/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>1703668

I was going to type something to the effect of "Wayne pls go", thinking it'd be funny because this looks like the kind of shit Wayne posts.

Less funny after I noticed the name.

>>1703668
We don't need antigravity, we need zero point generators.
Propulsion is easy, generating enough electricity to power it for any reasonable amount of time is the hard part.

>>1703668
Wow you've mastered the basics of electromagnetism. Good job.

>>1703668
Looks interesting. Your're actually building something else and decided to make this thread as a joke right?

>>1703668
inb4 he turns on the coils and propels those metal slugs out of their respective tubes at mach 4

>>1703668
what are those connectors called? I've been looking for something like that.

>>1703719
which ones?
terminal block + fork terminals?

>>1703668
are you just doing this to make that poor compass spin endlessly in circles?
what an evil wretched man you are

>>1703668
>putting a compass in the middle of the back side of a junk yard electromagnet
>anti-gravity!!!
Bptptptpt!!!

>>1703668
Go back to your own imageboard.

>>1703668
What I find interesting about gravity is its supposed to be a wave right like light or whatever but light you can absorb or reflect why not the same with gravity? You need something infinite dense to absorb it all but that will make more gravity so its not possible I think.

>>1703668
This thing doesn't look like it spins. Doesn't gravity wave propagation require some sort of spinning action?
So it just makes a biggish magnetic field? Can you at least generate power from it?

>>1703764
There are plenty of sources on the internet for you to educate yourself in your interests.

>>1703764
> gravity is its supposed to be a wave right like light or whatever

>>1703668
You covered some Old Spice trial size bottles in electrical tape, Wayne? Good for you.

Anyone who actually works in gravity repulsion knows the electrical wires all need to be the exact same length so as to have the directed energy bursts hit every modulator at the exact same second, It's like you never even graduated from building an implosion core.

>>1703692
Electroetheromagnetism.

>>1703668
>using toroidals when you want to make an external magnetic field
this can't even be called an electromagnet, there's literally nothing useful that this machine could do
>not twisting the wire pairs in a magnetics circuit
ISHYGDDT

>>1703764
To stop waves from entering a space, you need to surround that space with something that the waves cannot propagate through. In the case of EM waves, any good conductor works for this as an electric field cannot be present within a conductor. But there is no permittivity or permeability when it comes to gravitational waves, they travel as the ripples of spacetime itself. In order to block or reflect them, you'd need to significantly warp the structure of spacetime, perhaps by making it 100 times denser or less dense in a small spot, which would require an astronomical amount of energy.
Thinking in terms of transducers, for something to be able to absorb the energy of a gravitational wave, it should be in the same sort of scale of something that can emit those waves. So without a pair of black holes actively orbiting about one another to cancel out the incoming waves, you'd likely have no luck.

Try looking for antigravity within GR yourself, chances are you'll end up with some sort of exotic matter, if anything at all.

>>1703780
The idea behind electrogravity is that you want to make a static gravitational field, not oscillating gravitational waves, which would be near-useless for practical uses, though arguably easier to use. Technically there is an inch of truth about electrogravity, if grand-unified electroweak + strong + gravity is to be obtainable, but I suspect it won't be easy without very extreme temperatures.

Yo Wayne, do you have a farnsorth fusor to perform your experiments on?

Quick show of hands who thinks Wayne is inevitably going to harm everyone around him? I do.

>>1703668
If I turn it on, will it be painful?

>>1705271

For you.

>>1703717
>

>lost fuckin hard. I can envision the holes in the drop ceiling.

quick story:

>back in the Nav
>BEE School
>Capacitor week
>what happens when?
>set plastic cup over a couple microfarad cap
>wire it backward
>directions specifically forbid it.
>energize
>nothing but tiny pop noise
>b and other b's
>that was fuckin weak
>wait a tic
>tiny hole in plastic cup
>tiny hole in drop ceiling
>closer inspection
>cap is completely gone.

>TLDR Thought it just burned or something, and solder melted... Nope!

Shot a capicitor can about the size of an eraser into lower earth orbit.

Reminds me of uncle Rico's time machine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3LHAlcrTRA

>>1703668
looks cool, ill give it that

>>1703668
Anti-gravity? Easy.

COOL CLOCK WAYNE!

>>1703668
I FUCKING SWEAR

>>1703668
Needs more cats and buttered bread.

>>1705416
I'm honestly retarded but could we weaponize this?

Lambright is such a fucking loser. topkek

>>1705248
Wayne is pretty dense, this could actually work

WAYNE ON THE FRONT PAGE

>>1709094
WHY DID YOU BUMP IT?

