/fa/ - Fashion

>>13983883
Also scents for more than $0.50/ml should be probably removed given that one can get half of designer scents for such prices on fragrance.net.

>>13983607
I've recently started playing with perfume making myself. It doesn't take much going into the rabbit hole to realize that virtually every non-niche (and by niche I mean actual niche not Margiela or Tom Ford) perfume maker basically buys their ingredients from two same chemical companies. Moreover, if you think about "non-synthetic" ingredients as Tom Fords meeting Arabs to buy Oud from them after smoking opium or visiting Amazonian River tribes then this is a complete bs. They all buy the same ingredients from same Swiss companies. Finally, juice is worth a small fraction of a price. >90% of the price is marketing. It makes looking for nice cheapies so much fun.

>>13862843
I have a few back home, varying from the one in your pic to >>13863180. In my opinion, if you're going to piece together an outfit with one of the "loud" ones, it would obviously have to be the center and focus of the outfit. A more versatile sweater like the one in OP can be used to sum up a general theme or color scheme in your fit. One of the big problems for me is I can really only find them on Ebay, and since they don't always come with measurements, they may not be the best fit. If you can find some at a thrift/vintage clothing store though, that would be your best bet.

>>13821990
bump