/fa/ - Fashion

>>11552983
I think it's just the type of people it attracts, there's a lot of Brandy Melville, Urban Outfitters type of girls here girls raised of fast fashion with an interest for couture but little knowledge, or real love for it. It's like the girls who say "I'm into fashion" yet are caught up in pseudo luxury designers. For example >>11552691
is carrying a Micheal Kors purse and if you know anything about bags you'd know Kors rips off almost all their bag designers from other houses.

Like I said the Guys here are all HM chic with no interest in sneakers etc. or are super androgynous with their fashion (which I personally don't like) Like the guys here are awful at dressing

Everyone here is so caught up in being "fashionable" and on trend that nobody here is creative or original, but like I said this school doesn't really attract a type of "alt" person, or creative type person, even one here dresses "safe" or very spoon fed.

I guess it's becuase I find what's popular in woman's cause wear right now (long flowly boho type stuff, aka coachella chic) really ugly and derivative

That being said I think Parsons has better fashion, but Parsons kids are up their own ass honestly, but I think fashionably they are more creative and willing of risk. But I will say the girls and guys here who dress well and know what they like blow Parsons out the water.

I think more than anything it has to do with money, but talking to kids and watching people come from shopping at lot of them are okay with brands like H&M and Zara. Like I very rarely see brand names, but it's also college so money.