/fa/ - Fashion

>>14441266
Based digits telling the truth.
Grail watches are for losers. Live your life instead of slaving away for some stupid brand name.
>but i want to own that one watch so bad i can't help it

Buy a good replica but be honest about that it's a rep. Don't get played by the (((market))) like a good goy.

>>14438143
Nice, thx.
>>14438153
I believe you even without looking, the replica market has improved a lot in the last few years.
>>14438155
Well, it looks like competition but they can agree on prices in certain segments or that the whole industry does not get too innovative so that all the groups can stay afloat.

Well, i guess that if i would look closer into the details i would discover that i'm partly incorrect. But what would i gain from it? Just the knowledge that we are not getting scammed by 50% of the industry but only by 30%?

I'm still not going to pay thousands just for a brand. The manufacturing cost are not that high, especially when the movement is not in-house.
The real crime is manipulating the average consumer with decades of marketing and lies.

If i could, i would get a 1:1 replica without an brandname, i just want to own the design, i don't care about the brand, their history, how people react to that watch, etc, i just want a watch for myself.

>>14438193
Thanks for consuming and financing R&D of newer models, so that i can enjoy thos i like for 200$.
You are a good paypiggy.

>>14220490
>>14220495
>>14220522
Great marketing right there, LMAO.
That same longaynes model was posted in earlier threads. I like the dial but it is way too overpriced for what it is.
>orient
I never seen anybody else complaining about the orient. If this was real i'd assume the retarded user forgot to screw down the crown or the one of the seals was damaged from the factory or from opening the watch.
That ISO diver rating fact was just unasked for and was just advertisement.

In reality even a casio can be used as a diver, way above it's depth rating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqbPeuoXOWY
An undamaged diving watch, operated within it's depth rating will probably not fail you.
Only when you come closer to its rating limit, maybe then. But good luck actually reaching 200m as a recreational diver. Even 40-50 meters is a whole different skill level for most divers.

>>14207123
A cheap ad campaign for tudor. That costed them less than paying lady gaga again and collectors will probably buy them
>win/win

Almost every watch related yt reported on this model.

>>14173377
>imagine finding excuses for RAWLEKS

You might be actually retarded.
The price continued to rise despite the curve for inflation rising relative slowly.
Continue sucking corporate cock, göy.

>>14164879
>FAKE WATCHES ARE FOR FAKE PEOPLE

Stop crying, wagie.

>>14030041
Well, which tag are you dreaming of?
Autists will foam out of their mouths but i say it's ok. The watch industry is full of overmemed prices anyway. If you only care for the design and not give a shit about the movement or the history the company, go for it.

Just don't try to fool people that it's the real thing, you will be made fun of.
Your post is good bait, it brings a valid discussion starter for several things about blind consumerism of watch "enthusiasts"(yikes).

>>13962745
Accurate.
But nobody will care for those three either. If people like you, they will compliment everything, if not, they will shit on any of your decision behind your back.
>Doing anything to impress random people
Pretty beta.

>>13467663
>They're supposed to be meticulously made daily tools

Your mommy is a daily tool, fag, cry some more.
Good watches are both, technically and visually nice. If you want a purely anti fashion watch, then your beloved mechanical movements are out of the window. Quarz, viewed from a tech perspective only, is the superior movement.