 30 minutes. I really had hoped she got to see the list but she didn’t unfortunately. But the AD manager said my foot was almost in the door!! That led me to today, where I wanted to enhance my chances at a slot by purchasing a black bay. Why is the side of this so thick? Oh well the AD said I’ll get used to it. I am really feeling confident that my place on the list is really solidified. I hope to get my brown datejust within 3 years!! Wish me luck!!

*edit Thanks for the gold, kind stranger!!!

>>17206371
>better finishing
>GS
My sides, anon

>>17206370
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNuXPCK3jys

nice try anti invicta shill

>>17206377
unironically pretty good for $150 lol

>>17206371
I can agree with your take as well, I’m relatively new to watches compared to other people, but I have seen most evidence of proper attention to detail to finishing with the Japanese GS and German A. Lange. Both are 5 figures but one has the whole package the other is uninspired by design as we both can agree. The Swiss have been lazy but at least compared to GS their priorities are straight in my book: first design then finer details such as finishing.

>muh grand seiko (lack) of finishing

>>17206384
finishing on the outside>finishing on the inside
simple as is

>>17206384
holy ESL batman!

>>17206376
GS is far from perfect, it’s more that I’m sad how cool brands like JLC are becoming more greedy and cheaping out, especially in the entry level.
I guess I’m just a sucker for a nice underdog story.

>>17206396
rec me a jlc under 10k
preowned/new is fine

>>17206355
Here's your rolex bro.

>>17206396
>I’m sad how cool brands like JLC are becoming more greedy and cheaping out
Can you give an example?

>>17206400
interesting site
hasnt really changed my mind about anything tho

>>17206400
looks like balls and a cock cage with a yellow lock

>>17206401
Two price increases just this year alone & they recently cut deployant clasps from almost all entry level dress models to go with pinbuckle. They essentially just cost more while not providing a lot more
Mid 2000s JLCs are still an excellent buy tho, white gold (with deployant!!!) calendars in 37 with hunter casebacks & nice finishing for less than 8k

>>17206394
>Being called ESL by the ESL
This place never changes.

>>17206426
>Two price increases just this year alone & they recently cut deployant clasps from almost all entry level dress models to go with pinbuckle.
Which models are you talking about? I just scanned some of the cheaper men's size Reversos and Masters on their website and all have the new double-fold deployant.
The smaller women's models have a pin buckle because the single-fold deployant was discontinued.

>>17206426
>Mid 2000s JLCs are still an excellent buy tho, white gold (with deployant!!!) calendars in 37 with hunter casebacks & nice finishing for less than 8k

Waitwaitwaitwait...you're telling me that I can get a used watch for LESS than the price of a new watch?!

>>17206426
That sort of sucks if it’s true if you like deployant clasps I guess. The entire industry is hiking prices and have been for 2-3 years straight. I just don’t know why you would honestly care about a steel deployant clasp if you’re about to spend $10k on a watch. I thought you meant they were cost cutting in a little more meaningful way.

Just take the Quartz pill, save thousands of dollars and look good.

I'm at the Omega Boutique right now. Hesalite or Sapphire 3861?

>>17206452
Planning on getting the PRX quartz but can't decide on color. Torn between white, ice blue, green, or the gold

>>17206453
Hesalite

>>17206453
Sapphire, my dude. If you can pay the extra, it's worth it.

>>17206453
Sapphire

>>17206452
>>17206458
My problem is that, unless it's something like a superquartz, a high-end quartz or a vintage, quartz is fucking boooooooring.

>>17206377
I would buy that dial. Shame about the rest of the watch.

>>17206458
green, blue is over done. if you have a kay's jewelers or jared's or any of those chains then go try a few on. they always have them

watch for this feel?

>>17206453

I bought a sapphire recently. It is freaking awesome.

>>17206492
tag heuer black aquaracer

>>17206492
Something gay.

