/fa/ - Fashion

what watch would guts wear

From the H to the M
And the M to the T

Good evening watch fans

>>15613862
Nice quartz penis. It's too bad you don't see textured cases like that much outside of those $50k+ LE models in platinum these days.

>>15613862
Hot

>>15613853
Look at these sword hands

The perfect design

>>15613853
Unironically a Casio F91W or something attached with a nylon or leather strap
He just needs something that tells time, including in the dark, in the easiest and most understandable format with no other features, and the plastic band will have long since rotted off from abuse.

>>15613867
>It's too bad you don't see textured cases like that much
yours for under $130

>>15613879
>Casio F91W
>in the dark
its near useless in the dark with that one puny ass LED
get one with the EL backlight

>>15613881

Bully me on my choice. New tudor royal 38mm not because im a wristlet but because im a poorfag and can't afford 41. I dont mind small wrist watches though, I like my f91w and my komanderskie and they are a lot smaller than this.

>>15613881
>>15613867
oh you mean textured CASES

lol ok didnt read

>>15613891
don't do it it looks tacky and hideous

>>15613891
if you remove the tudor logo it literally looks like a generic mallshitter brand aka raymond weil or whatever

>>15613891
Was this made in Paint? I’m not bothered enough to look up actual pictures, but do whatever you please.

>>15613853
Casio Duro because he's not a wristlet

>>15613905
Heres a non gold one, both these pics are off the tudor website btw.

>>15613891
>Bully me on my choice
Get what you like. You're the one that has to be happy with it. But if you think you won't be 100% satisfied with it then don't waste money on a whim

>>15613931
Looks much better but in that style I much prefer the Omega Globemaster.

>>15613915
The duro can easily be worn by wristlets, stop coping with your shitty watch.

>>15613947
lmao if you're smaller than 6.7 you can't pull it off
manlet and wristlet cope

>>15613891
tudor is aiight and 38 is good, but that watch is hideous.
two-tone is horrible but looks even worse on a black dial.
then the date window is white. it's a disaster.

does anyone else think it's weird when a dial with roman numerals has a date window with arabic numerals?

>He doesn't grease his seals
>He doesn't grease his crown threads
>He doesn't grease his bezel
>he doesn't grease his lug holes

>>15613956
>my penis is small so I cope with my wrist size and mock "wristlets"
Next you'll be wearing those 59mm invictas.

>>15613960
fuck off u autistic retard.

>>15613931
tudor is so fucking trash

>>15613960
Why would you grease your bezel and lug holes? The grease will just trap more dust particles in the bezel and lug holes is just retarded.

>>15613931
much better

>Price ranges: 41mm: $2,325 to $3,350; 38mm: $2,250 to $3,300; 34mm:$2,200 to $3,975; 28mm: $2,150 to $3,975.

whats the difference in price?
i guess u can also consider the omega constellation

>>15613963
big wrists = big cock always

>>15613960
>he forgot to grease his deployant clasp

ngmi

>>15613960
I'll grease your lug hole.

>>15613972
Holy mother of cope.

>>15613972
>big wrists = big cock always

>>15613972
this is true
source and proof: me

>>15613978
>>15613977
Imagine being a manlet, wristlet and cocklet these these two anons

>>15613972
This is true. All MUDMEN have big wrists and even bigger MUD cocks

>>15613982
I'm 7.25'' , 6'2 and 8'', you're just a moron trying to justify your shitty watch.

>>15613990
yes anon I'm sure you're a very big boy

why do you guys assume everyone here has a dick?

>>15613987
Mud with mud within mud. Interlinked.

>>15613982
Imagine being so insecure that you have to lie about yourself on a Yugoslavian counterfeit Rolex appreciation forum

>>15614013
cute mudBOY
MUDMEN do NOT need solar and can keep their own time just fine

>>15614016
Can't you see we're on the same side of the mudpit? Infighting will only serve to bolden the Rolexfags.

