/fa/ - Fashion

Cope, if you must, and you will.

>>17180798

>>17180798
ascended ultra god tier: chink shitters that tell time

>>17180799
>>17180800
>coping already
We expected no less anons, well done.

>>17180798
>minase
>entry level
lmfao

>>17180807
Yep. It is. ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX WINS FGUCK YUOL 1`

>>17180807
>Minase
>Not entry level
LOL
LMAO

>>17180813
Oh the ranking is based on movement? In that case most of Luxury should go down to Entry Level, as well as 3-4 High-end Luxury brands.

is it cringe getting this style of diver watch if it isn't a rolex? is rolex the first to do it?

>>17180817
It's based in a lot of factors but in the case of shitty Minase it pushes down to entry level.
When you grow up, you'll understand the value of THE Chart.

>>17180820
no one gives a fuck about watches in public unless it's a richard or an apple watch

>>17180822
You live in Europe, you're a poorfag.

Let's post more based vintage Omegas.

>>17180820
Blancpain did it first

>>17180827

>>17180832
refer ot the chart

>>17180836
>Omega is in Luxury, as they deservedly should.
So?

>>17180843
Cope category for high luxury.. hehe

>>17180827
again!

>>17180822
>>It's based in a lot of factors
Like what?

>>17180827

>>17180851
How much feces can potentially cover the dial

>>17180827
Just stop posting it on your disgusting diabetic crusty flabby freckled sparsely haired hag arm.

This has become my favorite watch since I put it on the milanese band.

>>17180849
>Cope category for high luxury.
What if I don't *need* Omega to be High Luxury, and in fact one of the thigs I love from them is that their vintage catalog is son fun AND affordable?

>>17180855
Did omegachads fuck your wife in front of you? LOL

This has become my favorite watch since I put it on the milanese band

>>17180850
Good, my friend.

>>17180861
Stop replying to the troll

>>17180855
>>17180016

You got mad at people last thread for making fun of fat rolex tards LOL

>>17180866
You honestly have to be mentally ill to wear trash heap watches like that just because they have a luxury brand on the dial.

>>17180870
No taste

>>17180870
This is literally what you wear, chartkun

>>17180868
The only thing "troll" is retards like you who do not respect THE chart...

>>17180876
what the fuck

>>17180882
Why do you even try?

>>17180883
>pleb doesn't like patina and rolex finishing
cope.

>>17180870
>trash heap watches like that
Oh, I see. You have "special capabilities". I won't address you anymore.

>>17180868
You are right.

>>17180884
Because you faggots give him 40 (you)s every single fucking thread

>bout to buy another chinkshitter
>have to pay lawer fees
fug

So I have a bit of free time and spare cash so I'm getting to some of my other trash casios. If I change the hand on this thing and put it on a band, could this thing pass as a field watch? It has a screw down crown and caseback, easy to read dial, 100m water resistance when I'll replace the gaskets. Could maybe try changing the dial completely along with the hands. Fun little project.

>>17180889
Why is your watch on a Mortadella?

>>17180866
Yes

>>17180792
Is this just another quartz shitter or the ultimate tool watch?

>>17180906
its based

>>17180906
Is Breitling the official Himbo watch

>>17180906
They should reissue the pluton or even better buy the chronosport brand and make is a subsidiary.

>>17180827
Omega has outdone itself again.

>>17180889

>>17180901

has lolex crashed yet

What's the best dial for a field watch? Rolex Explorer dial is ugly so that's a pass. Black bay 36 just has the standard Rolex style dial. What are some other good ideas? This is for a custom projecr

>>17180866
I really like this reference I just found.

>>17180973
I like hour numerals with inset 24-hour numerals, minutes can be dashes or a rail.

>>17180917
What's the second crown for?

Grand seiko winning duh

>>17180973

>>17180973
This one is retard proof for crayon eaters

>>17180973
Or this railroad style

Picking this up later this week

>>17180976
Oh my

>>17180980
HELIUM YOU FOOL

>>17180989
Got the verbal confirmation?

