[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 946 KB, 2942x2105, OdRgYux.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10339058 No.10339058 [Reply] [Original]

recent cops, inspo, questions, etc.

>> No.10339066

Do streetwear people still have this romantic image of sneakers and NewEra caps
I always thought it was cool that they were into this stuff, but enough is enough lol

>> No.10339315
File: 124 KB, 800x600, DSCF3028.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10339315

>> No.10339371
File: 77 KB, 1024x683, ICNYxPUMA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10339371

just copped. pretty fucking hyped to run in these

>> No.10339441
File: 60 KB, 960x720, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10339441

>>10339058
Thoughts?

>> No.10340558
File: 297 KB, 959x640, y-3-retro-boost-black-white-02-960x640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340558

retro-boosts are calling my name

>> No.10340564
File: 1.10 MB, 1818x1220, Satans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340564

which one to cop?-

>> No.10340571

>>10340564
No

>> No.10340577

>>10340564
holy fuck just buy a pair of stans

>> No.10340584
File: 244 KB, 661x774, 19598145.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340584

>>10340558
y3 ss15 had great shoes

>>10340564
b8

>> No.10340586

>>10339441
what are thooooosssssssseeeeeee

>> No.10340587

>>10340584
>>10340577
>>10340571
i don't like the stans colorway

>> No.10340594

>>10340564
jesus christ m8

>> No.10340625
File: 117 KB, 1000x667, adidas-tubular-moc-runner-timber-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340625

Bought these
Love em
Sizing was weird though, had to go full size down from my usual adidas size

>> No.10340656

>>10340564
WAHT

DA

FUCK

ARE

THOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSE

>> No.10340685

>>10339441
sauce pls

>> No.10340701

>>10340584
Kohnas and the Boost m2 are actually pretty sexy

>> No.10340724

>>10340685
>>10340586
They're Zara... something. It was an impulse buy.

>> No.10340766
File: 58 KB, 630x420, adidas-by-rick-owens-fallwinter-2014-tech-runner-03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340766

>>10340564

>> No.10340777
File: 1.29 MB, 2448x3131, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340777

>>10340766
Wearing mine rn

>> No.10340825
File: 143 KB, 900x900, mid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10340825

Any britbongs here? What do you guys wear when you go clubbing in London?

I live Brighton area so never actually been out in London and apparently most clubs only accept dress shoes? Would my black mid CPs be acceptable in clubs like Drury or club55 or are they strict? I don't have a clue about how strict any of these clubs(I'm only going because of a friend's birthday).

>> No.10340831

>>10339058
where do you cop these they aren't on the adidas X raf simons

>> No.10340834

>>10340825

Just take some Owens and show them the receipt of your sweet kicks.

>> No.10341187

>>10339371
w2c

>> No.10341197
File: 3.57 MB, 5312x2988, 1441398304507761765478.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341197

Just copped yesterday

>> No.10341215

>>10339058
You done goofed OP

>> No.10341225

>>10341197
good timing! i have a feeling that these are gonna blow up soon and maybe even become meme shoes in a few months

>> No.10341227
File: 40 KB, 964x1238, 9065_08d84c7b83-ag6a5372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341227

>> No.10341321

>>10341197

>Thick tongue

You bought the worst model.

>> No.10341418

>>10340777
r those drkshdw prisoner pants

>> No.10341423

>>10340766

I sold my techrunners the quality really wasn't impressive..

>> No.10341440
File: 137 KB, 750x1334, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341440

Got these

>> No.10341492
File: 1.12 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341492

Recent crop

>> No.10341537

>>10339441
that is a disgusting laptop. LOOK AT THE FUCKING FINGERPRINTS ALL OVER IT.

>> No.10341709

>>10340825
Smart shoes only.

What kind of cunt wears trainers to clubs anyway?

>> No.10341757
File: 113 KB, 960x1002, 596847_mrp_fr_xl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341757

I got gifted a pair of Hender Schemes from my brother, these specifically.

>> No.10341794
File: 24 KB, 460x371, ann-demeulemeester-black-suede-high-top-sneakers-product-1-16567410-6-232261312-normal_large_flex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341794

does anyone have any on feet pics of these ann demeulemeester sneakers? also whats the sizing like on these?

>> No.10341799

>>10341440
those the new tubulars???

>> No.10341800

>>10341492
LMAO

WHAT ARE THOSE

THEY LOOK TERRIBLE ON YOU

>> No.10341803

If I'm a 43 in CP lows, am I a 43 in Derby shines?

