[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:


View post   

>> No.13839301 [View]
File: 94 KB, 736x1104, 1465809821119.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13839301

>>13838177
Not Op but:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/635705088/creation-hands-line-art?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=all&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=line%20art&ref=sc_gallery-1-11&plkey=e5a01a5976c314dfc2f00853d2a8c490bcc9f98d:635705088&col=1

>> No.11408892 [View]
File: 94 KB, 736x1104, 1462609785627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11408892

>>11408822
>Phew that's an an edgy fucking opinion
You have no counter argument.

There for my point stands.

>> No.11397749 [View]
File: 94 KB, 736x1104, 1462609785627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11397749

>>11397169
>Women who know how to dress usually attract more men too. It goes both ways
It doesn't simply go both ways, hygiene and style is a basic requirement for girls, unless you're trash class. I mean, some people get off on hoes and fucking downwards, but I don't date dumb women and only dumb women don't know how to dress.

>>11397587
Girls are attracted to power, period. Not muscles or clothes or taste, yes, but money and "confidence" is just misattributing a correlation.

Sometimes they fall in love, too. That's a different deal. I can't help you with that, though my gut tells me cultivating sincerity and, what's the word, holiness? angelicness? not partaking in any of the 7 deadly sins, etc. is your best bet

>> No.11345180 [View]
File: 94 KB, 736x1104, 1462609785627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11345180

haircuts should
1. fit your face
2. fit your style

the only reason haircut trends are a thing is because they follow behind changes in clothing style. it's the loudest part of any fit, everytime you change your haircut, your entire wardrobe changes with it

if you can rock it, wear it.

>> No.11313913 [View]
File: 94 KB, 736x1104, 1462609785627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11313913

>>11313418
>The only reason Vetements may have done more to undermine hype as it does it with intention and people notice this intention as it is blatantly obvious. Audiences watching hypebeasts succumb to the hype is enough to undermine hype, which is done in a much more subtle way.
Well yes, that's what I meant by satire having political power. It's more effective at changing the industry because it isn't subtle, there's no question about its critique, and its unavoidable since it's coming from within, rather than commentary from the outside.

Schadenfreude for hypebeasts is a lot weaker and quieter than Vetements' critique, which also extends far beyond just that - Vetements is more angled at designer rtw, rick owens, yy etc. than it is streetwear or diffusion lines, fyi.

>>11313252
Why do middle class plebs feel most entitled to their opinions on exactly those things they know nothing about?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]