>>17180991
>Oh my
Good or bad?

>>17180996
Got my foot in the door, at the very least.

>>17180981
ok rolexbros what the FUCK do we do about this???

>>17180998
>>17180996
Mfw this meme is still quite funny.

>>17181001
Its simple
Activate the two tone lume.

>>17181001
I love gs and that movement but those fat hour hands with the groove down the middle look like dogshit

>>17181001
Laugh at the s o y boys that buy that failure.

>Went to one of the most famous pizzerias in New York City.
>Browsed some of the display dollar slices they had.
>Salesmen realizes I'm here for one.
>Decide to buy 12 packs of breadsticks.
>Get the verbal confirmation I'm on the waiting list for a famous dollar slice of pizza.
>Don't have to pay someone sitting outside the pizzeria grey market prices for a slice of pizza

>>17181010
Why doesn't Rolex just increase prices?

>>17180996
>>17180998
>>17181002
>>17181010

Love this meme. But note- you will seethe and cope when Anon posts his Rolex

>>17181024
two tone lume shitter might as well buy a tag huehueheuhe

>>17181042
*starts to giggle a whole lot*
SHOULDA BOUGHT A ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX

>>17181045
Does Rolex make a fish finder?

>>17181046
dont need one if you're not poor hehehehhahahahohohoho

>>17180982
>>17180985
>>17180985
>>17180987
Good recs thank you very much. I'm also open to hand suggestions. I wanted to do sword hands but I don't think that works too well on a field watch application. Ideally I'd like the hands to be differently shaped like >>17180982 but not thin like >>17180987

>>17181054
rolex explorer

>>17181056
Ugly watch.

>>17181058
Refer to the chart.

>>17181059

no

>>17181062
Stop replying to yourself

>>17181062
You don't want to refer to the chart because... you're poor? RETARD

>>17181063

no

>>17181064

no

>>17181067
Cope and seethe, THE best chart sends it is regards hehehehojhheohoheeheh

>>17181068

no

>Cope and seethe, THE best chart sends it is regards hehehehojhheohoheeheh

>>17181001
At least post the not shopped photo, anon.

>the 2 permatroll pissing on each other's shoes
I've never seen a more pathetic and shameful display.

>>17181074
Really sad that Chartkun has been having full blown mental breakdowns recently.

>>17181073
Thanks

>THE best chart sends it is regards hehehehojhheohoheeheh
As always, the BEST chart is top class.

>>17181074
>I've never seen a more pathetic and shameful display.
You haven't seen your collection for a while then, I presume.

So whay are you favorite hands for a field watch guys?

>>17181080
Whatever Rolex decides is the best.

>>17181081
There are a few fantastic condition working vintage foresters on ebay right now. I won't link because some spazz will buy them all but take a lookz there arent many listings to dig through.

>>17181081
It makes it all the more fun to track them down

>>17181053
Money don't attract fish

Rolex getting Mogged by China.

>>17181084
Psssst
https://www.ebay.com/itm/255304229783

>>17181023
We have at least 2 years of fun left.

Looking for a watch that looks like this but isn't Omega.

>>17181090
I've been considering it, that was the watch I really wanted at first. I don't trust any listing that don't show the actual watch, that thing must be beat to hell for under $100.

The mtp-1302pd Casio got fucking scalped by resellers. A fucking Casio.

>>17180827
my linen dial Constellation

>>17181095
Just fucking get another one, they're not that hard to find.

>>17181094
He has 100s of them apparently. I guess you are taking a risk but he has already sold 70 of, they are very likely nos.

>>17181098
Don't want to pay $80 for a $30 watch.

What's the dumbest thing you've done in watches?

