/fa/ - Fashion

CLEAVAGE IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO IGNOBILITY; ALTHOUGH, ABSENCE OF CLEAVAGE DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE NOBILITY.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LZSnoaLWCVU

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yvSJoOKvako

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mYbgOIPacq8

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5OUaaZ8m_is

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QZn2wK3tErI

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y6120QOlsfU

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tmPws7eXcVk

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fTi2QDHnNRc

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lx3_3j2paNA

>>13408990

HE MAY BE A DEGENERATE FOR ENGAGING IN THE VICE OF SMOKING, BUT AT LEAST HE IS NOT POLLUTING THE STREETS BY THROWING THE CIGARETTE BUTT ON THE GROUND, LIKE DOES THE MAJORITY OF SMOKERS.

>>13406721

1. THE FLESH INDUSTRY IS NOT ONLY ECOLOGICALLY DETRIMENTAL, ETHICOMORALLY DEPLORABLE, AESTHETICALLY ABOMINABLE, BIOPHYSICALLY HYBRIDIZING, BUT ALSO ECONOMICALLY INEFFICIENT, SINCE IT NECESSITATES MORE WATER, MORE SPACE, AND OVERALL, MORE FINANCIAL RESOURCES, AND MORE LABOUR.

THERE ABSOLUTELY IS NO KIND OF JUSTIFICATION FOR THE FLESH INDUSTRY.

2. ONE CAN OBTAIN ALL THE NUTRIENTS THAT ONE'S BODY REQUIRES FROM VEGETABLE SOURCES.

MALNUTRITION IS THE RESULT OF DEFICIENT DIET, NOT OF NONZOOPHAGIC DIET.

3. THE MALEVOLENCE OF AN ACT IS NOT CONTINGENT ON REASON, NOR ON SENTIENCE, NOR ON CONSCIOUSNESS, BUT ON THE ACT'S IGNOBILITY, WHICH IS EVIDENT IN ITS DIRECTION: IF AN ACT IS CONDUCIVE TOWARD "EVIL", THE ACT IS MALEVOLENT.

ZOOPHAGY, AND THE FLESH INDUSTRY IN GENERAL, ABSOLUTELY ARE MALEVOLENT; IF YOU DO NOT RECOGNIZE THIS, YOU ARE EITHER SPIRITUALLY DEFICIENT, THUS, LACKING IN ETHICOMORAL INTELLIGENCE, OR YOU ARE IN WILLFUL DENIAL FOR WHATEVER CAUSE.

FLASH DRIVE.

>>13405170

I CONCUR WITH YOU IN THAT IMITATION OF LEATHER, OR OF FUR, THROUGH SYNTHETIC MATERIALS, IS DISHONEST, AND AESTHETICALLY SUBOPTIMAL, BUT I DO NOT CONCUR WITH YOU REGARDING THE FAULT BEING ONE OF VEGANISM; STYLISTIC HYPERCONFORMITY IS AN AESTHETICAL PROBLEM ROOTED IN THE DESIGNERS THEMSELVES, NOT A PROBLEM OF VEGANISM.

>>13404575
>... you could always buy thrifted leather...

THAT RATIONALE IS INDICATIVE OF BOTH, HYPOCRISY, AND LACK OF COMPREHENSION OF WHAT IS VEGANISM.

VEGANISM DERIVES FROM AN ETHICOMORAL REJECTION OF THE SYSTEMATIC ENSLAVEMENT, TORTURE, SLAUGHTER, AND MANUFACTURE, OF ENTITIES; TO CLAIM TO BE VEGAN, WHILST SIMULTANEOUSLY RATIONALIZING THAT IT IS "OK" TO BUY, AND WEAR, "THRIFTED" GARMENTS MADE FROM SKIN, HAIR, AND/OR OTHER BODYPARTS, CONSTITUTES AN ABSURDITY —HOW IS IT ACCEPTABLE TO WEAR GARMENTS MADE FROM BODYPARTS IF THEY ARE "NOT NEW"? IS IT BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT VEGAN, BUT ARE RATHER CONFLATING ANTICORPORATISM/ANTIINDUSTRIALISM WITH VEGANISM? YES.

>>13405025

EL ENANO SILVESTRE...

>>13405032

>"DO NOT LIE, AND DO NOT DO WHAT YOU DETEST, BECAUSE ALL THINGS ARE REVEALED BEFORE GOD; AFTER ALL, THERE IS NOTHING HIDDEN THAT WILL NOT BE REVEALED, AND THERE IS NOTHING CONCEALED THAT WILL REMAIN VEILED."

— JESUS, GOSPEL OF THOMAS, VERSE SIX.

>>13391758

>>13361351

JOAN OF ARC WAS NOT VIOLENT, BUT COUNTERVIOLENT, FIGHTING AGAINST THE INITIATORY VIOLENCE OF THE INVADERS.

JOAN OF ARC WAS NOT A “LUNATIC” —REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER YOU MEAN BY THAT—; SHE WAS A HERO.

>>13360964

IT IS IRONIC THAT YOU IMPLY THAT "GRIMES" IS NOT "GOTH", WHEN YOU ATTACH TO YOUR POST AN IMAGE THAT DEPICTS A SATANISTIC SUBHUMAN THAT POSTURES AS A "GOTH".

>>13360336

1. A PARTNER IS A SUBJECTIVE ENTITY, NOT AN OBJECTIVE THING, THEREFORE, A PARTNER CANNOT BE "ACQUIRED".

2. "TIMOTHY BURTON" (JEW) IS NOT GOTHIC, BUT SATANIC; I DO NOT KNOW WHO IS THE WOMAN BESIDE HIM IN THAT PHOTOGRAPH, BUT SINCE SHE WAS WITH HIM, ONE CAN INFER THAT SHE IS ALSO A SATANIST, NOT A "GOTH".

https://poshmark.com/listing/Champion-x-UO-Mens-Large-Varsity-Hoodie-5ab5b8073800c5369479dbf1

STOP MAKING THREADS THAT SHOWCASE THAT SATANISTIC PROFESSIONAL "ATTENTION WHORE".

STOP "SPAMMING" /fa/ WITH THESE THREADS.

>>13358520

IT SHOULD NOT BE A THREAD FOR ANYONE.

STOP MAKING THREADS THAT SHOWCASE THAT SATANISTIC PROFESSIONAL "ATTENTION WHORE".

STOP "SPAMMING" /fa/ WITH THESE THREADS.

>>13351764

DISCONNECTED LOW UNDERCUT, WITH SIDEPART COMBED OVER FOREHEAD.

PHENOTYPICAL DISGUISE IS A DISHONEST AND SUPERFLUOUS PRACTICE.

>>13351378

NO.

>LEATHER.

DISGUSTING.

>>13351114

>>>/b/

>>>/trash/

>>13351015

1. CLOTHES ARE NOT EQUIVALENT WITH STYLE, NOR DO CLOTHES CONSTITUTE STYLE.

2. STYLE TRANSCENDS CLOTHING; STYLE DERIVES FROM PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DERIVES FROM PERSON.

3. IF YOU WANT TO DEVELOP YOUR OWN STYLE, DEVELOP YOUR PERSONALITY; TO DEVELOP YOUR PERSONALITY, DEVELOP YOUR PERSON, THROUGH EXPERIENCE IN THE WORLD, RELATION WITH OTHERS, AND CONTEMPLATION OF SELF.