/fa/ - Fashion

>>17072843
I agree with this, just wish they'd stop ruining their classic designs or pumping out only Black Bays.

>>15565096
some watches just look better smaller.

A watch that was originally 34mm (and visually designed to work that way) but then got blown up to 40mm looks like shite.

>>15515900
t. fattie

its the tudor ranger all over again, but even worse
shit went from soulful vintage petite to boring modern mallshit

Dogshit Tudor redesigns edition

This thread is about the appreciation of watches and their design, their history, and the engineering and materials that are required to make a functioning timepiece.

Guides:
> Poorfag guide: https://m.imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

Previous >>15484263

Why are modern Tudor designs dogshit? The modern ranger looks like a plastic toy watch when compared to the 60s original one, worse than a timex. Are they that much afraid of canibalising Rolex that they have to shoot themselves in the foot?
>Oh I know, the design is from the 60s, so let's put straight end links despite the original (THAT WE MADE) having proper fitting end links