>> No.10341811

>>10341794
wait these are just converse

nice try u almost got me

>> No.10341817

>>10341811
thanks for this great contribution

>> No.10341845

>>10341418

Yes

>>10341423
Were they the all black or the white with black sole? The leather sucks on those. The all white or black with white sole are superior

>> No.10341892

>>10341321
Agreed, the made in France thin tongue is the nicest Stans

>> No.10341913

>>10341492
WASTED MONEY

AHAHAHAAHA

YOU COPPED THEM BECAUSE THEY WERE ON SALE AND YOU WANTED A RICK PIECE DIDN'T YOU?!

>> No.10341924
File: 1.60 MB, 1236x1222, qa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10341924

new grandpa banana ninja shoes, anybody coping?

>> No.10341935

>>10341197
toe box disgusting

>> No.10341989

>>10339315
underrated post

>> No.10342014

>>10340625
I have them too, but i replaced the laces for leather ones. I really like the silhouette but from above they look kinda weird

>> No.10342017

>>10341913
why else would you EVER buy rick?

>> No.10342021

>>10340558
They remind me of Nike Air Flow. Still dope though.

>> No.10342058
File: 1.10 MB, 1938x2046, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10342058

>>10340777

Me too.
Nice trips.

>> No.10342238
File: 1.06 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10342238

>>10341800
They're $885 designer shoes u retard, go jerk off to some Jordans fuccboi
>>10341913
>sale
Hahaha u actually think everyone here is poor just like you!

>> No.10342244

>>10342238
they look good. not $885 good, but good. what do you wear with them?

>> No.10342263

>>10342244
memphis jeans, black cropped pants, those are the only bottoms i have atm

>> No.10342265

>>10341197
fucking sheep

>> No.10342300

>>10339371
Just run in actual running shoes, not ones that will damage your joints.

>> No.10342309
File: 2.53 MB, 3264x2448, Hoka-Conquest1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10342309

>>10342300
actual running shoes are ugly af tho

>> No.10342356

>>10342238
>m-muh price tag
niggers just don't understand the concept of style.

>> No.10342379

looking to take a break from tigers and get a pair of nikes, what are some good models? anything wrong with this list?
http://www.stylekick.com/blog/10-stylish-nike-sneakers-you-need-to-have/#

>> No.10342408

>>10342309
those are safetycore as shit dude obvs 2 #advanced for a plebian like u

>> No.10342417
File: 76 KB, 360x640, kAVqRJVl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10342417

>>10341794
TTS i love mine

>> No.10342426

>>10342417
thanks!! about how high do they go up your leg?

>> No.10342555

>>10342426
same as like a Dr. Martin boot or like those nike SFB's

>> No.10342617

>>10342555
thanks m8 still debating whether or not to cop for $370

>> No.10342881

>>10342014
Yeah that's kinda common with all Tubulars really, I don't mind it.
Where did you cop the leather laces?

>> No.10342899

>>10342309
lmao are you one of those stupid instagram whores who just poses with a gym attire instead of actually working out

>> No.10342918

>>10342309
asics gel nossa tri 8 in a black/grey colorway looks dope tbh and is great for running

>> No.10342919

>>10342238
Nice cleats bro

>> No.10342943
File: 78 KB, 961x640, Nike-SB-Stefan-Janoski-Max-Grey-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10342943

Thoughts ??

>> No.10342951

>>10342943
Make sure you try them on first because they run large and it looks stupid as fuck when people buy their usual size and they're flopping about

>> No.10342982

>>10341799
Kek

>> No.10342992
File: 62 KB, 817x430, Danks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10342992

Cray Cray.

>> No.10343170

>>10341924
I like those.

But feel like Id be forced to wash them after every single use.

Not something I want to think about when walking about.

A single spec of mud and they're straight into the trunk.

>> No.10343173

>>10342992
are these an actual adidas release?

>> No.10343180

>>10343173
Nope, but you can buy them tho.

>> No.10343234

>>10339315

what are these

>> No.10343297
File: 43 KB, 750x750, adidas-sl-loop-moc-wheat-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343297

anywhere i can still cop those? everywhere they're out. i found only the black ones

>> No.10343311

>>10343180
where can i buy them from? assuming theyre customs theyre probably hella expensive

>> No.10343318
File: 68 KB, 123x212, 2014-10-20_224326.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343318

>>10341197
> he fell for it

>> No.10343323
File: 230 KB, 557x290, flylu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343323

Should I cop this?