>>15613993
theres only like one girl here and she dont post that often
unless you are another

>>15613993
it's either on you, or in you, plus automatics are for prime for jack-off charging

>Day 14.5 of waiting for my Stowa to arrive

Yes sir! Oh lawdy. What a damn fine watch. To expensive though. Wish the chinks could fake em.

>>15614074
how underwhelming for a GS

>>15614074
Of course the chinks could fake em but there is no money in it. No one wants a GS.

>>15613991
For you

>>15614064
aliexpress usually delivers ~30 days anon

>>15613993

>>15614095
chinese fake everything. they fake cigarettes

>>15614129
because cigarettes are very profitable.

>>15614095
They make fake f91, you'll be able to find a fake gs

>>15614021
Those merely adapting to the MUD are on a path into nothingness. Man's higher calling is to RESIST his base nature and MASTER the MUD in order to find the meaning of his existence.

>>15614134
because millions of f91w are sold each year so there is a large existing market. gs sell a fraction of that which means very very few people want a fake.

I love/hate mud posters

>>15614160
Why hate?

>>15614139
Analog is fucking ugly though.

>>15614223
Because they're fucking annoying

>>15614226
I love analog g shocks

>>15614244
me too, such a shame I'm a wristlet

>>15614244
When I want to know the time, I just want to glance at my watch and immediately know. Not stand there and calculate the hand positioning like an autist.

I mean, maybe you just like the aesthetic?

>>15614259
>Not stand there and calculate the hand positioning like an autist.
Jesus fucking Christ you're retarded.

>>15614259
Do you also count the indexes from the 12 position if they aren't numbered to count the hours you goddamn retard?

>>15614257
What model is this?!?

>>15614304
filename, it's a gravity master

>>15614306
I call it the gash master

>>15614259
>Not stand there and calculate the hand positioning like an autist.
Do you have brain damage or something?, analog or digital, you must see two things, the hour and the minutes.WTF is calculating the time on analog?, hour hand first, minute hand second, watching them takes less than 2s.

I don't like analog G-Shocks because the hand design is usually not that appealing to me, but not being able to quickly tell analog time is pathetic. The difference is what, .5 seconds to figure out which hand is pointing where?

>>15614314
Analog g-shocks are almost universally hideous and shitty.

>>15614013
can poorfags into mudman?

>>15614317
Well that's just like your opinion man

>>15614339
The og mudman is cheaper then half of the pretty colorway 5600
/
Look for the 9000 model on eBay, should be in the $60-$70 range

anyone else take a shit with their watch on?

>>15614499
...why would I take off my watch to shit?

>>15614555
To not get shit particles on your watch.

>>15614557
How do you shit in a way where that is a legitimate concern?

>>15614499
What are you, muslim? Wipe with your right hand.

>>15614576
im indian

>>15614593

>>15614597
fuck off, its not my fault i was born indian

>>15614598
don't you guys believe in samsara and reincarnation and stuff
it probably was

>>15614607
that is some incredible generalization. its like saying all americans praise the burger. and im not your "guy" asshole

>>15614611
>its like saying all americans praise the burger.
we do

gimme those fleur-de-lis hands I say

>>15614611
>tfw I praise the burger

>>15614593
I fucking knew it.

Redpill me on Daniel Wellington watches

>>15614727
Read the OP
https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

What's the largest watch one can wear while still retaining one's dignity?

>>15614737
30mm

>>15614730
What if I were a f*male

>>15614745
There are better women's watches out there for the price, I'm sure.

>>15614746
Any good recs? What I found most appealing about Dave Wellington was the strap options, either plain leather straps or small gold links. I feel like men’s watches tend to have more versatile straps desu

>>15614759
Don't have any off-hand. Could also just look around <=36mm men's watches if you can pull off that size.

>>15614745

>>15614773
Only because you asked so nicely :^)

>>15614745

Post a DW watch you like and we’ll give you a real alternative.

>>15614797
I’m not married to the minimalism aesthetic of the watch face, but I really like this band. They also have a plain caramel colored leather band I really enjoy

>>15614810
>I’m not married
please be in london

>>15614593

>>15614810
The aforementioned leather strap

>>15614834
Now that I think of it, watches with calendars would be super helpful. Given the examples I provided, I’ll probably want to stay at or below $200

Anyone have a DW-9052? How easy is it to press the adjust button?

