[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 74 KB, 1352x524, rb2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10692979 No.10692979 [Reply] [Original]

what does /fa/ think about these?

Too nerdy?

>> No.10692986

>>10692979
too shit

>> No.10692991

Too SJW.

>> No.10692996
File: 128 KB, 564x678, rb5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10692996

>> No.10693003
File: 30 KB, 669x468, ray-ban-rb2180-v-2012-havana+me++productPageLargeRWD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10693003

>>10692979

>> No.10693018

literally the only way to know if they would look good on you is if you post your face or at least face outline

>> No.10693486

if you're trying to be a hipster Unironically in 2015 then sure.
they will only attract a certain kind of person.
for example
they might attend a liberal art school and major in art or music,be In a lo fi noise band,have entry level /mu/ taste in music, think /fa/ memes are cool,are sjw, and have unnaturally dyed hair.

these are the people who wear and identify with these frames.

>> No.10693493

>>10692991
Not even the same shape as cateye glasses, dinkus.

>> No.10693503

>>10693486
so what are good looking frames/shapes that aren't associated with that look? i have rectangular black ones now but Im getting bored

>> No.10693681

>>10693493
that is literally the male version of sjw glasses, try again.

>> No.10693685

>>10693503
rectangular? try square then

>> No.10693713

>>10693681
Those would be teaglasses m8.

>> No.10693759
File: 16 KB, 402x300, 50c91-paul-allen-or-patrick-bateman-american-psycho-7633749-402-300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10693759

>>10693493
>>10693681
you guys are dumb

>> No.10693774

find out long they are. Round glasses look good if your face is narrow enough and if theyre too long youll end up looking like a fukn dufus

>> No.10693779

>>10692979
It depends on your face. I have very similar ones and posted a pic a while back, /fa/ actually liked them on me.

>> No.10693837
File: 88 KB, 740x473, gregory-peck-oliver-peoples.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10693837

>>10693486
>>10693493

Objectively Wrong

>> No.10693870
File: 81 KB, 960x720, Hx1GFNFnzg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10693870

Selling
>>10686370

>> No.10693929
File: 18 KB, 250x381, 1shostakovich.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10693929

>> No.10694442

>>10693837
>>10693929
unless you're dappered down 24/7 you're just going to look like a hipster try hard in these

>> No.10694552
File: 84 KB, 490x520, Dmitrij_Dmitrijevič_Šostakovič_(Дми́трий_Дми́триевич_Шостако́вич).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10694552

>>10693929
based

>> No.10694678
File: 8 KB, 200x200, Brando.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10694678

>>10692979
I like them but i cant pull them off unfortunately, I was looking at some like those over summer but decided to go with wire rimmed ones. Ones very similar to Harry Potter glasses...
>Are you Harry Potter :)
>Havent heard that one before you fucking freak.

>> No.10694691
File: 23 KB, 497x512, 1448856805748.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10694691

>>10693486
So what kind of frames other than rimless are not "problem" glasses?

Something that won't make you look like a lib arts cunt or a STEMfag autist.

>> No.10694713

You guys care WAY too much about what other people think.

>> No.10694721

>>10694713
Hey Reddit, how's it going?
>I agree with you, but don't be a self righteous faggot about it.

>> No.10694725
File: 1.39 MB, 200x150, 1449593709027.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10694725

>Comes to a fashion board designed for discussion of fashion.
>Gets mad when fashion is discussed.

>> No.10694873

>>10693486
Also interested in round glasses. Have been rocking brown 'regular' rectangular for years.
Rounds are also better for people with very bad eyesight cause the glass can be cut thinner, making them lighter overall.

How do these look on thinner/skinnier faces with pointier chin?
Thought round might counteract the skinny contours.

>> No.10694921

>>10694873
Bad eyesight = thick lenses.

>> No.10694931

>>10694921
Yeah, but as the raw glasses are round as well, round frames make it possible to cut away more material, making the glasses thinner.

>> No.10694939

>>10694931
Yeah i was actually going to get OP's glasses in pic but the lens was going to be so fucking thick it was going to protrude outwards.

>> No.10694954

>>10694939
Protrusion cannot be avoided after a certain point.
I am rocking roughly -9 dioptre on both eyes. Bad genes.
Need month to find frame which doesn't become to heavy, even with super ultra thin lense material

>> No.10694962
File: 29 KB, 339x339, 11846618_10203577665960681_2131415735232530416_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10694962

>Too nerdy?

Fuck off and die if you ever use that phrase again, normie.