>>1709097
Because I get the feeling his house will no longer not be on fire the second he plugs that in
I'm interested on how that board on the left is hooked up too

>>1709101
>that board on the left
Looks to me like a discrete 3-phase H-bridge. I can only assume that those 3 lots of 3 pin headers are somehow for driving the transistors without shorting some shit out. Reminds me of a high-side NFET boostrap circuit I saw recently that doesn't require any extra switching circuitry, pretty neat.
But is it really Wayne? Has he posted here in the past? The OP looks like a troll to me.

>>1709102
>He missed the lathe strip ghetto dome threads and the HEY GUIS HOW DO I BUILD A BOMB threads
Fug those were like 4 years ago now that I think of it

>>1708348
Yeah it's called a railgun, the US navy made prototypes like 10 years ago.

>>1709104

Not mentioning his career as a bagboy at Safeway that was derailed when a co-worker kept telling Wayne to eat a bag of dicks.

You had one job, anon.

>>1709097
>BUMP

I'll bump it because I'm Wayne.

>>1709102
>But is it really Wayne?
Yes, I took this photos, my friend bob made this.

This was the team. Robert is on the right built the device, based on the Stan Dayo design.
Warren in the middle is my roommate and he's a patent holder for many electronic circuts for radios and amplifiers. He holds three fcc licenses for tv and radio broadcast and repair transmission. Warren my professor I ask questions to when I need direction. He also has a multi-million dollar archive of electronic gear, I will post some photos of that next.

>>1709631
The gear. They are 5'11.

>>1709633
Yes, some is very old and some cost the price of a cadallic an expensive car of the time and some do stuff modern equipment can't do. I was loaning bob an ossiclliscope that only had 110 hours on it, it was used in a nuclear test. Warren has 10 of the, techtronic something.

>>1709102
>Looks to me like a discrete 3-phase H-bridge.
A close up.

>>1709635
A close up.

>>1709631
I'll bite, can you tell us more about the prototype, or possibly address some of the issues posed in >>1705248 and >>1705271?

>>1709635
That quality is no better than what I can see in the OP image, I'd wait for some better lighting before taking photos.

>>1709634
>ossiclliscope
This was expensive at one time, still work about $900 in working order. The tubes are about $100 each and it has 30 of them.

>>1709637
>I'll bite, can you tell us more about the prototype,
YES, it didn't work.

>>1709638
These were use one time only in nuclear tests then sold as scrap.

>>1709640
I see, how unfortunate. You should try making extreme temperatures in a farnsworth fusor, they react interestingly with magnetic fields. All it takes is a pickle jar, some wire, and a vacuum pump.

>>1709642
>You should try
Thanks, I figured it out. A much different way.

>>1705271
>>1705271
>>1705271
>>1705271

>>1703668
If this caused anti gravity, telephone office buildings would all be floating

>>1709631
Why is your roommate a sea captain?
Also why are you on my board you fucking normie fuck

This fucking guy..

>>1709847
>Why is your roommate a sea captain?

His ship hit the rock, he was swept up in a Bermuda triangle vortex from the year 1776.

>>1709791
>If this caused anti gravity, telephone office buildings would all be floating

OK, jack ass. You have pissed me off. I'll so a video on this.

>>1709857
>>1709852
lol. what a huge faggot

>>1709856
Take your meds schizo.

>>1709791
I just uploaded a video. I would crush you in real life.

https://twitter.com/LambrightWayne/status/1191435599334363137?s=19

>>1709941
Holy adipose tissue, Batman!

>>1709941
Noone cares about your lunacy Wayne. Come back when you have evidence or at least critical, intelligent thoughts. There's plenty of space for you to sperg on /b.

>>1703668
Wayne please fuck off. You are a very lonely man.

Damn. Lambright getting BTFO here. kek

>>1709852
Weren't they warned like... months in advance that "hey, get some non-perishable food, we'll probably shut off power in a while"? I agree what PG&E did is shitty but the guy should consider what would happen to him if some giant fuckup occured and he had no power or transportation (like it did)

>Lambright
? tl;dr? who that? /pol/?

>>1703668
How the fuck is this an anti gravity device? Are you retarded, OP?

>>1709633
I think i recognize that from some guy. Buying an IBM mainframe from him.

>>1709941
Seek help Wayne

>>1703668
Well I know who I'm voting for in 2020

>>1708348
If your cap is over 6000uf a cap explosion can make a large hole in a 4mm thick tempered metal sheet. Rip my poor amp. You can blow you hand off and possibly kill someone. Probably yourself.

>>1703668
Just like your girl is humbled and thankful to receive my.cock

>>1713167
>Just like your girl is humbled and thankful to receive my.cock

I don't keep a wench.

>>1703826
He read some pop-science description of LIGO and misinterpreted it

>>1713610
Thats what LiGO does: it detects if gravity is present in the form of waves. Thats what gravity basically is: high frequency waves. So my understanding is they basically a transport by which gravity propagates and thats how we feel it. Not because there is something inside the Earth that pulls us inward, lmao.

