[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

Search:

View post   
>> No.8760507 [View]
File: 46 KB, 700x440, clarks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8760507

>>8760432
I guess you'll say hideous, but I like them

>> No.8760281 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 2513x1928, IMG_20140905_170610.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8760281

Repost

>> No.8760235 [View]

>>8760187
>>8760209
Are you the CEO of J.P. Morgan? :^)

>> No.8755710 [View]
File: 1.67 MB, 2513x1928, IMG_20140905_170610.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8755710

>> No.8741670 [View]

>>8727044
holy.. w2c?

>> No.8740840 [View]

>>8737919
>>8738208
tinyurl ledh8t4

>> No.8740574 [View]
File: 24 KB, 300x345, Old-Cell-Phone-Douglas1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8740574

>>8739766
Nope.
There is just no demand for, so to say 'everlasting' products (did your tube TV break?, Did your first phone break?, ..). In this day and age progress is so a fast unpredictable, that it would only pay of for so few people to pay an extra 10-20% on the price we pay now, just to have longer lasting products, that's the reason companies don't use the best materials.
But the majority doesn't has the intention to 'build something that breaks within 2000 hours of use' or summin'.

>> No.8738425 [View]

>>8738419
*miserably

>> No.8738419 [View]

>>8738315
I used to shop at zara before, but I stopped, since the quality is pretty bad.
They aim for high quality (both in design and also their wannabe hq fabrics) and fail miserabley, whereas H&M knows their place and bring out pretty good basics, for the price, which zara lacks.

>> No.8736422 [View]
File: 957 KB, 1229x3264, IMG_20140901_105654.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8736422

>>8736109
>>8736147
>>8736348
Bomber is H&M, got it for 17,50 on discount (original price was 50)
They only had it in XL, would have gone for a L, but whatever.
Boots are Bundeswehr Fliegerstiefel

>> No.8736098 [View]
File: 811 KB, 1225x2826, IMG_20140901_105728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8736098

>> No.8734158 [View]

>>8733530
w2c?

>> No.8717087 [View]
File: 24 KB, 349x115, getss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8717087

>>8717066
The camo was an impulse buy, wanted the all black but i was to slow, i might flip it.

>> No.8702812 [View]

>>8702805
Growing out

>> No.8702792 [View]
File: 355 KB, 976x2580, IMG_20140825_141802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702792

Repost

>> No.8702392 [View]
File: 801 KB, 1028x2579, IMG_20140825_112049.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8702392

Pants are less redish

>> No.8687923 [View]
File: 15 KB, 239x347, kan2006yel_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8687923

Could it be this one by Christopher Kane?

>> No.8679712 [View]

>>8679650
He is in Berlin

>> No.8679633 [View]
File: 78 KB, 305x416, gebirgs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8679633

>> No.8672478 [View]
File: 2.49 MB, 2448x3264, IMG_20140808_191100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8672478

Dip bleached the shirt

Shorts are old diys from jeans

>> No.8658561 [View]
File: 382 KB, 1286x2642, IMG_20140816_195807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8658561

Going to something safer again, since last posts were bad.
Is this better?

>> No.8653611 [View]

>>8653450
>>8653455
Hmm.. Whats bad? Are it the colors?
>>8653453
Yes

>> No.8653442 [View]
File: 519 KB, 983x3264, IMG_20140815_193037.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8653442

>> No.8641893 [View]
File: 472 KB, 1188x3172, IMG_20140813_120307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8641893

Navigation
View posts[-96][-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]