/fa/ - Fashion

>>10375740

I always thought this prediction of future fashion was interesting.

crazy how that's a $300 shoe but if i wore it in public people would think it was an autism shoe

>>10375753
>paying 300 for a tennis shoe
No anon you are the retard

>>10375759
i'm talking about the rafs in the op

>>10375740
Ive always thought tech motorcycle boots were way more futuristic than high end sneakers

>>10377232

or anything by http://www.acronym.de/

i live in europe

>>10375740
It's gonna be more minimalist you fucks. More monotone you might say due to the impact technology has on culture (music, art, theatre, television, fashion, architecture, etc.).

That's one of our options at least.

This might be combined with styles that have already existed the same way fashion works today (converse, leather jackets, Hitler Youth, hipster beards, Dr. Martens, etc.)

And then there's ofc this option >>10377283.

>>10377339
I'll contribute with some examples

>inb4 that's not minimalism

>>10377374

>>10377374
is that a jock strap on his face? and a cape? reasonable outfit otherwise

>>10377379
These last three aren't necessarily minimalist, but "technological" in a sense and futuristic.
Same guy as >>10377363 btw.

>>10377380
Like I said in >>10377339, receiving inspiration from trends that existed in the past. The past here could even be the middle ages in the same sense as we have fashion inspired by Gregorian times. I believe there was a recent thread about that here on /fa/.

>>10377395

>>10377398

>>10377406

>>10377410
The future in the West might even be more militaristic. Who knows.

>>10377416
what do you mean by "the future" you are posting such drab shit

full body elastic suits. As people are caring more and more about cheapness and less and less about aesthetics (i.e. how every person wears cheap plastic shoes and cheap jeans and lives in a shitty plastic-sided house because they dont care how they look they just care about comfort and cheapness) everyone will just wear plain fullbody clothes made with the cheapest materials they can use without it falling apart.

>>10377379
I have that belt. It's dope, but kinda too large to work with a lot of stuff.

I predict that the future of fashion will continue trending toward a more global look that takes inspiration from many sources including but not limited to historical dress, native/tribal costume, and technology.

Clean looks drawing from the minimalist aesthetics of designers like Helmut Lang will continue to be seen, but will find counterpoints in the ever-present branding of luxury fashion houses like Moschino and Gucci.

Boundaries between gender specific clothing will continue to disintegrate, leading to a more unisex look or at least the acceptance of feminine styles for men.

These trends are already exemplified by collections like Julius ss16, which relies heavily on natural materials and robe-like drapes, and the oversized menswear looks of Acne and Christopher Lemaire, which downplay the masculine form in favor of a larger uniform silhouette.

Pic related is Balmain ss16, which featured drapey wrap tops typically seen in womenswear lines paired with strappy Helmut inspired bottoms all in neutral colors, which gives of a clean futuristic vibe.

>>10377432

w2c

>>10377283
hijabs r so fashianable tho

>>10377452
reverse image search it, its just under armor

>>10377444
Inaisce typifies the clean gender unspecific look for me. They have done at least one entirely unisex collection.
While it will take a long time to become widely accepted, I do think fashion is moving toward a less rigidly categorized set of clothing.

>>10375753
I agree

>>10375740
>ITT: 2000s nerd fashion

ecco2k
the whole gtbsg look is pretty futuristic

>>10377419
By future I mean what I think people will wear (or at least look like) in the upcoming future. In 50 years or so maybe. What do you mean by drab?

>>10377483
I mean monotone color palettes, unexpressive garment patterns, conservative dull looking clothes

this looks more futuristic to me

>>10377471
This thread has potential. Discussing possible trends in the future can actually be interesting. So try not to fuck it up with your shitposting and contribute instead.

new manufacturing techniques are going to produce wild stuff, think alexander mcqueen and algorithms

>>10377498
Minimalism is an incredibly new concept. Rich patterns is what was used throughout history for a long time up until the 2048th century where minimalism and modernism was introduced into modern culture. I believe this trend will continue even more down the road but with technology having an even greater impact, which gives us an idea of what "future fashion" might be.