I'll start, when I was 13, I spent my life savings (around $1000) on a Tag Heuer Indy 500 quartz chronograph. The year was probably like 2005

>>17181101
They're $36 on Amazon

>>17181100
It's sold as preowned and scatched, that 70 sold number makes it even sketchier. A good used one of those goes for like $120, I wouldn't touch that listing with a stolen credit card.

>>17181103
That's pretty cool. I love Indy 500 related shit.

>>17181103
Really not that bad

>>17181104
For the white one, not the blue one.

>>17181103
Looks like something you'd get at Kmart for $20

Holy Trinity bona fides or Richemont shit?

>>17181101
It's not a $30 watch anymore then. Should have bought it when it was widely available. I still hate myself for not buying a casio daydate for $40 when I could.

>>17181108
You've got to pay for paint.

>>17181113
Wasn't released in Amerifat land yet, I'll keep on eye out.

stop posting non rolexes

>>17181107
You want to know what's worse. I sold it like 6 years ago for a tiny amount of money and now that I'm back into watches wish I had kept it just because it was the one that got me into it.

>>17181115
Lol casio daydates have been discontinued for like 5 years

Is this watch any good?

>>17181118

>>17181119
Do you have your second watch?

>>17181122
I really want that thing, holy shit.

>>17181122
Yeah it's good. It's a fucking monster.

>>17181119
You could probably find one for not that much more than what you sold it for. Check out yahoo auctions japan.

>>17181095
Nothing valuable was lost.

>>17181103
I feel your pain, anon. Wearing a Tag Heuer is like asking a AIDS ridden whore to take a dump on your wrist.
At least you survived.

>>17181124
Yeah a Casio MTD 1010 that I got at a flea market for $5 because I was scared of getting robbed of my Tag Heuer on a trip to a third world country, lmao. Idk what the fuck I thought was going on at that time. In some ways I guess this casio was actually attached more to memories.

Needs a battery now though, been sitting dead for a few years.

>>17181112
Holy Trinity

>>17181131
I may be able to find one but probably not mine. I don't think I would wear it even if I found mine. Just a momento

>>17181139
These are pretty valuable now too. I got a blue one that won't tick for some reason, second hand twitches bit doesn't move.

1997 casio g-shock gaussman antimagnetic
Too bad all the old g-shock belezs crumbled if you look at them wrong, you can find compete examples for $200 or less

This one is kinda cool
MD-714

>>17181151
rip off rolex

>>17181150
Has the mascot on the dial

>>17181145
It's because the stem isn't properly installed or one of the gears in the plastic drive train is stripped. Extremely cheap movement. I've replaced my battery in mine before and I also replaced a badly scratched crystal with a new sapphire crystal also replaced the gaskets in mine. When I put the stem back in I had the same problem. You just need to be gentle with it putting it back in. These cheap movements are extremely delicate for what they are.

Grand Seiko

>>17181155
Invicta chads stay winning

>>17181150
I kinda like the no bezel look on a gshock.

WVQ200HLA-1BV

>>17181151
I really like it. Love the old marlin casios
>>17181152
Clearly it's a 50 fat ones rip off

>>17181155
Thanks for the advice. I'll see what I can do when I get around to it

Casio overland OVW-110T titanium
Basically a more beefy version of those titanium waveceptors

>>17181157
lmao, I think I had an invicta too once a way long time ago. I remember trying to sell it at a pawn shop and getting rejected, then I tried to replace the battery and the shitty press fit back wouldn't go back on even with a case press so I just threw it away.

Ovw-100Bj-3Ajf

CASIO W 900

>>17181157
Meanwhile this goes for tens of thousands. I'd kill for that invicta

>>17181157
Meanwhile this goes for tens of thousands. I'd kill for that invicta.

>>17181174
Their name sounds like a contraction of haughty flatulence

>>17181174
>doesn't even tell the time
into the trash

>>17181193
>Buying a watch to tell the time.

>>17181195
This but unironically

POST YOUR FUCKING MINGS

>>17181213

>spitz on your hand

Apart from generally ebay and etsy, can anyone recommend me some website to look for watch hands? Also if you have some specific ebay or etsy sellers it would be appreciated.