>>15614853

You can find the Junghans Max Bill Quartz for under $350 in mint condition if you look around

https://www.jomashop.com/junghans-watches.html?movement=Quartz

You can buy and change leather bands yourself extremely easily. Also I guarantee that Daniel Wellington is using cheap “leather” straps from Chinese websites, just as you can.

Thoughts on fossil watches? I’ve heard good things about their wallets but that’s not necessarily a marker of a good watchmaker

>>15614882

>>15614698
These look really good. My fav is the blue and yellow one.

>>15614853
>>15614881

https://www.jomashop.com/junghans-max-bill-quartz-white-dial-mens-watch-041-4817-04.html

>>15614890
Thanks for the recommendations. I’ll definitely check them out

>>15614853
You can check out Calvin Klein and Mondaine on jomashop.com, both entry level swiss made brands, their models have the contemporary minimalist look but they use better quality movements and materials than DW well under $200. They have a more traditional styling but Eterna's "Eternity" and Tissot's "Tradition" and "Bella Ora" lines might be worth checking out, too.

Has anyone tried attaching a torsion spring to the second hand to smooth out the movement, kinda like a smoothing capacitor?

>>15615017
That's pretty much what the seiko 5S21 does if I'm not mistaken. It beats at 4Hz then uses a spring (encapsulated in oil? I forget) to smooth out that movement. I might have some of the details wrong so look up the movement yourself.

>>15614851
no backlight. no deal.

What's /wt/'s verdict on Casios bluetooth stuff?
Seems like most G-shocks (and some others too) have a bluetooth function so that you can use your watch from you phone and stuff.
Now, that obviously defeats the purpose of a watch, but on the other hand, for some more complicated ones, it seems like a good idea for the initial setup, which just is a bunch of complicated morse code with 4 buttons.
But assuming I'll just use it for the setup, can I switch it off and have it not waste energy?
Also, how accurate are they? Since they're touting bluetooth as a way to sync the time with your phone (which in turn syncs with the network, which in turn (i believe) syncs with "official" time), I'm kinda worried that they're using the lowest binned movements, since it's gonna get reset every day or so, which would suck if you're using it without bluetoth.

>>15615025
Iirc that's a fairly common feature on old stopwatches

>>15613891
>New tudor royal 38mm not because im a wristlet but because im a poorfag and can't afford 41
>Tudor
>but because im a poorfag
Stop falling for the >le tudor is le poor mans rolex meeme! If you can afford a Tudor, you're not a poorfag. But looking at the
>can't afford 41
part, you might as well be poor and stupid. Lemme guess, you really want to put all of your meagre savings into one, single watch?

>>15615059
Old stopwatches just run at fuckyou speeds if I'm not mistaken.

>>15614259
>Not stand there and calculate the hand positioning like an autist.
Donald, is that you? Shouldn't you rest and make sure you recover? you got a country to run (into the ground…).

>>15614727
5 bucks worth of watch sold for 150 because your favourite podcast host told you so.

>>15615079
How the fuck do you even read this

>>15614759
You do know that you can buy straps without the watch and change them? DW's textile straps are literally less than $2 off aliexpress.

>>15615085
It's a 2 minute stop watch. Main seconds hands go up to 3 seconds and the sub-dial has markings for 3 second intervals.

>>15614882
Eh, they're okay.
A bit overpriced for what they are, sure, but at least they are quite sturdy. I have one that has taken a few beatings and it's still doing okay.
The level of finish is a bit lame though.
Their bracelets are awful but all their watches come with these slide bracelets so you can easily replace them without tools.

Talk me out of getting this.