>>1713614
They're waves in the material of space itself, not waves as in a particle or electromagnetic wave

Reminder that Wayne is a hobo con artist parasitizing the people around him and especially the elderly. Wayne was five months behind on the rent for his mobile home before the owner kicked Wayne Lambright out. This guy had also loaned Wayne over $1000 in his many failed attempts to get the psycho Wayne to straighten his life out. Everybody coming into contact with Wayne eventually learns. Wayne has no conscience, no prospects, no loyalty, no skills, no future. Behind Wayne is a long trail of devastated and financially inconvenienced people stretching back into Wayne’s 20s. Wayne also managed to con older technologically illiterate people into handing over several tens of thousands of dollars for projects that could have been carried out by an outsourced indian in one week. In Wayne’s hands, not even that can be done. Wayne is the perfect storm of incompetence and narcissism and the only people who have been willing to maintain a relationship with Wayne for more than a few months are a couple of redneck alcoholics and a methhead with whom Wayne enjoys periods of homosexual debauchery including the use of stimulants while seeking out ill reputed public bathrooms for "slam bams." But don't worry, Wayne fully forgives himself every time so he's Not Gay.

>>1703764
The most interesting thing about gravity is that the graviton is meant to be massless, and as such all matter in the universe acts on all other matter

>>1713632
>This guy had also loaned Wayne over $1000
Correction, $20-40K

This guy is Chick, my best friend.

>>1713652
>>loaned Wayne over $1000
>Correction, $20-40K
$20-40K IS 'over $1000' - no correction is needed.

>>1703668
How does it work?

>>1714302
>How does it work?
It does not work.
It's not my design.

The person who made it my friend Bob has quit on gravity. I kept at it and two years later figured out how gravity control works. This is not the way.

hey, newfag here
what the fuck is this tinfoil hat shit?
is this a containment thread or just larping?
thanks.

>>1714673
http://lambright.com/

He likes to post here and on pol.

What a fucking psycho.

>>1714771
Gave me a chuckle.

>>1703668
Are you going to be repulsing off a conductive surface? Like a Lenz Law type levitation?

>>1714771
He's definitely bipolar.

>>1714771
>it gave my mother cancer
this thread has given me cancer

If you want some entertainment Lambert's twatter account is a gold mine.

>and @safeway won't let me shop at their store
Wut?

>>1714977
He probably took a dump in a store isle or something. He's a total lunatic.

>>1709633
Still gets swiped right on tinder

>>1714983
>He probably took a dump in a store isle or something. He's a total lunatic.

NO, It's as simple as I was told to suck a bag of dicks, management wouldn't fire him, so I would not go back to work and they fired me. A judge has already ruled it was sexual harassment. That was July 2nd, 2015, then in August I was shopping and the Manager said I could no longer shop their. I thought it was related to me suing them for the sexual harassment, which it probably is. Yet, they never told me I wasn't allowed to shop at the store. I actually have the whole thing on film. I'll see my day in court and the world can see how criminally discriminatory what they did and how they treat people. It will end up costing them hundreds of millions in similar claims, it goes on all the time. My mother was a manager at Safeway for 30years. It's her retirement.

>>1715039
>Still gets swiped right on tinder
Yep, I don't need a job or anything. I just need to show and smile.

>>1715044
Not you Wayne, the gear. I'm sure you're killing it with the ladies

>>1708348

https://youtu.be/58MmOpSm4LY

>>1709226 not exactly the same same

>>1715041
>world can see how criminally discriminatory what they did and how they treat people
>how they treat people
>people

They treat 'people' fine.
It's just you.

>>1703668
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saT1XPAI580

Don't listen to all these haters, Wayne
follow your dreams...

>THIS IS MY ANTI-GRAV PROTO
>You should all be humbled and thankful that I am sharing this with you.

>>1703668
That shit’s gonna cook a mean pizza if you can find a steel tray.

>>1716832

I have been down that path, all you get are delicious baked potatoes.

>>1716729
>Don't listen to all these haters, Wayne
>follow your dreams...

Your wisdom is now eternal.
Thank you.
https://twitter.com/LambrightWayne/status/1196066489427623936

>>1703668
Thanks wayne

>>1720128
>Thanks wayne
You're welcome.

>>1715044
Considering on the number of missing women being reported in his area, I would suggest you don't know how right you are...

Is this guy schizophrenic or is he just autistic?

>>1720335
>Is this guy schizophrenic or is he just autistic?

Because a person has success people always try to put that person down. Often it's family.

>>1720759
How do we get rid of the Burmuda Triangle? Also are you able to conjure demons?