>>17181221
https://www.esslinger.com/

>>17181213
>>17181214
>That HUGE balance wheel.

>>17180901
This is nice, a bit flashy but not too much.

>>17181223
Much appreciated. Since I'm gonna be replacing the dial on this thing I guess I should forget about finding one with a daydate window that will work with this movement and just ghost it?

I really like the case shape on this watch, it's also pretty thick which I kinda like, really gives it a solid feeling, plus being a casio you know it can actually go to 100m.

>>17181150
>mudman
>frogman
>gaussman
Does Casio really? What's next, floridaman?

>>17181238
Why replace it?

Thicc

>>17181245
ASSMAN

>>17181249
I guess I just want a litte project. I'm not a fan of the dial. Feel too much like and old man's easy to read dial. A flieger dial or something else would work well. Plus if I were to keep it there's not much place to put lume. The little circle past the numerals seem too small to be worth luming.

based or cringe?

>>17181259
I don't like it

>>17181263
why

>>17181259
Not cringe, but ugly.

>>17181267
I don't like the dial

>>17181259
Mall shitter aesthetic. I would expect this from tissot

>>17181281
but you can find rolex in malls too

>>17181245

>Sony Walkman
>Sony Discman
>Namco: Pac-Man
>Nintendo: Jump Man

Japanese companies have a long history of adding 'man' to the model name. It's nothing weird.

>>17181282
You know what mall shitter means dipshit.

>Grand Ford
>Grand Nissan
>Grand WalMart
>Grand Target
>Grand KFC
>Grand McDonald's
>Grand Wendy's
>Grand Doritos
>Grand Coca-Cola
>Grand Pepsi
>Grand Walgreens
>Grand Costco
>Grand Ikea
>Grand CVS Pharmacy
>Grand Samsung
>Grand Huawei
>Grand Sony
>Grand FedEx
>Grand Home Depot
>Grand Domino's Pizza
>Grand Burger King
>Grand Delta Airlines
>Grand Starbucks
>Grand Heineken
>Grand Budweiser
>Grand Uber
>Grand Reddit
>Grand Seiko
Living the luxury lifestyle, anons.

>>17181259
05 10 3 0ᄅ ގᄅ 6 ގƐ 0ㄣ 9 50 55

For me, it's Grand Tudor.

>>17181303
>no grand cherokee
It was right fucking there for you

>>17181309
I'll add it next time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQyI3kuq84k

I am a coper.

>>17181346

>>17181350

>>17181354
OK fag.
Now delete my post and give me a 30 days ban so I can restart my router and post it again.

>>17181348
That dial is so bland, looks like a DW.

IWC

how does this work

>>17181420
The small hand with a circle indicates the hour and the big hand with a circle points at the amounts of minutes passed.

>>17181420
You start the chrono, count to 30 pulses and read at how many bpm the heart beats.

Post watches ruined by the date window.

>>17181354
smoke some clorox faggot

Omega

>>17181445
the daytona killer

>>17181445
>tachymeter
> and 5 other useless scales, that make the dial illegible shit
why did omega became a retarded sports watch only company? The old Constellations were so fucking nice. Now they look like goatse.

>>17181093
its an omega only design

Phoibos lume

>>17181441

>>17181445
what a complete mess

>>17181445
Stroke watch

>>17181093
ruined by date window

>>17181441
Literally all grand seiko.

>>17181441

Royal Oak

give me a tl;dr of the holy trinity?

patek is smug and try hard, audemars is for rappers, vacheron is autistic and ignored?

>>17181513
FPJ ALS HMC are the real trinity

>>17180901
I like it when the dial has elements that look 'integrated' with the case, be it by color, material or overall design.

>>17181482
If it's a 3 o'clock date it's one of the best in the business.