>>15615085
small dial, small numbers = seconds (in steps of 3 (markers) and 6 (numbers)
small dial, big numbers = minutes
large dial, small numbers = split seconds
large dial, large numbers = seconds (steps of tree, so every round the small dial jumps one marker)
At least that's what I'd assume, but what do I know, I'm just a brainlet…

But on the topic of stop watches and stuff like
>>15614259:
For stop watches, digital really beats analog, even if you don't care for split seconds. Hence:
Ana digi if you actually need a tool watch! Best of both worlds, especially if it's got a dive/timing bezel. Now if only pic related came in a wearable size, some money would just run out of my wallet.

>>15615099
I can't, it's one of maybe three acceptable bauhaus designs.
Only problem is that it's overpriced.

I dont know why I bothered buying anything other than rolex or cartier

>>15614737
both ends of the strap visible when viewing dial straight on.

>>15615109
We all make mistakes at the start.

>>15615109
>get looked down on both sides

yes, get a rolex or a cartier like a middle aged karen and her whipped husband.

>>15614698
based
one of the best watches ever made

>>15613960
i don't have the time for shit like this i have to fuck my wife lol

>>15613869
best watch i ever saw in a watch thread
where is it from?
i hope mine will be as fucked up one day to be honest

>>15614864
>orient divers
>le SARB
>le skx
>le bambino
all plebbit shit and you should feel bad for owning any of them

>>15615365
The watch posted is better then everything you listed but ok retard

>>15615039
this watch looks so bad it's almost cool

>>15615101
>in a wearable size
tuna cases can be enjoyed by wristlets because the l2l is only around 45mm

>>15613960
>tfw I just sat down and greased like 10 of my watches
feels amazing man, everything is so smooth

"Suggest a watch for me."
> up to 450$
> for daily use and for some events (theatre, birthdays, funeral)
> Movement, no matter, but prefer mechanical-self-winding watches
> Desired features: i want to dive in sea with watches (i guess it's 50WR at least), cool if they have a date
> Preferred strap option: no matter, but i prefer non-steel strap
> 7.4 inches wrist size

pic related watches that i like, but they so fucking pricey

>>15615373
embrace the MUD

>>15615373
you need to look up what water resistance means
50M water resistance doesn't mean you can jump 50M deep in the ocean and your watch will be fine. it means your watch has pressure resistance but that has little to do with waterproofing. generally if something has 50M water resistance, you are taking a huge risk even swimming in it. it's basically saying your watch will survive light rainstorms. if you intend on swimming you want 100M and if you're actually diving, 200M
now you are not going to get an automatic chronometer for that money unless you get very lucky on ebay but you have a lot of choice in solar or meca-quartz.

>>15615377
No, thanks
>>15615380
Oh, i see. So i guess i don't really need a mechanical one. Can you give me some pieces that a solar or quartz one?

>>15615382
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=citizen+chronograph+men&ref=nb_sb_noss_1
the world is your oyster
citizen and seiko make cool quartz chronos. citizen's designs tend to have more "attitude" and seiko's are more classic.
undone watches is a brand out of hong kong that makes very nice meca-quartz chronos too, if you want something more indie, their watches have a good degree of quality and are priced very reasonably at around $300 and have a more classic style.
there's also the meme brand dan henry which makes very cool chronographs inspired by watches from different eras but some people bitch because they don't want to see some dude's name on the dial.
I'd check out all four and make your decision.

Any watches like this with the tourbillion/small seconds combo but at a more reasonable price?
Color isn't important.

>>15615388
No, you are asking if you can have one of the most wanktastic expensive complications a watch can have, for less money. It's not happening unless you are buying a stolen watch from some crackhead.

>>15615388
There's some ugly chink tourbillons movement for ~$800 in several shitters.

>>15615373
Is Raymond Weil a good brand? Never heard of them.

>>15615392
It's one of those brands that makes good watches but they don't get talked about much and they lack any singularly famous design. Kind of like Carl F. Bucherer.

