/fa/ - Fashion

Go back to /pol/ you dumb faggot

>>14662686
they should've picked a far less ugly girl to be their political pawn

>le save the enviroment
>wears nothing but plastic clothing that would take hundreds of years to rot away (and even then plastic polymers never truly get recycled into anything useful by the earth)
shiggy diggy

>>14662686
it's not techwear. it's just a ski outfit paid for by her corporate sponsors

>>14663461
My god it's muh Islamic sexism all over again
>THEY'RE WORSE SO WE'RE FINE, SHUT UP!!

Rick inspired?

>>14662686
Bitch has a melon head LMAO

>>14663467
>JUST BE HAPPY WE AREN'T CHOPPING UP YOUR PUSSY, WENCH

i thought she was like 11-13, but it turns out she's already extremely old so...

>>14663525
>Born: January 3, 2003 (age 16 years)
damn...

*lifts greta up by her pigtails*

>>14662686
>Gortex
she copped this from costanza

>>14663461
Why does it make so many men feel so good to call Greta a hypocrite when there's zero chance you're doing more than her anyways? Imagine needing to denigrate an autistic teenage girl in order to reaffirm your sense of superiority

>>14663907
It's even funnier coming from Conservatives as they have a new child pundit they parade around and get to do panels on Fox and shit every other month. Cowger, Kirk, Burke, Bond, Krohn, Shapiro, Kashuv, Roy just to name a few off the top of my head who were/are all conservative celeb kids/teens who were/are regulars in Conservative media.

>>14662755
this, people dont sympathize with the message when its given by a really ugly person

>>14663907
we aren't actual autists with ecoveganism ocd, she is mentally ill but since its useful to corporate overlords they use it to their advantage

>>14663926
You do realise it's the corporate world that is actively fighting Climate Change action right and she lost her shit when they all laughed at her.
How conservacucks think they're not the corporate bootlickers is absolutely astonishing to me.

>>14663933
what? corporate and state have a fucking hardon on neo ecoveganism, new cars, new taxes, new envoiramental friendly clothes etc

the sooner you lose the right/left 60's mentality the better for you, we're all cattle no matter our ideology

>>14663933
>corporate world is fighting climate change action

who do you think paid for the 100 million yatch that brought this little goblin to the us?

>>14663907
Whoa, how can those disgusting men who work 80h a week to put food on the table and pay bills don’t like a 16yo neet telling them to pay more taxes while Asia and Africa are the ones actually fucking the world?

>>14663926
I'm calling bullshit on this, mate. Why is it that she's the arm of our corporate overlords despite the fact that one of our most powerful industries (IE, fossil fuels, plastics, etc.) is totally opposed to her and uses all of its leverage in the media to paint her as a fearmongering looney? They wouldn't be doing that if they genuinely didn't perceive her to be a threat.

>>14663938
It's impossible to speak in generalities like that. It may be in the interest of some corporations to move towards a more ecologically sound approach, but the number of industries that are dependent on environmentally unsustainable processes are too numerous to count. What Greta is proposing I imagine very few businesses would be willing to comply as it would trash their margins.

>>14663959
Are you retarded? The poster I was replying to was criticising Greta for not going far enough in her radical environmentalism. That is not the same issues that blue-collar workers have with her, IE. being worried about taxes going up, nor does it have any bearing on what Asia or Africa is doing. All I'm seeing here is a lot of loose red string and no deftly-woven argument. What convinced you that this reply was at all relevant?

>>14662686
That's her sailing gear. It even says "Malizia", the name of the sailboat. You want to dress like that, go buy some sailing gear.

>>14663959
Asia and Africa are fucking up the world with plastics, but Carbon emissions - what she's complaining about - are something exclusively Westerners do. Africans don't have the industry and cars to do that.

>>14663970
Look at the fucking statistics you fucking bootlicker, Europe has zero effect on climate change or contamination, that’s why people call her hypocrite

>>14663968
If you believe oil companies don’t have major stakes in electric car developement you are as stupid as you sound
They’re not billionaires just because they’re lucky

>>14663983
So you’re one of those retards who thinks carbon footprint per capita is more important than total

>>14663989

Not that guy, but countries who contribute a small percentage of carbon emissions (0-2%) total around 40% of all carbon emissions, which is the biggest chunk. Not reducing their footprint because their total emissions are not "important" doesn't add up.