>>17206496

>>17206492
Rolex DateJust black dial

>>17206292

>>17206444

>>17206453
Hesalite looks so much better in person

>>17206524
>give me your shiniest, obnoxious two tone quartz watch and give me 30 percent off

>>17206524
>He HAD to mod a meme

Anyone who says "horology" in 2022 is a fedoralord virgin

>>17206492
...or any vintage black PVD.

>>17206508
>>17206509
This are the same thing

>>17206517
Too expensive

>>17206538
Too low class

>>17206540
>nigga wanting to larp as an anime boy calling things low class
lol, lmao

whats your opinion on the Orient bambino 36mm dress watch?

So I bought it, its gonna ship soon from "Key-ev", I'm kinda excited to wear it when it arrives. Will post my wrist when I get it.

>>17206545
Super nice dress for the price, depends on the color though.

>>17206546
Congrats, my friend.

im finally one of the big boys..

>>17206555
Going for Rose gold

>>17206573
one of the first cheap watches ive considered buying. buy and post results plz

>>17206573
Rose Gold looks good.

Citizen prodiver automatic titanium, is it actually worth $700?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WWfT1HQ7x8

Post haute horlogerie

>>17206583
I don't have the titanium, but I have the pro diver fugu two tone automatic U.S.A release and I say it's worth the $400 I paid for it from my AD

>>17206575
Will do

>>17206588
How does the bezel feel? Have you compared it to Seiko? I wasn't impressed with the feel on a Seiko Prospex diver.

>>17206587
Nice design but the numerals look poorly done and the sub seconds hand looks cheap.

>>17206599
Rotating bezel is satisfying as hell, finishing is good. I only tried the Seiko Prospex diver for a few minutes in the store to compare and I wasn't impressed, especially considering it was pricier. Most complaints seem to be about the bracelet being lackluster, but I don't mind it.

>buy reverso
>cant wash my hands anymore
bros...

>>17206600

>the numerals look poorly done

But my brother, that is the best part

> the sub seconds hand looks cheap

The "spade shaped" hands are kino

https://watchesbysjx.com/2018/09/introducing-the-kikuchi-nakagawa-murakamo.html

>>17206614
hand sanitizer stinky

>>17206614
>unboosted
>unvaxxed
>uncut
>unwashed
>never sick
washing hands is for germaphobe retards.

>>17206621
i don't do any of these and the fungus on my arm matches my datejust perfectly.

>>17206622
Mine matches mi bronze's patina.

Looking for something that looks like skx013. Similar diver watches seem to be all 40mm+ but I need a 38mm or smaller.

>>17206583
Have you shopped around? I wouldn't be surprised if you can find it a bit cheaper on ebay or one of the Japanese sites like sakurawatch.

>>17206587
>Closed back case, no fucking window
Bravo, swiss window faggots btfo

>>17206679
>Closed back case, no fucking window
>Bravo, swiss window faggots btfo
Why having haute horlogery if can not see it?

INVICTA WOOON

>>17206426
Deployant clasps blow. Buckles are much more comfortable.

>>17206345
>grand seiko
Imaging buying a watch that loses half its market value the moment you purchase

ASKING THE REAL QUESTION
DUO FACE OR MONO FACE?

Seiko 5 GMT or Steinhart Ocean One GMT II? My budget's $500
I like the design of the Seiko more, but the features and movement of the Steinhart more

>>17206702
Since the popularity of display backs has increased movements are sacrificing more and more for aesthetics. Display backs are the antithesis of high whorelogy.

>>17206808
cute chihuahua looks like mine
get the seiko

>>17206808
Seiko. Steinhart is a rolex knock off brand. Do not support those companies

>>17206808
Steinhart. Seiko is a Grand Seiko knock off brand. Do not support those companies

>>17206808
use the money on a chihuahua

8 DAYS?
HOW?

>>17206846
idk

what the FUCK is a workhorse movement?

>>17206846
Now show how thick it is.

