/fa/ - Fashion

>>12839970
Do you have a problem with early European nations? The Greeks, or on a more decentralised level, the Germanics and Anglo Saxons? They had a semi free market, a degree of capitalism is (inb4 meme) human nature. These nations then transformed into some of the most successful socialist nations, like Norway and Sweden which has very little class inequity and really high taxes and was, until the migrant crisis, a bit of a socialist utopia. What these countries had in common, my friend, was social solidarity secured by perceived ethnic homogeneity- the locals looked at one another as part of an extended tapestry of the same ethnic background, who had endured the same trials and in some cases whole stocks were perceived to be directly related to each other (for example, everyone believing they descended from Charlemagne and his dynasty).

This social solidarity is proven to lower crime, lower tax evasion, lower cortisol levels, there are tangible tests done on this. You can easily have a socialist society in an ethnostate, Japan or Israel could easily switch to high taxes, Engelian economics etc, because the social solidarity and sense of tribal union and loyalty would encourage everyone to work for the greater good of their people, to contribute taxes, instead of feeling bitter and resentful that their land is being palmed off to invaders and these invaders don't want to work, won't play fairly, act violently (and whites get blamed), and lo and behold civil unrest goes through the roof, whites stop having babies, and placate themselves with mindless hedonism and consumerism.