>>17181527
>yes, I dropped my watch into a blender

>>17181513
Patek
>super exclusive and prestigious
>can't buy any if you're not already a client or recommended by a client
>weird meme complications
>independent
>owned and run by jews

Audemars
>fun, colorful, blingy
>one watch brand
>not as exclusive as Patek but almost impossible to buy at retail
>shit quality and shit customer service
>independent
>owned by the Audemars family, run by one histrionic jew

Vacheron Constantin
>Patek cope
>easily available except for a few models
>no real identity, brand is trying to be too different things at the same time
>only good models are from the Historiques collection (ie heritage models)
>use third party movements for their cheapest models
>not independent, owned by Richemont Group

>>17180854
I don't like rolex but I actually dig this.

>>17180973

>>17181549
>I don't like rolex but...
It always starts like this

>>17181558
meaning I'll end up liking rolex?

>>17181562
Stupid question, what material is the bracelet on the left?

>>17181569
It's suede or nubuck. Isn't it obvious?

I want it so bad. It's $650usd in japan

>>17181575
is it quartz

>>17181579
Yeah, it's only 9mm thick

>>17181562
Actually yes. First you start liking Rolex because it’s all you know. Then you hate Rolex because you learn about other brands that aren’t the normie choice. Then you learn exactly how Rolex is so good and you like them again.

>>17181557
If they made a mini Alpinist with the classic applied dial, no date or compass or fucking X on the dial, and in 36mm, I'd fly to Japan and suck off every Seiko salaryman I could find.

>>17181526
what are these

Longines

>>17181607
Stage 1
>WOW, a ROLEX!
Stage 2
>Ugh, Rolex....
Stage 3
>Nice Rolex
It's a rite of passage.

>>17181623
Looks nice. Let me guess. It’s 42mm and 15mm thick?

>>17181629
lmao u wish
its 49 and 17

>>17181628
Tragically, not everyone makes it to the end stage where they can enjoy Rolex AND other watches.

>>17180820
what is "this style" you mean a rotating bezel?

>>17181632
Lmao. I was giving them waaaay too much credit. More fool me, I guess.

>>17181636
Long Jeans Long Jeans Long Jeans Long Jeaaans
I'm begging on you please don't make your watches so thicc

GMT or Sub?

>>17181653
No Date Sub > GMT > Date Sub

>>17181537
>Patek
>super exclusive and prestigious
>can't buy any if you're not already a client or recommended by a client
lmao, you know nothing. You can buy any patek you want at or below retail if it's not Natuilus or Aquanaut.

>>17181657
Saw a no date at the jewelers. Just seemed boring and lacking without the cyclops. And I don’t really like cyclopses.

>>17181696
shit taste

>>17181713
sometime too much symmetry just kills a watch for me. idk

>>17181713
That's a given seeing as they like Rolex

>>17181467
That polish job is atrocious

>>17181653
Do you do more diving or flying planes?

>>17181740
Not him but can you be specific

>>17181496
Here is the minimalist fashion brand homage.

>>17181537
I remember hearing about the holy trinity a lot a few years ago but I'm glad people realized what a sham VC is, even with it's newfound shilling. I remember the first watch I got obsessed about was a VC patrimony before I actually got into watches. I think it's the perfect watch trap for the uninformed.

>>17181776
What would be a better option?

>>17181583
>Limited edition of 3000
I really don't get why Seiko does this. Fewer people died in 9/11. It's so weird seeing "limited edition of 10,000". That is not limited and knowing how many feels worse. Just call it a special edition and move on with your life.

>>17181648
kek

>>17181780
To the Patrimony? A DW. Affordable Luxury.

>>17181786
I thought you might say the traditionalle, since it at least has something going on.

>>17180792
Where can I get high-quality fake Rolex watches?

