/fa/ - Fashion

>>15521360
>nobody/very little of the people involved would call themselves a communist.
Correct, this is something used by the right out of sheer ignorance. Their are many schools of Marxism e.g Marxist-Leninist, MLM, Trotskyists, Leftcoms, Anarcho-Communists, Dengists, De Leonismists, Post-Marxists esc... And almost all of these groups would refer to themselves as Socialists.

>and yeah i read capital years ago. havent been to a socialist meeting in 4 years.
Glad to hear it so you are aware of the contradictions that exist in under capitalism and how it would be in our interested not to be exploited.

>once again circling back to the sectarism, as you seem to think communist regimes are fans of relgion, no wat in hell they would be communists plain and simple.
In Marxism we look at thing through a Material analysis. No universal standard exists for how to best go about building Socialism because material conditions differ from region to region and country to country. Irish Socialism naturally will have Irish characteristics. But at it's head the goals are fundamentally the same.

>Yeah but soviets and marxism is not communism. its the workers getting their dues its not trying to instigate a communist revolution.
Again I am assuming you are referring to Marxism-Leninism and no the Soviets were not nor was Soviet Russia at that point either since it as a school of thought came about after Lenin's death. However solidarity is clearly shown with our Russian comrades hence the name "Soviets" meaning Councils in Russian. The proletarian struggle is truly a global humanitarian effort.