/fa/ - Fashion

>>12978104
to me, even though there's tiny variations in each pic you posted, they all fall into the same category of a look:

#casual rugged urban american boyish#

some of the pics look downright ridiculous. like the one guy with blue desert boots, he looks ridiculous. the ultra high ankle derby boots (undone) and with rolled up jeans looks somewhat juvenile.

whether it looks numale" or not, I don't think it's numale per se
it's a slight step above numale in terms of look, but the "rolled up" cuffed jeans with casual derby boots or desert boots, is pretty basic

not all guys can pull this look off, for some this look might be the exact perfect look for them. but for other like the guy in blue desert boots, he looks totally wrong. when you have more boyish type face, like a standard "american" preppy type soft features then this look is suitable and will enhance you. if you have sharper more angular european features this look will just look silly

tbs no grown man should be wearing desert boots, let alone blue ones.

Every boot you posted is a more "worker" style boot, derby boot, and the brown is fitting colour. This look is like one degree away from the "Hiker" look, with the hiker boots and the full out rustic rugged look.

This is an addicitve look for the newbie fashionable man, but it is just a look. And for some it could be the look that fits them best. As to the other poster who is degrading this look as "numale", sorry, but it's not, it's stylish but it is still basic. Numale would be rolled up jeans, heritage boots, a thick bushy beard and a beanie, sherpa or jean jacket. pic related. It's silly to degrade a "look" because for some it actually is the perfect look for them.

>>12846939
lol zero. zero fa. 3 x zero, still = zero.