>> No.10343349

>>10343323
Yes

>> No.10343508

>>10343311
150$, http://www.footweardesign.us/adidas-ultra-boost-yeezy-350-boost-grey-p-29.html

>> No.10343519

>>10343323
no

>> No.10343524

>>10343297
This looks like something the Tusken Raiders would wear. Congrats on your desertwave savagecore aesthetic m10

>> No.10343534
File: 65 KB, 956x650, 7M58dQ1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343534

>>10339058
Not really into New Balances, but these were worth copping for $59

>> No.10343536
File: 19 KB, 460x207, ann-demeulemeester-black-velcro-fastening-trainer-product-2-438964-124040320_large_flex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343536

Should I cop them? Like them, but not sure. Or should I just cop new margielas?

>> No.10343537

i copped kva multilace hi's on sale any idea how to wear them without looking herby?
the black ones

>> No.10343540

>>10343536
raf velcros are superior to these imo.
Which margielas were you referring to

>> No.10343546
File: 30 KB, 540x376, visvim_fbt_waxed_2_tone_04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343546

Copped some cheap visvims. Dual tone waxed fbt from 09'

>> No.10343549

>>10343546
Dope as fuck
How much did you pay

>> No.10343550
File: 83 KB, 960x660, nike-nike-air-pegasus-83-ltr_960x660c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343550

>>10341227
I can dig. here's my recent purchase.

>> No.10343553
File: 79 KB, 800x600, Shoe2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343553

Copped these a few months back.

>> No.10343562
File: 91 KB, 1024x768, IMG_1067_zps7cb3cbfc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343562

>>10343540
Saw rafs velcro irl - dont like them. Also, got many anns things, so, a little straight to her. And, of course - price. Well, wish to have canvas painted white or black gats like on pic, but seems no reissues from 2011, so full black or black with gum sole. Maybe you got any ideas?

>> No.10343566

>>10340825
anywhere other than shoreditch and camden go smart mate

>> No.10343576

>>10343562
I'm definitely feeling those margielas in the pic. If you can find a pair I'd go for those.

I really like the low raf velcros white with black outlines from last season, a few pairs went to sale but I missed out.

>> No.10343657

>>10341924
Do they come in black? The rain would destroy them pretty much instantly.

>> No.10343680

>>10341924
>>10342058
>>10340777
What the fuck are these meme-shoes? Jesus fucking christ these are some twatty shoes.

>> No.10343687
File: 75 KB, 620x413, nike-sb-stefan-janoski-cork.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343687

C O P O R N O T

>> No.10343690

>>10343680
Sound the poorboi alarm

>> No.10343691

>>10343690
The only poor thing in this thread is the fashion sense of the people who buy those shoes.

>> No.10343696

>>10343687
Ugh no

>> No.10343705

>>10343687
god no

>> No.10343710

>>10342899
Confirmed

>> No.10343711

>>10343553
from where?

>> No.10343747
File: 98 KB, 852x1136, 11892358_10207589674478713_6426539408975514126_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343747

Got them for half price, worth.

>> No.10343748

>>10343747
What're you going to wear them with?

>> No.10343753

>>10343748
a noose

>> No.10343780

>>10343711
The company is called Sneaky Steve, it's based in my hometown of Göteborg, Sweden.

>> No.10343830

>>10341492
WHAT ARE THOSSSEEEE

HAHA THEY LOOK SO BAD

>> No.10343834

>>10343747
dope colourway, really versatile. Nice cop, same as mine

>> No.10343865

>>10340777
Might aswell build a shoe out of lego.
More shapes on those than on fat women

>> No.10343866

>>10342238
i smell zara ninja, you have some serious problems man

>> No.10343868
File: 18 KB, 417x360, 10686890_1671652693047753_4230124936545591891_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343868

>>10341492
NIGGA
WHAT
ARE
THOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSE

>> No.10343870

>>10342238
Just because you have expensive shoes, doesnt make them nice, they are ugly as fuck

>> No.10343897

I need some new white sneaks, but they need to be available in wide sizing. Any suggestions?

>> No.10343916

>>10340587
those polo shoes and top middle are literally just stans with more/worse branding, it even has the perforations on the side. just get stans they're better than any of this shit

>> No.10343935

>>10343576
Well, im sure there is no chance to find this margielas in my size, even not new. They are too good. Raf since 2008 is pretty meh for me. I saw full black and full white hightops, but there is something wrong this them.

