/fa/ - Fashion

>>10376812
you mad as shit nigga

>>10376812
Crayons don't look like much in the box. It's how you put them to paper, m8.

>he doesn't "get" the fit
lmao please educate yourself OP

>>10376842
You can get cheap clothes hemmed to fit and have them look way better than some off the shelf high end stuff most of the time

385$ for a blue crewneck is a scam and you're an asshole if you buy into it

Most brands/retailers don't anticipate moving a bulk of their product at the actual MSRP. The MSRP is the high point where things will be more likely to sell as it's marked down.

>>10376842

This is wrong. There's nothing special about these 'high-end' basics to justify such a price. You could likely find a sweater/pants with very similar measurements and fabric composition in a fast fashion place for like 10% of the price.

>>10376812


Are u shitting me nigga

First, u can get a fit like that for less than a 100$ (at least in my shit third-world-country)

Second, u posted the absoulte worst of said "vibeless, unispired, drab, monotone horse shit lookbooks", I mean the vomit-inducing color matching (which saddly happens quite often)

You can spend very little effort (both cash and imagnination) to look good in a simple configuartion. My general appearance doesn't let me explore some vivid looks without looking like a douchebag, so I stick to basic fair-enough-looking shit, saving both money and time. Step up, nigga.

>>10376841
Hey
Cool
That's interesting

>>10376979
you're making my point.

You can get clothes like this, that fit like this, with the same fabric composition, for much cheaper.

APC is a shit brand, thats my main point. And lots of normcore style brands are pushing expensive boring clothes and I'm fucking sick of it.

>>10376979
He isn't saying you cant, in fact he is pointing out that you can
You must have limited grasp of the English language to not see that was the intent of the thread; to point out how ridiculous it is for someone (and they do exist) to pay these ludicrous amounts of money for basic shit.

>>10376921
>There's nothing special about these 'high-end' basics to justify such a price.

B-B-BUT, THE CONSTRUCTION

>>10377001
>>10377010

I am sorry, I took it as an insult towards people wearing simple, devoid of fancy colours stuff costing far too much.

Well, I'm drunk, so I hope you'll excuse me and my shitty english.

>>10376841
Except these crayons cost $1000

>>10377110
If you don't want to color with Crayola Crayons you don't have to, go use RoseArt

>>10377110
And paper does not fold in 8 but I can!

>buying anything APC other than the jeans/outerwear
>buying any mid-range streetwear for < 35% retail price

It's like you wanna look basic as fuck and throw away money.

>>10376812

Agreed this is a shit boring fit. There is basic, which can be exciting and then there is boring.

On another note I've realised now that what you wear tends to reflect how your life is going. My life has recently become 10/10 so I am now unusually offended by this fit, more so than I am by people who just don't care

>>10376812
What the fuck does "vibeless" even mean? Are you getting mad at monochrome basic bitches because they dont have a vibe whirring away in their assholes like you apparently do?

>>10377297
what's wrong with having a vibe in your asshole

>>10376842
Doesn't get the stopped being fashionable in early 2011 monochrome aesthetic?

>>10376852
>385$ for a blue crewneck is a scam and you're an asshole if you buy into it
not understanding materials used in the process
>You can get cheap clothes hemmed to fit and have them look way better than some off the shelf high end stuff most of the time
you sound poor and trying to justify it. you also dont seem like you know much about fashion

>>10377637
Look how mad this kid is about his shit dated monochrome streetwear garbage that's years past relevance

>>10376852
>What are textiles?

>>10377637
I make six figures and spend my money on experiences, and equity building assets, not 400$ turtlenecks

>>10376812
>$1000 outfit
>expensive

Well memed my friend. Stay poor.

>>10376812
Literally looks like this outfit costs $50 max. What a faggot

>>10376812
Agreed OP

Wish people bought more stuff off runway here. I feel this isn't really much of a fashion board without this element. The pic just the generic outcome when no one engages with the exciting and novel aspects of fashion, i.e. what /fa/ does.

>>10377675
>>10377637
There is literally nothing special about the materials used in this sweater. If you're talking about some artisanal shit like Paul Harnden or Carol Christian Poell, I can understand and respect the varying textiles and textures incorporated. Not with some crappy made in the 3rd world cheap woolen sweater.

>>10377017
> muh construction
You could buy 3 pieces of a mid ranged brand and still save money.
Muh construction is moot when you're still fucked if you end up tearing it on something unless you send every waking minute inside looking at yourself.

>>10377154
except this shit isn't crayola, it's $1,000 crayons. u give $1,000 to a 4 year old (4chan being the 4 year old in the figurative and literal sense) and they will still end up drawing their parents fucking doggie style

>>10378267
apc is midrange

>>10378293
> basic shit for 300
> midranged
I guess I'm just a poor fag but apc is not midrange for the shit they are selling.

Just like supreme and other hypebeast brands can be called high-end for BASIC Hanes tier tees.

>>10378305
price is mid-high end, garments are actually low-mid end.

>>10377678
lol @ this argument
it's used everytime
person a spends on what they like
person b spends on what they like
great that you invest
but others like to have clothes that feel nice, whether it's an illusion by price and prestige/esteem or not

>>10378305
APC is midrange
they can also be labeled as entry level designer
i'm not even going to waste my time tackling the other half of your post

>>10378341
> entry level designer
Can you really consider their shit designer level? Even entry level?
Looks far from it tbh. I think that was the entire point of the thread.

>>10378341
>entry level designer
no. they are a "contemporary" brand. entry level designer is something like margaret howell or patrick ervell.

>>10378357
>>10378360
with regards to my manufacturing and merchandising textbook, apc is an entry level designer

>>10378281
>they will still end up drawing their parents fucking doggie style
what kind of 4 year olds are you hangin around

>>10378375
you dont get it. nobody gives a shit about your textbook. apc is not designer, there is no big creative force/mind behind anything they make. helmut lang is designer, acne is not. raf simons is designer, uniqlo is not.

>>10377678
What's your point? You like experiences? Others like clothing, cars, sex, whatever. You use your money your way, others use their money their way.

>>10378385
bbbut muh experiences

>>10378384
lol @ your comparisons
i'm studying in this actual industry
you're just a consumer
your opinion on acne and apc mean nothing to what they are labeled as.

>>10378391
>I once sky dived nude from a learjet using a goat-skin parachute onto a gold-plated sea-soo that was set up to run up a ramp and jump a shark, all while drinking vodka that was distilled 6 times and poured on a model's breasts before being bottled.
I know that nude parachuting and boob vodka is real.