>>1720841
>Also are you able to conjure demons?
I have no idea.

>>1720841
>How do we get rid of the Burmuda Triangle?
I love those stories.

>>1703668
What does a unit do on it's own? the toroid plus grey tape bit

>>1703668
Reminder that Wayne is a hobo con artist parasitizing the people around him and especially the elderly. Wayne was 5 months behind on the rent for his mobile home before the owner kicked Wayne Lambright out. This guy had also loaned Wayne over $1000 in his many failed attempts to get the psycho Wayne to straighten his life out. Everybody coming into contact with Wayne eventually learn. Wayne has no conscience, no prospects, no loyalty, no skills, no future. Behind Wayne is a long trail of devastated and financially inconvenienced people stretching back into Wayne’s 20s. Wayne also managed to con older technologically illiterate people into handing over several tens of thousands of dollars for projects that could have been carried out by an outsourced indian in one week. In Wayne’s hands, not even that can be done. Wayne is the perfect storm of incompetence and narcissism and the only people who have been willing to maintain a relationship with Wayne for more than a few months are a couple of redneck alcoholics and a methhead with whom Wayne enjoys periods of homosexual debauchery including the use of stimulants while seeking out ill reputed public bathrooms for "slam bams." But don't worry, Wayne fully forgives himself every time so he's Not Gay.

>>1703668

Good news. 75 days away.

https://twitter.com/LambrightWayne/status/1199088725319274496

>>1723288
Sorry, wrong image.

>>1723289
What are you even going on about?

Holy Shit Wayne this is where you've been hidding

>>1705271
You're a big guy.

>>1723372
>What are you even going on about?
I now have money to build a real life jetson car.

>>1723457
>Holy Shit Wayne this is where you've been hidding
I'm not hiding if I'm name tripping! :-)

>>1705271
>If I turn it on, will it be painful?
Grounding strap.

>>1723852
>I now have money to build a real life jetson car.
Doubt it.

>>1723852
>I now have money to build a real life jetson car.
Prove it you. You've always been full of shit.

This is some backyard MVE shit

>>1709638
Nice! I got a 545a a few years ago for $100. Needs a little tlc, gotta dedicate a weekend or two to run through the calibration/maintenance book. Last time I was in it I shorted a screwdriver across the kv feed to the cathode ray tube. Tennis ball sized ball of light, screwdriver impaled into the ceiling, trex arm....good times.

>>1724795
cunt’s fucked mate

>>1723289
>I was told to suck a bag of dicks
How much money are you getting?

>>1703668
Does have the useful side effect of making you less faggoty?

>>1722270
Like it or not this is peak e-celeb.

Wayne are you rly gay? ;-;

>>1724864
>are you rly gay?
>>1713632
>Wayne fully forgives himself every time so he's Not Gay.

>>1724873
I'm trying to figure out if he wants to hook up and would let me call him daddy

>>1724881
>let me call him daddy
If the money is right, you can call him anything that pleases you.

>>1723852
You don't have any money faggot.

>>1703668
nice one

>>1708348
There are already capacitor primer guns

>>1713615
Wrong. They're graviton waves. The reason it seems space shrinks and expands is the photons they were using to measure distance are affected by graviton-photon interactions (as are many other particles). Same thing with the eclipse general relativity experiments. Einstein was a huge faggot who decided to curve space to fit Newton's equations instead of explaining what actually happens when the carrier particle for gravity meets the carrier particle for electromagnetism, ruining a hundred years of physics in the process.

>>1729288
>graviton waves.
Not real.
Do you know how to make an ElectronicMagnet? Then you know what gravity is.

To make an electric magnet doesn't mean you can make the big junkyard type. There is lots of manipulating of magnetism. That is my guess. Regarding space travel. It's like a climber grappling hook. We don't just cruise we jump by time warping. How it works is like this. Example us to the moon. Make a radio beam spinning with enough power to the moon. The human gets inside and we turn off this side and it's collapses to the other side 'moon'. Space would be the same. Set the power 'range' then point it that direction. Nearly like StarTrek is my guess.

>>1729291
>Not real.
Wrong.
>Do you know how to make an ElectronicMagnet?
You mean a coil?
>Then you know what gravity is.
Gravity is unrelated to magnetism.
>To make an electric magnet doesn't mean you can make the big junkyard type. There is lots of manipulating of magnetism. That is my guess.
Your guess is wrong.
>To make an electric magnet doesn't mean you can make the big junkyard type. There is lots of manipulating of magnetism. That is my guess. Regarding space travel. It's like a climber grappling hook. We don't just cruise we jump by time warping. How it works is like this. Example us to the moon. Make a radio beam spinning with enough power to the moon. The human gets inside and we turn off this side and it's collapses to the other side 'moon'. Space would be the same. Set the power 'range' then point it that direction. Nearly like StarTrek is my guess.
Meaningless word salad.