>> No.10343949

>>10342300
This. People here take any shoe that looks remotely athletic and say you should run in it. Actual running shoes will be ugly, but they'll be comfortable as fuck

>> No.10343988
File: 484 KB, 300x225, file.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10343988

>>10341197
>those jeans

>> No.10343994

>>10339058
Nice Autism shoes
>>10339441
lol what a faggot
>>10341492
lol

>> No.10343995

>>10343988
Blue jeans.

>> No.10344000

>>10340777
vacuum your cow

>> No.10344004

>>10342943
people seem to dislike these but I think the grey looks great.

>> No.10344072

>>10341227
W2C

>> No.10344087

Where can I get good sneakers preferably in the UK)?

Something decent, good quality and works with alot of clothes
>No over priced shit.
>No meme shoes

>> No.10344134

>>10343680
Do you even know what a meme is? /fa/ has been completely wrecked by new cancer like this.

>> No.10344161

>>10342992
These look amazing anyone actually bought any?

>> No.10344182

>>10344087
kill yourself

>> No.10344323

can someone recommend some nice triple black sneakers?

>> No.10344334

>>10344182
your nan is dead

>> No.10344361

>>10343546
How much? Grailed? Looking to cop cheap visvim too

>> No.10344381
File: 446 KB, 1632x918, DSC_8663r.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10344381

NB CRT300
half size small so size up.

I like them better than Stans.

>> No.10344388

>>10344381
anywhere to cop right now not sold out?

>> No.10344396
File: 25 KB, 331x207, 8947910299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10344396

Just copped em. What do?

>> No.10344399

>>10344388
The New Balance site still has them. I got mine from ebay though. They pop up from time to time there, so keep watch for your size.

>> No.10344406

>>10344323
the only recent triple black sneakers that looked ok were the yeezy boosts, huarches are ok but they're nandocore

>> No.10344429

>>10341757
these look v odd off feet but really good on feet especially after a couple of months

>> No.10344434

>>10342309
>unaware of the fact that a ton of people in japan wear hokas and pull them off v well

>> No.10344484

>>10343562
someone literally took germany army sneakers and tried to color them with a black sharpie

kek

>> No.10344495

>>10344396
them them in your garbage bin

>> No.10344649

>>10342992
http://www.footweardesign.us/designer-c-16.html

lol wtf these are actually pretty cool

>> No.10344691

>>10343550
w2c?

>> No.10344918

>>10344484
What?

>> No.10344986

>>10341492
How do they fit? I usually wear size 8-8.5 (size 8 geos are a little roomy esp the toe). Could i wear a 9?

>> No.10345452

How to distress stans quickly? They look like nurse shoes brand new

>> No.10345521

>>10345452
go hiking bud

>> No.10345535

>>10343234
takahiromiyashita thesoloist. x foot the coacher sneaker

>> No.10345542
File: 734 KB, 1200x800, tumblr_nt1foxg98Z1toryllo5_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345542

takahiromiyashita thesoloist. x foot the coacher sneaker

>> No.10345581
File: 1.10 MB, 2592x1936, IMG_3608.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345581

>>10344986
i have the 1st and 2nd rick adidas models and i went half a size down and they fit good but these i had to get my true size (11us) and they actually fit good too. the springblades fit pretty narrow and the tongue is sewn really tight and firmly to the inside of the shoe, its not elastic or stretchy at all. i think if i were to size down half then my foot would barely be able to even get inside the shoe and would probably rip the tongue stitching from the side over time.
pic related is how the entire tongue is sewn onto the shoe fabric.
i think ramones are like this too, but the tongue isnt sewn on, its just part of the leather or w/e fabric is used . anyways i think you could still get away with half size down from your true size.

>> No.10345613

>>10345581
Thanks man. So half size up im fucked eh?

>> No.10345628

>>10345613
yeah i think any larger than your true size would be a bit too big and your heel would probably start slipping out unless you tied them super tight, but you could probably get away with it if you added another insole though

>> No.10345648

>>10344399
You have baby feet

>> No.10345650
File: 122 KB, 620x382, springblade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345650

>>10342238
>$885

LOL THOSE ARE MODIFIED ADIDAS SPRINGBLADES AND THOSE GO FOR LESS THAN $200

>> No.10345660

>>10339058
i copped this from tres-bien for like 240 <3

>> No.10345691
File: 48 KB, 667x819, 8762130472098374.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345691

>> No.10345733

>>10342238
you have the worst style and personality of all /fa/. Literally kill yourself. If the fact that the sheos are designer is so important to you, you could have gotten some real fucking nice shoes for that money. Dressed by a name on the pricetag.