>>14663996
>40% is the biggest chunk

Kek, how many countries to make that 40% btw?

>>14662686
fuck off shill

and die in hell

>>14664005
And I’m not even against taking care of nature, I live in a very pretty island and now the beaches are filled with plastic and dirt, I just hate this whole “Europe has to do everything while the rest of the world does fuck all”

>>14664012

>Europe has to do everything while the rest of the world does fuck all

That's not what I mean, either. Those small emitters have a responsibility to reduce their footprint because together they make up 40%, which is the same as China and the US emissions combined. Everyone has to pull their weight; can't just bow out because "we only produce 1.2%!"

>>14664019
And that’s what we’re doing, no place is as compromised with climate change and envoirement as the western society, just in my European city there’s about 20 new laws and taxes about it, but it’s understandable that if you put a neet zoomer with fetal alcohol syndrome to tell white people “how you dare?” It will misfire

>>14663986
>Europe has zero effect on climate change or contamination
Are you trying to say that Europe has zero impact on the climate, or that Europe's attempts to combat climate change amount to nothing? If you're gonna mention statistics, at least reference them, and if you're going to write something, at least write in a clear way that doesn't lend itself to misinterpretation. Also, see >>14663983


>>14663988
Having a stake in a more renewable form of energy does not mean you want all of your investments in older, less sustainable energies to tank, but that's what would happen if we went through with Greta's plan. And if she's nothing but a corporate puppet, you'd at least be able to explain to me why the American media in particular is so hostile to her.

>>14663924
Brutal but true

>>14663989
Nah, but Germany, the USA, Japan are still amongst the top emitters. While countries like Nigeria or Bhutan emit close to nothing given their large populations.

>Greta is a corporate puppet

LMAO, yes, corporations just LOVE shilling for stricter industry standards or more expensice energy

The fact this autistic little girl is getting her message through DESPITE coal and car corporations worldwide opposing her is amazing

>>14662686
nice fit

also laughing at all these internet neckbeards protecting big government and multinational corporations. There's literally nothing wrong with her message. It just annoys you because shes a widdle girl telling you wat to do.

>>14664136
Big corps love regulation the same way that hairdressers and taxi drivers love licensing. It raises the barrier to entry. Big megacorps with their talons in govt can afford to keep up with regulation. Their small competition cannot. They die off. Consolidate power. This is basic corporatist playbook shit, dude.

>>14663461
You can just burn it you know. There is nothing wrong with incinerating garbage.

>>14663461
You're moving the goalposts, her argument has always been about carbon emissions rather than plastics in the ocean. I don't think I nor Greta think that plastic pollution is a good thing, but but its not the most imminent threat in the same way that climate change is. There's nothing wrong with prioritising.

>>14664188
>Big megacorps with their talons in govt can afford to keep up with regulation. Their small competition cannot.
But this is a problem rooted in capitalism, not environmental protection. Capitalism cannot solve the ecological crisis because (as you've rightly pointed out) big business will thrive in an environment that punishes cheaper, less sustainable practises. It's certainly going to be a challenge, but the only way things will change is if that hegemony is broken up to give smaller businesses a chance. If we're going to take the ecological crisis seriously, a shift of the overton window to the left is inevitable

>>14664259
Shifts to the left won't solve it. Conservatives trust business too much and progressives trust govt too much. Both are blinded.

But to make this a fault of capitalism is a mistake, because behind a whole lot of these corps are govt hands. Just look at the meat industry. Govt gives farms low prices on water and subsidies so they can raise cattle in areas that have no business raising cattle and in an actual free market would be unsustainable. Govt also cannot break up big business with regulation. They need to pull the teat and stop feeding them. Supply and demand works, but our demand right now, for a number of reasons, is fucked. And that is what we are supplied.

>>14664188
This is the correct answer. Most anons in this thread clearly don't understand how big business works

>>14664259
yeah lets go left, enjoy ur 5year cut when u are starving to death :-D abveins inc

stop forcing your garbage threads