>>1729291
>Do you know how to make an ElectronicMagnet? Then you know what gravity is.
*cough*

Well, seems like the ban expired. WB

>>1720759
>Because a person has success people always try to put that person down.
Wayne |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| success

>>1703764
>>1703780
>>1703826
>>1705248

Waves of what?

>>1703668
>all this shit relating to electricity.

Which is a conjugate phenomena of "dielectricity"(electrostatic) and "magnetism". It will never get you where you need to go because it cannot RESONATE WITH THE ENERGY FROM WHICH YOU "SEEK" TO TRAVEL TO. That is what electrostatics are, but no one really knows about that. Science threw it out the window it favor of "electricity". Wayne, if you really want to understand "anti-gravity" you must first understand that "gravity" doesn't even exist to begin with. It's basically nothing other than incoherent magnetism.

>>1729485
>Waves of what
The electric and magnetic fields. They fall right out of maxwell's equations in a vacuum. Same for in a substance with nontrivial electric permittivity at the relevant frequency, but that derivation is a little more difficult. Considering we can have short capacitive antennas that pick up the electric field or long inductive antennas that pick up the magnetic field or tuned monopoles/dipoles that pick up both fields of a radio broadcast, I'd say the model fits reality relatively well. Look into the equations that that one early guy used to discover or experiment with radio waves if you're curious and/or want to replicate them.

>electrostatics
The field of electrostatics is alive and well. Also look into the oil drop experiment, where the individual electric charge was first isolated and measured. You can buy a commercial electrometer if you're curious, such a device will measure the electric field across the probe. Or just make a simple gold-leaf electroscope. Unfortunately for your theory, the planet seems to be approximately neutral in charge. And yes, Gauss's law applies.

As far as gravity itself goes, Newton's law seem to fit pretty well with Kepler's observations. Do the math yourself if you're really keen, but I can't promise that it's at all fun. And on the smaller scale, there's always the Cavendish experiment that you can construct at home.

>>1729291
>Gravity is unrelated to magnetism.

Oh... OK, then I guess I'm wrong I'll stop sharing the proof I have.

>>1729625
>The electric and magnetic fields.
A wave is what something does. Not a thing.

They fall right out of maxwell's equations in a vacuum. Same for in a substance with nontrivial electric permittivity at the relevant frequency, but that derivation is a little more difficult. Considering we can have short capacitive antennas that pick up the electric field or long inductive antennas that pick up the magnetic field or tuned monopoles/dipoles that pick up both fields of a radio broadcast, I'd say the model fits reality relatively well. Look into the equations that that one early guy used to discover or experiment with radio waves if you're curious and/or want to replicate them.

That doesn't tell me what the "Wave" is nor what causes "it".

>The field of electrostatics is alive and well.
Where?
>Also look into the oil drop experiment, where the individual electric charge was first isolated and measured

An oil drop was isolated, but this "electric charge" you speak of is purely conceptual and no empirical evidence of it exists. A hovering oil drop in a field proves nothing except that the oil is altered by the field.

>You can buy a commercial electrometer if you're curious, such a device will measure the electric field across the probe
that doesn't tell me what an "electric field" is though.

>Unfortunately for your theory, the planet seems to be approximately neutral in charge. And yes, Gauss's law applies.

But that doesn't tell me what causes the charge or the field....

>>1729677
What proof and how is it original and "yours"?

>>1729701
>A wave is what something does. Not a thing.
Yes, this wave is what the electric and magnetic fields do, and those electric and magnetic fields are everywhere. But any propagating pattern can be called a thing, it's half semantics and half an adaptation of common nomenclature to more easily describe a quantum mechanical phenomenon. In reality, all "wave" behaviour of particles can be described via simple probability of individual particles, with enough computational power. But at macro scales this appears to be a wave, as seen by the double-slit experiment with light and electrons. And the Heisenberg uncertainty principle blurs this further, so we can and do discuss particles as "wavepackets".

>this "electric charge" you speak of is purely conceptual and no empirical evidence of it exists
Absolute waffle. The oil drop experiment showed that the force on the oil drop was directly proportional to the charge on the oil drop, and that this charge could only be observed to have integer multiples of a certain value, which was later found to be the charge of an electron. You can also construct an electron gun inside a vacuum chamber with a noble gas within, and apply a constant magnetic field to it, which will curve the electrons through the Lorentz force. By measuring the radius of curvature you can determine the charge/mass ratio of the particle.