>> No.10345749

>>10340777
lucky 7 trips
my tech runners are upstairs in their box, I've only worn them a few times since they came a couple weeks ago but I love them

>> No.10345760
File: 1.62 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345760

Copped today

>> No.10345762
File: 22 KB, 500x500, Lawn Aerator Sandals.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345762

>>10341492
kek

>> No.10345792
File: 403 KB, 1000x1000, 150149C_shot4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10345792

>> No.10345892

>>10343534
Goddamit why can't I find these in Canada

>> No.10346047
File: 1.54 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346047

Thrifted. $7.

>> No.10346049
File: 18 KB, 375x327, 1414447850891.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346049

>>10345760
w2c

>> No.10346074
File: 170 KB, 1000x750, tumblr_m2hfpnEvxR1qa2j8co1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346074

Are these still being made or nah?

>> No.10346168

>>10345650
Except actual Springblades aren't that good looking—check the pic you posted. It's not a shoe made for fits.

I'd love to own a pair of Rick Springblades myself, but I can't justify the price. I saw some pairs of white Rick Springblade boots for about $400, and I seriously considered copping for a while, but at the same time, I didn't need it, so I didn't get it.

>> No.10346201

>>10343534
ayyy just got these yesterday

>> No.10346208

>>10345542
Nice, how much did you get em for? They remind me of the n(n) x Converse collab

>> No.10346229

>>10345762
L M A O
M
A
O

>>10342238
you're retarded if you paid retail for those

>> No.10346253
File: 62 KB, 1200x803, 32ed1249-3155-41ca-a969-a6f3ab1dcf5a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346253

If I don't care that they're meme shoes, are stans a decent everyday shoe?

>> No.10346259

>>10342263
Can you post a fitpic?

>> No.10346293

>>10345762
dope as fuck
raf simons? what brand

>> No.10346299
File: 66 KB, 1068x500, blah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346299

yo i'm looking for a first white high top, which would you guys pick?

or make other suggestions, im poorfag tho

>> No.10346345

>>10346299
right, or get some sk8 his if you want cheaper

>> No.10346347

>>10343753
Kek

>> No.10346365

>>10343780
Nice, anon!

>> No.10346375
File: 455 KB, 720x871, velvet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346375

>>10346299

call me when you're ready to step up

>> No.10346379
File: 85 KB, 1599x764, nb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346379

>>10346299
get the j.crew NBs, cleaner than both of those

>> No.10346381

>>10346253
yee

navy stronk

>> No.10346394

>>10346381
thanks fam

>> No.10346395

>>10346253
If you have wide feet probs no, if you have skinny feet you should be good. They are good quality. Nobody in public is wearing them, I can assure that, because they aren't that popular as this site makes them out to be.

>> No.10346398

>>10346253
y not green

>> No.10346403

>>10346299
how about national standard?

or af1

>> No.10346415

>>10346395
i don't have wide feet as far as i know. I figured they're a decent shoe. Thanks for the heads up, I felt that they weren't nearly as popular as /fa/ makes them out to be. I haven't seen anyone at uni wearing them.
>>10346403
buying them off adidas site, they're sold out of green. couldn't find the green at 75 at other sites so i figured the navy is a good alternative

>> No.10346418

>>10346415
Good, do not get green, they are beyond played out and look gross imo

>> No.10346424
File: 39 KB, 620x363, nike-air-pegasus-new-racer-black-white-light-brown.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346424

>> No.10346427
File: 20 KB, 600x600, CM_n7pnUYAA9EqS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346427

>> No.10346428

>>10346418
i know it's only the top of the tongue and the bit on the back, but the green just sticks out too much to me.

>> No.10346445

>>10346074
bump for this

>> No.10346454

https://axelarigato.com/usd/low-sneaker-20003

What's your guy's opinion on these?

>> No.10346473

>>10346445
yes, they're on ebay but you have to search the german version

unless you want MMM gats in which case they're fucking everywhere

>> No.10346484

>>10346454
look like cp's

i like em

>> No.10346576

Do raf velcros run true to size or should I size up

>> No.10346639

>>10341197
your jeans looks like shit

>> No.10346643

>>10343687
fuck no

>> No.10346659
File: 48 KB, 520x411, f39cf4e1c7013f1eaaf4f186894eb6cc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346659

meet the ultimate lunar core shoe, and it cant be bought cause it was an artpiece. I wish they would mass produce these.