>>15615392
They are not good but they are not bad either. They are the definition of average. Kind of like a Swiss version of Christopher Ward. Low end mechanical fashion watches for the masses.

good morning fellow seiko cutlists

>>15615388
seagull makes tourbillions for $1000 onwards

>>15615380
Please, please explain to me how underwater pressure testing somehow has "little to do with waterproofing"

when the FUCK is Christopher Ward going to get a proper logo

>>15615434
makes it look liek a shitter that you can get dropshipped with your name on it

>>15615433
because people think if a watch says "water resistant 50M" it means they can jump 50M deep in the ocean and it'll be fine. when a watch is tested it's tested at static pressure. the method which water is interacting with the watch is rarely going to be static.
if your watch has 30M water resistance, that is generally understood to mean you can wash your hands with the watch on. if you are on dry land washing your car and you accidentally have the hose on too strong, the water coming out of that hose can exceed the tolerance of the watch and destroy it.
a water resistance of 50M means you can tread water in the watch and float on the surface of the seas for a bit, but it might be taken out by heavy rain or by wearing it in a hot shower.

>>15615441
It really makes all the difference in the world. Imagine if Grand Seiko had instead of the GS, printed "Grand Seiko" in fucking sans serif font on the dial.

>>15615447
Grand Seiko dials used to say Seiko GS Grand Seiko. And it was awful

>>15615446
>because people think if a watch says "water resistant 50M" it means they can jump 50M deep in the ocean and it'll be fine.
This would be true if a watch that had 50m on the dial is tested to 50m, but they aren't, it's just an arbitrary number slapped on the dial.
>static pressure. the method which water is interacting with the watch is rarely going to be static.
Literally a Reddit i love science ™ meme that's doing damage control for the watch industry lying to you, it's just not even true that you are significantly increasing the pressure on a watch by wiggling your arm around underwater but it sure sounds like I nice explanation.

>>15615456
whatever, the point is that your watch is less water resistant than you think

>>15615428
That's not even a tourbillion. It's a normal balance wheel made to look like one.

Get me a domed glass GMT watch with cream dial under say, $400-600, thanks.
Prerably with an elegant GMT hand thats not a BIG ARROW.

Absolutely CHUFFED

Join the based watchcord without any overbearing mods and nigger janny admin

emvDkgs

>>15615423
morning

>just sold out
>next batch next year at the earliest
Just shoot me then I guess

>>15614064
*sigh...sorry anon. Be happy. At least you didn't buy some meme watch that shits up this board.

>>15615363
It came from a listing on a site that sells watches, that fucker is long gone

>>15615498
2 big

>>15615434
The same day that Dan Henry does

>>15615500
you don't need to take estrogen, lil' breh
they won't do anything
run while you can

>>15615505
>dive watch
>leather strap

>>15615505

hideous and impractical lugs. also the finishing on the case and bezel sucks.

>>15615573
>finishing on the case and bezel sucks.
its called a brushed finish and its intentional.

>>15615423
good morning

walking dog

>>15615604
Your dog is tiny, just like your wrist

>>15615606
dog is small but my wrist is 7.8

>>15615604
Perro

>>15615610
that is a big ass wrist how tall are ya, bmi?

>>15615613
im not tall, king of manlets so 5 foot 11. not sure what my bmi is but im about 180lbs. i think thats overweight but i do have muscle from when i used to lift

7.8" wrist at 5'11 and measly 180lbs is BIG BONED legit

>>15613890
I own this

>>15615622
its slightly annoying cause i have to wear my watch on the last available slot on the band. its useful for lifting however since good form is easy to do. pros and cons i guess

>>15615099
Breaks VERY easily

>>15615505
Looks pretty cool, shame about the crazy case

>>15615655
do you have 1st hand experience or...?

>>15615423
'Sup.

>>15615680
>he bought the cheapo version

NEW TEDDY!

https://youtu.be/8qrbTg-SUpI

end game watch.

>>15615682
Huh?

moonphase 2bh

Post one (1) moon phase watch that actually spins in the correct direction.

>>15615604
do people really buy gold plated watches?

>>15615709
no that watch there was free... yep

moon phase 3bh

>>15613960
i'll grease your mother's anus

>>15615099
chronoscope better

>>15615723
More like chronicslop

>>15615692
SKX007-J is what you want

SKX without the "J" is the cheapskate version. Simple as.