>>17206865

>>17206739
nta but if I ever were to buy GS I'd get a used one with a simple clean design. I've seen one of those quartz ones go for somewhere between 1-2K with only small traces of being worn.

https://youtu.be/1k63F3doj2o

Nice watch but what good is a perpetual calendar when it only shows the current date and doesn't really show any important info otherwise.

I would like a watch that you could input a specific date into, and it shows the position of the planets, the signs of the Zodiac, the alignment of stars, something... anything that isn't just related to today.

Does anything like that exist (I assume it would have to be quartz)?

>>17206775
Duo Face, of course.

>>17206808
you're retarded if you buy anything other than a Seiko under $1000

>>17206810
>movements are sacrificing more and more for aesthetics.
Oh yeah? Name one thing it has sacrificed.

>>17206846
It's a JLC, a master watchmaker, that's how.

>>17206866
Not really thick

>>17206886
No

I need to stop looking at watches I cant afford bros, it's not healthy

>>17206898
No. Let yourself be swallowed by the high horology pithole. We all suffer and cope in here.

What is a "sports watch"?

I come in peace, I come from /g/, what's the general consensus about smart watches itt?

>>17206938
Absolut shit.
Welcome, btw.

Does anyone here have a tide and moon please g shock? I work in an aquarium so having access to tide and moon phases can actually be pretty useful, not to mention the 200m of water resist and countdown timers.

>>17206458
Why are they so overpriced? Quartz shouldn't be that expensive

>>17206946
Because people are buying them at that price.

>>17206966
The Bulova never went did it?

>>17206977
Yes, it did. The astronaut hit his Omega very hard on a staircase and the crystal poped, so he went for the backup.

>>17206966
>>17206991
And yet, no Rolex EVER achieved something as impressive.
Kek

Do people really

The first automatic chronograph in space.

>>17207005
Anyone can go to space, the prize was the moon.

>>17207005
I really want to like these but can't

>>17207005
The other first automatic chronograph in space.

>>17207016
See
>>17207010

Got this the other day, fucking love it /wt/. Got 3 Seikos and an Oris as well as some Casios and G-Shocks.

>>17206275
Very nice, can't go wrong with monsters.

>Thank you, Anon-kun. You got the job!
>*sees your watch*
>Ahh... sorry, nevermind.
>We'll have to get the job to someone else... we don't hire neo-Nazis.

Frankly I can't think of a bigger cope than "muh Speedmaster went to the moon!!".
Not because of the competition against Rolex (I mean lets be real... Omega is like 5 times smaller than Rolex, and Cartier is now ahead of them sales-wise), but because of the state of modern Omega.
The company that built the moonwatch simply doesn't exist anymore. The continuity has been broken several times during Omega's history and what remained of the original company died in the late 90s. Swatch inherited Omega's name and patents, and has turned the brand into a parody of its former self.

I actually love the Speedmaster's design (I prefer the '57 version, with the broad arrow hands) but I don't want to be associated with Swatch in any way. They can't even make proper reissues of their old models for fuck's sake...

>>17207074
Omega has and always will be a shit company.

Only fucking retards like them.

>>17207016
A Movado Datron.

>>17207124
Nice, looks like it came from a heap of trash from a yard sale when someone's grandpa died.

>tudor
>day date 3k
>rolex
>day date 35k
bros?

I'm about to cop one of these JDM Citizens, should i go for green or black?

>>17207148
>green
Are you a fucking forstersturmunddrangfuhrer.

>>17207148
>eco-drive
What is this? a fucking Toyota?

>>17207155
Eco-drive is a horological wonder-works anon. A true engineering marvel. Why are you even here? Does Rolex pay you?

>>17207148
I think the green one looks better, at least in that photo.

>>17207160
>Does Rolex pay you?
I wish

Gonna pick one of these up. Thoughts?

>>17207160
Newfag here. Do Rolexfags do anything other than seethe and cope because it doesn't appear that way. It's like once you buy it you divert all your energy into rationalizing it.