>> No.10346663
File: 68 KB, 520x411, cee2921c1f63e7baa3d9bd6047845bdc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346663

>>10346659

>> No.10346668
File: 117 KB, 652x434, dicklicking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346668

>>10339058
converse interests me, I kno I kno im a pleb, but you all look like fucking tryhards wearing shoes from the future.

>> No.10346681

>>10346668
Do you think I should cop the black low-top Chuck II?

>> No.10346683
File: 582 KB, 1000x1000, 150149C_shot1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346683

Should I cop these?

>> No.10346700

>>10346659
>lunar core
In what possible way is that lunar core

>> No.10346799

>>10346683
no

>> No.10346821

>>10346799
And why not? Chucks are classics. The new shit is even butttteeerrrrr

>> No.10346833
File: 151 KB, 800x600, ultra boost.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346833

Should I cop them? They are fake, about $70.

>> No.10346835
File: 7 KB, 277x400, RE212B00O-Q11@10.1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346835

Copable?

>> No.10346838

>>10346683
These are Bretty cool imo. What's the name of this model?

>> No.10346884

>>10346833

Sure, although they won't be as comfortable as the retails.

>> No.10346909

>>10346838
Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars II

>> No.10346931
File: 119 KB, 450x450, 549719C_shot3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346931

>>10346909
chucky beast level

>> No.10346935
File: 194 KB, 450x450, 549719C_shot1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346935

>>10346909
>10/10

>> No.10346939
File: 44 KB, 762x1100, CO412B04D-Q12@10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346939

Whach'ya think?

>> No.10346942

>>10346931
>>10346935
Jesus christ, what the fuck

>> No.10346946

>>10346942
I don't like it,,, I;d go for the black and white converse II i posted earlier,

>> No.10346951
File: 84 KB, 450x450, 549718C_shot5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346951

>>10346946

>> No.10346955
File: 555 KB, 1000x1000, $RT7PTYF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346955

>>10346951
NO LOL

>> No.10346956
File: 207 KB, 2436x1100, CO412B04D-Q12@10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346956

>>10346946
Well I wear classic Chuck Taylors high and they're cool, go well with pretty much anything altough long walks in tem can be a pain. Now I want to buy new shoes, though about somethink like these
>>10346835
>>10346939

Probably will go with Reefs from 3 in pic rel

>> No.10346957

>>10340777

Playstation 1 shoes

>> No.10346960

>>10340777
Sagen gotta neg mr SS

>> No.10346965
File: 492 KB, 1700x1293, gbroaml_20108_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346965

>> No.10346981

>>10346884
Yeah I know, but I'm just scared theyre going to come and look fake as fuck.

>> No.10346996
File: 78 KB, 612x612, 1435295647071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10346996

>> No.10347001

>>10346996
aww too cute

>> No.10347019

>>10339371
w2c leggings

>> No.10347024

>>10340558
they're super comfy, def cop

>> No.10347042
File: 274 KB, 1000x1000, 1_52828_ZM[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347042

bought these yesterday. i'm 29. i've read they're mostly for younger people.. should i return them?

>> No.10347053

>>10347042
Save up more and get the Chucks II.

>> No.10347068

>>10347042
Get normal sneakers, as in something that will look good for a long time, buy CP's or even Stans. Stay away from Middle schooler shoes.

>> No.10347072

>>10345691
Lmao, this is bershka. Lowest quality ever.

>> No.10347073

>>10347053
they only had blue and red at the store i went to.. i have money to spend, don't need to save

>>10347068
are the chuck taylors really that bad?

>> No.10347075

>>10347073
For sure. Yeah, there are some good converse, sometimes suede or collabs. But this one are pure shit.

>> No.10347086
File: 531 KB, 890x2720, clothes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347086

>>10347075
what about this image? it recommends the shoes

>> No.10347090

>>10347086
This image is pure shit. Its purest shit, like king of shit. Really, man, even mfa and fa advices are better. There did you find it, lol?

>> No.10347100
File: 72 KB, 416x620, sghd2rywwjnijaiwbdfy[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347100

>>10347090
saw it here >>10344532

are converse chuck taylors really bad? they seem popular even among older people

>> No.10347105
File: 983 KB, 250x188, 534.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347105

>>10341197
those pants.. they fit so bad it actually makes me cringe.