THAT'S right
cheap ass poorfag

>>15615737
>>15615739
>>15615741
fuck off Igor. Show your trip so everyone here can filter you.

>>15615739
SKX is a trash watch. Simple as.

This is after a long day. Proof that these kinda straps with the vents that wick away sweat are superior.

>>15615748

>>15615737
Why would I pay extra just because a nip has overseen the watch production in Malaysia?

Guys, does anyone here know if it's possible to buy a new Rolex as a first time buyer? I'm aware of all the fuckery surrounding authorised dealers and I've just sent a message to my local to the effect of 'Hey, I'd like to buy a yellow 36mm oyster perpetual now and a few more different models in future, could you help me out?'. Should I expect a response from them, or am I just deluding myself?

>>15615773
>I'd like to buy a yellow 36mm oyster perpetual

>>15615773
I don’t know how the new models have sold, but it shouldn’t be anywhere near as impossible as the meme divers with nicknames.
You might have to wait some months, but even without a purchase history you should be able to land one.

>>15615773
everyone else buying shitters while this guy gets a pisser lmao

>>15615773
Should be easy to get, because who in their right mind would want that ugly piece of shit?

>>15615763
So as to not look like a cheapskate non-J skx buyer

>>15615804
Nobody actually gives a fuck Igor, it's a cheap Seiko.

>>15615829
non-J cope

>>15613891
It looks dated like from the 70s or 80s.

>>15615829
This is a perfect example of COPING

>>15615773
One the initial hype dies and scalpers buying them stop the OP's should be a lot more readily available than any of the other new releases.

You should get a response from the AD even if its to say try again in a few months.

>>15613891
Get a Turn-O-graph.

>>15615773
I think that buying one of those "stella" dials as your first/only nice watch is a bad idea, those are watches for people who already have everything and now are looking for a watch to match their lambo or outfit.
But answering your question, now I think that for you they are impossible to get, they are the brand new toy that everybody wants. But in a year or so, when they become old news, I think one color or two are going to be hard to get, but the others you can easily get. Which ones are going to be hard to get? I think the green(the rolex green/hulk...), the turquoise(le tiffany dial...) and the yellow is very similar to the vintage stella, so a lot of people are after those.
But try your luck.

>>15613891
If I was you, I would save a little bit more and get the new 36mm oyster perpetual with the grey sunburst dial and yellow gold hands/markers. Really cool looking, pretty much a tone down two tone datejust.
Don't know why but that tudor really gives me patek neptune vibe. Unless you really like that watch, is a mistake getting it.
Also wait for a while, those are going to be easy to get for much less in the secondary market.

>>15615796
kek

>>15615723
>>15615735
i'm considering going to my local AD and trying to get the chronoscope with sapphire crystal retrofit and mesh bracelet

i think it's like 2600 retail, and see if they'll do it for 2000

i have a tangente 38 date and seiko spb149
i'd like to eventually add the junghans and a stowa classic 40 flieger and close out my collection
thoughts?

>>15615369
Thanks, I guess?
But I'm wating for some smaller adaptors.

Can someone explain to me the casio classic/vintage series?
There's a bunch of really cheap G-shocks in there, that apparently arent' G-shocks, and then there's stuff like pic related: Triple sensor and al that stuff at half the price of the cheapest Pro-Trek.
Where's the catch?

>>15615773
If you're serious im sure you'll be fine.
But fuck that thing is ugly.

>>15615773
Unless you're buying the hypebeast shit (Daytona, Pepsi/Batman GMT, Sub) then you'll probaby be able to

a dateJUST is usually people's first Rolex

>>15615835
>>15615849
Piss off samefag.

Any scary movie recommendations?

>>15616033
i l-love you bro

>>15614810
Did you know that you can buy ONLY the strap? Don't buy a DW just because you like the strap, do i really have to explain why? Just buy a proper watch and a strap you like and you're good.

>>15616008
Get a life fag

>>15616033
Event Horizon.

>>15615773
double baton is fucking hideous what the fuck

>>15615461
You sure about that? It looks like a memebillion to me.