>>17207148
Black with the yellow second hand.

>>17207190
Cope watch/1000

dont buy from chinks..

>>17207190
VK64 movement is going to shit all over you in a few years.

>no mention of Rolex
>Rolexlets start seething about Rolex out of nowhere
rent free

>>17207204
Which Omega did you buy?

>>17207207
>>no mention of Rolex
>>Rolexlets start seething about Rolex out of nowhere
>rent free

>>17207207
>t. Milgauss owner

>>17207227
the best omega

>>17207231
Thank you for posting a drawing of your seething face after reading my based post, faggot lmao

>>17207244
>0.00027 Milgauss credits have been deposited in your account
Keep up the good work anon

>>17207065
This fantasy again…

>>17206325
BIG
I
G

>>17207270
I'v seen a timex that looks exactly like it

>>17207139
You're paying for the brand name, back in the 80s you'd buy a Rolex for like $190, which is like $700 today
>inb4 you're just saying that because you don't own one!!11!
Damn right I don't, I went with non-meme brands

>>17207278
>Damn right I don't, I went with non-meme brands
porrtard

>>17207281
>t. No one of any social class to date has complimented his rolex

>>17207063
That's a great design, I've always liked those

>>17206546
this tone of red gives me nostalgia
when I was a kid I had a toy that was red like this watch
or maybe is because the candy apples...
infant stuff you know...

>>17207206
What problems does it have?

>>17207201
For what watch?

>>17207139
but every time you look at the watch it looks back at you like :D, as if mocking you for not getting a rolex

>>17207074

Non-moon cope right there. It’s ok if your watch is a bitch ass watch and never went to the moon, you can still wear and enjoy it. You just can’t say it was good enough to go to the moon, while the Speedmaster and the Bulova were, that’s all. So stop dwelling on your watch of choice’s shortcomings and embrace what it does well.

>>17207074
There's nothing in this world like Rolextard cope

>weight cutting turns me into a wristlet
Gonna heem myself

>>17206846
more like reservo

>>17207408

Same. 15 cm here

Help me /wt/

I just got the call from mb&f. The watch is about 92k. I imagine I could probably get much more than that on gray market.
92k is a bit more than I have. Do I pull the trigger anyway?

>>17207420
yes. take a loan if you have to.

>>17207420
It's not going to sell for enough over retail to make it worth your time. Might even loose money if you're taking out a loan.

>>17207420
Line up a buyer first

>>17207420
Market it to chinese, they love that color.

>>17206320
German watchmaker stowa as well as laco(lacher & co) and A. Lange & Söhne made the pilots watch the nazis wore under the war called the b-uhr. However they were huge and most of those movements would be inaccurate if you even got one to work today. If you want a historical piece the other anon gave you a link to an original. Be cautious that it probably is pretty radioactive considering it's a big watch with probably a lot of radium used as lume.

However if you want a newer made wearable watch I think the best option would be the stowa flieger in 40mm. Looks very authentic apart from the wearable size and how polished and new it looks.
https://www.stowa.de/en/Flieger+Classic+40+Baumuster+B.htm

Laco also makes some alternatives but the stowa is my favorite.

>>17206320
Sinn, the company was run by a Nazi pilot, Helmut Sinn.

Is Red for women?

thinking about getting the prx

Still thinking about the two-tone sea dweller, bros...

>>17207499
get it, two tone reigns supreme

why shouldn't i buy this for $40?

>>17207515
Brass case

>>17207515
Because you waited too long and i sniped the ebay listing

>>17206941
>I work in an aquarium so having access to tide and moon phases can actually be pretty useful

>aquarium
>tide phases

Wait I'm dumb what use does knowing when the tides will be in or out have on an aquarium that isn't connected to the sea?

>not to mention the 200m of water resist

Do you dive more than 15 meters under water?