Have you ever heard of the term "predictive capabilities"? Any model worth its salt needs to have predictive capabilities. The model of EM waves works pretty damn well because not only theoretical physicists, but commercial radio producers, radio hams, anyone designing high frequency PCBs, optical engineers, etc. take Maxwell's equations into account in their work way or the other. Same for the electric charge. While you're back here telling people that their equations and laws are wrong, people are using these equations and laws without running into any problems. Without predictive capabilities a model is worthless.

How many magnets do I need to put on my shoes to overcome earth's magnetism?

>>1729747
1.21GigaLambrights.

>>1729747
1 in each shoe
The Earth's magnetic field is extremely weak compared to modern rare earth magnets. Some iron shielding would do the trick too. You can calculate the surface-to-volume ratio of superconductor required to achieve diamagnetic levitation on the Earth's surface if you want. It's a very extreme ratio.

Okay I've ordered some neodymium magnets for my shoes how do i control the antigravity once I tape them on? Thinking I may need to use a compass like OP.

>>1729806
It's exactly like balancing on a skateboard, but if you "ollie" you will be put into low Earth orbit.

I love threads like these because I get to ask questions and not get ridiculed in the legit threads.

say I want to LEGITIMATELY begin to explore gravity, not build some transformers movie prop. I am thinking of hanging something on a string and monitoring the tension on the string somehow. I would need to place the item in a vacuum box to prevent wind from fucking with it and some kind of control to account for vibrations from the building. Is it possible for the string/wire to manipulate or adjust an electrical component that I can measure? Something like a string attached to an adjustible capacitor that I can measure

>>1729741
In reality, all "wave" behaviour of particles can be described via simple probability of individual particles, with enough computational power. But at macro scales this appears to be a wave, as seen by the double-slit experiment with light and electrons. And the Heisenberg uncertainty principle blurs this further, so we can and do discuss particles as "wavepackets".

so is it "Waves of water" or what? A wave is still what something doe
Absolute waffle.
Somewhat. I suppose there is "charge and discharge" but all that means is "it does more of the same thing".

>rambles on about mathematical descriptions

But I don't care about that. Just tell me what the math is for. "Waves of what?" Yes I'm familiar with the drop experiment which proved what
was never empirically validated. There was never any actual empirical evidence of an electron particle and the drop experiment made a horrible assumption that electric fields and gravity were different to begin with despite no explination to gravity. Oh and also that oil somehow magically maintained its own density in perpetuity, not based on the conditions it was subjected to. Basically it proved oil can be levitated in an electric field.

>The model of EM waves works pretty damn well because not only theoretical physicists, but commercial radio producers, radio hams, anyone designing high frequency PCBs, optical engineers, etc. take Maxwell's equations into account in their work way or the other.

Which tells me what an "EM wave" does but doesn't tell me what it is. A

>While you're back here telling people that their equations and laws are wrong

They can't be wrong, they're descriptions. It would be like calling me wrong for saying that the "sky is blue". I'm not wrong, it's just that the answer doesn't accurately pertain to what the sky really is.

>>1729844
The concept of an electron has predictive capabilities, while your extreme scepticism does not. As far as scientists can tell, mathematics is the language of the universe. Only through mathematical expressions will we be able to describe the universe. All physicists hope to contribute to finding a set of fundamental equations that can be used in order to accurately predict how anything in the universe will behave, at all scales. There are still missing pieces to this puzzle (quantum relativity, dark matter), but that doesn't stop us from seeing most of the big picture. Sticking to qualitative explanations won't get you anywhere, learn the maths or stop complaining.

>>1729747
>How many magnets
The question is, how many tesla coils?

I'm not ready to teach you anymore here is why.

Screenshot this. Today's day is the 6th of Dec. I should have my money next week. I think I'll have it working in 30 days or less.

* Gravity is Electromagnetism, powered by the sun as induction.
* Project sky vault gave me a clue.
* A cutaway of the Nazi bell showed me two Telsa Coils.
* The ALien reproduction vehicle taught me about plate capacitors '3 years later', I figure what it all means.
* Patent number 2,912,244 is actually power station and anti-gravity. You can turn off the gravity and just use the power station. I plan to open-source this to the world.
* I plan to sell a human scooter for $4000 one hour range of $1000. Or 500 miles at 2000 mph. It's a magnetic opposing magnet math equation.
* I'm not selling spacecraft, my stuff is in orbit no oxygen.

I have it working by Feb 9th is my guess. Then I get to work on the human version. Have that working in 60 days April 10th. Is the guess.

I'll use some of my money to flip cars with under 50K miles Mercedes I find on Craigslist to safely quadruple my money quickly. I'll show you how it's done, I am 'how to get rich dot com' 23 years now.