>> No.10694964

>>10694954
Mine are so shitty, i basically just got contacts and wire rimmed with fake lenses. Call me a fag idc.

>> No.10695022

>>10694964
Also considered that, using glasses as fashion accessories at that stage. Would wear different frames every day.
But couldnt get out of bed without glasses, would fall asleep again. Hell cannot even shower without glasses cause i get tired.

>> No.10695050
File: 1.96 MB, 1190x662, kinda_fa_ybh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10695050

>which?

>> No.10695055
File: 311 KB, 923x1600, 1449540748818.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10695055

>>10694962
/r9k/ pls go and stay go

>> No.10695111

>>10693759
>>10693837
You guys do realise I said they AREN'T SJW glasses, right?

>> No.10695290

>>10692979
I wore specials since I was nine roughly
I wear a pair of glasses much like the ones here and I like them. Not the best pair Ive ever owned but it does its job.
Honestly though, I dont like the weird metal shit in the corners. While its classic, these ones just look fuckgoofy

>> No.10695294

>>10695050
First row, second to last pair, faggot

>> No.10695347

>>10692979
These are the kind of glasses the older, baby boom, (salon) socialist, chubby, middle class men that studied sociology/psychology/polsoc and now being almost 65-67 (almost retired), and haven't made a lot of money, are mad at the "capitalistic system" and so keep on propagating socialist ideas the whole time while trying to make an intelligent impression with precisely these kind of glasses, here in West/North Europe.

So, I wouldn't say they are SJW "problematic" frames, but still pretty leftist/socialist.

>> No.10695397

>>10695347
what frames would a right winger/conservative wear

>> No.10695446

>>10695347
chubby?
i'd rather say skinny.

they were very popular in the 50s so the association with baby boomers somewhat makes sense.

>> No.10695468

>>10695397
Ugly wire frames.

>> No.10695486

>>10695397
The Libertarians/Conservatives I know usually don't wear glasses that are too showy. A good example is Mark Rutte (classical liberalism/libertarian). Very modest, formal, business like, unironic, practical frames.

Same goes for modern day neocons.

The older libertarians and conservatives from the 70's and 80's however did have thick frames. Just look for Thomas Sowell and Milton Friedman on google for good examples. I guess that was the more modest, formal, business look back in those days (like Patrick Bateman in American Psycho in the 80's).

>> No.10695492
File: 22 KB, 363x501, Julius_Evola.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10695492

>>10695397

>> No.10695504
File: 37 KB, 400x600, eliade_1929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10695504

>>10695397
although it's fucking dumb to think of them in terms of larping a political affiliation, get ones that fit your face instead

>> No.10695512

Which one should I go for?

http://www.specsavers.co.uk/glasses/fc-89?sku=25142501

http://www.specsavers.co.uk/glasses/fc-89?sku=25142501

>> No.10696027
File: 16 KB, 340x297, 4SUJa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10696027

>Damn gurl you hot!

Can make you look smart though

>> No.10696282

>>10695486
patrick bateman wears oliver peoples

the exact shape in the OP photo

>> No.10696324
File: 2.46 MB, 1513x1127, kekold.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10696324

>>10692979
im regretting not getting contacts now because of the people I see wearing the same kind of frames I have t.bh

>> No.10696336

>>10694721
>Hey Reddit, how's it going?

Nice original comment you shitposting neanderthal.

>> No.10696747

>>10696336
No need to panic.
Try searching for Reddit in your search engine, and click on the first link you see.

>> No.10696752

>>10696747
go back to reddit cunt

>> No.10696755

>>10696752
go back to r9k you faggot

>> No.10696760

>>10696755
sorry

>> No.10696772

>>10692979
Depends on your face. I have a similar pair, less round at the top, and the round bottom bit is metal. I think they look fine. If you like them and look good in them, go for it.

>> No.10696959

>>10692979
The overall shape (panto) of those is okay, but that's not a great pair since it's pretty close in execution to SJW glasses.

>> No.10697557

>>10696282
Yes, in the late 80's like I said. Not now.

>> No.10697566
File: 32 KB, 873x1200, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10697566

How do these look?

>> No.10697569

>>10694552
W2c round frames

>> No.10697769
File: 25 KB, 320x320, lemtosh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10697769

what about lemtosh moscots?
too played out?

>> No.10697910

>>10697566
good

>> No.10698389

>>10693018
This. I hate it when people are asking whether one or another frame looks good or bad. We have to see the face. Everyone looks different with the same frame.