/fa/ - Fashion

>>13498823

1. FOR WHAT PURPOSE DO YOU WANT A LOGOTYPE FOR /fa/?

2. >... sub...

RETURN TO YOUR WEBSITE OF ORIGIN —"REDDIT"— IF YOU WILL INSIST ON USING THAT WEBSITE'S TERMINOLOGY IN "4CHAN".

THERE ARE NO "SUBFORUMS", OR "SUBREDDITS", IN "4CHAN" —ONLY BOARDS.

>>13487849

>>13494584

I DO SOMETHING SIMILAR; NOT THE SAME ATTIRE REITERATED MULTIPLE TIMES, BUT RATHER, MULTIPLE ITEMS OF THE SAME GARMENT, AND GARMENTS THAT ARE MUTUALLY SIMILAR.

AFTER ONE HAS PERFECTED ONE'S STYLE, AESTHETICAL EVOLUTION CEASES, SIMPLIFICATION IS REALIZED, AND THERE IS OPTIMAL CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN PERSONALITY, AND VESTURE —THE END OF FASHION.

REACHING THE END OF FASHION ENTAILS PERFECTION OF STYLE; PERFECTION OF STYLE ENTAILS EXCELLENCE OF PERSONALITY; EXCELLENCE OF PERSONALITY ENTAILS OPTIMAL PERSONHOOD; OPTIMAL PERSONHOOD IS ACHIEVED MOST OFTEN BY AUTISTIC INDIVIDUALS, WHICH IS THE CAUSE FOR THE AUTISTIC TENDENCY TOWARD UNIFORMITY, AND REITERATION, OF ATTIRE.

>>13493973

THIS INDIVIDUAL SAVED THE ENTIRETY OF THE WEBSITE, INCLUDING ALL THE IMAGES, THE BLOG, THE BLOGPOSTS, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COMMENTS —THERE IS NO MORE CONTENT THAT DIRECTLY PERTAINS TO aryanism.net; REGARDLESS OF THIS, THE CURRENT CRISIS WILL BE RESOLVED, AND THE WEBSITE SHOULD BE RETURNED TO INTEGRITY.

>>13493847
>>13493308

I OVERLY THANK YOU; EVEN IF BACKUPS ARE NOT NEEDED, IT IS USEFUL TO HAVE THE WEBSITE'S SKELETON ORDERED AND SAVED IN THIS MANNER.

>>13493659
>… [HAVE] FAILED ...

>>13493629
>I think it has more to do with millenials already seeming dated, unrelatable, irrelevant, and over the hill, like boomers

THAT IS HOW ZIONIST MEDIA IS ATTEMPTING TO PORTRAY “MILLENNIALS”, NOW THAT THEIR TACTICS OF DENIGRATING THEM BY CALLING THEM “LAZY”, “SELFISH”, “IRRESPONSIBLE”, ET CETERA, HAS FAILED DUE TO BEING SELFEVIDENTLY FALSE; THEIR NEW TACTICS WILL FAIL ALSO.

>>13493588

IT WAS NOT NOT SHUT DOWN DUE TO ITS CONTENT, NOR DUE TO LACK OF FUNDS TO RENEW THE LEASE —THIS IS ALL THAT I WILL TELL YOU, ESPECIALLY IN PUBLIC.

>>13493540

1. A READER OF WHAT?

2. WOULD I KNOW WHO YOU ARE FROM THE WEBSITE, OR FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE? IF SO, STATE YOUR NAME.

>>13493186
>>13493308

WHO ARE YOU?

NATURALISTIC REDUCTIONISM IS NOT ONLY ERRONEOUS, BUT ALSO MALIGN; IT IS ONE OF THE MANY BANES THAT ARE SYMPTOMATIC OF MATERIALISM.

APPARENTLY, FEW —AND NOONE IN THIS THREAD— UNDERSTAND THAT MEME; THE MEME MOCKS "BABYBOOMERS" WHO BEHAVE AS IF THEY WERE YOUNGSTERS —KNOWN AS "ZOOMERS"—, NOT TO "MILLENNIALS" OF A CERTAIN AGEGROUP, AND/OR WHO DRESS, AND BEHAVE, IN PECULIAR MANNERS.

ADDENDVM:

http://www.demko.com/zoomers.htm

>ANY YEAR, ANY CENTURY, ANY MILLENNIUM.
>MUTILATING ONE'S BODY.

BODILY MUTILATION IS NOT COMPREHENDED WITHIN FASHION; STOP "SPAMMING" /fa/ WITH THESE MISERABLE THREADS.

>>13487963

BODILY MUTILATION IS NOT FASHIONABLE.