>> No.10347112
File: 164 KB, 500x400, 5234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347112

>>10341492

>> No.10347113

>>10347086
this image makes me feel like crying

>> No.10347122

>>10347113
what about these people
http://www.gsneakers.com/2011/01/celebrities-wearing-converse-chuck.html

>marc jacobs
>zac efron
>lebron

i think i'm going to keep my shoes

>> No.10347124
File: 156 KB, 570x377, 88983.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347124

>>10346168
>Except actual Springblades aren't that good looking

heh

>> No.10347126

>>10347122
stay pleb my man

>> No.10347131

>>10346395
>>10346415
here in france everybody wear the stan smiht. I mean everebody; just go to the subway in paris. Old people wear it, student, even worker. Not really a meme here.

>> No.10347144

>>10346835
Bretty cool

>> No.10347183

>>10347122
Lurk more, as I said previously, they are disgusting, why are you trying to say thats a good purchase when its obviously a shitty one. High Top Chucks or 70's are meh looking, but these ones you should just shove them in the trash.

>> No.10347271

>>10343550
have they changed the shape of these a little?

I bought a pair of pegasus 83s a while ago, and I ended up returning them cause they seemed slightly too bulky. I dunno if it's just the angle, but these seem slimmer. am I making that up?

>> No.10347307
File: 307 KB, 1280x853, air-jordan-1-mid-white-white-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347307

>>10346299
buy air jordan 1s or af1 hi

>> No.10347319

>>10343687
hell no

>> No.10347334
File: 376 KB, 960x1280, IMG_0508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347334

Can do anything with these or trash them?

I think I copped like 4 years ago and has been sitting in the back of the closet
Also, w2c nice pair of beige/brown NB's? I can't figure out all the different numbers

>> No.10347337

>>10347307
this, they're popular for a reason, Jordan 1's are more comfortable but the af1's are easier to find/cheaper

>> No.10347351

>>10347124
>Implying these look good.

They're still part of the "ugly running shoes" group. They MIGHT work for maybe tech fits, but even then, there are a lot better choices.

>> No.10347375
File: 110 KB, 800x533, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347375

Copped stans in this colorway. How did I do?

>> No.10347543
File: 675 KB, 3264x1840, 1441552811337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347543

Muh Gazelles

>> No.10347548

>>10347375
It's still a mémé shoe, you did horribly

>> No.10347567

>>10347122
meh /fa/ are proto-hipster,if you think a converse will look good on you go for it,asking /fa/ is for advice,not for guidance

>> No.10347690

>>10347334
998 connoisseur guitars are dope

>> No.10347725
File: 122 KB, 800x533, large_ee492505141e0406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347725

>> No.10347748

>>10341492
Love them, the rest are so jealous

>> No.10347751
File: 30 KB, 602x400, 2207436.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10347751

>> No.10347825

>>10340564
The tigers

>> No.10347842

>>10347375
these are nice

ignore >>10347548 memes for you arent memes for others

>> No.10347849

>>10339058
dope cop

>> No.10347852

>>10347122
yeah youre fine dude. chucks are so basic that most people will have a neutral feeling towards them. only autists feel a hatred towards them

>> No.10348005
File: 13 KB, 277x353, IMG_20150906_193129.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348005

Feel like coping these.

>> No.10348007

>>10346683
Used to have these, i'd get em again.

>> No.10348158

>>10343318
that is someone trying to baby freeze

>> No.10348332
File: 1.28 MB, 1800x1707, adidas_gazelles_1800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348332

>>10347543
you fucked up

>> No.10348356

>>10348007
>used to have these
they came out like a month ago what happened

>> No.10348381

>>10346833
Where did you find these bro

>> No.10348392

anyone know when low raf velcros will be available again?

>> No.10348399

>>10347131
oh wow didn't know they were that common over there. in philly, i've seen nobody with them, i guess they're all stuck on jordans over here.

>> No.10348501
File: 99 KB, 750x1334, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348501

just found these. Thoughts?

>> No.10348582
File: 35 KB, 312x368, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348582

>>10346375
Where can I get a cheaper version of these?? Similar style and preferably in black. Anyone know? I'm not rich enough to blow 1k on shoes, even if they are tf

>> No.10348590

>>10348501
The texture is not up my alley, but pretty cool anyways.
What do you think about these: >>10348005 ?

>> No.10348601

>>10346047
You're fucking kidding me. 7 bucks??

>> No.10348609

>>10348590
i think basic vans authentics would look better, but theyre not bad

>> No.10348643

>>10341892
Not him but my stans are getting pretty worn and I have just the standard stans u can get on the adidas website. When and where can I get the thin tongue model?

