/fa/ - Fashion

>>15897798
it is totally RADICAL, man!

I used to be a real LOSER. Since I became a communist I know am a really COOL guy and I get lots of SEX.

>>15897798
it is totally RADICAL, man!

I used to be a real LOSER. Since I became a communist I now am a really COOL guy and I get lots of SEX.

>>15897798
Yes. You're on the right side of history.

Very cringe, comrade

Political extremism in any form is effay by nature commie flags look fucking disgusting if you ask me

Remember to support big tech and billion dollar capitalistic corporations, comrade!

Them Drumfy nazi right wingers are against these things, fascists!!

No pasaran!

>>15897798
No matter how much you stick to a political ideology, covering your image with it will only make you look like a shallow fanatical idiot.

If you're gonna do it, be subtle.

>>15897798
ideologies are as effay as their creators.

>>15897854

>>15897857

>>15897798
no

>>15897798
yes

>>15897831
This

we already have a thinspo thread, OP.

>>15897798
No.

Political ideologies are devoid of fashion. If you want to somehow argue which political faction has an objectively better sense of fashion that’s a different discussion.

>>15898028
Don’t conflate ideologies that deviate from communism. (i.e. Stalinism)

No. I'm a communist and study it all week long. Extremely alienating to everyone, hard to talk about without using cliched terms, generally boring uncreative and a dead ideology

>>15898094
how is it dead?

>>15898094
>self proclaimed communist
>dislikes communism
just become a post-modernist or something if you hate it.

>>15897798
yes

>>15898103
Look at modern "communists" kek. Same with fascism though looking at right wingers.

only if you win

Only true communism, not what you think communism is, гaмбypгep.

>>15898103
You'll never get the working class to join an ideology that's like 75% trannies that hate them because they're white

classicalism, high culture and hierarchies are the most effay so no

yes

>>15897798
/Fa/scism is MUCH more effay

>>15897798
Nah, aesthetically Communism is rather soulless

>>15897798
It's Reddit tier and tranny (seriously, why are all commies trannies).

>>15898569
shit example, looking like this would get you arrested in pre 1990s eastern europe, up until highschool i had teachers threatening to get me expelled because i had longer than average hair and that was happening 30years after the revolution.

>>15898738
Yeah people dont realise old school communism is socially conservative as fuck, they wouldn't of liked the blue haired liberal tranny retards either.

>>15897798
Lol no, communist is the complete opposite of effay. communist makes everyone wear the same shit that is just 'good enough' for everyone.

Supporting communism today is straight up admitting you are retarded.

>>15898945
>straight up admitting you are retarded.

>>15898738
>>15898867
sorry to break this to you guys, but the USSR wasn't communist. Neither is China. Read Hoxha, read Marx, read Bordiga.

>>15898955
>my perfect form of communism hasn't been tried!

>>15898955
Yeah and Third Reich wasn't fascist, it just has not been implemented correctly. :^)

>>15898949
He is right to some extent though. Fashion as a production is extremely classist and most designers are not affordable for prolets. And don't even start with "b..but muh vintage Yohji!". There is a reason why all of communist countries looked same - regulating textile production on the state level made clothes affordable for everyone and clothes were made not per customer but per state order (aka 5 years plan).
>t. grew up in CSSR

>>15898979
absolutely, yes. It did not abolish private property, it did not abolish currency, it did not abolish class relations, it was imperialist, it was bureaucratic. The conditions for a communist "state' (which is a contradiction in itself, hence further proving that calling it a communist state is retarded) is readily available in the first pages of the communist manifesto guys. atleast read the arguments you're trying to dunk on.

>>15898996
>it did not abolish currency
Bruh USSR literally abolished currency from 1919 to 1924, didn't work as all could see.
>it was imperialist
So what about: CSSR, HPR, GDR, SRR, Yougoslavia etc. All of them were not imperialist yet showed same shit as USSR.
>it did not abolish class relations
You cannot abolish class system in a nation, there is a reason why Red Terror happened in the first place. At the bare minimum there will always be two classes - communists and everyone else (=enemies).

>>15897804
>>15897824

>>15897798
yes

>>15899006
>Bruh USSR literally abolished currency from 1919 to 1924, didn't work as all could see.
if you are talking about the monetary reform in the Soviet Union from 1922–24, it did not abolish currency at all. It was a reform proposed to conteract the inflation, and it was passed through a centralised banking system. very communist lol
>So what about: CSSR, HPR, GDR, SRR, Yougoslavia etc. All of them were not imperialist yet showed same shit as USSR
They were USSR satalite states. Of course they showed the same shit as the USSR. it doesn't mean they achieved actual communism.
>You cannot abolish class system in a nation, there is a reason why Red Terror happened in the first place. At the bare minimum there will always be two classes - communists and everyone else (=enemies)
read Marx. Communism is explicitely Stateless. If you think that's unacheivable is another matter, and completely derails that of which we were talking about (was the USSR communist (it wasn't))
And i haven't even mentioned surplus labour, the bourgeois relations of production, the central bank etc etc

>>15899013
#Owned

>>15898955
Neither are blue haired liberal trannies m8, communism is an economic theory, theres no mention of having to tolerate deviants.

>>15898996
I can't remember the soviet union ever claiming to be communist, it was a socialist state. communism isn't attainable instantly.

People can also have property in a theoretically true communist society too, a house could be considered personal property, as could everything inside it. What marx was on about was the means of production.

>>15898955
imagine being this guy lmao

>>15897864
The sunglasses on the guy on the left look great, anyone got id on them?

>>15897798
No. The flag design is so shitty. The ideology is also cringe as fuck. The principle of total equality and man as purely an economic creature is gay.

>>15898450
Cuban thotties...

>>15898955
>Read Hoxha
Oh no no no
>>15897824
Neoliberal chapo trannies arent commies

>>15897798
Yes

In theory?
Yes.
In reality?
No
See, people are greedy and don’t want to earn the same as someone else when they do more work. That’s why communism failed.

>only posting old pics of commies and none from within the last 20 years
Interesting, I can't imagine why nobody is posting effay pics of modern day commies.

>>15899801
pretty sure every model you have a picture of is a leftist

>>15899793
>See, people are greedy and don’t want to earn the same as someone else when they do more work

It's a myth that everyone would be paid the same, do some research instead of relying on tired tropes anon.

>>15899834
>everyone left is a communist

>>15898539
this

>>15897798
Leftcoms are but no other kind. Be an anarchist instead we're way sexier

>>15898094
any logical man who thought commie was cool hates it because it literal babies/normies first extremism and it doesn't even work. it's so safe that you'll see posters of it being sold on campus and professors promoting it. it's the basic bitch revolutionary where you can wear merch of it without anyone caring

>>15897824
I don't know any leftists (insofar as there are any) that like big tech.

>>15898989
>and Third Reich wasn't fascist
I mean, they technically weren't. That was Italy's dominant party.

>>15900656
it's so safe that you'll see posters of it being sold on campus
The irony is that it's (attempted) practice isn't safe, though. The CIA made sure of that.

>>15898542
>classicalism, high culture and hierarchies
this is for incels, most especially cringe classicism and simping for trust fund fags

>>15899834
>leftist
*liberal

>>15897798
yes, if you do it right. radical chic, bohemian chic are a thing. it's very difficult though.

No. Being political is never fashionable, it just makes people think you're a try hard fag

>>15897798
Yes.

>>15899801
The same reason that pictures of modern day white supremacists are ignored over nazi propaganda whenever /pol/sters want to make themselves look cool.

imagine the smell

>>15897798
Communism has kitschy aesthetics and not in a good way.