Annoying watch phrases:
>watch-collecting journey
>humble collection
>state of the collection (SOTC)
>relationship with your AD
>building rapport
>getting "the call"
>taking the watch out for a walk
>wrist check
>wrist presence
>nice finishing
>plays with the light
>a pop of color
>slips under the cuff
>wear it in good health
>strap monster
>GADA
>daily driver
>tool watch
>beater watch
>grail watch
>first real watch
>exit watch
>workhorse movement
>in-house movement
>iconic
>homage
>heritage
>haute horology
>holy trinity
>under the radar
>stealth wealth
>affordable luxury
>value proposition
>vintage military inspired
>nicknames (King, Tuna, Casioak, etc.)
>why didn't you get a Rolex instead?
>watch community
>microbrand

>>17181776
>what a sham VC is
Retards in the thread? Who would have thought?

>>17181801
>>17181802
>>17181803
Nice Jacob&Co.

u jealous gweilo?

>>17181800
this fuckin guy

>>17181800
All of that is correct except I disagree with iconic, microbrand, and vintage military inspired, iconic is ok to describe any fashion item as long as it really is iconic (like chuck taylors or wayfarers), microbrand is a real thing and owning a microbrand watch is cringe, and how else would you describe a watch that is supposed to look like an old military watch, but is larger, has domed sapphire, etc?

>>17181537
>Audemars trashcan
>Audemars wheelchair
>Audemars Rollieface Rick Flair

>>17180792
f91w-9 with a nato strap, need it or keep it? image stollen from r*ddit

>>17181303
>Grand Ford
Lincoln
>Grand Nissan
Infiniti
>Grand WalMart
Moosejaw
>Grand McDonald's
Boston Market
>Grand Wendy's
Pasta Pomodoro
>Grand Doritos
Starbucks

Half the remainder are owned by the same company. ITT: Anon learns about the global economy and "luxury products" are just a way to milk middle class people with the same trash.

>>17181557
Alpinist gang represent

>>17181801
>>17181802
>>17181803
>>17181818
I've never been impressed by Métiers d'Arts.
Many brands are on this segment : Jacob & Co, Van Cleef & Arpels, Channel, Louis Vuitton, Blancpain, Breguet... All it says about these brands is they make a shit ton of money on mass produced luxury goods, so they can afford to pay large teams of people working on 5 watches a year. Also I unironically think it's kind of tasteless... It's not a coincidence if the larger markets for thes watches are chinks and arabs.

I'm more impressed by a brand's capacity to produce large amounts of cool/interesting/accurate/well built watches.

>>17181873
I'm still seething over their rape of the sarb017
Alpinist should not get a prospex logo
Cyclops is debatable, I don't agree with it but it's debatable
But prospex logo makes me seethe

Thoughts on Brew chronos?

Thought on this ?

absolutely SOVLful

>>17181878
I’m not the biggest fan of the prospex X on any of the classic numbered dials. I do think it looks really balanced on the sharktooth with the red 20bar.
The cyclops I’m getting used to but I debate trying to get it off with a torch pretty often.

>>17181884
i think it's cool:
vintage looking
unlit most of the time
thin old LEDs

is it vintage? modern LEDs are bigger font'd than alarm clocks... pic related

>>17181884
Prepare to get raped by Yema if anything ever goes wrong (and it will)

>>17181873
shark tooth is my beater/beach watch. a little thicc but not end of the world. I’m debating sourcing a SARB solid caseback to thin it down some.

>>17181885
What kind of retard needs AM and PM hour markers?

>>17181892
That's the new Kavinski limited edition from Yema
>>17181893
I knock on wood for now I still have nothing to complain about my other Yema

>>17181904
It looks cool which is all that matters.

>>17181904
Americants. Cause they still use the am pm gimmick.