>>15616054
is that the sarx? also iron press your pants. looking good tho

What's missing in my low income watch collection fa

>>15616064
money

>>15616064
A diver?

>>15616064
taste

>>15616063
It is. Pants are fine. Thanks.

>>15616064
I actually like most of this, you gotta get one of those chink chronos.
Seagull 1963

>>15613853
something gay. lmaooo

>>15616064
Luch one hand watch or some vostok, you need some slavshit on that collection.

>>15615796

>>15616033
The Fourth Kind

Applied indices?!?

>>15616064
Tudor black bay 58 in blue or a Baltic Aquascape

i prefer implied indices

>>15616140
>implying

>>15616139
The Tudor is more extremely boring but boring isn’t the worst thing in the world, whereas I think I’d get sick of the Baltic after ten minutes, so if you put a gun to my head it would be the BB58.

>Last year, Japan’s largest watchmaker Seiko brought back its legendary “Captain Willard” in the form of its SLA033, which to many fans’ dismay came with a $4,250 USD price tag. Fortunately, the brand issued another re-creation of the iconic timepiece from Apocalypse Now through its Prospex line with the SPB151 and SPB153 which came in green and black, at a more affordable $1,300 USD and 1,100 USD respectively. Now, joining the duo is a new limited-edition blue variation.

>As with the previous two releases, the SPB183 comes in the same 42.7mm stainless steel case, with a sapphire crystal sitting inside a blue bezel protecting the equally blue dial. It’s also powered by the same upgraded automatic caliber 6R35, featuring 24 jewels and 70 hours in power reserve while operating at 3Hz. Of course, as a diver, the solid caseback, screw-down crown, built-in crown guards, and numerous gaskets provide a water-resistance of up to 200 meters and ISO6024 certification.

>Limited to just 5,500 units made, the new Seiko SPB183 will retail for roughly $1,400 USD when it arrives in November.

whats with seiko and the constant limited edition releases. Like bruh every single one is a limited release

>>15616054
reddit

>>15616154

>>15616154
Isn't this just a turtle with a bit of the "retro" indices from the other overpriced seiko dive watch? Do people really keep eating that shit up? Because it's been going on for a while.

>>15616163
there's a reason why the chink willard and tuna are so popular now

>>15616154
Just get a san martin instead. Stop funding zipperhead jewery.

>>15616171
>zipperhead
thats the chinese you nigger

can we make ugly watch threads circle jerk again

>>15616173
fuck em

>Day 15.5 of waiting for my Stowa to arrive

Is this an acceptable cheap quartz shitter or too much of a vintage explorer ripoff?
$200 sapphire crystal, boring Ronda 763 quartz movement.

>>15616174
>wait a minute, this isn't faux-ugly - this is ugly!

>>15616178
it literally looks nothing like an explorer. The hands and indices dont even match.

price is too high and lol@ the american assembly bit but whatever
its desperately trying to hide that its a quartz shitter by not mentioning it once

>>15616178
Just get a timex and at that point you wouldn't even be buying a homage watch

>>15616190
Yeah i know american assembly is a joke. That movement is even more of a joke than i expected, not sure I can actually bring myself to buy it.

>>15615917
Sounds dope didnt know u could get sapphire on that

>>15616139
Tudor is much nicer but also 4x the price. Really depends on your budget and how much you care about watches I guess. I like the baltic desu

>>15616198
yea
these are made in thailand and they cost $2 on alibaba, even cheaper in bulk ofc. They have never been an inch upon swiss soil

the rock bottom of major quartz movements and takes like 10 seconds to plop the movement into the watch and squeeze the spacer in.

>>15616178
Nah it’s different enough

Nice watches with some red on them?

>>15616213
Hi janitorbro

>>15616033
Love this watch but I don't think i could pull it off with my style.

I feel feel uncomfortable wearing anything even slightly dressy or polished.

I love the watermelon Sea Wolf so much

>>15616218
Quick rundown?

