/fa/ - Fashion

>>6877419
You really are a bad human being.
inb4
> LEL nerd I was just trolling stop taking everything so serious XD
Fool. I could easily describe just exactly why you are such a tremendous fool. But that would be of no benefit to noone as seeing no accurate feedback would every get through your thick fucking skull.

>>6877432
No. I don't like his demeanour one bit but he does state valid points. You guys are just circlejerking your bad fashion styles with too much money to spend and too much time on their hands trolling softly on this board.

>>6877447
I do feel the urge to do so, but I'll stand my ground for now. Deciding whether I should leave this board once and for all or not - judging from today i don't like it one bit. There's 99% shit and 1% actual education and benefit for visitors.

>>6877378
That is an uncalculable subjective matter. But the fact you feel the need to put yourself above me proves you're inferior, just that - a nobody.

>>6877382
>why are u taking everything so seriously,
It's more often than not just hard or impossible to distinguish serious or sarcastic posts. He acts like an elitist who believes he has high style standards but actually looks like a fool, he gets treated like one.

>how new r u, ive never seen u before
I've lurked since late 2008.

>>6877359
>Can you post a serious fit for once though?
Here's one.

>>6877304
>boo hoo I was actually joking you took what I said serious you don't like my fit you're lame
You really aren't a decent person at all. Found this of you and was about to say that it's decent, I am just clueless as to why you don't just stand up straight and normal like in pic, as opposed to that retarded pose. Whatever, if it's your thing do it - no need to get butthurt over it.

>>6877317
You've got money to blow cause what looks like you've got rich parents yet you still look like a dull tasteless tryhard.

>>6877275
Sigh.

>>6877174
Was right. Whatever, do nothing with our opinions and continue looking odd and retarded ruining what might look like good fits (I'm actualyl not into autistic gothninja myself, nor do I think you do a great job at pulling it off). Oh and I don't dress dadcore.

>>6877231
>ITS AVANT GARDE POSING - LOOK IT UP NERDS
You fail at it, the pose does not flatter you at all. Like an autistic dirty longhaired manchild that cosplays a pirate ninja manlet being hunchback.

>>6877069
Why in gods Earth would you stand like that? Honest question. Your outfits look decent but that posture/stance ruins it.

Back problems?

>>6877106
Your blog is pretty educational +1 for that.

But insulting people in the way you do is of bad taste. I don't like turnleft and poet's outfits either, which is completely a matter of taste. And they seem like decent posters actually contributing to this board, you're going too far.

>fit battles

>>6876792
(except Asians)

>>6876724
Depends, is your hair thick or thin? It's definitly achievable with wax, but if your hair is thin like mine you'll need to use alot more than the size of a fingernail.

>>6876711
#shotsfired

>>6876605
Only females can really pull off oversized clothes.

>>6876640
I'm not 8(. But the indications are so clear that we are.

>>6876520
But this time we're right.

>>6876546
>shit from 2003 already looks dated as fuck
I said 2008 though. In 2003 everything was different, I think the internet made a huge impact on the fashion world in the sense that it gave voice to the individuals instead of copying what you saw your favourite MTV popstar wear for example.

Alot of clothes from 2008 still look very decent today, not that much different from 2013. You can't make that comparison from 2003 to 2008 for example.

>>6876551
>it'll take a generation or more for baggy fits to come back.
Doubt fashion will cycle back to the 90's ever. Baggy clothes which were mainstream in 90s and early 00s looked objectively bad.

I like to believe it won't look ridiculous at all. Anything after 2008-ish will still look decent in 15 years time.

We're entering an era in which clothes will be considered eternally aesthetic, timeless. It just took a few generations to this point.

I may be terribly wrong though but that's what I believe.

>>6876426
Thanks for the info mate, much appreciated.

I think I'll just save up few months and get a good quality one like >>6875712

But, for now I have this <--- I bought it about a month ago for €89, though after posting it on /fa/ it got ridiculous hate even though I thought it looked decent and I could pull it off considering I'm pretty young looking. But yeah, it got me a lil' insecure so I'm aiming for a more mature backpack.

What's your opinion on it tho? (Herschel Supply Survey Navy Canvas, btw)

>>6876210
Help me find a brown/(gray) minimalistic yet interesting backpack that resembles >>6875712
or >>6875977
for around €100, and I will love u forever. :3

>>6876092
Doubt it

>>6876069
>>6876073
>>6876076
If only they weren't so saturated... :/

>>6875829
True. But I can't be bothered to spend my full monthly salary on it now. Gotta spend more on essentials first. My Dakine backpack is still intact, so.

Though I wish I could get that preppy hipster look I'm going for, and the gray roll tops would be the ideal bag for me.

>>6875793
Thx m80ey

>$255
Welp, time to look further

>>6875712
Wtc those beauties?