/fa/ - Fashion

>>13141191
... like any bird...

NOT REALLY.

1. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT ALL SPECIES OF BIRDS ARE WITH NO MUTUAL DIFFERENCES IN APPEARANCE, YOU ARE DELUDED AND IN ERROR.

2. IT IS SHAPE, NOT SIZE, OF NOSE, WHAT MAKES IT RESEMBLE A BEAK.

>>13136074

IF YOU WEAR BOOTS, TIE THEM PROPERLY, OR DO NOT WEAR BOOTS.

>>13132903

THE PROBLEM PERSISTS: YOU STILL LACK FASHIONSTYLE; THE ONLY THING THAT CHANGED IS THAT YOU LEARNED MIMESIS.

YOUR RADICAL PROBLEM IS YOUR UNDEVELOPED PERSONALITY; FROM PERSONALITY DERIVES FASHIONSTYLE; YOU LACK FASHIONSTYLE, THEREFORE, I INFER THAT YOU LACK PERSONALITY.

FOR AS LONG AS YOU NEGLECT THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM IN FAVOUR OF REMEDIAL IMITATION OF OTHERS, YOU WILL REMAIN A NONPERSON.

>>13122888

?

1. WIDE FACES IN GENERAL ARE AESTHETICALLY SUBOPTIMAL —ID EST: UGLY.

2. TESTOSTERONE LEVEL IS NOT A FACTOR IN FACIAL WIDTH.

3. WHY DO YOU IMPLY THAT WIDE FACES ARE “GOOD”, OR BEAUTIFUL, AND THAT HIGH TESTOSTERONE LEVEL IS SOMETHING “GOOD”, BENEFICIAL, OR SOMETHING THAT ONE SHOULD WANT?

4. ABSTAIN FROM POSTING IGNORANT OPINIONS.

HELLO?

>>12988337

WHY DO YOU POST DEPICTIONS OF GERMAN NATIONAL SOCIALIST UNIFORMS IF YOU ARE ADDRESSING FASCIST FASHION?