>>17207515
invicta is better

>>17207585
>Wait I'm dumb what use does knowing when the tides will be in or out have on an aquarium that isn't connected to the sea?
Due to our proximity to the ocean, we get our water from there. You'll find this to be true with many aquariums near an ocean. The system that pumps the water in is partially automated but its still useful to know where it js
For moon phases, we have a number of fish and corals who will spawn during full moons even though they can't see the moon. Also useful to know.
>Do you dive more than 15 meters under water?
Not even more than 20 feet but I can't complain about more water resistance.

>>17207612
Lmao, I just realised that there are a few actual professions outside of werewolves that have a fringe usecase for a moonphase. Aquarium workers, marine biologists, fishermen, astronomers, astrology hoes.
Did I miss any, /wt/?

>>17207634
Witches

>>17207634
Sex-havers

>>17207634
Photographers, research pilots, biologists, physicists (they have to include the gravitational difference of the tides and the moon in some calculations), videographers, archaeologists, etc...

>>17207634
You don't use astrology to make business decisions?

>>17207634
hedge funds

>>17207634
I feel like potheads and other drugs users too...

>>17207634
>he doesn't use moon phase as a trading indicator

>>17207190
Looks very nice actually.

>>17207679
Yes, because is blatantly copying successful design from other brands.
It's shit in reality.

>>17207682
So what?

>>17207683
So anon, which watch do you consider the only valid chrono design? And don't say Daytona.

>>17207190
>>17207687
citizen bullhead all day erry day

>>17207634
Hunters

>>17207666
Get ye back, Satan(Jew).

>>17207190
Would be better without that damn 24hr subdial and 4:30 date.

>>17206844
I miss my chihuahua. She was very racist, we got along great.

>>17207687
>the only valid chrono design
What are you talking about? What did I say that came off in any way elitist? And a Porsche Design Orfina is something I would really like to have.

>>17207691
Extremely based, well chosen.

>>17207695
Dont mind the date window, agree on the 24h sub but so many chronos have them now. So far the only thing stopping me is apparently the VK64 movement can have issues

>>17207687
Sneedmaster

>>17207634
anything water related like surfers

VACHERON CONSTANTIN

>>17207728
nice invicta kermit homage

>>17207721
>many chronos have them now
Only the bad ones, as it is completely useless.

>>17207728
Everyone will think you’re a nazi and you’ll get fired from your job.

>>17207420
I wouldn't do it unless I was a dealer or was working with a trusted dealer. I would not trust a buyer enough to sell something so expensive. It's a big liability and risk. Maybe that's why I'm poor, too paranoid.

>>17207735
I thought it meant you were a witch

New thread when?!

>>17207772
100 posts early retard

>>17206941
I have a frogman with moon and tide. It's neat but I don't really use the feature unless I'm curious about the moon phase. If I were you I would hunt down a gulfman because it has a titanium back. It's rare to have an issue with rust but titanium is cool.

>>17206892
costs

Am I a big boy now guys?

>>17207793
as0foijkaoisdfjaoifd jRUGH RUGH RGUH

>>17207789
Only of you're poor. LOL

Speedmaster or navitimer?

>>17207798
Speedmaster

>>17207798
Do you race cars or fly planes more?

>>17207798
BASEDmaster.

Take the Quartz pill

>>17207813
hmmmm

>>17207827
Kek

>>17207795
That's the market for display backs.

What watches/brands do SEX-core weares use?

>>17207880
Armani
Gucci
Tag huhuhue

>>17207880
MVMT is the ultimate SEX time piece

Bought this bockcock from Ukrainian ebay seller. What acts of charity have you done lately.

hehe or not hehe

>>17207793
Very nice! Take some pics in better lighting.

fair price for a tissot quartz prx?

>>17207926
Less than msrp
Shop around

>>17207926
Of you go on eBay, you can get one for 20-50 off msrp maybe a little more.

>>17206271
>>17206458
Gold sleaze mode activated

>>17207880
Unironically casio, especially digital ones

>>17207995
Thanks, jewelry store offered me 25 percent off of one so I'll probably just go back and get it.