>> No.10348686

>>10342238
those shoes are ugly as fuck, even if they're 885. price doesnt buy fashion you fuccboi

>> No.10348711

>>10343680
gtfo newfag

>> No.10348766

>>10348332
og master race

>> No.10348791
File: 3.81 MB, 2848x4288, DSC_0235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348791

just copped these

>> No.10348801

>>10348791
gta5 shoes

>> No.10348804
File: 156 KB, 980x470, wear-adidas-gazelle-og.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348804

>>10348766
ye, og silhouette is so fucking clean
what color're yours?

>> No.10348814

>>10348804
blaaack

>> No.10348817

>>10348814
the goat

>> No.10348832
File: 45 KB, 639x548, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10348832

>>10348582
Balmain

>> No.10348863

>>10348832
Too expensive! Anything under $200??

>> No.10348908

>>10348863
The build quality just won't be that good.

Check CPs for the first pic, Cinzia Araia for the second. Those Balmains are basically fake Geos, anyway.

>> No.10348948

>>10343687
oh bullcunt no

>> No.10348959

>>10346074
svennson has a cheaper alternative to the margielas

>> No.10348993

>>10348908
Thank you for the suggestions, I didn't even think about the cps. But they're both a little too expensive for me, know of anything cheaper?

>> No.10349008
File: 61 KB, 900x630, supra.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10349008

I recently bought this one. I like them with only black, not ninja though

>> No.10349013

>>10348332
Why? Got them over a year ago off Adidas website.

I like that gold logo though fam

>> No.10349044
File: 181 KB, 1800x600, AF1-STAN-SUPERSTAR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10349044

which one guys? I don't know about AF because I'm skinny and 5'7

>> No.10349055

>>10349044
AF1s have a chunky sole and would make you look taller you disgusting manlet.

>> No.10349059

>>10349055
but I think they look better in /fit/ people

>> No.10349082

>>10339058

Literally old-man core.

>> No.10349090

>>10349044
I've always thought that AF1s look like ass
Stans look best out of those three
Navy Stans are GOAT

>> No.10349091

>>10348590
I like them. Very simple

>> No.10349139

>>10349013
look at the differences in branding, silhouette, laces, tongue, sole, stitching, materials, etc
the gazelle II's are inferior in every respect imo

>> No.10349184

Are Supra shoes good?

>> No.10349271

>>10349184
some people in /fa/ view as shoes for middle scholers just like vans or converses but i don't get that sentiment.

>> No.10349362

>>10348993
Maybe wait for sales or lurk on Grailed. I have a pair of CPs I got for $95, I'm sure you can find something in the $200 price range that's decent.

>> No.10349374

>>10349044
If you want stands, find a way to get the more premium ones without the puffy tongue. There's a huge difference for not that much in price difference.

>> No.10349391
File: 91 KB, 628x419, 1508194.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10349391

>>10343508
what am I looking at right now?
are these real?
where did they come from?
and why do they have a yeez version of every running shoe?

>> No.10349404

>>10349362
>I have a pair of CPs I got for $95
when was this? I find it really hard to believe that it wouldn't be instacopped these days by someone running a bot or some shit

>> No.10349438

>>10349184
no

>> No.10349540

>>10349404
On Grailed. It was up for like a month and nobody copped it.

Shipping included was like $120 though, but the listed sale price was $95.

>> No.10349554

>>10349391
What are those sneakers?

I tried reverse image search but no dice. Please ID. If there's a black/white colorway, I might consider copping.

>> No.10349601

>>10349554
>I tried reverse image search
you really fucking didn't
it takes less time to actually do it than to bullshit about it
https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.4cdn.org%2Ffa%2F1441581189389.jpg

>> No.10349604

>>10349554
>>10349601
jk I'm a giant prick

>> No.10349744

>>10346427
W2c?

>> No.10350221
File: 879 KB, 1156x1028, asics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10350221

I can't decide between which one. The gemini has a great blue color but the concept of having different looking shoes sucks. The desert pack with its purple and light brown can go well with lunarcore but wear it with anything else and I'll just look like a kid.

>> No.10350523

>>10346957
Fucking kek

>> No.10350643
File: 47 KB, 700x700, adpal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10350643

I just ordered these, and I'm anxiously awaiting their arrival.

>> No.10350647

>>10343534
I got the red ones they're so fucking nice.

>> No.10350657

>>10341227
I really like these.

>> No.10350716

>>10346996
CL is so fucking hot

>> No.10350835
File: 45 KB, 700x700, adpalbak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10350835

>>10350643
they look especially nice from behind though