I can imagine your perspective becoming a reality too.

>>10377515
it will be a blend of course just like today, everyone wears different stuff

death to the silk screened graphic t-shirt and khaki pants / denim jeans

>>10377515
You seem incredibly misguided.

Minimalism has always existed. Every point has a counterpoint. For every richly clothed king there were many minimally clothed peasants. You also appear to be taking a very Westernized perspective of history and values.

The Japanese, for instance, have long valued simplicity and natural forms. Traditional Japanese minka (farmhouses) are paragons of minimalism in architecture. Form follows function and functional elements are usually the most simple.

>>10377538
and then you have modern architects making concrete versions of these houses and charging millions for the plans, recycled ideas. Good ideas though. I love their balance of form, the japanese have it figured out, except for all the whale hunting

i can only hope in the future (like in 5-10 years) things will still be roughly conventional, but that experimental silhouettes and fits will become more common. pic mildly related

>>10377538
Yeah I was looking at it from a western perspective.
The peasants didn't go for minimalism as a style. They were broke as fuck and had no other choice. Very expensive clothing items of today can have a focus on minimalism as a style in itself. This applies to architecture as well. This whole concept of modernism/minimalism as an art wasn't really explored until the 20th century.

Now from a global perspective I see what you mean, but I wouldn't refer to what I said as misguided information.

>>10377538
One thing. Roman times and ancient Greece had, what I would call, a minimalist style to both fashion and architecture. Also among the upper class. I can imagine clothing even all the way back to those times can cause inspiration to future fashion.

>>10375746
its the collar right?

its always the fucking collar

>>10377636
>Minimalism is an incredibly new concept.
I think I just take issue with this particular statement and how you state it like a blunt truth as your opening sentence. It colors the rest of your post and immediately has me judging everything that follows.

Im going to buy this.

What would you think if you saw a 20 year old wearing this space gear?

>>10378549
where for sale?

>>10378554
Not out yet, its Adidas X Kolor colab coming out within the next few weeks;

and that is a 550 Euro Adidas jacket you are looking at, a bit crazy when you think about it being Chinese made adidas clothing, but I still want it and will cop.

What do you all think of this hoodie? Same colab:

Its a typical fleece blue jacket with Space-hoodie flare added.

I honestly love everything about this colab, and I dont give a shit if it's adidas and will be copping 3 things from it if I can. (shoes + two jackets pictured)

>>10378564
Here's the back/hoodie part:

>>10378564
>>10378568
Oops refreshed and lost upload :

>>10377374
damn i wish this was a real thing you could wear in public without looking like an autist..

>>10378589

Since you already are autistic then it shouldn't be a deterrent.

>>10377398
source?

>>10378652
I believe it's either Daniel Andresen or Y Project

>>10377817
I see your point. I think of a more specific minimalism, which involves for instance modernism in architecture. There is a "deeper" artistic purpose behind it rather than just the aestheticism behind simplicity. But you're right. I should probably read more up on it.

>>10377283
LOL!!! good one /b/ro!!! xD

>>10377444
>Boundaries between gender specific clothing will continue to disintegrate, leading to a more unisex look or at least the acceptance of feminine styles for men.
I assume makeup will be more accepted among men. Oh the emasculinity.

>>10377440
this probably

>>10378922
Men have never cared.

>>10377339
i can tell you know nothing about what you're talking about

Who /fremencore/ here?

>>10379486

>>10377363
>>10377363
the only one I like

>>10378893
You don't think that the Japanese have a philosophical appreciation for minimalism? You think they just do it because it looks nice?

>>10377275
I came.

Hoping for a less Islamic future.

for the betterment of society and the world.

>>10379620
What's their philosophical appreciation? I assume it goes within the ideas behind Buddhism where the inner soul is more important than the materialistic. Living with as simple surroundings as possible is the ideal behind their minimalist architecture, art and fashion.

>>10377444
Shorts/sandals/ bag are sick <3

>>10377427

>>10377477
futureee

>>10381459
>>10381451
This trash aint FUTURE