>>15615388
Ulysse Nardin has a bunch for $28k, TAG for around $20k

Unless you're going for the chink route

>>15616284
He was this guy who posted a few threads ago looking for an expensive watch with a burgundy dial so he could impress his boss at the cleaning company

>>15616054
Nice.

>>15616177
Why would anyone wait so long for a retarded watch?

nobody has ever released the seiko mecaquartz series in a watch smaller than 40mm, so during one boring night I whipped up a badly planned mockup for a 36mm mecaquartz field watch, the movement is only 30mm so would fit in fine, would anyone here buy this for $80

>>15616231

i love you

>>15616379
Boldr is releasing a whole series of 38mm mecaquartz watches shortly.
Unfortunately all the mecaquartz except for the one with the 12hr totalizer instead of the small 24hour display suck.

>>15616390
yeah but they went for the shity VK model which has a subdial dedicated to the world's most useless complication - 24 hour subdial

I cannot even fathom why that was created, let alone why 90% of mecaquartz microbrands specifically choose it for their watch when the classic seconds-minuites-hours-runningseconds variant is avaliable

so fucking useless, it's unreal.

>>15616412
Because the only mecaquartz with the 12hr totalizer has subdials at 12 6 and 9 and every microshitter brand wants to use subdials at 3 and 9

>>15616427
I'd love to make my own watches and shove in cheap movements, don't even care if I make my own money, but it's such a colossal project for someone with zero fabrication or industrial experience, so I guess it will just never happen, will keep making mockups for fun though to scratch my itch

>>15616437
I'd love to bust in a bad bitch, sometimes life just don't be like dat.

>>15616462
but sometimes it do

>>15616231
The only 1000+ buck watch I’m interested in

>>15616231
Me too man, me too

>>15616162
>>15616154
is it bad that I unironically like the chink willard more? Especially the ceramic bezel and the crazy amount of blue AR on the bezel

you guys are my only friends, i love you all

Would 36mm look ridiculous on 8 inch wrists or would it just be a dated look?

>>15616542
Measure the flat part of your wrist, across the top.

>>15616528
all MUDMEN are friends

>>15616545
what? i need a picture describing what you are saying

>>15616550
If you hold a ruler across the top of your wrist, where the watch will sit. Measure from edge to edge. That will determine what size watch will look good on you more then the overall diameter

>>15616545
I think it's around 2.5 inches, kind of hard to judge.

>>15616557
Convert that to centimeters and then compare that to the top to bottom measurement of the watch you are looking at, that will give you an idea of how much empty space there will be.

>>15616550

>>15616555
>>15616564
thanks for that, im so stupid.

>>15616560
Will do, thank you man.

>>15615773
It may depend on the color and size combination.

I copped a new 41 mm with blue dial. I have a pretty big purchase history at that particular department store with their gold card (mostly Omegas) so they called me right when it came out.

I was told however that the new 41 Oyster Perpetuals are totally sold out and they're not even taking wait list names anymore.

Not sure if I'll keep it though since I paid $6000 retail and I'm seeing it on Chrono24 for $9k+. Might flip it.

>>15616560
Millimeters not centimeters, gah you know what I'm talking about

>>15616581
That's alright, I understood. By top to bottom do you mean lug to lug btw?

>>15616589
Yeah not lug width but top lug to bottom lug.

>>15616595
Cool, thank you!

>>15615498
go back faggot

Are there chronographs with subdials at 4 8 and 12?

>>15616667
seiko

>>15616162
new sumos just came out

MUD

>>15615423
Morning

HOLY FUCKING SHIT WHERE IS THE NEW THREAD WE ARE GOING TO DIE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>15615505
This looks amazing, does it come with a black strap? This is one of the microshitters that are actually defensible if anyone asks you why you have a cheap shitter from an unknown brand, because it looks like nothing else on the market.

>>15616547
Brothers in timekeeping

>>15613850
WHAT WATCH IS THIS

>>15615723
i hate how short the hands are

>>15615434
i like it

New
>>15617161
>>15617161
>>15617161

>>15616777
I baked, now I'm going back to bed

>>15616528
Iktfb