>>17181797
www.tudorwatch.com

>>17181917
post more pictures pls? looks good but expensive imo
probably the best LED revival watch you can buy atm

YEMA is really coming back it feels like

Citizen

>>17181925
Here's a few more
https://files.catbox.moe/fawdh5.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/6mht40.jpg

>>17181925
They're $300 something. Only other widely available watches with LEDs is the bulova computron and armitron grifft

>>17181971
yeah the more i see it the better it looks
bulova fucked up when they made the font bold, it looks cheap in comparison

btw 300€ is way above my budget for watches desu

my most expensive one is a modern second hand tissot i got for 150€))) pic related not mine

>>17181978
The armitron griffy isn't awful looking if you really want an LED watch. You other option is the crapshoot of vintage LED watches.

>>17181988
>armitron griffy
really disliking it though, compare it to yours and you'll see how cheap it looks :-D

i have enough watches anyway, it's already unreasonable

but nice one anyway, enjoy it

>mfw there are at least 30 watches over 5k I want to buy

>>17180792
How close to too big is this watch for my wrist?

>>17182039
way too big for you buddy
get something around 34mm

>>17181880
>Where should we put the date window?
>How about at 3?
>Nah, too obvious
>What about 4, opposite the subdial?
>Too symmetrical
>4:30?
>4:32.
>Perfect

>>17182047
Can you even get similar diver watches that size?

Just got the call

>>17182000
I'm a different anon. I wish I had the kavinsky yema.

>>17182039
Too close to? It’s already waaay too big for your wrist

Also tuck your shirt in.

>>17182039
You are maxed out. You can try experimenting with straps to help, but I would not keep buying similar or larger sized watches. jmho

>>17182039
>How close to too big is this watch for my wrist?
Already too big. Stick to 36mm or less. 34mm Rolex would probably be perfect.

>>17182051
WOmen's

>>17182066
>It’s already waaay too big for your wrist
Well shit. I'll have to deal with it and do more forearm exercises.
>>17182067
I wouldn't go any bigger, this is 38.5mm. What strap would you suggest?
>>17182069
Post similar watches that are smaller

>>17182072
>Post similar watches that are smaller
Look up ladies’ divers. Many of them come in traditional black/blue and look like men’s watches.

>>17180798
>>17180799
Looking at getting a new watch, besides Junkers which watch brands contributed to the axis war effort? Thanks

>>17182076
Consider the Oris Aquis 36mm for example.

>so much of a wristlet I need to buy women's watches

>>17182080
Nice watch there, a bit expensive though. Is oris good?

>>17182079
Sinn came from a Nazi pilot iirc

>>17182088
>Is oris good?
No, and they're utterly delusional on their pricing.

>>17182088
They’re fine. Nothing special. Off the shelf movements so anyone can service them.
You can save money buying used. Guys will buy them for their wives and then the wife never wears it because 36mm is still too big for her. You can get them in new condition for half price.

I hate niggers, watches for this feel?

>>17182039
retard stop looking at it from your POV
watch it from a mirror, that's how it appears irl

>>17182060
>I wish I had the kavinsky yema.
you and i both, different anon

>>17182109
fossil

new
>>17182118
>>17182118
>>17182118
>>17182118
>>17182118

>>17182094
Thanks, that's a contender

>>17182049
Golden ratio.
1 - 0.618 = 0.382
0.382 × 12 hours = 4.584 hours
0.584 × 60 minutes = 35.04 minutes
4:35

>>17181872
Is it called Grand Ford or Lincoln?
Is it called Grand Nissan or Infiniti?
Is it called Grand Walmart or Moosejaw?
Etc...
Anon is right, tho.
It's retarded to name your luxury company grand something, if that something is associated with cheap products with quality control issues.

>>17181874
>I'm more impressed by a brand's capacity to produce large amounts of cool/interesting/accurate/well built watches.
Funny thins is, you write that as if anyone care. No trolling, but unless you can pay Métiers d'Arts level prices, your opinion regard them is null to the brands.
That's the harsh reality for most anons here.

>>17180885
>muh patina

Did I do it right?

>>17180906
I like mine a lot. Maybe not worth the money but it was a gift so I can live with it

>>17181088
Rolex npc’s on suicide watch