>>1729870
>The concept of an electron has predictive capabilities
As do all ideas whose potential is not realized. So are you saying that an electron is imaginary and that the imagination of it makes it exist?
>As far as scientists can tell, mathematics is the language of the universe.
It's a language of quantification, made up by apes on a spinning rock. It doesn't pertain at all to the universe. You're assuming that there is "quantity" based on your observations of that which exhibits quality. Where does the quantity come from? How? What is the basis of it? An imagined standard of measure to follow based on another particular observed? Literally insanity.

>Only through mathematical expressions will we be able to describe the universe
Descriptions are not explanations. Any mentally ill person can describe something in terms that only they can understand, it doesn't mean we all can.

>All physicists hope to contribute to finding a set of fundamental equations that can be used in order to accurately predict how anything in the universe will behave, at all scales.
It is "the universe". What would be its "equal"? How could there possibly be an "equation" for it? It makes no sense, unifying what is already unified?

>at all scales.
the arbitrary ones we made up or the ones we assumed the universe runs off of? What is the standard of measure for "the universe"? How can there even be one?

>Sticking to qualitative explanations won't get you anywhere, learn the maths or stop complaining.

Where would you go? You're here forever. Universe doesn't run off a calculator or plugging numbers into some magical equation you numerologist. That is basically the basis of Quantum physics; numerology and atomism. The obsession of quantities and their relation to one another as if the number of things pertains to what they do and why they do it.

>>1729884
A 4chan caricature who nobody can tell is really the actual person, serious, or just a troll pretending to be them. I pity (you).

>>1729909
Well it's not like that isn't a faint possibility, but Occam's razor applies. When you start questioning whether our intention impacts what we're trying to study at a fundamental level you're entering the realm of philosophy. Such a thing would be very difficult if not impossible to ever prove, so Newton's Flaming Laser Sword also applies.
>It's a language of quantification, made up by apes on a spinning rock
Doesn't stop the universe from being described by mathematics. And the nature of what we're describing is attempting to be as non-human-centric as possible, so we can only assume that it applies everywhere. Occam's razor still applies.

>Descriptions are not explanations
A mathematical description with predictive capabilities is an explanation enough for me.
>Any mentally ill person can describe something in terms that only they can understand
That would be a non-predictive model. We use the scientific method because it works.

>It is "the universe". What would be its "equal"? How could there possibly be an "equation" for it?
This statement is tumor inducing. I mean you'd have a series of equations that describe how particles in the universe behaves as a function of time, given a minimal number of initial conditions and room for quantum uncertainty. An equation for electromagnetism doesn't mean "electromagnetism = x*y" or something like that. Do you even understand algebra?

>How can there even be one
See: the Planck units, the absolute units of this universe regardless of what sort of being is measuring them. But even without them, just because our scales are arbitrary doesn't mean that we can't describe the universe with predictive capabilities.
>numerology and atomism
>The obsession of quantities and their relation to one another as if the number of things pertains to what they do and why they do it.
Still has the best predictive capabilities of any model. The reason quantum mechanics came along is just because our old models reached their limits.

>>1729933
>Well it's not like that isn't a faint possibility, but Occam's razor applies.
The simplest being "No quantity".

>Doesn't stop the universe from being described by mathematics
That is exactly what I just said. Described, in terms for people capable of interpreting said descriptions. You are correct.

>And the nature of what we're describing is attempting to be as non-human-centric as possible, so we can only assume that it applies everywhere. Occam's razor still applies.
So where does the quantity come in? Describing it using a language made by HUMANS doesn't sound "non-human-centric" in the slightest.

>A mathematical description with predictive capabilities is an explanation enough for me.
But it fails to be an explanation in the first place.

>We use the scientific method because it works.
Tools are indeed designed to "work", but only if you know how to use them.

>I mean you'd have a series of equations that describe how particles in the universe behaves as a function of time, given a minimal number of initial conditions and room for quantum uncertainty.
But non of that means anything because there's no empirical evidence of a particle. Nor time itself, yet another description that reifies the action of something as something. Prove to me time exists and then you have something. Until then you're mathematically describing something that has no relation to the universe, only to the standards of measure already arbitrarily set by humans.

>An equation for electromagnetism doesn't mean "electromagnetism = x*y" or something like that. Do you even understand algebra?

Do you even know what a field is?

>just because our scales are arbitrary doesn't mean that we can't describe the universe with predictive capabilities

Polish psychic predicts the past.

>The reason quantum mechanics came along is just because our old models reached their limits.
>so lets perpetuate the same mistake and keep describing what potentially has no quantity.

>>1729958
>The simplest
Occam's razor isn't about the simplest explanation, but rather the explanation that requires the least assumptions. The idea that God made everything is far simpler than modern physics, but this requires numerous assumptions (e.g. he deliberately put dinosaur skeletons and carbon-14 quantities underground such to trick people into thinking it was older). In other words, whichever set of rules requires the least number of exceptions to those rules.