>>17206345
Grand Seiko

>>17208202
nigga looking at used models

>>17208202
Cool now post rolexes from 2002

>>17208209

>>17208202
Humiliating. Japs lose again.

>>17208209
>>17208211
Wait…2002 fr?

>>17208233
>tritium lume
No

the only guy i know with a rolex is an indian stemlord who lives in Cincinnati and unironically says
>do the needful

>>17208202
can't wait to buy another one

>>17206458
Blue for Oystercopes Perpetual, green or gold

>>17208202
Japs are fucking fraudulent.

>>17206458
I'm getting the green myself. Will post pics

>>17208293
LOL
LMAO, even

>>17208293
grrrr. GET OUT OF MY THREAD AND TALK ABOUT ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLEX

>>17208202
>comparing brand new to used

>>17208202
Grand Seikoids seething

>>17208202
my 50 year old rolex btw

>>17208333
>>17208323
>>17208220
samefag

Why do poorfags cope so hard with Grand Seiko and Omega?

>muh rolex muh omega noooooo you can't like grand seiko

yawn

>>17208346

Omega is objectively a better watch thats why. Why would I have inferior movements and less tough watches (rolex failed the very first test nasa gave it) when I can wear superior equipment? My wrist deserves the toughest watches, so only officially space agency certified watches are allowed. Pity flights and personal affects that were taken into flight simply don’t count. Only officially certified does. Rolex isn’t officially certified, hence it is not good enough. Omega, Fortis, Casio and Timex are, because they have the right stuff. Space is for winners, and Rolex lost. And only winners are put on my wrist.

>>17206332
got to agree, if you need to play games to get some trifling wee doll, you're gonna spend all your time thinking chess moves and burning your brain out with some chick who's constantly shit-testing, whereas the GM-B2100 is very reliable

>>17208366
This but unironically. Rolex can’t compete and Seiko isn’t even in the conversation - they’ve never made a good watch.

>>17208375
yes

>>17208353
>4.30

>>17208353

>>17208366

>>17208382
That's not a planet ocean anon

>>17208385
filtered

these are both so boring I would just choose whatever is better to resell

>>17208399
being boring is better than being ugly

>>17208401
sure yeah and what is this in reference to

>>17208399
It would probably help if you looked at actual photos and not soulless 2ds renders that would make Lange look boring

>>17208385
time to blaze it 8)

>>17208417
>muh angles
what are you female?

>>17208446
What does he mean with that?

>>17206321

watches that portray this aesthetic?

>>17208487
Go full Knight Hospitalier and get a Vacheron decked out in Maltese crosses.

Or get a fucking F91W if you wanna actually live like Christ you faggot

>>17208487
PP Ellipse d'Or.

>>17208513
>>17208519
Wow fucking mall tier watches.

>>17208487
This is the watch of a carpenter.

>>17208525

Is this a good watch?

>>17208529
Ah yes, the watch of a king.

NEW THREAD WHEN?

>>17208539
A superb watch.

If I see a Rolex design or a Rolex in public, I'm gonna say nice Pagani.
If I see a Submariner, I'm saying nice Invicta.
SIMPLE AS IS.

>>17208487
king of poorfags

>>17208563
Lol.. if you called my Subby an Invicta you'd never see the light of fucking day!

>Lol.. if you called my Subby an Invicta you'd never see the light of fucking day!

You just wouldn't "get it"

>>17207469
Oooh I like that. If you don't think you can pull of red you cant.

I love that you fucking weirdos all cream yourselves over your rolexes, but you work minimum wage retail gigs. LOL

>>17208513
>>17208519

Very based choices. Will explore

>>17208608
i cream myself over invicta

>>17208608
I only cream myself over François-Paul Journe, the man.

>>17208650

new

>>17208650

>>17206856
something some lame cunt made up

>>17208399
The omega looks cooler. The red, indices, hands, and bezel look much better on the omega in my opinion.