/fa/ - Fashion

>>13347168
not obvious branding on belt, non-cropped trousers, derbies should be fine.
Spend money you save on gaudy belt to make sure shirt is nice and fits well

For those who cut their own hair, would you share your method start to finish?(not a buzz cut...)

>>13342366
someone post the geotracker memes

>>13345664
They're alright. I would size up as they are kind of tight in lower leg. Not really a fan of Uniqlo pants' cut in general but the quality is definitely what was expected.

>>1334274
>>13344502
Open a museum called "NY Grandma" and charge for entrance

>>13343073
>Closest you will find now are:
In Law Black Jeans
In Law Deep Black Jeans
Audiac Deep Black Jeans

looks like rise is lower but its still "mid rise"

>>13343073
pretty sure this was the exact pair.
http://us.asos.com/cheap-monday/cheap-monday-jeans-dropped-tapered-fit-in-new-black/prd/3028963?&affid=10607&pubref=1248&transaction_id=1022fa46119a2cab26511928022d86

I couldn't find this version on the actual site though... it might be out of production

>>13343073
No the ones I have are not cropped and have a zip fly. The rise looks about the same and comfortably reaches my belly button, they are a true high rise.
The material is listed the same so I would say they are probably pretty close in quality.
I paid 60$ on some kind of sale and it was well worth it.

>>13343014
https://www.zalando.co.uk/cheap-monday-in-law-relaxed-fit-jeans-deep-black-ch622g03v-q11.html

This is a pretty close representation of what I have but they look different. If you wear them at the hip they are drop crotch and baggy but if you wear them at the waist they are tapered and high rise without a noticeable drop crotch

>>13343014
There was a "dropped-crotch jean" made by cheap monday which were just actual super-high rise trousers if you wore them at the waist line.
I can't seem to find them anymore, if you can, I would appreciate a link.

>>13342407
From what I gather, most guys would rather think that girls are not wearing make up at all. So the less is more route is the safest route as a beginner.
If you notice in the OP she does make noticeable her blush/redness of cheeks & largeness or focus of eyes. This is again to emphasize traits of feminine youth.
I don't know enough about make up to say for sure, but I'm betting that it translates differently to picture from real life, so maybe she is overdoing it for a certain look only seen on picture format.

>>13340374
T by Alexander Wang has collars like

>>13342297
A round face will definitely help. Depends on your age, as it tends to become less round as you get older. Having a round face might make you look juvenile which can compliment a feminine style which values the looks of youth.
I would assume any maintenance of eyebrows makes people think you are a girl, because guys simply don't do this. Could very likely be different for traps though.
Deeps voice really isn't a big deal, but you could possibly look into voice training and try listening to things back over recordings of your laugh or speaking to see if it sounds masculine.
As for being professional, I don't think the style you posted aligns directly with being taken serious professionally. Being modest is absolutely necessary in the work place, but this style plays off looking girlish.
For that I would suggest looking into some of the womens stuff for YSL and CdG and how they use androgyny to make womens wear incorporating standards of mens wear.

>>13341944
Also they almost always do this kind of display when you read an article about packing clothes.
They seem to fold and neatly display the clothes to give an idea how much space they will take in your luggage.

>>13341944
There are sites that will do this kind of shopping for you:
https://www.threadbeast.com/#what-you-receive

Honestly this kind of thing looks so lame and overpriced. If you're willing to dress so trite, at least look to pictures of individual outfits on actual people/manikin to emulate it yourself

>>13342245
I personally like that hairstyle and the idea of androgyny.
You would probably run into some people who think the short hair could make you look boyish and then assume trap (as you are probably noticing in this thread).
One of the difficulties is when you become skinny your face is more angular and gaunt, which can make your chin look masculine. Most people, especially outside of the fashion interested, will not consider this a cute trait for girls.
Be careful in overdoing make up if you add all this up because people will think you are trying to cover up your masculine features and it may just draw more attention to the trap style

>>13342132
Girls in that style look great but a feminine style requires feminine features to already be there and then accentuate them.
These outfits would not look nearly as good without the:
Skinniness (waist, wrists, legs are all important)
Feminine hair (bangs, long length, volume, etc.)

Make up probably gives a big addition to the look too, but you can't really tell given the angle.

>>13339843
Cloth type can be pretty noticeable.
Take a look at how silk shirts fall on the body vs cotton shirts.
Also take a look at linen clothing in generally, it is visibly wrinkled.
There are a few factors that also contribute, such as weight of fabric and construction, but generally they are noticeably different

>>13342061
nice sketch

>>13342001
Whats your take on people who go against expectations of career image in their wardrobe?
A lot of designers don't flaunt their runway pieces in their casual dress. You could even say many of them dress very simply and would rather their products speak for themselves.
You see the same in people like Zuckerburg, its as to say your expectation of what a designer/professional should look like does not fit my world view.

On the other-hand there are people like Rick or Kanye who are inspired to make clothes by what they themselves want to wear.

One can argue that proven designers aren't under any real wardrobe guidelines.

>>13341669
nudies lean dean are good, have an actual medium rise

>>13341804
Fair enough as a clarification. I am trying to put into words my thoughts for some of the following ideas as an example.
Wear thrasher because you like the design, not because you want to appear to be "in" the skater crowd.
Learn to skate because you enjoy the practice, not because it is a requirement to wear thrasher.
I only use "skate fashion" as an example as they seem to be pretty exclusionary for whatever reason.
>>13341838
This is a bit idealist to me.
As
>>13341839
points out clothing is also a means to an end. It is basically required to own specific clothes for you job in many fields. I don't think this necessary addition to your wardrobe invalidates your personality as shallow

>>13341629
>>13341693
I wouldn't disagree that personality trumps style, but I can't quite follow this logic.
There are plenty of people who's wardrobe doesn't match their personality. Think an an engineer or tradesman, just because one wants to wear Gucci or what have you instead of some industry respected work wear doesn't invalidate them as an engineer or plumber.
People could also set out to disrupt your perception-- think about wealthy people who don't want to appear gaudy or flaunt wealth.