>a language made by HUMANS
You're taking it as a language, and not a more fundamental existence. There are infinite possible languages because language is that kind of fluid thing. While there is only one possible superset of mathematics. Aliens and the like might have different symbols and notations and units, but they'll put the same numbers in and they'll get the same numbers out, because regardless of how human you are you still pursue the same model driven by predictive capabilities.

>But it fails to be an explanation in the first place
Again, treading the boundary between explaining "what happens" with "why it happens" might as well be a meaningless question, at least as far as physics is concerned. It's the job of philosophers to answer that, because it boils down to "why is there something and not nothing" or "why are we here to observe this". Newton's flaming laser sword applies.

>empirical evidence
Yes, the scientific method is fundamentally based on some key assumptions. If you question these assumptions, then you're right, you can never empirically prove anything. But scientists stick to these assumptions because questioning them wouldn't lead them anywhere but the realm of philosophy. Laser sword. And by sticking to these assumptions we've used our theories to time and time again produce real results. Like the discovery of the Higgs particle, the invention of the laser, the discovery of Neptune.

>what potentially has no quantity
>implying quantum physics doesn't predict real things

>>1729965
>Occam's razor isn't about the simplest explanation, but rather the explanation that requires the least assumptions
>In other words, whichever set of rules requires the least number of exceptions to those rules.
so still no quantity. Which also does not imply "God" if that's what you think I mean.

>You're taking it as a language, and not a more fundamental existence.
No, it is literally a language. Stop pretending it isn't when it literally cannot be anything else but.

>but they'll put the same numbers in and they'll get the same numbers out.
Well that's an assumption you're making, for al we know the aliens you speak of have evolved past chasing shadows.

>might as well be a meaningless question, at least as far as physics is concerned.
I understand that, because the basis of physics is that the world is driven by that which is physical and phenomena. Even though it isn't.

>It's the job of philosophers to answer that, because it boils down to "why is there something and not nothing" or "why are we here to observe this". Newton's flaming laser sword applies.
Exactly. You have to keep experimenting because there is no actual standard of measure present to dictate the answers you seek other than the ones you arbitrarily set. An absence really is not worth debating, neither is the experiments involving it.

>But scientists stick to these assumptions because questioning them wouldn't lead them anywhere but the realm of philosophy.
Which means the paychecks stop coming in.

>Lazer sword!11!
An idea older than Parmenides himself.

>And by sticking to these assumptions we've used our theories to time and time again produce real results. Like the discovery of the Higgs particle, the invention of the laser, the discovery of Neptune.
In the same argument you say that something can be an assumption and something that exists. Illogical. Lasers don't work without a medium by the way. And I also believe Neptune was discovered with a telescope by Galileo.

>>1729978
>>1729965
You both are phenominally retarded and posting in a Lambright thread.
Kids, if you want to actually do shit, study engineering.
> Does red even like, exist man?
Jesus. or better yet, learn a fucking trade.
Fuck the linguistic turn.

>>1729986
>You both are phenominally retarded and posting in a Lambright thread.

I totally agree. I'm using a trip code for fuck sake. I actually gave away some secets.

>>1729884
why don't you post on /sci/, wayne? they have threads like this all the time. have you been ostracized from there?

>>1703668
nice navigators coil

>>1703677
Cool down Kleiner, don't you blow your top

>>1730075
>why don't you post on /sci/, wayne?
I didn't know about it.

>>1731198
Can you prove you're the real Wayne, not a larper?

>>1729986
>Safeway tells him to suck a bags of dicks
>proceeds to reinvent physics
Wayne is a national hero.

>>1731238
being /b/ tier retarded is for /b/. Ironically autistic, some how self-aware of autism yet completely fucking cringepostingly autistic.

>>1713178
>I don't keep a wench.

>>1703668
Dammit Wayne you're the one that should be humble if you think you're gonna be a trillionaire

>>1709791
>his att store is below the clouds.

Pathetic

>>1710205
...i cost $5,000 to put a bid in as a presidential nominee. You can't just make a fb post and get votes.

Maybe as a write in i guess but nobody uses that shit for anything other than voting for Harambe

>>1713632
The seething rage in this post anon. How much money did Wayne con you out of?

>>1713652
Well os it 20k or 40k? The fuck

>>1714676
Greentexting on a presidential bid.

>although, if we bid Wayne in imagine the fucking place with wayne as pres

>>1714676

>>1729884
>* I plan to sell a human scooter for $4000 one hour range of $1000. Or 500 miles at 2000 mph. It's a magnetic opposing magnet math equation.

Be me. Be in Oklahoma. Travel 250 miles away and back for a pizza A TWO THOUSAND MILES PER HOUR

>>1729884
Anons please do screenshot this

Wayne's got my vote.